Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “interphase chemistry”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

97 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Topological Considerations in Electrolyte Additives for Passivating Silicon Anodes with Hybrid Solid–Electrolyte Interphases

Unlike most anodes used in high energy density batteries, lithiated Si does not form long-lasting passivating solid-electrolyte interphases (SEI) during formation or on charge due to SEI delamination, reconstruction, or dissolution. As a result, electrolyte degradation is continuous and results in a permanent loss of the Li inventory, shortening the useful life of the battery. Here, in this study, we show that perfluoroether electrolyte additives featuring either sulfonyl fluorides or trifluorovinyl ethers, when introduced in prescribed amounts to locally superconcentrated electrolytes, exhibit preferential reactivity at Si during formation due to their higher reduction potential than salts and solvents, creating a hybrid SEI that is simultaneously enriched with LiF and organics tethered to the reactive functionality. While both reactive motifs are effective in creating a hybrid SEI, perfluoroether additives bearing sulfonyl fluorides show more substantial integration. More important, however, is the combined influence of additive topology on anchoring efficacy and tether flexibility between anchoring sites on SEI resiliency. Top-performing Si|LFP cells featuring ditopic additive-enriched SEI improve capacity retention by as much as 45% over 100 cycles when compared to additive-free cells.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2025

The Solid Electrolyte Interphase Dispersion Can Predict Cycle and Calendar Lifetimes in Silicon Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) plays a critical role in lithium-ion battery (LIB) anodes. It is responsible for passivating the reactive surface of lithiated anodes against degradation of the electrolyte which enables long cycle and calendar lifetimes for LIBs. This role is especially important in high energy density anodes like silicon, that undergo massive volumetric changes during electrochemical cycling. The mechanism by which the SEI performs this role, however, is not clear which makes designing an SEI to passivate silicon anodes impossible. Through decades of research, dozens of chemical species have been identified within the SEI ranging from inorganic solids to polymeric coatings all of which simultaneously exist in a 'mosaic' composition at the anode surface. This mosaic creates a highly dispersive environment in which electrostatic screening of the anode surface from the electrolyte is not always complete. Here, we present an electrochemical technique to directly test the dispersion at the anode surface. We use this technique to screen more than 20 different electrolytes against silicon anodes and find correlations between both the cycle life and calendar life. The insights from this study offer a new framework to think about the SEI and a rapid screening method to test novel electrode/electrolyte combinations.

battery↗
DOE OSTI2026

Surface heterogeneity propagation and homogenization for pouch cell-scale Li metal anodes

Li metal anode is a promising candidate for next-generation energy storage systems and is widely explored in Li-ion and solid-state batteries. Despite its potential, Li metal anodes face instabilities during long-term cycling, especially when paired with NMC or sulfur-based cathodes, where Li is cycled at high capacities of 6-8 mAh/cm2, equivalent to a thickness of 30-40 µm. During such extensive utilization, degradation mechanisms such as excessive solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), dendrites, and dead Li emerge, and ultimately lead to sudden failure and reduced cycle life. The origin of the degradation mechanisms stem from surface heterogeneities introduced during Li foil manufacturing and storage [1, 2]. As cycling progresses, the local heterogeneities propagate, resulting in uneven Li utilization and degradation-prone regions across the electrode [3], which consequently induce performance variations at the cell level. This heterogeneity propagation is particularly pronounced in large-format pouch cells in practical applications, where the surface effects are magnified. Without a clear understanding of the multi-scale heterogeneities and the development of surface homogenization methods, the performance consistency will be compromised, hindering the commercialization of Li metal batteries. In this presentation, we investigate the evolution of surface heterogeneity propagation on commercially available Li foils. We discover that inhomogeneous Li utilization appears as early as the first half-cycle of formation, manifesting as localized clusters and pits. In pouch cell configurations, these features exhibit areal density variations across the electrode on a scale of millimeters. To improve Li utilization homogeneity, a scalable mechanical brushing method is introduced to remove the chemically heterogeneous surface passivation layer. Furtherore, the influence of utilization homogeneity on cell-to-cell consistency is evaluated using 32 Li-NMC811 pouch cells divided into as-received and brushed Li groups. On the brushed Li, clusters and pits are no longer observable, and the cells exhibit significantly improved consistency in discharge capacity trajectories and cycle lifetime. Overall, this study highlights the role of Li surface utilization homogeneity on long-term cycling performance. Our research provides a pathway for improving large-area electrode uniformity and establishing evaluation methods for cell-to-cell consistency, both are key steps toward the commercialization of Li metal batteries and beyond. [1] Otto, Svenja-K., et al. "In-depth characterization of lithium-metal surfaces with XPS and ToF-SIMS: toward better understanding of the passivation layer." Chemistry of Materials 33.3 (2021): 859-867. [2] Hatzell, Kelsey, et al. "Aligning lithium metal battery research and development across academia and industry." Joule (2024). [3] Kim, Sangwook, et al. "Calendar life of lithium metal batteries: Accelerated aging and failure analysis." Energy Storage Materials 65 (2024): 103147.

