Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Turbulent Simulation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1980

Verification of interim simulated atmospheric turbulence

During horizontal and near-horizontal flight of the space shuttle orbiter, the effects of atmospheric turbulence on the vehicle are crucial in establishing the space shuttle design, control, and human pilot effects. The effects of both turbulent gusts and gust gradients (shears) must be taken into account. By means of a nonrecursive turbulence simulation model, twelve simulated turbulence time series for gusts and gust gradients were generated as part of a previous investigation. The current investigation was concerned with the spectral analysis of the time series based on the use of Fourier transform theory. A comparison between the computed spectra and the corresponding von Karman theoretical spectra is also included. A basic difference is explained between the computed and theoretical spectra which was identified as a result of the comparison. Conclusions and recommendations are presented.

Tatom, F. B.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Wind shear and turbulence simulation

The aviation community is increasing its reliance on flight simulators. This is true both in pilot training and in research and development. In moving research concepts through the development pipeline, there is a sequence of events which take place: analysis, ground based simulation, inflight simulation, and flight testing. Increasing fidelity as progress toward the flight testing arena is accompanied by increasing cost. The question that seems to be posed in relation to the meteorological aspects of flight simulation is, How much fidelity is enough and can it be quantified. As a part of the Langley Simulation Technology Program, there are three principal areas of focus, one being improved simulation of weather hazards. A close liaison with the JAWS project was established because of the Langley Simulation Technology interests regarding reliable simulation of severe convective weather phenomena and their impact on aviation systems. Simulation offers the only feasible approach for examining the utility of new technology and new procedures for coping with severe convective weather phenomena such as wind shear. These simulation concepts are discussed in detail.

Bowles, Roland L.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Verification of Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation for Turbulent Simulations over ONERA M6 Wing

Unstructured anisotropic mesh adaptation is known to be an efficient way to control discretization errors in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Method verification is required to provide the confidence for routine use in production analysis. The current work aims at verification of anisotropic mesh adaptation for RANS simulations over the ONERA M6 wing. The present verification study is performed using four different flow solvers, three different implementations of the metric field, and three mesh mechanics packages. Two of the flow solvers use stabilized finite-element discretizations (FUN3D-SFE and GGNS), one uses finite-volume discretization (FUN3D-FV), and the last one uses mixed finite-volume and finite element discretizations (Wolf). The mesh adaptation is based on an error estimator that aims to control the quadratic error term in the linear interpolation of Mach number. Two sets of adaptations were performed; the first one controls the interpolation error in L2 norm and the second one controls the interpolation error in L4 norm. Convergence studies were performed on the forces and the pitching moment using all four solvers, and the results are compared with previously verified convergence studies on fixed (nonadapted) meshes. Both forces and pitching moment on adapted meshes are found to be converging to the fine mesh values faster than those on fixed meshes. In addition to forces and moments, convergence of surface pressure and skin friction coefficients at various measurement locations on the wing are also presented. Adapted-mesh surface pressure distributions agree with the fine fixed mesh pressure distributions. Adapted-mesh skin friction distributions contain high frequency noise with mean values approaching the fixed mesh pressure skin friction distributions.

Aravind Balan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75, and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10 million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre- and post- buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre-and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre-and post-buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the span wise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗
NASA NTRS2023

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES),and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES)are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985).1The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model.The unsteady RANS simulations,only with the compressibility correction,predict the pre- and post-buffet characteristics,which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment.The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment

Transonic Buffet↗