Impact cratering models and their application to lunar studies - A geologist's view
Impact cratering models are discussed which were derived from: (1) laboratory hypervelocity experiments in cohesive materials; (2) laboratory impact experiments in noncohesive materials such as sand; and (3) terrestrial meteorite impact craters (specifically the Ries Crater, the largest well-preserved terrestrial meteorite crater). Salient features of these three categories of models are compared in order to point out unresolved controversies and inconsistencies. Arguments and evidence are presented to support the conclusions that (1) penetrations of secondary impacts are insignificant and are not likely to stir up much local material, (2) the laboratory hypervelocity experiments are perhaps the best model for lunar glass-lined microcraters, (3) laboratory impact experiments in noncohesive materials such as sand are the best model for impacts in lunar regolith, and (4) the Ries is considered the best model for large lunar impact craters. From analogy with the Ries, it appears that lateral and low-angle transport of ejecta and accelerated lateral growth are important in formation of large impact craters.