SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “mission execution”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2011

ISECG Mission Scenarios and Their Role in Informing Next Steps for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit

The International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) was established in response to The Global Exploration Strategy (GES): The Framework for Coordination developed by fourteen space agencies* and released in May 2007. This GES Framework Document recognizes that preparing for human space exploration is a stepwise process, starting with basic knowledge and culminating in a sustained human presence in deep space. ISECG has developed several optional global exploration mission scenarios enabling the phased transition from human operations in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and utilization of the International Space Station (ISS) to human missions beyond LEO leading ultimately to human missions to cis-lunar space, the Moon, Near Earth Asteroids, Mars and its environs. Mission scenarios provide the opportunity for judging various exploration approaches in a manner consistent with agreed international goals and strategies. Each ISECG notional mission scenario reflects a series of coordinated human and robotic exploration missions over a 25-year horizon. Mission scenarios are intended to provide insights into next steps for agency investments, following on the success of the ISS. They also provide a framework for advancing the definition of Design Reference Missions (DRMs) and the concepts for capabilities contained within. Each of the human missions contained in the scenarios has been characterized by a DRM which is a top level definition of mission sequence and the capabilities needed to execute that mission. While DRMs are generally destination focused, they will comprise capabilities which are reused or evolved from capabilities used at other destinations. In this way, an evolutionary approach to developing a robust set of capabilities to sustainably explore our solar system is defined. Agencies also recognize that jointly planning for our next steps, building on the accomplishments of ISS, is important to ensuring the robustness and sustainability of any human exploration plan. Developing a shared long-term vision is important, but agencies recognize this is an evolutionary process and requires consideration of many strategic factors. Strategic factors such as the implications of an emerging commercial space industry in LEO, the opportunity provided by extending ISS lifetime to at least 2020, and the importance of defining a plan which is sustainable in light of inevitable domestic policy shifts are timely for agency consideration.

Culbert, Christopher J.↗

NASA NTRS1986

Concept for a manned Mars flyby

A concept is presented for a three man crew to fly by the planet Mars. The ground rule for the study is to execute the mission as quickly as possible which dictates using late 1990's technologies and space infrastructure. The proposed mission described herein uses a preliminary concept for the agency's Manned Orbit Transfer Vehicle (MOTV) and proposed space station elements. The space vehicle will depart from the LEO space station and is delivered to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) by a future launch vehicle of a Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicle (SDV) class. The trajectory parameters are chosen such that the mission duration is on the order of one year, with a two and one-half hour period within ten planetary radii of Mars. If the issues of acceptable crew g loads and entry vehicle heat load can be resolved, then the returning vehicle can aerobrake at Earth into a space station compatible orbit. Otherwise, a propulsive maneuver will be required to reduce vehicle velocity prior to Earth entry interface. It is possible to execute a mission of reasonable capability at an initial LEO departure weight of 716,208 pounds for the aerobraked case of 1,350,000 pounds for the propulsive case.

Barney B Roberts↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Small Spacecraft Technology Program: Select Technology Demonstration Missions

NASA's Small Spacecraft Technology Program expands the ability to execute unique missions through rapid development and demonstration of capabilities for small spacecraft applicable to exploration, science and the commercial space sector. This presentation provides information on three technology demonstration missions currently on orbit or in development to include Starling, the Advanced Composite Solar Sail System, and DiskSat.

Roger C Hunter↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Small Spacecraft Technology Program: Overview and Select Technology Demonstration Missions

Roger C. Hunter↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Small Spacecraft & Distributed Systems: Overview and Select Technology Demonstration Missions

Roger C. Hunter↗

NASA NTRS1989

The diverse roles of unmanned precursors in supporting manned missions to Mars

The diverse roles of robotic precursors are examined in the context of recent NASA studies on a long-term program to establish a human outpost on Mars. The scenario in which these precursors must function and the requirements they must satisfy are discussed, and a tentative set of missions is developed which satisfy this scenario and the set of requirements. The missions and an example of vehicle implementation are described, and how these missions assist in technology demonstrations and building an appropriate infrastructure is addressed. The experience to be gained in the areas of mission operations and management as a result of executing the missions is considered.

Craig, Mark K.↗

NASA NTRS2013

End of Mission Considerations

While a great deal of effort goes into planning and executing successful mission operations, it is also important to consider the End of the Mission during the planning, design, and operations phases of any mission. Spacecraft and launch vehicles must be disposed of properly in order to limit the generation of orbital debris, and better preserve the orbital environment for all future missions. Figure 30-1 shows a 1990's projected growth of debris with and without the use of responsible disposal techniques. This requires early selection of a responsible disposal scenario, so that the necessary capabilities can be incorporated into the hardware designs. The mission operations must then be conducted in such a way as to preserve, and then actually perform, the planned, appropriate end of mission disposal.

