NASA NTRSDate not supplied
For almost 100 years, commercial aircraft have been fabricated using riveted aluminum alloy structures. Aside from refining aircraft designs for better aerodynamic efficiency, improving alloy compositions, and automating assembly steps, fuselage construction remains largely unchanged today. The intent of the lightweight metallic fuselage prototype undertaken in NASA’s Advanced Air Transport Technology project was to demonstrate innovative forming and joining processes that advance the design paradigm, i.e. achieve high-rate manufacturing and reduce assembly time/costs. Over the past decade, researchers at NASA Langley Research Center have evaluated the potential to modify the flow forming process to produce near-net shaped cylinders, integrally stiffened along the cylinder axis, for space launch vehicles. The production of integral stiffeners in a formed aluminum cylinder, the size of the Space Shuttle external tank, replaced machined thick plate and welding steps to eliminate > 500,000 pounds of machining chips and ~ 0.5 miles of welds. The flow forming method, called the Integrally Stiffened Cylinder (ISC) process, was successfully demonstrated up to the 10-foot diameter scale, which laid the groundwork for the current investigation of metallic fuselage structures. Using the ISC process as the basis for the re-design of a metallic fuselage eliminates hundreds of thousands of holes and rivets, while significantly reducing assembly time and crack initiation sites in the integral structure. However, the ISC process is not currently configured to fabricate circumferential ring frames for carrying fuselage internal pressure loads. Consequently, a trade study was performed to assess existing and advanced manufacturing processes, including additive manufacturing, forming, and welding. The approach with the lowest barriers to success, while simultaneously improving manufacturing time and cost, was to use formed ring frame segments attached to the ISC via Refill Friction Stir Spot Welding (RFSSW). The RFSSW process is five times faster than drilling, reaming, and riveting and provides similar mechanical performance. Finishing the fuselage structure with conventional windows, floor beams, and floor panels can then be accomplished using incumbent assembly methods, thereby maximizing reuse of existing infrastructure for aircraft construction. Structural analyses were performed to assess and optimize the geometric variables of integrated skin and stiffener configurations. A cost benefit and manufacturing rate analysis was also performed to compare against the current state-of-the-art for single aisle transport class aircraft. The resulting structure offers a weight reduction that rivals current graphite-epoxy composite fuselage structures. The projected manufacturing rate is close to double current metallic fuselages and six times faster than current composite manufacturing practices. The damage tolerance properties of a monocoque fuselage structure have yet to be assessed, but past integral airframe structural work has exploited geometric features to blunt or turn cracks. This concept offers promise that integrated structures can meet stringent aircraft durability specifications. An important benefit is that such aluminum fuselage structures may be inspected and repaired using established practices and existing expertise. Finally, pursuit of advanced manufacturing processes for future aluminum fuselages minimizes waste and the structure is 100% recyclable at the end-of-life for maximum sustainability.