Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Spacecraft Development”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Study to develop improved spacecraft snow survey methods using Skylab/EREP data

The author has identified the following significant results. A segment of the interim S192 film product from the SL-2 mission has been examined. The film covers the White Mountains area near the California-Nevada border and contains useable data for spectral bands: band 3, band 7, band 9, and band 11. Whereas the snow surface exhibits wide variations in reflectance, no significant change in the reflectance of the clouds occurs over the spectral range of these four bands. In band 11 the clouds appear white and snow appears black; in the band 3 data, both the clouds and the snow appear white. Two potential applications are possible, based on these results. First, because the reflectance of the snow surface in the band 9 data is much lower at the lower elevation terrain of the White Mountains, it appears that the drop in reflectance in the near-IR portion of the spectrum may be related to the wetness of the snow surface. Secondly, the complete reversal in reflectance that is observed in band 11 data indicates that in this portion of the spectrum snow surfaces have a low reflectance regardless of the condition of the snow. Because clouds do not exhibit a similar drop in reflectance, measurements in this spectral band have potential use for automatically distinguishing snow from clouds.

Barnes, J. C.↗

A study to develop improved spacecraft show survey methods using Skylab/EREP data: Demonstration of the utility of the S190 and S192 data

The author has identified the following significant results. This interim report provides a demonstration of the utility of spacecraft acquired Skylab S190A and S190B photography and S192 imagery for mapping areal extent of snow cover in western United States test site areas. The data sample is from the SL-2 mission flown in June 1973. Results of the investigation indicate that areal snow cover extent can be mapped more accurately from the S190A and S190B photography than from any other spacecraft system, including ERTS. The results of a qualitative analysis of the S192 imagery indicate considerable potential for the utility of multispectral snow cover analysis; the potential for distinguishing snow from clouds automatically is particularly significant.

Barnes, J. C.↗

Study to develop improved spacecraft snow survey methods using Skylab/EREP data

The author has identified the following significant results. Of the four black and white S190A camera stations, snowcover is best defined in the two visible spectral bands, due in part to their better resolution. The overall extent of the snow can be mapped more precisely, and the snow within shadow areas is better defined in the visible bands. Of the two S190A color products, the aerial color photography is the better. Because of the contrast in color between snow and snow-free terrain and the better resolution, this product is concluded to be the best overall of the six camera stations for detecting and mapping snow. Overlapping frames permit stereo viewing, which aids in distinguishing clouds from the underlying snow. Because of the greater spatial resolution of the S190B earth terrain camera, areal snow extent can be mapped in greater detail than from the S190A photographs. The snow line elevation measured from the S190A and S190B photographs is reasonable compared to the meager ground truth data available.

Barnes, J. C.↗

Some recent developments in spacecraft environmental control/life support subsystems

The subsystems considered include a flash evaporator for heat rejection, a regenerable carbon dioxide and humidity control subsystem, an iodinating subsystem for potable water, a cabin contaminant control subsystem, and a wet oxidation subsystem for processing spacecraft wastes. The flash evaporator discussed is a simple unit which efficiently controls life support system temperatures over a wide range of heat loads. For certain advanced spacecraft applications the control of cabin carbon dioxide and humidity can be successfully achieved by a regenerable solid amine subsystem.

Gillen, R. J.↗

The development of spacecraft explosives for the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Several heat resistant secondary explosives suitable for use in spacecraft hardware were characterized and tested in order to select a prime candidate for further study. The design goal criterion was that no significant degradation of the explosive takes place after exposure to 315 C. The final selection was made from the following candidates: PYX (2,6-bis (picrylamino)-3,5-dinitropyridine), ONT (octanitro-m-terphenyl), and TPT (2,4,6 tripicryl-s-triazine), following performance tests in detonating cords. TPT was the final selection and was further characterized and evaluated in order to obtain data for a procurement specification.

Source record↗

Developing Sustainable Spacecraft Water Management Systems

It is well recognized that water handling systems used in a spacecraft are prone to failure caused by biofouling and mineral scaling, which can clog mechanical systems and degrade the performance of capillary-based technologies. Long duration spaceflight applications, such as extended stays at a Lunar Outpost or during a Mars transit mission, will increasingly benefit from hardware that is generally more robust and operationally sustainable overtime. This paper presents potential design and testing considerations for improving the reliability of water handling technologies for exploration spacecraft. Our application of interest is to devise a spacecraft wastewater management system wherein fouling can be accommodated by design attributes of the management hardware, rather than implementing some means of preventing its occurrence.

Thomas, Evan A.↗

Development of Spacecraft Radiated Susceptibility RS103 Requirements From Modeling Methods

In defining radiated susceptibility requirements for a spacecraft with multiple number of receivers and transmitters in close proximity to each other, the main objective of an RF coupling analysis is to determine if the mechanical configuration of the receiver and transmitter antennas presents a risk to the functionality and safety of sensitive science instruments on the payload as a result of unintended RF coupling. Where there is a potential risk for interference or permanent damage, further analysis is required to evaluate the feasibility of mitigation schemes, such as mechanical reconfiguration of antennas or additional RF filtering. From these coupling analysis results, radiated susceptibility RS103 requirements are derived to better reflect actual requirement levels with adequate test margins.

Gonzalez, Edward C.↗

Tools Automate Spacecraft Testing, Operation

"NASA began the Small Explorer (SMEX) program to develop spacecraft to advance astrophysics and space physics. As one of the entities supporting software development at Goddard Space Flight Center, the Hammers Company Inc. (tHC Inc.), of Greenbelt, Maryland, developed the Integrated Test and Operations System to support SMEX. Later, the company received additional Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) funding from Goddard for a tool to facilitate the development of flight software called VirtualSat. NASA uses the tools to support 15 satellites, and the aerospace industry is using them to develop science instruments, spacecraft computer systems, and navigation and control software."

Source record↗

Task four report: Telemetry, command, and data handling

An overview of the telemetry, command, and data handling features of four spacecraft developed under GSFC management is presented. Two of these spacecraft ATS and SMS, are designed for geostationary orbit; the other two OSO and ERTS, are designed for low earth orbits. The program time spans for these spacecraft are as shown. The programs are seen to be near contemporary, especially in the 1973, 1974 period. All of the spacecraft listed were developed under GSFC control and are thus subject to the standards set forth in the Aerospace Data System Standard developed by GSFC. These standards must be adhered to by all spacecraft programs under GSFC control or utilizing STDN unless waivers have been granted. The standards were developed to maximize the utilization of the large amount of standard equipment at each STDN ground facility. The standards impose bounds on both the command and telemetry formats to be compatible with the STDN ground station unless valid and acceptable reasons are raised to deviate from these restraints.

Source record↗