Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium batteries”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Preparation of Proton Exchange Membranes and Lithium Batteries from Melamine-containing Ormosils

Our laboratory has recently reported a series of rodcoil polymers for lithium batteries that display dimensionally stable films with good ionic conductivity. The rod segments consist of rigid linear and branched polyimides and the coil segments are polyethylene oxides (PEO). It has been proposed that good mechanical and transport properties are due to phase separation between the rod and coil segments. It was also observed that increased branching and molecular weight lead to increased conductivity. The following study was undertaken to assess the effects of phase separation in polyalkylene oxides connected by melamine linkages. Melamine was chosen as the linking unit because it provides a branching site, cation binding sites to help ionic transport between polymer chains, and the opportunity for self assembly through hydrogen bonding. Polymers were made by the reaction of cyanuric chloride with a series of amine-terminated alkylene oxides. A linear polymer was first made, followed by reaction of the third site on cyanuric chloride with varying ratios of monofunctional Jeffamine and (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane. The lithium trifluoromethane sulfonamide-doped polymers are then crosslinked through a sol-gel process to form free-standing films. Initial results have shown mechanically strong films with lithium conductivities on the order of 2 x 10(exp -5) S/cm at ambient temperature. In a separate study, organically modified silanes (Ormosils) that contain sulfonic acid derivatized melamines have been incorporated into proton exchange membranes. The membranes are made by reaction of the primary amine groups of various ratios of melamine derivative and difunctional Jeffamine (MW = 2000) with the epoxide group of (3-Glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane. The films were then cross-linked through a sol-gel process. Resulting sulfuric acid doped films are strong, flexible, and have proton conductivities on the order of 2 x l0(exp -2) S/cm (120 C, 25% relative humidity). Our best results have been observed when films contain 60% PEO and 40% sulfonated melamine.

Tigelaar, Dean M.↗

A Metal Organic Framework Derived Solid Electrolyte for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) are currently considered as promising candidates for next-generation energy storage technologies. However, their practical application is hindered by the critical issue of the polysulfide-shuttle. Herein, a metal organic framework (MOF)-derived solid electrolyte is presented to address it. The MOF solid electrolyte is developed based on a Universitetet i Oslo (UIO) structure. By grafting a lithium sulfonate (-SO 3 Li) group to the UIO ligand, both the ionic conductivity and the polysulfide-suppression capability of the resulting -SO 3 Li grafted UIO (UIOSLi) solid electrolyte are greatly improved. After integrating a Li-based ionic liquid (Li-IL), lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, the resulting Li-IL/UIOSLi solid electrolyte exhibits an ionic conductivity of 3.3 × 10 -4 S cm -1 at room temperature. Based on its unique structure, the Li-IL/UIOSLi solid electrolyte effectively restrains the polysulfide shuttle and suppresses lithium dendritic growth. Lithium–sulfur cells with the Li-IL/UIOSLi solid electrolyte and a Li 2 S 6 catholyte show stable cycling performance that preserves 84% of the initial capacity after 250 cycles with a capacity-fade rate of 0.06% per cycle.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Fe-single atom catalysts facilitate fast electron transfer with MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes in lithium–sulfur batteries

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) emerge as promising next-generation energy storage systems offering cost-effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and high theoretical energy density. The practical implementation of LSBs faces significant hindrances due to the shuttle effect and sluggish redox reactions. To address these challenges, single-atom catalyst (SAC) based combination materials from d-block elements can offer increased active catalytic sites, rapid charge transfer, accelerated electron migration, and fast sulfur redox conversion kinetics of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). In this study, we fabricated three different LSB cathodes: pure S, S@MoS 2 /SnS 2 , and S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 . These cathodes were then used to explore the cycle life, capacity, rate capability, and redox kinetic reactions of LiPSs while assessing the influence of Fe-SACs on their performance. As a result, LSBs with S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes demonstrate an extended cycle life of 1000 cycles at a C-rate of 0.2C, maintaining a capacity close to 500 mA h g −1 , the highest initial discharge capacity of 1622 mA h g −1 and 1066 mA h g −1 at 0.05C and 0.2C, and excellent rate capabilities of 708 mA h g −1 and 558 mA h g −1 at 1C and 2C, respectively. The synergistic effect of the Fe-SAC-based combination cathode (S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 ) creates plentiful adsorptive and highly active catalytic sites, resulting in substantially enhanced capacity for adsorbing soluble long-chain LiPSs. This facilitates ultra-fast redox kinetics, surpassing the performance of the S@MoS 2 /SnS 2 and pure S cathodes. In the ex situ analysis, results from powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) to observe the new phase, soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to investigate the electronic structure, and hard X-ray photoelectron microscopy (HAXPES) with different energies (900 eV, 2000 eV, and 6000 eV) to track the chemical-state evolution of Fe-SACs in MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes displayed notable electrochemical reversibility involving S 8 ⇄ LiPSs ⇄ Li 2 S conversion even after 1000 cycles. Additionally, in situ, operando Raman analysis can unveil a novel catalytic mechanism of Fe-SACs in MoS 2 /SnS 2 “facilitating rapid electron transfer” during the discharge and charge processes of LSBs involving the conversion of S 8 ⇄ long-chain LiPSs ⇄ Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S. This study elucidates the working mechanism of Fe-SAC cathodes, offering insights into overcoming the shuttle effect and facilitating sulfur redox kinetics to advance commercial LSBs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Constitutional under-potential plating (CUP) – New insights for predicting the morphological stability of deposited lithium anodes in lithium metal batteries

