Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “electric propulsion systems”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Fidelity Aeropropulsive Optimization of a Mail-Slot Distributed Electric Propulsion System for the SUSAN Electrofan

Hybrid- and all-electric aircraft concepts use electric motors for power rather than a conventional jet engine. Electric propulsors open the door to new ways to synergistically integrate the propulsion system with the airframe. For example, many small electric propulsors can be distributed along the wing to increase the effective bypass ratio for better overall efficiency. Furthermore, these propulsors can be attached to the wing surface for boundary layer ingestion(BLI) to further the efficiency gains. However, these novel methods of aeropropulsive integration also create challenges such as nonuniform inflow and complex nacelle geometries. Here we use gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimization to address the design challenges of the wing-mounted distributed electric propulsion system of the Subsonic Single Aft Engine (SUSAN)concept. In doing so, we aim to more accurately benchmark the flow power of SUSAN’s mail slot propulsors relative to a conventional propulsion system in both an isolated and BLI configuration. Our preliminary results found relative to an optimized podded propulsor the optimized mailslot and BLI mailslot design required 8% and 17% more flow power respectively.The methods and key design insights also apply to other aircraft concepts that utilize distributed electric propulsion and boundary layer ingestion.

CAS↗
NASA NTRS2018

Preparation for Hollow Cathode Testing for the Advanced Electric Propulsion System at NASA Glenn Research Center

NASA Glenn Research Center is performing activities to support the unique needs of hollow cathode development and testing for the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS). Three existing vacuum facilities have been outfitted as cathode test facilities, and each will serve a different role in upcoming testing. Vacuum Facility 67 is being developed to serve as a long-duration test facility for the Engineering Development Unit cathode, which is to be delivered by the AEPS contractor. It will feature a thruster-like magnetic field simulator and cold-cycle capability via a liquid nitrogen-cooled cold plate. Vacuum Facility 17 is being developed as a test facility for short- to medium-duration experiments in order to provide auxiliary support for the long-duration testing. It will feature a magnetic field simulator but not cold-cycling. Finally, Vacuum Facility 1 will be a high-pumping speed cathode development environment, and will feature an array of plasma and temperature diagnostics. In addition to the facility preparation work, a new cathode, referred to as the Mark II, has been designed. The Mark II is an evolution of the Technology Demonstration Unit cathodes that better evokes the geometry, fabrication, and construction of the forthcoming Engineering Development Unit. This cathode serves as a transition between the Technology Demonstration Unit cathodes used during early thruster development and the forthcoming Engineering Development Unit cathodes. It will be used as a means of verifying the new test facilities prior to arrival of Engineering Development Unit hardware. Details of the Mark II design and key features are presented, as well as details of future work to be performed.

Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS)↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Edge Wear of the Advanced Electric Propulsion System Pole Covers

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) focused on characterizing the erosion of the edges and side walls of the thruster pole covers. Testing was performed with the AEPS Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster and accumulated approximately 325 hours of operation at the 600 V/12 kW condition with the magnetic field strength set to 75% of its nominal value. Thruster performance was invariant throughout the wear test for all thruster throttle conditions and was found to be equal to previous measurements. Contrary to past results, inner front pole cover erosion rates were invariant to magnetic field strength at the 600 V/12 kW condition and no erosion was measured on the outer front pole cover. The erosion profile of the downstream inner front pole cover faces was continuous across the cover indicating no significant change in erosion process at the pole cover edges. Side wall erosion was only detected on the cathode-facing surfaces of the inner front pole cover and was equal in magnitude to the rates measured on the adjacent downstream edges. Taken together, these results suggest that erosion of the pole cover edges and sidewalls is driven by cathode-borne ions and will ultimately not impact AEPS life estimates.

Hall thrusters↗
NASA NTRS2000

Field Emitter Cathodes and Electric Propulsion Systems

Replacing hollow and filament cathodes with field emitter (FE) cathodes could significantly improve the scalability, power, and performance of some meso- and microscale Electric Propulsion (EP) systems. This article discusses the motivation and challenges of integrating of FE and Electric Propulsion systems.

field emitters cathodes Electric Propulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterization Test of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the detailed characterization testof the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit 2 (AEPS ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. This test campaign had two major goals: to assessthe risk of design compliance with thruster requirements and providea comparison to the previously-tested NASA Hall Effect Rocket with Magnet Shielding Technology Demonstration Units (HERMeS TDUs) from which the AEPS ETU design was derived.

