Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Random vibration”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Are We Shaking Too Much? An Inquiry into Environmental Random Vibration Testing Margins

Problem Statement: The conventional, MIL-STD-810 approach to vibration environment derivation is perhaps too conservative, leading to unnecessary failures during acceptance & qualification vibration testing of Armstrong’s one-off flight equipment. Objective: This presentation explores some alternative understandings of the distributions of vibration severity in nonstationary environments. Proposed methods of sorting and adding appropriate margin are explored.

Scott L. Stebbins↗
NASA NTRS1996

Force limited vibration testing of Cassini spacecraft cosmic dust analyser

The testing of the cosmic dust analyzer for the Cassini mission using the force limited method in order to avoid overtesting and to verify the ability of the specimen design to withstand the loads during launch and cruise, is reported on. In order to implement the method, force gages, fixtures and a test controller are required and the test specimen is subjected to sine vibration, random vibration and half sine shock. The practical aspects of the use of the force limited method are described. Due to the high loads and the weak design of the structural element, a notching method is used which provides the possibility of limiting the excitation to flight expected levels.

Jahn, Heiko↗
NASA NTRS1994

Strength Analysis Report Flight Readiness Review (FRR) for SXI Stepper Motor/Encoder

The strength analysis report for FRR shall include only revisions to update the strength analysis reports for the flight design configuration. Since there have been no revisions to the design configuration since the PDR and the CDR this report shall consist of re-submitting the analysis previously performed. In addition the motors have been subjected to Sine vibration, Random vibration, and shock per the SM specification. Both motor/encoders have passed all three tests. There was no evidence of damage to the motor/encoder and the motor/encoder performed as required by the Acceptance test procedure. No degradation was seen between the before and after performance tests. The testing verified the analysis that there were adequate safety margins with regard to structural integrity. Separate reports are available from the test facility and are apart of the FRR submittal.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1998

Fiber Optic Cable Feedthrough and Sealing

A novel fiberoptic hermetic bulkhead feedthrough has been developed which will offer cryogenic sealing at leak rates of 10(exp -11) cc/sec helium. This feedthrough was developed for NASA in response to needs for a hermetically sealed feedthrough which could withstand a range of temperatures from low cryogenic (-196 C), due to liquid fuels and oxidizers, to high temperatures (+200 C) encountered in the proximity of combustion gasses. The development effort will be reported from conceptual design of single and multi-channel feedthrough units with single interconnection interfaces to units with double-ended interconnection interfaces. Various combinations of fiber/buffers are reported with recommendations based on test results. A comprehensive series of environmental and mechanical tests were performed to evaluate the feedthroughs in adverse conditions. Test results are reported including insertion loss, salt spray, sinusoidal vibration, random vibration, mechanical shock, thermal shock and humidity. A second set of feedthrough units was exposed to 3 different types of radiation. Optical transmittance changes during the tests were monitored and leak rate testing was done after each test. State-of-the-art technology in optical fiber feedthroughs constructed with polycrystalline ceramic is presented.

Fan, Robert J.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Microelectronics Instrument Products Shock and Vibration Electro-Optics: Strength Analysis - Section D

The strength analysis report for FRR shall include only revisions to update the strength analysis reports for the flight design configuration. Since there have been no revisions to the design configuration since the PDR and the CDR this report shall consist of re-submitting the analysis previously performed. In addition the motors have been subjected to Sine vibration, Random vibration, and shock per the SXI specification. Both motor/encoders have passed all three tests. There was no evidence of damage to the motor/encoder and the motor/encoder performed as required by the Acceptance test procedure. No degradation was seen between the before and after performance tests. The testing verified the analysis that there were adequate mf@ty margins with regard to structural integrity. Separate reports are available from the test facility and are apart of the FRR submittal.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1994

System level mechanical testing of the Clementine spacecraft

This paper discusses the system level structural testing that was performed to qualify the Clementine Spacecraft for flight. These tests included spin balance, combined acoustic and axial random vibration, lateral random vibration, quasi-static loads, pyrotechnic shock, modal survey and on-orbit jitter simulation. Some innovative aspects of this effort were: the simultaneously combined acoustic and random vibration test; the mass loaded interface modal survey test; and the techniques used to assess how operating on board mechanisms and thrusters affect sensor vision.