Lithium (Li) cycling in lithium metal batteries (LMBs) inevitably witnesses a non-planar Li/electrolyte interface (cellular/dendritic microstructure) affecting the performance, safety and reliability of LMBs. Herein, the “constitutional under-potential plating” (CUP) concept is presented for the first time to understand the evolution, formation and predict the morphological stability/instability of the Li/electrolyte interface. Here, the CUP condition, a measure of the driving force for interface perturbation, occurs when the true potential gradient at the interface is smaller than the equilibrium electrodeposition potential gradient at the Li/electrolyte interface resulting in the electrolyte ahead of the Li-electrolyte interface to be in an under-potential state. Detailed CUP criterion calculations conducted herein establishes the relationship of battery operating conditions (e.g. current density, potential gradient) with the electrolyte properties (e.g. Li-ion transference number and diffusion coefficient) predicting the morphological stability condition at the interface. In addition to the driving force for interface perturbation, the capillarity effect or the Gibbs Thomson effect, a measure of the resistance to perturbation of the perturbed interface is discussed for understanding the influence of interfacial energy/adhesion energy between the current collector and the deposited Li on the overall morphological stability of the Li/electrolyte interface, a critical criterion for the unwanted dendritic morphology.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A chemically stabilized sulfur cathode for lean electrolyte lithium sulfur batteries

Lithium sulfur batteries (LSBs) are promising next-generation rechargeable batteries due to the high gravimetric energy, low cost, abundance, nontoxicity, and high sustainability of sulfur. However, the dissolution of high-order polysulfide in electrolytes and low Coulombic efficiency of Li anode require excess electrolytes and Li metal, which significantly reduce the energy density of LSBs. Quasi-solid-state LSBs, where sulfur is encapsulated in the micropores of carbon matrix and sealed by solid electrolyte interphase, can operate under lean electrolyte conditions, but a low sulfur loading in carbon matrix (<40 wt %) and low sulfur unitization (<70%) still limit the energy density in a cell level. Here, we significantly increase the sulfur loading in carbon to 60 wt % and sulfur utilization to ∼87% by dispersing sulfur in an oxygen-rich dense carbon host at a molecular level through strong chemical interactions of C–S and O–S. In an all-fluorinated organic lean electrolyte, the C/S cathode experiences a solid-state lithiation/delithiation reaction after the formation of solid electrolyte interphase in the first deep lithiation, completely avoiding the shuttle reaction. The chemically stabilized C/S composite retains a high reversible capacity of 541 mAh⋅g −1 (based on the total weight of the C/S composite) for 200 cycles under lean electrolyte conditions, corresponding to a high energy density of 974 Wh⋅kg −1 . The superior electrochemical performance of the chemical bonding-stabilized C/S composite renders it a promising cathode material for high-energy and long-cycle-life LSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Mechanistic Study of Functional Electrolyte Solvents for High-Voltage Lithium Batteries

The pervasive use of Ni-rich cathode active materials, e.g., LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811), for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been hindered by rapid battery capacity decay when cycled with high charge cutoff voltages due to electrolyte decomposition in the conventional carbonate solvent-based electrolytes, oxidative parasitic side reactions at the electrolyte/cathode interface, and irreversible phase changes in the cathode active materials leading to dissolution of transition metals into the electrolytes. Various functional electrolyte solvents have been studied to tackle the above technical challenges, yet the roles of individual solvents in the performance of LIBs remain poorly understood. Here, in this study, we systematically investigate electrochemical performance mechanisms of fluorinated and organosilicon single solvents and cosolvents, for the first time, in high-voltage Li/NMC811 batteries, using electrochemical and analytical characterizations and density functional theory modeling. We observe that some unique combinations of the functional solvents can lead to exceptionally stable high-voltage cycle performance in the Ni-rich cathode-based LIBs. Our mechanistic study reveals that the synergistic effect of solvents plays a vital role in enabling electrochemical stability at both the Ni-rich cathode and the Li metal anode. Understanding the electrochemical performance mechanisms of functional solvents can greatly help in designing and formulating advanced electrolytes that enable the development of high-voltage, high-energy-density, long-cycle-life lithium batteries.

