Results for “consumer protection” — Page 6

NASA NTRS2002

Opportunities for nutritional amelioration of radiation-induced cellular damage

The closed environment and limited evasive capabilities inherent in space flight cause astronauts to be exposed to many potential harmful agents (chemical contaminants in the environment and cosmic radiation exposure). Current power systems used to achieve space flight are prohibitively expensive for supporting the weight requirements to fully shield astronauts from cosmic radiation. Therefore, radiation poses a major, currently unresolvable risk for astronauts, especially for long-duration space flights. The major detrimental radiation effects that are of primary concern for long-duration space flights are damage to the lens of the eye, damage to the immune system, damage to the central nervous system, and cancer. In addition to the direct damage to biological molecules in cells, radiation exposure induces oxidative damage. Many natural antioxidants, whether consumed before or after radiation exposure, are able to confer some level of radioprotection. In addition to achieving beneficial effects from long-known antioxidants such as vitamins E and C and folic acid, some protection is conferred by several recently discovered antioxidant molecules, such as flavonoids, epigallocatechin, and other polyphenols. Somewhat counterintuitive is the protection provided by diets containing elevated levels of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, considering they are thought to be prone to peroxidation. Even with the information we have at our disposal, it will be difficult to predict the types of dietary modifications that can best reduce the risk of radiation exposure to astronauts, those living on Earth, or those enduring diagnostic or therapeutic radiation exposure. Much more work must be done in humans, whether on Earth or, preferably, in space, before we are able to make concrete recommendations.

Review↗

NASA NTRS2007

Voltage Controller Saves Energy, Prolongs Life of Motors

In 1985, Power Efficiency Corporation of Las Vegas licensed NASA voltage controller technology from Marshall Space Flight Center. In the following years, Power Efficiency made patented improvements to the technology and marketed the resulting products throughout the world as the Performance Controller and the Power Efficiency energy-saving soft start. Soft start gradually introduces power to an electric motor, thus eliminating the harsh, violent mechanical stresses of having the device go from a dormant state to one of full activity; prevents it from running too hot; and increases the motor's lifetime. The product can pay for itself through the reduction in electricity consumed (according to Power Efficiency, within 3 years), depending on the duty cycle of the motor and the prevailing power rates. In many instances, the purchaser is eligible for special utility rebates for the environmental protection it provides. Common applications of Power Efficiency's soft start include mixers, grinders, granulators, conveyors, crushers, stamping presses, injection molders, elevators with MG sets, and escalators. The device has been retrofitted onto equipment at major department store chains, hotels, airports, universities, and for various manufacturers

Source record↗

DOE OSTI2024

Transportation Electrification Impact Study (TEIS)

Recent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notices of proposed rulemakings for GHG emissions standards for light-, medium-, and heavy-duty on-road vehicles would accelerate ongoing advancements already happening in the industry because of private investment, consumer demand, state-level policies, and federal incentives. As the EPA finalizes these regulations, questions persist regarding the cost of the requisite charging infrastructure and associated upgrades to the nation's electric grid. With support from the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Joint Office of Energy and Transportation, and the EPA, a multidisciplinary team conducted a Multi-State Transportation Electrification Impact Study that quantitatively assesses the incremental investment necessary to enable the levels of vehicle electrification expected to be induced by pending EPA regulations and to estimate the potential value of deferred investments in electric distribution infrastructure stemming from proactive vehicle-grid integration planning and deployment. This study finds the simulated incremental capital cost of charging infrastructure (including grid upgrades) to be at least 2.5 times smaller than the lifetime net benefits of vehicle electrification (including fuel savings but excluding the value of avoided emissions). Additionally, the incremental distribution grid upgrade cost of the EPA Action-Unmanaged scenario was found to be approximately 3% of existing utility distribution system investments (on an annual basis). Finally, the potential for managed charging to defer distribution grid upgrades was found to be significant with costs found to decrease from $2.3 billion to an incremental cost of $1 billion across five states in the Action-Managed scenario (relative to the No Action-Unmanaged scenario).

ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS,POWER TRANSMISSION AND↗

NASA NTRS2016

Exploration Mission Benefits From Logistics Reduction Technologies

Technologies that reduce logistical mass, volume, and the crew time dedicated to logistics management become more important as exploration missions extend further from the Earth. Even modest reductions in logistical mass can have a significant impact because it also reduces the packaging burden. NASA's Advanced Exploration Systems' Logistics Reduction Project is developing technologies that can directly reduce the mass and volume of crew clothing and metabolic waste collection. Also, cargo bags have been developed that can be reconfigured for crew outfitting, and trash processing technologies are under development to increase habitable volume and improve protection against solar storm events. Additionally, Mars class missions are sufficiently distant that even logistics management without resupply can be problematic due to the communication time delay with Earth. Although exploration vehicles are launched with all consumables and logistics in a defined configuration, the configuration continually changes as the mission progresses. Traditionally significant ground and crew time has been required to understand the evolving configuration and to help locate misplaced items. For key mission events and unplanned contingencies, the crew will not be able to rely on the ground for logistics localization assistance. NASA has been developing a radio-frequency-identification autonomous logistics management system to reduce crew time for general inventory and enable greater crew self-response to unplanned events when a wide range of items may need to be located in a very short time period. This paper provides a status of the technologies being developed and their mission benefits for exploration missions.

Broyan, James Lee, Jr.↗

NASA NTRS2005

A Common Approach for the Certifying of International Space Station (ISS) Basic Hardware for Ground Safety

In order to support the International Space Station, as well as any future long term human missions, vast amounts of logistical-type hardware is required to be processed through the various launch sites. This category consists of such hardware as spare parts, replacement items, and upgraded hardware. The category also includes samples for experiments and consumables. One attribute that all these items have is they are generally non-hazardous, at least to ground personnel. Even though the items are non-hazardous, launch site ground safety has a responsibility for the protection of personnel, the flight hardware, and launch site resources. In order to fulfill this responsibility, the safety organization must have knowledge of the hardware and its operations. Conversely, the hardware providers are entitled to a process that is commensurate with the hazard. Additionally, a common system should be in place that is flexible enough to account for the requirements at all launch sites, so that, the hardware provider need only complete one process for ground safety regardless of the launch site.

Kirkpatrick, Paul D.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Mars Surface Tunnel Element Concept

How crews get into or out of their ascent vehicle has profound implications for Mars surface architecture. Extravehicular Activity (EVA) hatches and Airlocks have the benefit of relatively low mass and high Technology Readiness Level (TRL), but waste consumables with a volume depressurization for every ingress/egress. Perhaps the biggest drawback to EVA hatches or Airlocks is that they make it difficult to keep Martian dust from being tracked back into the ascent vehicle, in violation of planetary protection protocols. Suit ports offer the promise of dust mitigation by keeping dusty suits outside the cabin, but require significant cabin real estate, are relatively high mass, and current operational concepts still require an EVA hatch to get the suits outside for the first EVA, and back inside after the final EVA. This is primarily because current designs don't provide enough structural support to protect the suits from ascent/descent loads or potential thruster plume impingement. For architectures involving more than one surface element-such as an ascent vehicle and a rover or surface habitat-a retractable tunnel is an attractive option. By pushing spacesuit don/doff and EVA operations to an element that remains on the surface, ascended vehicle mass and dust can be minimized. What's more, retractable tunnels provide operational flexibility by allowing surface assets to be re-configured or built up over time. Retractable tunnel functional requirements and design concepts being developed as part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Evolvable Mars Campaign (EMC) work will add a new ingress/egress option to the surface architecture trade space.