AEPS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Performance Characterization of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first detailed performance assessment of the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne at the throttle conditions most relevant for AEPS application on the Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). First, an assessment was performed of ETU-2 performance and backpressure sensitivity at the previously-tested throttle points of 300 V/6.25 kW, 400 V/8.33 kW, 500 V/10.42 kW, and 600 V/12.5 kW that confirmed ETU-2 and the test facility were both operating nominally and consistent with historical baselines. ETU-2 performance and stability were then assessed throughout the PPE throttle range of 2.6-12 kW and shown to be in-family with predictions based on the scaling of previous results. Taken together, these results will help inform application of AEPS on PPE as the AEPS design progresses towards its Critical Design Review.

Jason D Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Performance Characterization of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first detailed performance assessment of the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne at the throttle conditions most relevant for AEPS application on the Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). First, an assessment was performed of ETU-2 performance and backpressure sensitivity at the previously-tested throttle points of 300 V/6.25 kW, 400 V/8.33 kW, 500 V/10.42 kW, and 600 V/12.5 kW that confirmed ETU-2 and the test facility were both operating nominally and consistent with historical baselines. ETU-2 performance and stability were then assessed throughout the PPE throttle range of 2.6-12 kW and shown to be in-family with predictions based on the scaling of previous results. Taken together, these results will help inform application of AEPS on PPE as the AEPS design progresses towards its Critical Design Review.

HERMeS↗
NASA NTRS2018

Iodine Hall-Effect Electric Propulsion System Research, Development, and System Durability Demonstration

This paper reviews recent iodine electric propulsion research and development activities at the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC). Activities included (i) investigation of the iodine compatibility of BaO-CaO-Al2O3 impregnated tungsten hollow cathodes based on a flight heritage design, (ii) investigation of the iodine compatibility of a handful of materials common to propulsion systems, spacecraft, and ground test facilities, (iii) development of reliable iodine feed system technologies, (iv) implementation of test facility improvements in an attempt to mitigate iodine associated negative impacts, and culminated in (v) an 1,174-hour hybrid iodine-xenon propulsion system durability demonstration (iodine fed Hall-effect thruster with xenon fed cathode). Each of the activities resulted in extensive insights that shall informfuture iodine electric propulsion developments. While reliable operation of a BaO-CaO-Al2O3 impregnated tungsten hollow cathode on iodine vapor was not achieved, long-term operation on xenon gas in proximity to an iodine fed thruster was demonstrated without any measurable degradation or cross-contamination of the cathode. Furthermore, iodine material corrosion investigations conducted at 300 degrees C over 5, 15, and 30 days showed significant deterioration of all materials evaluated, although the same materials with a silicon coating proved nearly impervious to iodine so long as the coating was not mechanically damaged. Finally, the 1,174-hour durability test demonstration showed that (i) iodine feed system technologies developed at GRC delivered well-regulated uninterrupted propellant, (ii) implementation of appropriate facility improvements and procedures can limit negative impacts of iodine on test hardware and ground support equipment, although facility challenges with iodine are extensive, and (iii) a Hall-effect thruster operates with similar performance whether employing iodine or xenon propellant over long durations. The work was motivated by strong government and commercial interest in the growing capabilities of small-spacecraft (<500 kg), in combination with interest for denser low-power, high delta-v in-space propulsion systems. This work adds to a growing body of research and development efforts aimed at addressing the many anticipated challenges of implementing iodine as an in-space propellant. This work was conducted under the Advanced In-Space Propulsion (AISP) project funded through the Game Changing Development (GCD) program within NASA's Science Technology Mission Directorate (STMD).

Benavides, Gabriel F.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Iodine Hall-Effect Electric Propulsion System Research, Development, and System Durability Demonstration