density functional theory modeling↗

Methylation enables the use of fluorine-free ether electrolytes in high-voltage lithium metal batteries

Lithium metal batteries represent a promising technology for next-generation energy storage, but they still suffer from poor cycle life due to lithium dendrite formation and cathode cracking. Fluorinated solvents can improve battery longevity by improving LiF content in the solid-electrolyte interphase; however, the high cost and environmental concerns of fluorinated solvents limit battery viability. Here, for this work, we designed a series of fluorine-free solvents through the methylation of 1,2-dimethoxyethane, which promotes inorganic LiF-rich interphase formation through anion reduction and achieves high oxidation stability. The anion-derived LiF interphases suppress lithium dendrite growth on the lithium anode and minimize cathode cracking under high-voltage operation. The Li + -solvent structure is investigated through in situ techniques and simulations to draw correlations between the interphase compositions and electrochemical performances. The methylation strategy provides an alternative pathway for electrolyte engineering towards high-voltage electrolytes while reducing dependence on expensive fluorinated solvents.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Stable Solid Electrolyte Interphase Layer Formed by Electrochemical Pretreatment of Gel Polymer Coating on Li Metal Anode for Lithium–Oxygen Batteries

Lithium (Li)-oxygen (O2) batteries (LOBs) exhibit the highest theoretical specific energy density among candidates of the next-generation energy storage systems, but the instability of Li metal anode (LMA), air electrode, and electrolyte largely limit the practical energy density of these batteries. Herein, we report an effective method to protect LMA against side reactions between LMA and crossover contaminants such as highly reactive oxygen moieties. A solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer rich in inorganic components was formed on a LMA coated with polyethylene oxide thin-film through an in-situ electrochemical pre-charging step under oxygen atmosphere. This uniformly distributed stiff SEI layer interacted with flexible polymer matrix and formed a submicron-sized gel-like polymer layer. This polymer supported SEI layer leads to much longer cycle life (130 vs. 65 cycles) as compared to those of pristine cell under the same testing conditions (1.0 mAh cm-2 at 0.2 mA cm-2 in the voltage range of 2 to 5 V without any catalysts). It is also very effective during low voltage (2 to 4.5 V) cycling with a redox mediator (0.1 and 0.15M (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl) oxidanyl). Therefore, this approach can be used to stabilize LMA/electrolytes interphase and improve the cycle life of rechargeable LOBs.

lithium-oxygen batteries, lithium metal anodes, ar↗

Navigating thermal stability intricacies of high-nickel cathodes for high-energy lithium batteries

High-nickel oxide cathodes, LiNi x M 1−x O 2 (x ≥ 0.8), are preferred in automotive lithium batteries, but they face thermal instability challenges. Inconsistent literature reports and unstandardized testing protocols further complicate quantitative assessments of the thermal stability of these cathodes. Here, we present here a statistical thermal analysis based on the differential scanning calorimetry measurements of 15 representative cathode materials with different compositions, morphologies and states of charge. The findings reveal that each cathode has a critical state of charge that defines its safe operating limit, which is affected by the metal–oxygen bond strength and surface reactivity. The thermal runaway temperature is dictated by the layered Li 1−x NiO 2 to LiNi 2 O 4 spinel-like phase transition, which is thermodynamically determined by the metal–oxygen bond covalency and kinetically influenced by the cation mixing and particle size. Raman spectroscopy is used to predict the thermal runaway temperature on the basis of the linear relationship between them. Finally, we propose a thermal stability index to quantify cathode thermal stability as a guide for developing safer high-nickel cathodes.

batteries↗

Evaluation of heat sink materials for thermal management of lithium batteries

Aluminum, neopentyl glycol (NPG), and resins FT and KT are evaluated theoretically and experimentally as heat sink materials for lithium battery packs. The thermal performances of the two resins are compared in a thermal vacuum experiment. As solutions to the sublimation property were not immediately apparent, a theoretical comparison of the thermal performance of NPG versus KT, Al, and no material, is presented.