Rucker, Michelle A.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Exploration Mission Benefits From Logistics Reduction Technologies

Technologies that reduce logistical mass, volume, and the crew time dedicated to logistics management become more important as exploration missions extend further from the Earth. Even modest reductions in logical mass can have a significant impact because it also reduces the packing burden. NASA's Advanced Exploration Systems' Logistics Reduction Project is developing technologies that can directly reduce the mass and volume of crew clothing and metabolic waste collection. Also, cargo bags have been developed that can be reconfigured for crew outfitting and trash processing technologies to increase habitable volume and improve protection against solar storm events are under development. Additionally, Mars class missions are sufficiently distant that even logistics management without resupply can be problematic due to the communication time delay with Earth. Although exploration vehicles are launched with all consumables and logistics in a defined configuration, the configuration continually changes as the mission progresses. Traditionally significant ground and crew time has been required to understand the evolving configuration and locate misplaced items. For key mission events and unplanned contingencies, the crew will not be able to rely on the ground for logistics localization assistance. NASA has been developing a radio frequency identification autonomous logistics management system to reduce crew time for general inventory and enable greater crew self-response to unplanned events when a wide range of items may need to be located in a very short time period. This paper provides a status of the technologies being developed and there mission benefits for exploration missions.

Broyan, James Lee, Jr.↗

NASA NTRS2000

Laser Welding in Electronic Packaging

The laser has proven its worth in numerous high reliability electronic packaging applications ranging from medical to missile electronics. In particular, the pulsed YAG laser is an extremely flexible and versatile too] capable of hermetically sealing microelectronics packages containing sensitive components without damaging them. This paper presents an overview of details that must be considered for successful use of laser welding when addressing electronic package sealing. These include; metallurgical considerations such as alloy and plating selection, weld joint configuration, design of optics, use of protective gases and control of thermal distortions. The primary limitations on use of laser welding electronic for packaging applications are economic ones. The laser itself is a relatively costly device when compared to competing welding equipment. Further, the cost of consumables and repairs can be significant. These facts have relegated laser welding to use only where it presents a distinct quality or reliability advantages over other techniques of electronic package sealing. Because of the unique noncontact and low heat inputs characteristics of laser welding, it is an ideal candidate for sealing electronic packages containing MEMS devices (microelectromechanical systems). This paper addresses how the unique advantages of the pulsed YAG laser can be used to simplify MEMS packaging and deliver a product of improved quality.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS2000

Orbiter Reinforced Carbon-Carbon Advanced Sealant Systems: Screening Tests

Oxidation protection for the Orbiter reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC consists of three components: silicon carbide coating, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) impregnated into the carbon substrate and a silicon based surface sealant (designated Type A). The Orbiter Type A sealant is being consumed each mission, which results in increased carbon-carbon substrate mass loss, which adversely impacts the mission life of the RCC components. In addition, the sealant loss in combination with launch pad contamination (salt deposit and zinc oxide) results in RCC pinholes. A sealant refurbishment schedule to maintain mission life and minimize affects of pin hole formation has been implemented in the Orbiter maintenance schedule. The objective of this investigation is to develop an advanced sealant system for the RCC that extends the refurbishment schedule by reducing sealant loss/pin hole formation and that can be applied to existing Orbiter RCC components. This paper presents the results of arc jet screening tests conducted on several sealants that are being considered for application to the Orbiter RCC.

Curry, Donald M.↗

NASA NTRS2000

Design of a 2-Hour Prebreathe Protocol for Space Walks (EVAs) from the International Space Station (ISS)

The majority of extravehicular activities (EVAs) performed from the shuttle use a 10.2 psi staged decompression. The International Space Station (ISS) will operate at 14.7 psi, requiring crews to "campout" in the airlock at 10.2 psi. The constraints associated with campout (crew isolation, oxygen usage, and waste management), provided the rationale to develop a 2-hour prebreathe protocol from 14.7 psi. Previous studies on the affect of microgravity and exercise during prebreathe suggested the feasibility of this approach. Various combinations of adynamia (nonwalking subjects), prebreathe exercise doses, and space suit donning options (10.2 vs. 14.7 psi) were analyzed against timeline and consumable constraints. Prospective decompression sickness (DCS) and venous gas emboli (VGE) accept/reject criteria were defined from statistical analysis of historical DCS data, combined with risk management of DCS under ISS mission circumstances. Maximum operational DCS levels were defined based on protecting for EVA capability with two crew members at 95% confidence, throughout ISS lifetime (within the constraints of NASA DCS disposition policy JPG 1800.3). The accept / reject limits were adjusted for greater safety (including Grade IV VGE criteria) based on analysis of related medical factors. Monte-Carlo simulation was performed to design a closed sequential, multi-center laboratory trial, including the capability of rejecting the primary protocol and testing at least one alternate exercise dose, within the 2-hour prebreathe. The 2-hour protocol incorporates 0, breathing for 5 0 min at 14.7 psi, including 10 min dual cycle ergometry at 75%VO(2max). It requires an additional 30 minO2breathing during depress from 14.7 to 10.2 psi, followed by a 30-60 min suit donning break at 10.2 psi/26.5% O2. It concludes with a 40 min in-suit O2 prebreathe. The protocol would be accepted for operations, if the incidence of DCS was less than 15% and Grade IV VGE less than 20%, both at 95% confidence. The above protocol and accept/reject limits were implemented in a multi-center study.

