Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “acceptance”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

LCLS-II-HE Vertical Acceptance Testing Plans

LCLS-II-HE has performance requirements similar to but generally more demanding than those of LCLS-II, with an operating gradient of 21 MV/m (up from 16 MV/m in LCLS-II) and tighter restrictions on field emission and multipacting. In this paper, we outline the requirements for the 1.3 GHz cavities and the plans for qualification of these cavities by vertical test. We discuss lessons learned from LCLS-II and highlight the changes implemented in the vertical test procedure for the new project.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Default Radioactive and Hazardous Waste Management (RHWM) Dose Conversion Factors (DCFs) and Weighting Factors and plutonium-239 equivalent Curie (PE-Ci) methodology for acceptance into the Waste Storage Facilities

DOE-STD-5506-2007 (Ref. 1) is the standard that provides the methodology for preparing hazard analysis and accident analysis for transuranic (TRU) waste facilities. The Waste Storage Facilities hazard and accident analysis for the DSA is developed in accordance with DOE-STD- 5506-2007. Two related issues need to be addressed when implementing DOE-STD-5506-2007 regarding the calculation of consequences from TRU waste releases in accident analysis: Consequences determined in accident analysis must be modeled using inhalation Dose Conversion Factors (DCFs) that are consistent with those from the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 72 (ICRP-72, Ref. 2).; The use of a statistical Material at Risk (MAR) representing the distribution of radiological loading of TRU waste containers based on the use of a plutonium-239 equivalent Curie (PE-Ci) methodology. The PE-Ci methodology simplifies accident analysis by allowing one to model releases based on the Curie value of one standard nuclide (e.g., Pu-239) instead of needing to model releases for every potential nuclide of interest. This is accomplished by normalizing the Curie value of all nuclides to a single Curie value of a standard nuclide by using a Weighting Factor that is a ratio of the DCFs associated with the nuclides and that of the standard nuclide. By using the ICRP-72 DCFs to calculate PE-Ci values used in the statistical MAR, the accident analysis that uses that statistical MAR will be consistent with the consequence methodology identified in DOE-STD- 5506-2007.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Example Evaluation of a Representative Heat Pipe Test Article Design for Structural Acceptability using ASME Design Rules

This report describes a design analysis of a test article mimicking a core block of a heat-pipe mi-croreactor using the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B rules. These rules cover the design and construction of elevated temperature nu-clear reactor structural components, like the core block of a heat-pipe microreactor emulated by the test article. The purposes of the report are to: (1) provide a step-by-step example of applying the ASME rules to a reasonable core block geometry and corresponding loading conditions, (2) to provide design feedback on the test article, and (3) to evaluate the ASME rules for use in the design of complex heat-pipe microreactor components. The test article design has a relatively short ASME design life, limited by high thermal stresses. The current ASME rules are adequate for evaluating the core block component designs, though they could be optimized to increase the design efficiency and reduce the amount of designer/analyst time required to execute the design process. The report covers both the current, 2019 edition ASME rules and modified, currently unapproved, rules designed to improve the design process for components with complex geometries and high secondary stresses, like the core block test article.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance

In 2016 the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) announced three awardees to hold plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) showcases to demonstrate available technologies and provide a hands-on consumer experience at conveniently located, brand-neutral settings. The events varied in style from long term stationary storefront settings to weekend events at a variety of regional venues. Attendees could interact with the technology through ride-and-drives and longer-term test drives. The events began in the spring of 2017 and continued through 2019.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

RG217 V2-V2 Coaxial Cable Acceptance Test

The ECSE Solid State Pulsed Power unit is a high current, high power solid-state pulse modulator. The RG217 V2-V2 Coaxial Cable Assembly is the interface cable between the Solid State Pulser and the load. This document covers the testing procedure for the RG217 V2-V2 Coaxial Cable Assembly. This assembly is comprised of RG217 Coaxial Cable with a LRU Connector on either end. This test procedure verifies the cable is undamaged and assembled correctly, the correct cable connectors are installed properly onto the cable, and that the entire assembly meets conductivity and holdoff voltage requirements. This procedure will verify that the RG217 Coaxial Cable Assembly meets all assembly and functional requirements. In particular, this procedure verifies the Cable Shield and Center Conductor meet conductivity requirements by testing their resistances. Additionally, this procedure ensures the RG217 Coaxial Cable Assembly meets holdoff voltage requirements by applying high voltage and verifying the RG217 Coaxial Cable Assembly does not experience any breakdowns or arcing.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Acceptance Testing of the Scorpius Sweep Magnet