Haughton, James↗
NASA NTRS2011

Dynamic Loads Generation for Multi-Point Vibration Excitation Problems

A random-force method has been developed to predict dynamic loads produced by rocket-engine random vibrations for new rocket-engine designs. The method develops random forces at multiple excitation points based on random vibration environments scaled from accelerometer data obtained during hot-fire tests of existing rocket engines. This random-force method applies random forces to the model and creates expected dynamic response in a manner that simulates the way the operating engine applies self-generated random vibration forces (random pressure acting on an area) with the resulting responses that we measure with accelerometers. This innovation includes the methodology (implementation sequence), the computer code, two methods to generate the random-force vibration spectra, and two methods to reduce some of the inherent conservatism in the dynamic loads. This methodology would be implemented to generate the random-force spectra at excitation nodes without requiring the use of artificial boundary conditions in a finite element model. More accurate random dynamic loads than those predicted by current industry methods can then be generated using the random force spectra. The scaling method used to develop the initial power spectral density (PSD) environments for deriving the random forces for the rocket engine case is based on the Barrett Criteria developed at Marshall Space Flight Center in 1963. This invention approach can be applied in the aerospace, automotive, and other industries to obtain reliable dynamic loads and responses from a finite element model for any structure subject to multipoint random vibration excitations.

Shen, Lawrence↗
NASA NTRS1999

Benefits of Force Limiting Vibration Testing

Force limited random vibration testing is used at NASA John Glenn Research Center (formerly NASA Lewis Research Center) for qualifying aerospace hardware for flight. The benefit of force limiting testing is that it limits overtesting of flight hardware, by controlling input force and acceleration from the shaker (dual control) to the test article. The purpose of force limiting is to replicate the test article resonant response for the actual flight mounting condition. The force limiting testing technology has been implemented at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the past 10 years on various spacecraft testing programs. The Cassini mission to Saturn, most notably, utilized force limiting vibration testing as part of the spacecraft system level vibration testing. NASA John Glenn Research Center is responsible for microgravity combustion and fluid science research on the Shuttle and the International Space Station. Qualification testing of delicate and vibration sensitive science instrumentation is particularly challenging to successfully qualify for flight. In order to facilitate the testing process, force limiting has been implemented to minimize overtesting of flight hardware. This paper will address recent flight camera testing (qualification random vibration and strength testing) for the Combustion Module-2 mission and the impact of Semi-empirical Method force limits.

McNelis, Mark E.↗
NASA NTRS2014

Deducing Electronic Unit Internal Response During a Vibration Test Using a Lumped Parameter Modeling Approach

During random vibration testing of electronic boxes there is often a desire to know the dynamic response of certain internal printed wiring boards (PWBs) for the purpose of monitoring the response of sensitive hardware or for post-test forensic analysis in support of anomaly investigation. Due to restrictions on internally mounted accelerometers for most flight hardware there is usually no means to empirically observe the internal dynamics of the unit, so one must resort to crude and highly uncertain approximations. One common practice is to apply Miles Equation, which does not account for the coupled response of the board in the chassis, resulting in significant over- or under-prediction. This paper explores the application of simple multiple-degree-of-freedom lumped parameter modeling to predict the coupled random vibration response of the PWBs in their fundamental modes of vibration. A simple tool using this approach could be used during or following a random vibration test to interpret vibration test data from a single external chassis measurement to deduce internal board dynamics by means of a rapid correlation analysis. Such a tool might also be useful in early design stages as a supplemental analysis to a more detailed finite element analysis to quickly prototype and analyze the dynamics of various design iterations. After developing the theoretical basis, a lumped parameter modeling approach is applied to an electronic unit for which both external and internal test vibration response measurements are available for direct comparison. Reasonable correlation of the results demonstrates the potential viability of such an approach. Further development of the preliminary approach presented in this paper will involve correlation with detailed finite element models and additional relevant test data.

