Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SATELLITE ATTITUDE CONTROL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Nonlinear studies, optimal control

Attitude control for earth satellite in elliptic orbit, linearization in attitude control, and computation of optimal controls by method based on second variations

LINEARIZATION↗

Attitude Control System for the Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer Satellite

The requirements, design, and expected performance of the Attitude Control Subsystem for the spin-stabilized Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer Satellite are presented. In the sky-mapping phase, closed-loop magnetic control keeps the spin axis pointed toward the sun. In the spectroscopy phase, the attitude control loop is closed via the ground. The satellite's attitude and spin rate are determined using periodically downlinked star data. An attitude control algorithm generates commands to be uplinked to the satellite for spin axis precession and spin rate control. Computer simulations of the satellite dynamic response, pointing error, and stability during spin axis precession are presented, and parameters that affect the pointing performance are evaluated.

Wong, E. C.↗

Three-axis attitude control for a geostationary satellite

The Applications Technology Satellite-6 was successfully launched into a geostationary orbit in May, 1974. Since that time, its attitude control subsystem has routinely demonstrated its ability to perform precision pointing and precision closed loop maneuvers. This paper describes the ATS-6 attitude control subsystem. The requirements imposed by the spacecraft mission objectives are outlined, and functional descriptions of the principal attitude control subsystem components and control laws are presented. The paper concludes with a summary comparison of in-orbit performance relative to its specified performance requirements.

Freeman, H. R.↗