Dimpault-Darcy, E. C.↗

Lithium Cyano Tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) Borate as a Multifunctional Electrolyte Additive for High-Performance Lithium Metal Batteries

Lithium cyano tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) borate (LCTFEB) has been synthesized and investigated as a new electrolyte additive for high performance of lithium metal batteries. LCTFEB is prepared by the reaction of tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) borate with lithium cyanide. Incorporation of LCTFEB into carbonate-based electrolyte has been investigated. The electrochemical performance of NCM523/Li cells as well as symmetric Li/Li cells are significantly improved upon incorporation of LCTFEB (5 wt.%) into the electrolyte. Various characterizations of lithium metal morphology and the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the lithium metal anode have been conducted using by FE-SEM, cryo-TEM and XPS suggesting the generation of a thin (≈ 10 nm) LiF rich SEI with low concentrations of B and N-compounds. The different SEI structure is formed by the preferential reductive decomposition of LCTFEB resulting in improved electrochemical performance. As a result, the new electrolyte additive provides insight into innovative approaches for multi-functional electrolyte additive design.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Liquid electrolytes for low-temperature lithium batteries: main limitations, current advances, and future perspectives

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) can now be used in almost all modern electronic devices and electric vehicles. However, as the range of applications increases, the challenges increase as well, especially at very low temperatures. Many individual processes could result in capacity loss of LIBs at low temperatures; however, most of them are associated with the liquid electrolyte inside the battery. In this review, we first discuss the main limitations in developing liquid electrolytes used in low-temperature LIBs, and then we summarize the current advances in low-temperature electrolytes, including lithium salts, solvents, additives, and new strategies. Finally, we present some perspectives on the current state of low-temperature electrolytes for LIBs, outlining the most promising research areas in this field. In conclusion, this review will provide useful insights into the design of cryogenic electrolytes and the path forward to the widespread use of LIBs in cryogenic environments.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Imaging the Phase Transformation in Single Particles of Lithium Titanate Anode for Lithium-ion Batteries

Lithium uptake and release in lithium titanate (LTO) anode materials during a discharge and charge cycle is one of the fundamental processes of a Lithium-ion battery (LIB), still not fully understood at the microscopic level.During discharge cycle, LTO undergoes a phase transformation between Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 states within a cubic crystal lattice. To reveal the details of the microscopic mechanism,it is necessary to track the sequence of phase transformation sat different discharge/charge states under operating conditions.Here we use in-situ Bragg Coherent Diffraction Imaging (BCDI) and in-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments to examine the lithium insertion-induced materials phase transformation within a single LTO particle anda bulk battery analogue,respectively. BCDI analysis from (111) Bragg peak, shows the two-phase transformation manifesting as a distinct image phase modulation within a single LTO nanoparticle occurring in the middle of the discharge region then subsiding towards the end of the discharge cycle. We observe the biggest phase variation at the two-phase stage,indicating the formation of phase domains of 200 nm in size during the discharge process. Additionally, we also observe a lattice contraction of >0.2% in a single LTO nanoparticle at the (400) Bragg peak measurement, larger than that in the corresponding bulk material. Our observation of this phase transformation at a single particle level has implications for the understanding of the microscopic/mesoscale picture of the phase transformation in anode and cathode LIBs materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Electrolytes for lithium batteries with carbon and/or silicon anodes

Electrolytes for lithium ion batteries with carbon-based, silicon-based, or carbon- and silicon-based anodes include a lithium salt; a nonaqueous solvent comprising at least one of the following components: (i) an ester, (ii) a sulfur-containing solvent, (iii) a phosphorus-containing solvent, (iv) an ether, (v) a nitrile, or any combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt is soluble in the solvent; a diluent comprising a fluoroalkyl ether, a fluorinated orthoformate, a fluorinated carbonate, a fluorinated borate, or a combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt has a solubility in the diluent at least 10 times less than a solubility of the lithium salt in the solvent; and an additive having a different composition than the lithium salt, a different composition than the solvent, and a different composition than the diluent.

Xu, Wu↗

High-Energy All-Solid-State Organic–Lithium Batteries Based on Ceramic Electrolytes

Recent studies have identified unique properties of organic battery electrode materials such as moderate redox potentials and mechanical softness which are uniquely beneficial for all-solid-state batteries based on ceramic electrolytes. Here, we further explore the promise of organic materials and demonstrate a sulfide electrolyte- based organic-lithium battery with a specific energy of 828 Wh kg –1 , rivaling the state-of- the-art of all-solid-state batteries. Two innovation steps are responsible for the accomplishment. First, the combination of lithium anode and the high-capacity cathode material pyrene-4,5,9,10-tetraone ensures a high theoretical specific energy. Second, the microstructure of the organic cathode is optimized with the introduction of cryomilling, a technique common to processing soft materials but not familiar to electrode fabrication. The cathode material utilization increases to 99.5% as a result, up from the 55–89% previously reported for ceramic electrolyte-based solid-state organic batteries. In conclusion, the improvement highlights the special requirements of solid-state organic electrodes for microstructural engineering while preserving the chemical integrity of components.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