random vibration response↗
NASA NTRS2018

Environmental Testing of the HERMeS TDU-2 Hall Thruster

The Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS) is a 12.5 kW magnetically shielded Hall thruster presently under development for deep-space missions. A development model HERMeS thruster, TDU-2, with borosilicate channel walls, has successfully undergone proto-qualification testing including random vibration and thermal-vacuum, demonstrating the thruster can survive critical launch and operational environmental requirements. The three-axis random vibrational tests were performed with the thruster body mounted directly to the shaker table using a modified loading schedule to compensate for the vibration isolation dampers under design for the flight thruster. Initial random vibration testing revealed issues with fragmentation of magnetic coil potting material and thruster spool mount fabrication weaknesses that were addressed with an alternate potting material and fabrication revisions that were then successfully retested with an additional round of random vibration tests. Thermal-vacuum testing involved three cycles of full-power 600 V 12.5 kW thruster operation from -121°C to +373°C which included eight hours at peak temperature as well as a hot restart. A thermal model of the test configuration was developed and validated with the experiment results within an average difference of 5°C. Before and after the random vibrational and thermal-vacuum tests, the thruster performance, plasma plume, thrust vector angle, discharge characteristics, and magnetic field profile were measured. The thruster performance, magnetic field, and most other parameters remained invariant throughout the environmental testing campaign. During the thermal testing, an increase in the discharge oscillation amplitude of 11% was observed as well as subtle thrust vector changes of ±0.2° as the thruster warmed from -121°C to +373°C.

Sorenson, Ryan↗
NASA NTRS2002

In-Flight Vibration Environment of the NASA F-15B Flight Test Fixture

Flight vibration data are analyzed for the NASA F-15B/Flight Test Fixture II test bed. Understanding the in-flight vibration environment benefits design and integration of experiments on the test bed. The power spectral density (PSD) of accelerometer flight data is analyzed to quantify the in-flight vibration environment from a frequency of 15 Hz to 1325 Hz. These accelerometer data are analyzed for typical flight conditions and maneuvers. The vibration data are compared to flight-qualification random vibration test standards. The PSD levels in the lateral axis generally are greater than in the longitudinal and vertical axes and decrease with increasing frequency. At frequencies less than approximately 40 Hz, the highest PSD levels occur during takeoff and landing. Peaks in the PSD data for the test fixture occur at approximately 65, 85, 105-110, 200, 500, and 1000 Hz. The pitch-pulse and 2-g turn maneuvers produce PSD peaks at 115 Hz. For cruise conditions, the PSD level of the 85-Hz peak is greatest for transonic flight at Mach 0.9. From 400 Hz to 1325 Hz, the takeoff phase has the highest random vibration levels. The flight-measured vibration levels generally are substantially lower than the random vibration test curve.

Corda, Stephen↗
NASA NTRS1978

Development of structural dynamic test environments for subsystems and components

Structural dynamic environmental test levels were developed for the thematic mapper instrument, components of the Tandberg-Hanssen instrument, and components of the International Ultraviolet Explorer spacecraft using NASTRAN structural models and test data. Both static and dynamic NASTRAN analyses were used. The model size required could be as small as 300 degrees of freedom for the static analysis and as large as 4000 degrees of freedom or more for the high frequency dynamic analysis. An important step in the development of the levels is model verification by test. The launch environments that generally dictate many important features of the design of an instrument or component are steady state acceleration, sinusoidal vibration, and random vibration.

Coladonato, R. J.↗