Gernhardt, M. L.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

To Biocide or not to Biocide? Exploring the "No Biocide" Option in Spacecraft Potable Water Systems

Residual biocide has been used to protect against microbial growth in spacecraft potable water systems since the Gemini program. Iodine, the biocide currently used on the International Space Station (ISS) has a long history of use but presents a few challenges for exploration: it must be removed using a consumable absorbent before crew consumption and is known to lose its biocidal concentration due to interactions with wetted components, especially during periods of dormancy. Biocidal silver is being considered for exploration missions as it is safe for crew consumption, but it too has challenges with proper material design to maintain sufficient disinfection residuals. An idea proposed by some in the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) community has been that the biocide does not provide a true barrier against microbial growth, and therefore, perhaps the challenges of maintaining a residual biocide in the system could be best overcome by removing the biocide altogether. In this argument, they point to the regenerative water treatment system on the ISS which produces high purity water that theoretically meets the microbiological requirements before the iodine is added. Exploration water processing systems are expected to have similar water processing capabilities. This paper will discuss the role that residual biocide may play in controlling microbial growth and presents perspectives on the potential risks associated with removing it from exploration water systems.

biocide↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

To Biocide or not to Biocide? Exploring the "No Biocide" Option in Spacecraft Potable Water Systems

Residual biocide has been used to protect against microbial growth in spacecraft potable water systems since the Gemini program. Iodine, the biocide currently used on the International Space Station (ISS) has a long history of use but presents a few challenges for exploration: it must be removed using a consumable absorbent before crew consumption and is known to lose its biocidal concentration due to interactions with wetted components, especially during periods of dormancy. Biocidal silver is being considered for exploration missions as it is safe for crew consumption, but it too has challenges with proper material design to maintain sufficient disinfection residuals. An idea proposed by some in the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) community has been that the biocide does not provide a true barrier against microbial growth, and therefore, perhaps the challenges of maintaining a residual biocide in the system could be best overcome by removing the biocide altogether. In this argument, they point to the regenerative water treatment system on the ISS which produces high purity water that theoretically meets the microbiological requirements before the iodine is added. Exploration water processing systems are expected to have similar water processing capabilities. This paper will discuss the role that residual biocide may play in controlling microbial growth and presents perspectives on the potential risks associated with removing it from exploration water systems.

biocide↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

To Biocide or Not to Biocide? Exploring the "No Biocide" Option in Spacecraft Potable Water Systems

Residual biocide has been used to protect against microbial growth in spacecraft potable water systems since the Gemini program. Iodine, the biocide currently used on the International Space Station (ISS) has a long history of use but presents a few challenges for exploration: it must be removed using a consumable absorbent before crew consumption and is known to lose its biocidal concentration due to interactions with wetted components, especially during periods of dormancy. Biocidal silver is being considered for exploration missions as it is safe for crew consumption, but it too has challenges with proper material design to maintain sufficient disinfection residuals. An idea proposed by some in the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) community has been that the biocide does not provide a true barrier against microbial growth, and therefore, perhaps the challenges of maintaining a residual biocide in the system could be best overcome by removing the biocide altogether. In this argument, they point to the regenerative water treatment system on the ISS which produces high purity water that theoretically meets the microbiological requirements before the iodine is added. Exploration water processing systems are expected to have similar water processing capabilities. This paper will discuss the role that residual biocide may play in controlling microbial growth and presents perspectives on the potential risks associated with removing it from exploration water systems.

