SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.
This dataset contains the figures and tabulated results generated from a system-level optimization study of transit fleet electrification planning. The dataset does not include executable modeling code required to reproduce the optimization. The dataset includes results for optimized charging infrastructure deployment by location and power level and service block assignments by fuel type, battery capacity selections, and distributed energy resource sizing. It also contains aggregated financial results, capital expenditures, operating cost summaries, net present cost comparisons across scenarios, and quantified air quality impacts. Results are structured to reflect multiple planning scenarios, including heuristic electrification plans, system-optimized configurations, and sensitivity cases with alternative objective weightings. The modeling was developed using publicly available General Transit Feed Specification data from Omnitrans and standardized modeling assumptions.
A sample output file generated by CalderaCast, showcasing typical results and data structure. This example helps users understand expected outputs from the tool.
This dataset includes modeling results from The 2030 National Charging Network: Estimating U.S. Light-Duty Demand for Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure, including region-specific (i.e., national, state, and core-based statistical area [cities and towns]) electric vehicle supply equipment port count requirements in 2025 and 2030 for multiple scenarios described in the study.
This file contains modeled county-level home electric vehicle charging access shares from the study The 2030 National Charging Network: Estimating U.S. Light-Duty Demand for Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure by Wood et al. (2023). These are based on modeling in There's No Place Like Home: Residential Parking, Electrical Access, and Implications for the Future of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure by Ge et al. (2021).
This dataset contains the figures and tabulated results generated from a system-level optimization study of transit fleet electrification planning. The dataset does not include executable modeling code required to reproduce the optimization. The dataset includes results for optimized charging infrastructure deployment by location and power level and service block assignments by fuel type, battery capacity selections, and distributed energy resource sizing. It also contains aggregated financial results, capital expenditures, operating cost summaries, net present cost comparisons across scenarios, and quantified air quality impacts. Results are structured to reflect multiple planning scenarios, including heuristic electrification plans, system-optimized configurations, and sensitivity cases with alternative objective weightings. The modeling was developed using publicly available General Transit Feed Specification data from Omnitrans and standardized modeling assumptions.
Efforts in the study of the longitudinal behavior of charged particles in the Fermilab Booster can be catalyzed with an image of the two-dimensional phase space distribution. In the past, tomography has been extensively employed in the reconstruction of the phase space in accelerators such as the Recycler at Fermilab and the Proton Synchrotron Booster at CERN. However, such a capability had yet to realize for the Fermilab Booster synchrotron. In this work, the first successful tomographic phase space reconstruction of a low-energy Booster bunch is presented along with validation metrics. A numerical turn-by-turn model of the longitudinal particle dynamics in the Booster has been implemented, which utilizes a fast, map-based particle transport algorithm. Using a sinogram generated from the Wall Current Monitor, the iterative reconstruction algorithm recovers a discretized image of the original phase space distribution at variable resolution. The reconstruction result shows low root-mean-square error and a rapid convergence toward the solution, providing strong evidence of accuracy. Future and ongoing work includes modeling high-energy bunches above transition and using tomography to infer certain machine parameters such as synchronous phase, peak gap voltage, and synchronous energy in addition to the phase space distribution.