A beam-dump magnet for Scorpius has been defined by LANL and designed and built by Radiabeam Technologies. Initial verification of the Radiabeam design used a magnetic field model provided by Radiabeam and analyzed by LANL tools during September 2021. Simulations indicated that the design was sufficient to meet deflection requirements to protect sensitive equipment in the case of a failed target. In January 2022, the magnet was fabricated and Radiabeam conducted measurements of the magnetic field as a function of position. The measurements deviate somewhat from the simulation. In particular, the peak magnetic field is 10-15% smaller in magnitude than expected from simulation. This note compares the magnetic field measurements to simulation and to measurements of the existing DARHT magnet, which was designed for the same purpose. We show a comparison of the measured beam deflection performance between Scorpius and DARHT and show updated results of LANL’s electron beam tracking code using the Scorpius measurements. Using field measurements we find that the DARHT magnet will deflect a 19.6 MeV electron beam by 46.6° and the Scorpius magnet will deflect by 44.6°. These results show that the as-built Scorpius magnet has met design requirements for beam deflection.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Energy and transverse acceptance calculation of the 750 keV RFQTS with Parmteqm

Using the code Parmteq and a model of the 750 keV test stand RFQ produced by Kress, labeled ‘as11c’, I calculate the effect on RFQ beam transmission in the following cases: 1. Varying input energy spread, 2. Transverse mismatch of the input beam, 3. Varying input emittance of matched beam, and 4. Injection offset of beam centroid. For this model, the RFQ transmission is 96.3%, input energy 35 keV, and beam current 35 mA.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Venado acceptance: results and tips [Slides]

Nvidia compiler support is not available through cray-mpich/compiler wrapper interface. Adjust CMAKE files to use the correct COMPILER_ID in conditionals and explicit variables to package flags. Use pinned host memory in cray-libsci_acc and cublasXt calls. Set a large blockDim for cublasXt calls. Try MPS and/or explicit numactl binding if performance is lackluster. Use CRAY_MALLOPT_OFF=1 if unexpected OOM errors appear using cce. Use MPICH_SMP_SINGLE_COPY_MODE=CMA for xpmem issues. Use MPICH_OPT_THREAD_SYNC=0 for MPI_THREAD issues. Poor CUDA-aware MPI performance remains an issue.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

FAST-1.0 Software Acceptance Testing Report

The purpose of this document is to detail the software testing of FAST-1.0 through unit, integration, and assessment tests. More than 400 tests were designed to provide coverage of the requirements for FAST-1.0. These requirements were developed in the NRC Statement of Work (SOW) for NRC Agreement Number NRC-HQ-25-14-D-001 and are transcribed to this document as part of the Software Quality Assurance Plan for the FAST Code System, PNNL-28767. FAST 1.0 represents the merger of the FRAPCON and FRAPTRAN codes and as such FAST-1.0 performs steady state and transient fuel performance calculations described below. FAST-1.0 calculates the steady state response of light-water reactor fuel rods during long-term burnup. The code calculates temperature, pressure, and deformation of a fuel rod as functions of time-dependent fuel rod power and coolant boundary conditions. The phenomena modeled by the code include: 1) heat conduction through fuel and cladding to the coolant; 2) cladding elastic and plastic deformation; 3) fuel-cladding mechanical interaction; 4) fission gas release from the fuel and rod internal pressure; and 5) cladding oxidation. FAST is used to perform independent calculations for regulatory evaluations of fuel performance under normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). FAST calculates the temperature and deformation history of a fuel rod as a function of time-dependent fuel rod power and coolant boundary conditions. The phenomena modeled by FAST include: 1) heat conduction; 2) heat transfer from cladding to coolant; 3) elastic-plastic fuel and cladding deformation; 4) cladding oxidation; 5) fission gas release; and 6) fuel rod gas pressure. FAST code assessment, development and maintenance drive a significant portion of the NRC fuel research activities and the tools are used in a substantial number of regulatory products. Given the centrality of the FAST code to the effectiveness of fuel research, it is critical to assess, develop and maintain this tool.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