Hull, Scott M.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Small Spacecraft Technology Program: Space Technology Mission Directorate

Roger C Hunter↗

NASA NTRS2002

The IRIS-GUS Shuttle Borne Upper Stage System

This paper describes the Italian Research Interim Stage - Gyroscopic Upper Stage (IRIS-GUS) upper stage system that will be used to launch NASA's Triana Observatory from the Space Shuttle. Triana is a pathfinder earth science mission being executed on rapid schedule and small budget, therefore the mission's upper stage solution had to be a system that could be fielded quickly at relatively low cost and risk. The building of the IRIS-GUS system wa necessary because NASA lost the capability to launch moderately sized upper stage missions fro the Space Shuttle when the PAM-D system was retired. The IRIS-GUS system restores this capability. The resulting system is a hybrid which mates the existing, flight proven IRIS (Italian Research Interim Stage) airborne support equipment to a new upper stage, the Gyroscopic Upper Stage (GUS) built by the GSFC for Triana. Although a new system, the GUS exploits flight proven hardware and design approaches in most subsystems, in some cases implementing proven design approaches with state-of-the-art electronics. This paper describes the IRIS-GUS upper stage system elements, performance capabilities, and payload interfaces.

Tooley, Craig↗

NASA NTRS2010

Altair Navigation During Trans-Lunar Cruise, Lunar Orbit, Descent and Landing

The Altair lunar lander navigation system is driven by a set of requirements that not only specify a need to land within 100 m of a designated spot on the Moon, but also be capable of a safe return to an orbiting Orion capsule in the event of loss of Earth ground support. These requirements lead to the need for a robust and capable on-board navigation system that works in conjunction with an Earth ground navigation system that uses primarily ground-based radiometric tracking. The resulting system relies heavily on combining a multiplicity of data types including navigation state updates from the ground based navigation system, passive optical imaging from a gimbaled camera, a stable inertial measurement unit, and a capable radar altimeter and velocimeter. The focus of this paper is on navigation performance during the trans-lunar cruise, lunar orbit, and descent/landing mission phases with the goal of characterizing knowledge and delivery errors to key mission events, bound the statistical delta V costs for executing the mission, as well as the determine the landing dispersions due to navigation. This study examines the nominal performance that can be obtained using the current best estimate of the vehicle, sensor, and environment models. Performance of the system under a variety sensor outages and parametric trades is also examined.

lunar lander↗

NASA NTRS2012

Integrated Campaign Probabilistic Cost, Schedule, Performance, and Value for Program Office Support

This paper describes an integrated assessment tool developed at NASA Langley Research Center that incorporates probabilistic analysis of life cycle cost, schedule, launch performance, on-orbit performance, and value across a series of planned space-based missions, or campaign. Originally designed as an aid in planning the execution of missions to accomplish the National Research Council 2007 Earth Science Decadal Survey, it utilizes Monte Carlo simulation of a series of space missions for assessment of resource requirements and expected return on investment. Interactions between simulated missions are incorporated, such as competition for launch site manifest, to capture unexpected and non-linear system behaviors. A novel value model is utilized to provide an assessment of the probabilistic return on investment. A demonstration case is discussed to illustrate the tool utility.

Cornelius, David↗

DOE OSTI2020

ARIES team achieves major milestone in support of nonproliferation

The Advanced Recovery and Integrated Extraction System (ARIES) Program is a great example of LANL’s Weapons and Global Security programs working together to achieve important nuclear security mission goals. Executed at PF-4, a facility better known for its pit production mission, the ARIES Program is helping the nation meet its nonproliferation commitments by preparing surplus weapons-grade plutonium for final disposition. ARIES recently met a major milestone of producing 1 metric ton of plutonium oxide from material removed from surplus pits. The milestone was celebrated in an awards ceremony at LANL on January 28.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

NASA NTRS2011

Remote Infrared Imaging of the Space Shuttle During Hypersonic Flight: HYTHIRM Mission Operations and Coordination

The Hypersonic Thermodynamic Infrared Measurements (HYTHIRM) project has been responsible for obtaining spatially resolved, scientifically calibrated in-flight thermal imagery of the Space Shuttle Orbiter during reentry. Starting with STS-119 in March of 2009 and continuing through to the majority of final flights of the Space Shuttle, the HYTHIRM team has to date deployed during seven Shuttle missions with a mix of airborne and ground based imaging platforms. Each deployment of the HYTHIRM team has resulted in obtaining imagery suitable for processing and comparison with computational models and wind tunnel data at Mach numbers ranging from over 18 to under Mach 5. This paper will discuss the detailed mission planning and coordination with the NASA Johnson Space Center Mission Control Center that the HYTHIRM team undergoes to prepare for and execute each mission.