25 - ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Speciation of Transition Metal Dissolution in Electrolyte from Common Cathode Materials

Significant capacity loss has been observed across extended cycling of lithium-ion batteries cycled to high potential. One of the sources of capacity fade is transition metal dissolution from the cathode active material, ion migration through the electrolyte, and deposition on the solid-electrolyte interphase on the anode. While much research has been conducted on the oxidation state of the transition metal in the cathode active material or deposited on the anode, there have been limited investigations of the oxidation state of the transition metal ions dissolved in the electrolyte. Here, in this work, X-ray absorption spectroscopy has been performed on electrolytes extracted from cells built with four different cathode active materials (LiMn 2 O 4 (LMO), LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO), LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811), and (x Li 2 MnO 3 *(1-x) LiNi a Mn b Co c O 2 , with a+b+c=1) (LMRNMC)) that were cycled at either high or standard potentials to determine the oxidation state of Mn and Ni in solution. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry has been performed on the anodes from these cells to determine the concentration of deposited transition metal ions. While transition metal ions were found dissolved in all electrolytes, the oxidation state(s) of Mn and Ni were determined to be dependent on the cathode material and independent of cycling potential.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Control of Two Solid Electrolyte Interphases at the Negative Electrode of an Anode‐Free All Solid‐State Battery based on Argyrodite Electrolyte

Abstract Anode‐free all solid‐state batteries (AF‐ASSBs) employ “empty” current collector with three active interfaces that determine electrochemical stability; lithium metal – Solid electrolyte (SE) interphase (SEI‐1), lithium – current collector interface, and collector – SE interphase (SEI‐2). Argyrodite Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl) solid electrolyte (SE) displays SEI‐2 containing copper sulfides, formed even at open circuit. Bilayer of 140 nm magnesium/30 nm tungsten (Mg/W‐Cu) controls the three interfaces and allows for state‐of‐the‐art electrochemical performance in half‐cells and fullcells. AF‐ASSB with NMC811 cathode achieves 150 cycles with Coulombic efficiency (CE) above 99.8%. With high mass‐loading cathode (8.6 mAh cm −2 ), AF‐ASSB retains 86.5% capacity after 45 cycles at 0.2C. During electrodeposition of Li, gradient Li‐Mg solid solution is formed, which reverses upon electrodissolution. This promotes conformal wetting/dewetting by Li and stabilizes SEI‐1 by lowering thermodynamic driving force for SE reduction. Inert refractory W underlayer is required to prevent ongoing formation of SEI‐2 that also drives electrochemical degradation. Inert Mo and Nb layers likewise protect Cu from corroding, while Li‐alloying layers (Mg, Sn) are less effective due to ongoing volume changes and associated pulverization. Mechanistic explanation for observed Li segregation within alloying Li x Mg layer is provided through mesoscale modelling, considering opposing roles of diffusivity differences and interfacial stresses.

Wang, Yixian [Materials Science and Engineering Pr↗
DOE OSTI2026

Tailored Solvent Treatment for Optimized Production of Upcycled Anodes from End-Of-Life Li-Ion Batteries

Recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries typically overlook graphite because of its lower market value relative to that of transition-metal-containing cathode materials. However, graphite recovered from cycled lithium-ion batteries holds additional engineered value associated with the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). The SEI contributes critical electronic passivation of the graphite surface but becomes highly resistive with extended cycling, yielding poor cell performance. In this work, we apply tailored solvent treatment to end-of-life (EOL) graphite anodes to selectively remove adverse SEI components while retaining beneficially passivating species. We evaluate a series of polar protic solvents to achieve targeted removal of SEI components and control selectivity through rational variation in solvent properties. The physiochemical properties of treatment solvents correlate with both the retained SEI composition and the corresponding electrochemical performance of solvent-treated “upcycled” graphite anodes. Within the initial set of solvents evaluated, top-performing candidates show capacity and Coulombic efficiency nearly equivalent to those of an analogous pristine anode, as well as promising electrochemical performance enhancement with regard to irreversible capacity-loss metrics. This study establishes critical design principles for an optimized anode upcycling method that enhances the value of recycled graphite by retaining and upgrading the SEI.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Modeling the influence of the solid electrolyte interphase on the sand’s time and dendrite formation on lithium metal electrodes

Lithium metal is a sought after battery material for its high energy density due to the low electrochemical potential and density. However, lithium metal is also highly reactive, which results in a strong propensity for dendrite formation. The Sand’s time has previously been used to predict the time of dendrite initiation on metals that do not form a solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), but it has been shown that the Sand’s time is not accurate for lithium electrodes when using transport parameters associated with the electrolyte. Thus, we built a numerical model to simulate lithium ion transport through a growing SEI to predict the Sand’s time. The numerical model is shown to be more accurate than previous analytical solutions, especially for low current densities. We then analyze the sensitivity of the Sand’s time to different SEI properties and the chemical potential gradients present in the SEI, driving lithium transport. The results showed that high lithium concentration has a greater impact at high current density, while fast diffusivity is more important at low current density. Lastly, we modeled the influence of surface roughness on the plating evolution and chemical potential gradients when an SEI is present in comparison to the electrolyte. As a result, we demonstrate that the SEI plays a critical role in lithium electrode stability, and that improved characterization techniques are needed to better understand transport through the SEI and increase lithium metal utilization in energy storage devices.

Chemistry↗