Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “fire test”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Characterizing Performance of Additively Manufacturing Regenerative Cooled Combustion Chambers Through Hot Fire Testing

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has developed several additive manufactured regenerative cooled combustion chambers from 2014 to present. Chambers have been constructed using the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) powder bed additive manufacturing (AM) technique. The materials used for the chambers has varied from Inconel 718, Inconel 625, GRCop-84, and C18150 metal alloys. The surface finish and build techniques used to successfully manufacture combustion chambers using the SLM AM result in as built surface finish and off nominal geometric features. This paper discusses and reviews the effects of surface roughness, flow area, and hydraulic performance of regenerative cooled combustion chambers. The thrust chambers designs tested ranged from 200 to 1,400 psia producing 1,000 to 35,000 lbf thrust. Empirical data from four test campaigns will be reviewed and related to design modeling parameters such as pressure drop, surface roughness, and actual fluid flow geometry. Correlation results with simple 2-D CFD modeling will also be presented. The goal of the work is to better understand how the finished additive manufactured component characteristics inside internal features can effect regenerative cooling chamber design. Adjustments to design methodology will be discussed and recommended based on the above results.

Garcia, C. P.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Space Launch System Completes Key Hot Fire Test and Begins Vehicle Integration

The Moon is again in reach. NASA and its commercial and international partners are on the way back. The team is working to land the first woman and the first person of color on the planetary body. NASA and its partners made significant progress towards that goal in the latter half of 2020 and the first half of 2021, including on the agency’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket – a key part of the Artemis program. The SLS core stage for the Artemis I mission – the first launch of SLS and an uncrewed Orion capsule – completed the Green Run test series and was successfully mated with the SLS twin solid rocket boosters on the mobile launcher at Kennedy Space Center (KSC). All of the major systems for Artemis I are at KSC for assembly, integration, and launch, targeted for late 2021. Work also continued on SLS hardware for Artemis II, which will be the first flight of crew on Orion and SLS. Work progressed on core stage components, booster segments, and other hardware for Artemis III and future missions. This paper will detail the progress made.

John Honeycutt↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Space Launch System Completes Key Hot Fire Test and Begins Vehicle Integration

NASA and its commercial and international partners are on the way back to the Moon. Significant progress towards that goal was made in 2021, including on the agency’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket – a key part of the Artemis initiative. The SLS core stage for the Artemis I mission – the first launch of SLS and an uncrewed Orion capsule – completed its Green Run test series in early 2021 and was successfully mated with the SLS twin solid rocket boosters on the mobile launcher at Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The launch vehicle stage adapter, interim cryogenic propulsion stage, and the Orion stage adapter structural test article and Orion spacecraft mass simulator were also stacked. The flight Orion spacecraft and Orion stage adapter are being prepared for stacking and launch, targeted for late 2021 following a wet dress rehearsal at Launch Complex 39B. SLS hardware for Artemis II, which will be the first flight of crew on Orion and SLS, is also in work. Work progressed on core stage components, booster segments, and other hardware for Artemis III and future missions. This paper will detail the progress made.

John Honeycutt↗
NASA NTRS2008

Fire Chemistry Testing of Spray-On Foam Insulation (SOFI)

An experimental study was initiated that included the long-term testing of the following SOFI materials, which make up the majority of the Thermal Protection System of the Shuttle External Tank: NCFI 24-124 (acreage foam) and BX-265 (close-out foam, including the intertank flange and bipod areas). A potential alternate material, NCFI 27-68 (acreage foam with flame retardant removed), was also tested. Fire chemistry testing was completed on samples that were retrieved after aging/weathering at intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months. The testing included three standard test methods: limiting oxygen index (ASTM G125), radiant panel (ASTM E162), and cone calorimeter (ASTM E1354).

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1998

Development of Lead Free Energy Absorber for Space Shuttle Blast Container

The Space Shuttle vehicle (SSV) is connected to the mobile launch platform (MLP) by four aft skirt hold down studs on each solid rocket booster (SRB). Prior to lift-off, the frangible nuts inside the aft skirt blast containers (BC) are severed into two nut halves by two pyrotechnic booster cartridges. This action releases the SSV and allows the hold down studs to eject through the aft skirt bore and then down into the MLP. USBI has been tasked to upgrade the BC for two specific reasons; 1. to eliminate lead for environmental concerns, and 2. to reduce the chance of nut recontact with the holddown stud. Nut recontact with the stud has been identified as a likely contributor to stud hangups. This upgrade will replace the lead liner with an aluminum foam material. The aluminum foam used as a energy absorber is a proven design in many other aerospace/defense applications. Additional benefits of using the open cell, energy absorbent aluminum foam in place of the solid lead liner are: A. Lead handling/ exposure, and possible contamination, along with hazardous waste disposal will be eliminated; B. Approximately 200 lbs. weight savings will be contributed to each Space Shuttle flight by using aluminum foam over lead; C. The new aluminum liner is designed to catch all shrapnel from frangible nuts thus virtually eliminating chance of foreign object debris (FOD) exiting the HDP, and causing potential damage to the vehicle; D. Potential of using the lighter aluminum liner over lead, allows for easier assembly and disassembly of blast container elements, also allowing for improvements in safety, operator handling, and efficiency of operations. Six BC firing tests will be required to determine if the new liner material will perform in a way to decrease the chance of stud hangups and enhance the ability of the BC to retain blast debris. Testing will be performed at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) facility known as the Launch Equipment Test Facility (LETF), and will simulate the SRB hold- down post, with actual BC hardware and pyrotechnics assembled, and then test fired. Initial testing was performed in 1997 using a frangible nut in a static drop test over lead and aluminum foam sheet materials. The aluminum foam showed a dramatic improvement of energy absorption over the lead liner material. Proof-of-Principle testing at the KSC-LETF commenced in May, 1998, and is expected to be completed by June, 1998.

Ingram, T.↗
NASA NTRS1970

High-temperature oxidation and erosion-resistant refractory coatings

Various refractory coating systems were evaluated for rocket nozzle applications by actual rocket test firings. A reference is noted which identifies failure mechanisms and gives results of the firing tests for 18 coating systems. Iridium, iridium-rhenium, and hafnium oxide-zirconium oxide coatings show most promising results.

Peterson, D. A.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Timing system for firing widely spaced test nuclear detonations

The national weapons design laboratories (Los Alamos National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) test fire nuclear devices at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), which is spread over an area of over 1200 square miles (a bit larger than the state of Rhode island). On each test there are hundreds of high time resolution recordings made of nuclear output waveforms and other phenomena. In order to synchronize these recordings with each other, with the nuclear device, and with offsite recordings, there is a requirement that the permanent command center and the outlying temporary firing sites be time tied to each other and to UTC to permit firing the shot at a predetermined time with an accuracy of about a microsecond. The system is so designed that this can reduce to about 100 nanoseconds if it should prove necessary in the future.

Ralph E. Partridge↗