This paper reviews recent iodine electric propulsion research and development activities at the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC). Activities included (i) investigation of the iodine compatibility of BaO-CaO-Al2O3 impregnated tungsten hollow cathodes based on a flight heritage design, (ii) investigation of the iodine compatibility of a handful of materials common to propulsion systems, spacecraft, and ground test facilities, (iii) development of reliable iodine feed system technologies, (iv) implementation of test facility improvements in an attempt to mitigate iodine associated negative impacts, and culminated in (v) an 1,174-hour hybrid iodine-xenon propulsion system durability demonstration (iodine fed Hall-effect thruster with xenon fed cathode). Each of the activities resulted in extensive insights that shall inform future iodine electric propulsion developments. While reliable operation of a BaO-CaO-Al2O3 impregnated tungsten hollow cathode on iodine vapor was not achieved, long-term operation on xenon gas in proximity to an iodine fed thruster was demonstrated without any measurable degradation or cross-contamination of the cathode. Furthermore, iodine material corrosion investigations conducted at 300degC over 5, 15, and 30 days showed significant deterioration of all materials evaluated, although the same materials with a silicon coating proved nearly impervious to iodine so long as the coating was not mechanically damaged. Finally, the 1,174-hour durability test demonstration showed that (i) iodine feed system technologies developed at GRC delivered well-regulated uninterrupted propellant, (ii) implementation of appropriate facility improvements and procedures can limit negative impacts of iodine on test hardware and ground support equipment, although facility challenges with iodine are extensive, and (iii) a Hall-effect thruster operates with similar performance whether employing iodine or xenon propellant over long durations. The work was motivated by strong government and commercial interest in the growing capabilities of small-spacecraft (<500 kg), in combination with interest for denser low-power, high delta-v in-space propulsion systems. This work adds to a growing body of research and development efforts aimed at addressing the many anticipated challenges of implementing iodine as an in-space propellant. This work was conducted under the Advanced In-Space Propulsion (AISP) project funded through the Game Changing Development (GCD) program within NASA's Science Technology Mission Directorate (STMD).

Benavides, Gabriel F.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Iodine Hall-Effect Electric Propulsion System Research, Development, and System Durability Demonstration

This paper reviews recent iodine electric propulsion research and development activities at the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC). Activities included (i) investigation of the iodine compatibility of BaO-CaO-Al2O3 impregnated tungsten hollow cathodes based on a flight heritage design, (ii) investigation of the iodine compatibility of a handful of materials common to propulsion systems, spacecraft, and ground test facilities, (iii) development of reliable iodine feed system technologies, (iv) implementation of test facility improvements in an attempt to mitigate iodine associated negative impacts, and culminated in (v) an 1,174-hour hybrid iodine-xenon propulsion system durability demonstration (iodine fed Hall-effect thruster with xenon fed cathode). Each of the activities resulted in extensive insights that shall inform future iodine electric propulsion developments. While reliable operation of a BaO-CaO-Al2O3 impregnated tungsten hollow cathode on iodine vapor was not achieved, long-term operation on xenon gas in proximity to an iodine fed thruster was demonstrated without any measurable degradation or cross-contamination of the cathode. Furthermore, iodine material corrosion investigations conducted at 300 C over 5, 15, and 30 days showed significant deterioration of all materials evaluated, although the same materials with a silicon coating proved nearly impervious to iodine so long as the coating was not mechanically damaged. Finally, the 1,174-hour durability test demonstration showed that (i) iodine feed system technologies developed at GRC delivered well-regulated uninterrupted propellant, (ii) implementation of appropriate facility improvements and procedures can limit negative impacts of iodine on test hardware and ground support equipment, although facility challenges with iodine are extensive, and (iii) a Hall-effect thruster operates with similar performance whether employing iodine or xenon propellant over long durations. The work was motivated by strong government and commercial interest in the growing capabilities of small-spacecraft (<500 kg), in combination with interest for denser low-power, high delta-v in-space propulsion systems. This work adds to a growing body of research and development efforts aimed at addressing the many anticipated challenges of implementing iodine as an in-space propellant. This work was conducted under the Advanced In-Space Propulsion (AISP) project funded through the Game Changing Development (GCD) program within NASA's Science Technology Mission Directorate (STMD).

Benavides, Gabriel F.↗
NASA NTRS1968

Handbook for the study of electric propulsion systems

A compendium of techniques and basic information useful to the preliminary performance analysis of power-limited (low-acceleration, electric) propulsion systems applied to space missions is presented. The material is in handbook form and is reasonably complete within itself insofar as a basic understanding of the techniques and procedures is required for one to acquire facility in computing performance. This, in essence, is the objective of the handbook. The accumulation and organization of the material selected for inclusion was guided by the desire for simplicity and computational ease while maintaining a sufficient level of completeness for a general understanding.