Schwartz, Richard J.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Growing the success of Small Satellite missions through community learning

The successful utilization of small satellites for scientific missions relies on continual infusion of technology innovations, creative approaches, and new capabilities, all of which advance at a very rapid pace. Achieving these advancements requires open and efficient exchange of results, experiences, and ideas. Community learning is particularly challenging in this fast-growing community involving an increasingly diverse set of players from all sectors: industry, academia, government, and the public at large. Building and cultivating a community of practices around small satellite technology development and mission implementation are key objectives for NASA’s Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute (S3VI). The institute has developed and provides access to a large collection of products, tools, and activities to advance clear communications and coordination regarding small spacecraft undertakings across NASA, to provide mission enabling information to the smallsat research community, to engage with stakeholders in industry, government, academia and the general public, and to support the overall small spacecraft community. New and updated offerings by the S3VI include: The2021 NASA State of the Art Report of Small Spacecraft Technology, the Small Spacecraft Reliability Initiative Knowledge Base, and the “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED”webinar series. These and other institute products will help scientists and engineers planning future missions answer pertinent questions, such as: What is the state of the art of small spacecraft technology that can be used?What are some best practices that other experts and teams can recommend? What did previous missions accomplish? What lessons could be learned from previous missions? What flight-proven parts are available? What emerging technologies could be taken advantage of? A status will be presented on S3VI activities facilitating community learning within the small satellite science community through the collection, sharing, and exchange of experiences with small satellite mission development and execution across all NASA mission areas.

Moretto Jorgensen, T↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Growing the Success of Small Satellite Missions Through Community Learning

The successful utilization of small satellites for scientific missions relies on continual infusion of technology innovations, creative approaches, and new capabilities, all of which advance at a very rapid pace. Achieving these advancements requires open and efficient exchange of results, experiences, and ideas. Community learning is particularly challenging in this fast-growing community involving an increasingly diverse set of players from all sectors: industry, academia, government, and the public at large. Building and cultivating a community of practices around small satellite technology development and mission implementation are key objectives for NASA’s Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute (S3VI). The institute has developed and provides access to a large collection of products, tools, and activities to advance clear communications and coordination regarding small spacecraft undertakings across NASA, to provide mission enabling information to the smallsat research community, to engage with stakeholders in industry, government, academia and the general public, and to support the overall small spacecraft community. New and updated offerings by the S3VI include: The2021 NASA State of the Art Report of Small Spacecraft Technology, the Small Spacecraft Reliability Initiative Knowledge Base, and the “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED” webinar series. These and other institute products will help scientists and engineers planning future missions answer pertinent questions, such as: What is the state of the art of small spacecraft technology that can be used? What are some best practices that other experts and teams can recommend? What did previous missions accomplish? What lessons could be learned from previous missions? What flight-proven parts are available? What emerging technologies could be taken advantage of? A status will be presented on S3VI activities facilitating community learning within the small satellite science community through the collection, sharing, and exchange of experiences with small satellite mission development and execution across all NASA mission areas.

Small Satellite↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orion's Powered Flight Guidance Performance During Artemis I

Artemis is NASA’s campaign to explore the Moon and beyond. Artemis I, the un-crewed exo-LEO test flight, was completed in 2022. The Artemis I mission provided the means to prove-out both vehicle and systems as a pre-cursor to more advanced missions. The Orion capsule and service module had to be capable of accurately executing all major orbital burns and numerous correction burns to successfully execute the mission profile. In support of this needed translation maneuver capability, a powered flight guidance algorithm has been designed that provides a number of guided burn options depending on the burn objective. Some of these guidance options are based on classic orbit transfer problems, such as Lambert's time-of-flight problem. Some are based on proven NASA heritage manned space programs like Apollo and Shuttle. Some are new concepts that fill unique niche requirements. All of these options are integrated into an architecture based on a proven Shuttle heritage design, with a simple closed-loop guidance strategy, that provides both modularity, simplicity and adaptability to future, as yet to be defined, mission profiles. This paper will summarize the performance of Orion’s orbital powered flight guidance during the mission.

space guidance↗

NASA NTRS1994

Towards an integral computer environment supporting system operations analysis and conceptual design

VITROCISET has in house developed a prototype tool named System Dynamic Analysis Environment (SDAE) to support system engineering activities in the initial definition phase of a complex space system. The SDAE goal is to provide powerful means for the definition, analysis, and trade-off of operations and design concepts for the space and ground elements involved in a mission. For this purpose SDAE implements a dedicated modeling methodology based on the integration of different modern (static and dynamic) analysis and simulation techniques. The resulting 'system model' is capable of representing all the operational, functional, and behavioral aspects of the system elements which are part of a mission. The execution of customized model simulations enables: the validation of selected concepts with respect to mission requirements; the in-depth investigation of mission specific operational and/or architectural aspects; and the early assessment of performances required by the system elements to cope with mission constraints and objectives. Due to its characteristics, SDAE is particularly tailored for nonconventional or highly complex systems, which require a great analysis effort in their early definition stages. SDAE runs under PC-Windows and is currently used by VITROCISET system engineering group. This paper describes the SDAE main features, showing some tool output examples.

Barro, E.↗

NASA NTRS2010

Requirements of an Integrated Formal Method for Intelligent Swarms

NASA is investigating new paradigms for future space exploration, heavily focused on the (still) emerging technologies of autonomous and autonomic systems [47, 48, 49]. Missions that rely on multiple, smaller, collaborating spacecraft, analogous to swarms in nature, are being investigated to supplement and complement traditional missions that rely on one large spacecraft [16]. The small spacecraft in such missions would each be able to operate on their own to accomplish a part of a mission, but would need to interact and exchange information with the other spacecraft to successfully execute the mission.

Hinchey, M. G.↗