biocide↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

To Biocide or Not to Biocide? Exploring the "No Biocide" Option in Spacecraft Potable Water Systems

Residual biocide has been used to protect against microbial growth in spacecraft potable water systems since the Gemini program. Iodine, the biocide currently used on the International Space Station (ISS) has a long history of use but presents a few challenges for exploration: it must be removed using a consumable absorbent before crew consumption and is known to lose its biocidal concentration due to interactions with wetted components, especially during periods of dormancy. Biocidal silver is being considered for exploration missions as it is safe for crew consumption, but it too has challenges with proper material design to maintain sufficient disinfection residuals. An idea proposed by some in the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) community has been that the biocide does not provide a true barrier against microbial growth, and therefore, perhaps the challenges of maintaining a residual biocide in the system could be best overcome by removing the biocide altogether. In this argument, they point to the regenerative water treatment system on the ISS which produces high purity water that theoretically meets the microbiological requirements before the iodine is added. Exploration water processing systems are expected to have similar water processing capabilities. This paper will discuss the role that residual biocide may play in controlling microbial growth and presents perspectives on the potential risks associated with removing it from exploration water systems.

biocide↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Method Development for In Situ Microbiome Profiling of the Water Recovery System’s Wastewater Tank Onboard the International Space Station

A distinctive microbial community has inhabited the wastewater tank within the International Space Station Water Recovery System (WRS) for over 14 years and experienced the stressors associated with the microgravity environment. The WRS generates potable water for the crew from urine distillate, humidity condensate, Sabatier product water, and the occasional off-loading of ground-supplied water. The reservoir for these products, the wastewater tank, does not have a means of microbial control. While samples are occasionally collected for analysis, the time between sample collection and the return to Earth, as well as the lack of preservation, results in a skewed depiction of the microbiome. Routinely observed from these returned samples are high counts (105 – 106 colony forming units per mL) and two prevailing genera, Burkholderia and Ralstonia. The wastewater tank likely contains a more diverse microbiome, as a higher diversity of bacteria and fungus has been noted upstream and downstream of the tank. To characterize the microbial profile of the tank, analysis needs to occur at the time of sample collection. Toward this goal, a method for in situ analysis based on nanopore sequencing was developed. The filter-to-sequencer method evolved from previous work that has been validated onboard the ISS (BEST payload and the BioMole Crew Health Care Systems Facility). The method, including filtration, DNA extraction, purification, amplification, library preparation, and nanopore sequencing will be described. Additionally, data collected with this method from both ISS and terrestrial samples will be detailed. The consumables needed to support in situ analysis of the tank are set to the launch to the ISS in the spring of 2023. This investigation will allow for the first accurate characterization of the microbiome of the tank providing insight for crew health, planetary protection, and has the potential to enable engineering controls for future space station water systems.

Sarah Stahl-Rommel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Situ Surface Construction of Infrastructure