Ragsac, R. V.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Comparison of the solar sail with electric propulsion systems

The propulsive efficiencies of the solar sail and of electric propulsion systems are compared on the basis of specific impulse. It is shown that the solar sail is more efficient at one a.u. for mission durations greater than about two months, that the advantage is increased for missions toward the inner planets, and that the same conclusions are reached when the comparison is based on maximizing the momentum transferred to the payload. Other factors that will influence the choice of a propulsion system for a specific mission are mentioned.

Macneal, R. H.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wear Test of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit 2 (AEPS ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. The ETU-2 Wear Test accumulated approximately 730 hours of operation split between the nominal 600 V/12.5 kW condition and the 300 V/6.25 kW condition previously identified as the worst-case erosion condition.

Jason D. Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the performance test campaign of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. This test campaign had three major goals: to assess design compliance with thruster requirements, provide a comparison to the previously-tested NASA Hall Effect Rocket with Magnet Shielding (HERMeS) Technology Demonstration Units (TDUs) from which the AEPS ETU design was derived, and support AEPS application on the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). Assessments of ETU-2 performance were conducted at discharge powers of 2.6 to 13.1 kW, which encompasses the original AEPS throttle conditions as well as those most relevant for AEPS application on PPE. The results from the test campaign indicate that ETU-2 performance meets or exceeds all AEPS thruster performance requirements and matches the values and trends previously measured with the HERMeS TDUs. In addition, similar to the HERMeS TDUs, ETU-2 performance showed minimal variation over approximately 1636 h of operating time due to the incorporation of magnetic shielding. Taken together, these results show that the AEPS design is successfully replicating the performance of the HERMeS TDUs to within the empirical uncertainty and meeting its performance requirements as the design progresses to its Critical Design Review.

HERMeS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the performance test campaign of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. This test campaign had three major goals: to assess design compliance with thruster requirements, provide a comparison to the previously-tested NASA Hall Effect Rocket with Magnet Shielding (HERMeS) Technology Demonstration Units (TDUs) from which the AEPS ETU design was derived, and support AEPS application on the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). Assessments of ETU-2 performance were conducted at discharge powers of 2.6 to 13.1 kW, which encompasses the original AEPS throttle conditions as well as those most relevant for AEPS application on PPE. The results from the test campaign indicate that ETU-2 performance meets or exceeds all AEPS thruster performance requirements and matches the values and trends previously measured with the HERMeS TDUs. In addition, similar to the HERMeS TDUs, ETU-2 performance showed minimal variation over approximately 1636 h of operating time due to the incorporation of magnetic shielding. Taken together, these results show that the AEPS design is successfully replicating the performance of the HERMeS TDUs to within the empirical uncertainty and meeting its performance requirements as the design progresses to its Critical Design Review.

Jason D Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Wear Testing of the 12-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) intended to isolate the impact of discharge current on component wear rates. Testing was led by Aerojet Rocketdyne and performed with the AEPS Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster. In total, approximately 860 hours of operation were accumulated split between operating conditions of 600 V/9 kW, 600 V/11 kW, and 600 V/12 kW. Thruster performance and stability were invariant throughout the wear test for all thruster throttle conditions and shown to be equal to the values previously measured with ETU-2. Inner front pole cover erosion rates were found to be invariant to discharge current as the measurements at all three operating conditions were equal to within the empirical uncertainty. Outer front pole cover erosion rates were found to be equal for the 600 V/9 kW and 600 V/12 kW conditions with operation at 600 V/11 kW yielding elevated erosion rates. Overall, the data shows that the AEPS thruster design has a high probability of meeting lifetime and performance requirements as the design proceeds to flight production and qualification.

Jason D Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Wear Testing of the 12-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) intended to isolate the impact of discharge current on component wear rates. Testing was led by Aerojet Rocketdyne and performed with the AEPS Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster. In total, approximately 860 hours of operation were accumulated split between operating conditions of 600 V/9 kW, 600 V/11 kW, and 600 V/12 kW. Thruster performance and stability were invariant throughout the wear test for all thruster throttle conditions and shown to be equal to the values previously measured with ETU-2. Inner front pole cover erosion rates were found to be invariant to discharge current as the measurements at all three operating conditions were equal to within the empirical uncertainty. Outer front pole cover erosion rates were found to be equal for the 600 V/9 kW and 600 V/12 kW conditions with operation at 600 V/11 kW yielding rates that were comparable to those on the inner front pole cover. Overall, the data shows that the AEPS thruster design has a high probability of meeting lifetime and performance requirements as the design proceeds to flight production and qualification.

HERMeS↗