In situ resources offer an opportunity to reduce the amount of items brought from Earth when exploring moons and planets. Utilizing those resources requires energy that comes with a cost. In the case of human missions to Mars, trading surface power for launch mass is beneficial for propellant and consumables required to sustain human pioneering and settlement on the planet’s surface. However, In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) can mean far more than propellant production and consumables replacement for missions beyond Low Earth Orbit. NASA’s Systems Capability Leader-ship Team (SCLT) for ISRU created a work break-down structure based on functions identified in roadmaps pertaining to human exploration. That WBS includes Prospecting, Extraction, Processing, Construction, Manufacturing, and Energy. Over the years, NASA has developed some capabilities and technologies for prospecting, extraction, and processing carbon dioxide and water on Mars into propellants and life support consumables. However, that is a small subset of the ISRU needs that are coming to light with NASA’s push to return to the Moon for extended periods of time. For instance, astronauts require shielding from Ga-lactic Cosmic Rays and nuclear radiation and protection from the low temperatures and pressures in Space. Surface assets including crew, landers, and ascent modules can be damaged by surface ejecta during landing and launch operations on the Moon and Mars. Creating shielding, berms, and pads requires movement of large volumes and stabilization of regolith in the context of a civil engineering construction project. Because of the multi-disciplinary nature of the aerospace systems needed for human exploration, SCLT on ISRU created an ISRU Construction Integrated Steering Group that combines expertise among several NASA Principal Technologists and Capabilities Leaders for exploring options, assessing opportunities, and developing requirements for construction and manufacturing on the Moon and Mars NASA’s new program to develop Lunar landers for small, mid, and large payload deliveries to the Lunar surface leading to human missions by 2025 spawned an investigation into plume surface interactions caused by the lander during descent and ascent. The trade space to resolve this issue includes regolith stabilization via landing pad construction techniques and lander nozzles characteristics due to vehicle systems design. Some data exists from the Apollo missions but more is required for the missions ahead. The purpose of this paper [1] is to outline an approach for developing requirements that can guide systems designs while taking advantage of flight opportunities in NASA’s plans to return to the Moon.

In-Situ↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Review of Extra-Terrestrial Regolith Excavation Concepts and Prototypes

Regolith is present on many extra-terrestrial bodies, and the crushed rock material it is made of contains many of the resources that are enabling for In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). When extracted these resources can be used to provide consumables such as rocket propellant, human life support, working fluids and gases for industrial processes and feedstocks for manufacturing. In addition, the regolith can also be very beneficial for construction purposes as an aggregate which can be used for construction materials and shielding for radiation protection and micrometeorite impact. Binders for regolith concrete may also be made from geopolymers that may be in the regolith. The regolith can be melted and drawn out into glass fibers and used as reinforcements in a metal, polymer, or concrete matrix. In addition, there is tremendous scientific and geological knowledge that can only be obtained by studying samples of the regolith. However, none of these valuable activities can proceed without first acquiring the regolith granular material with some type of excavation device and method. Excavation is in the critical path of many workflows that will make up the capabilities required to establish a human and robotic presence in our solar system. While scientific in-situ sampling of regolith in small quantities has been achieved since the dawn of the space age in the 1960’s, large scale excavation for mining and construction on extra-terrestrial bodies has only been contemplated for many decades in works of scientific fact and also in fictional stories, but serious development and prototyping of excavation technologies for use in reduced gravity space environments was only started in the late 1990’s.This paper will review and document the evolution of extra-terrestrial excavation concepts and prototypes based on the available literature and the personal experience of the author who has been working on regolith excavation technology development since 1998.

ISRU↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Review of Extra-Terrestrial Regolith Excavation Concepts and Prototypes

Regolith is present on many extra-terrestrial bodies, and the crushed rock material it is made of contains many of the resources that are enabling for In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). When extracted, these resources can be used to provide consumables such as rocket propellant, human life support, working fluids and gases for industrial processes and feedstocks for manufacturing. In addition, the regolith can also be very beneficial for construction purposes as an aggregate which can be used for construction materials and shielding for radiation protection and micrometeorite impact. Binders for regolith concrete may also be made from geopolymers that may be in the regolith. The regolith can be melted and drawn out into glass fibers and used as reinforcements in a metal, polymer, or concrete matrix. In addition, there is tremendous scientific and geological knowledge that can only be obtained by studying samples of the regolith. However, none of these valuable activities can proceed without first acquiring the regolith granular material with some type of excavation device and method. Excavation is in the critical path of many workflows that will make up the capabilities required to establish a human and robotic presence in our solar system. While scientific in-situ sampling of regolith in small quantities has been achieved since the dawn of the space age in the 1960’s, large scale excavation for mining and construction on extra-terrestrial bodies has only been contemplated, for many decades, but serious development and prototyping of excavation technologies for use in reduced gravity space environments was only started in the late 1990’s. This paper will review and document the evolution of extra-terrestrial excavation concepts and prototypes based on the available literature and the personal experience of the author who has been working on regolith excavation technology development since 1998.

Regolith↗