Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “power flight”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems Status and Path to Flight

Dynamic power conversion offers the potential to produce Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) that generate higher power outputs and utilize the Pu-238 radioisotope more efficiently. Additionally, dynamic power conversion offers the potential of producing generators with minimal degradation resulting in more power at the end of the mission, when the power is needed. Dynamic power conversion technologies being developed for space applications include the Stirling and Brayton thermodynamic cycle machines. Machines can be built based on these cycles while eliminating wear mechanisms of the moving components, enabling long design life necessary for space missions. The Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems (DRPS) project at NASA Glenn Research Center (Glenn Research Center) is pursuing the realization of this type of power source on a flight mission. The project currently has three convertor development contracts that will deliver prototype hardware in 2020. This hardware will undergo a gamut of experimental performance verification efforts at NASA GRC. In parallel, the project has also initiated generator design efforts based on these underlying convertor options, and is also on track to build an in-house version of a generator for laboratory system-level testing. The project is also funding control electronics technology, which are necessary to convert alternating current from the dynamic devices to direct current for use by a spacecraft. A lunar mission is being targeted as the first use of this new technology, as DRPS enables a wide range of high-return scientific missions on the moon, while the mission being short in duration (2 years rather than 10 years for an outer planets mission).

Salvatore Oriti↗
NASA NTRS2002

Shuttle Abort Flight Management (SAFM) - Application Overview

One of the most demanding tasks that must be performed by the Space Shuttle flight crew is the process of determining whether, when and where to abort the vehicle should engine or system failures occur during ascent or entry. Current Shuttle abort procedures involve paging through complicated paper checklists to decide on the type of abort and where to abort. Additional checklists then lead the crew through a series of actions to execute the desired abort. This process is even more difficult and time consuming in the absence of ground communications since the ground flight controllers have the analysis tools and information that is currently not available in the Shuttle cockpit. Crew workload specifically abort procedures will be greatly simplified with the implementation of the Space Shuttle Cockpit Avionics Upgrade (CAU) project. The intent of CAU is to maximize crew situational awareness and reduce flight workload thru enhanced controls and displays, and onboard abort assessment and determination capability. SAFM was developed to help satisfy the CAU objectives by providing the crew with dynamic information about the capability of the vehicle to perform a variety of abort options during ascent and entry. This paper- presents an overview of the SAFM application. As shown in Figure 1, SAFM processes the vehicle navigation state and other guidance information to provide the CAU displays with evaluations of abort options, as well as landing site recommendations. This is accomplished by three main SAFM components: the Sequencer Executive, the Powered Flight Function, and the Glided Flight Function, The Sequencer Executive dispatches the Powered and Glided Flight Functions to evaluate the vehicle's capability to execute the current mission (or current abort), as well as more than IS hypothetical abort options or scenarios. Scenarios are sequenced and evaluated throughout powered and glided flight. Abort scenarios evaluated include Abort to Orbit (ATO), Transatlantic Abort Landing (TAL), East Coast Abort Landing (ECAL) and Return to Launch Site (RTLS). Sequential and simultaneous engine failures are assessed and landing footprint information is provided during actual entry scenarios as well as hypothetical "loss of thrust now" scenarios during ascent.

Hu, Howard↗
NASA NTRS2007

Orion Entry Flight Control Stability and Performance

The Orion Spacecraft will be required to perform entry and landing functions for both Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Lunar return missions, utilizing only the Command Module (CM) with its unique systems and GN&C design. This paper presents the current CM Flight Control System (FCS) design to support entry and landing, with a focus on analyses that have supported its development to date. The CM FCS will have to provide for spacecraft stability and control while following guidance or manual commands during exo-atmospheric flight, after Service Module separation, translational powered flight required of the CM, atmospheric flight supporting both direct entry and skip trajectories down to drogue chute deploy, and during roll attitude reorientation just prior to touchdown. Various studies and analyses have been performed or are on-going supporting an overall FCS design with reasonably sized Reaction Control System (RCS) jets, that minimizes fuel usage, that provides appropriate command following but with reasonable stability and control margin. Results from these efforts to date are included, with particular attention on design issues that have emerged, such as the struggle to accommodate sub-sonic pitch and yaw control without using excessively large jets that could have a detrimental impact on vehicle weight. Apollo, with a similar shape, struggled with this issue as well. Outstanding CM FCS related design and analysis issues, planned for future effort, are also briefly be discussed.

Strahan, Alan L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems Development Status and Path to Flight

Dynamic power conversion offers the potential to produce Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) that generate higher power outputs and utilize the Pu-238 radioisotope more efficiently. Additionally, dynamic power conversion offers the potential of producing generators with minimal degradation resulting in more power at the end of the mission, when the power is needed. Dynamic power conversion technologies being developed for space applications include the Stirling and Brayton thermodynamic cycle machines. Machines can be built based on these cycles while eliminating wear mechanisms of the moving components, enabling long design life necessary for space missions. The Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems (DRPS) project at NASA Glenn Research Center (Glenn Research Center) is pursuing the realization of this type of power source on a flight mission. The project currently has three convertor development contracts that will deliver prototype hardware in 2020. This hardware will undergo a gamut of experimental performance verification efforts at NASA GRC. In parallel, the project has also initiated generator design efforts based on these underlying convertor options, and is also on track to build an in-house version of a generator for laboratory system-level testing. The project is also funding control electronics technology, which are necessary to convert alternating current from the dynamic devices to direct current for use by a spacecraft. A lunar mission is being targeted as the first use of this new technology, as DRPS enables a wide range of high-return scientific missions on the moon, while the mission being short in duration (2 years rather than 10 years for an outer planets mission).

Salvatore M Oriti↗
NASA NTRS1996

Flying Cars

Flying cars have nearly mythical appeal to nonpilots, a group that includes almost the whole human race. The appeal resides in the perceived utility of flying cars, vehicles that offer portal-to-portal transportation, yet break the bonds of road and traffic and travel freely through the sky at the drivers will. Part of the appeal is an assumption that flying cars can be as easy to fly as to drive. Flying cars have been part of the dream of aviation since the dawn of powered flight. Glenn Curtiss built, displayed, and maybe even flew a flying car in 1917, the Curtiss Autoplane. Many roadable airplanes were built in the 1930's, like the Waterman Arrowbile and the Fulton Airphibian. Two flying cars came close to production in the early 1950's. Ted Hall built a series of flying cars culminating in the Convaircar, sponsored by Consolidated Vultee, General Motors, and Hertz. Molt Taylor built and certified his Aerocar, and Ford came close to producing them. Three Aerocars are still flyable, two in museums in Seattle and Oshkosh, and the third owned and flown by Ed Sweeny. Flying cars do have problems, which so far have prevented commercial success. An obvious problem is complexity of the vehicle, the infrastructure, or both. Another is the difficulty of matching low power for normal driving with high power in flight. An automobile uses only about 20 hp at traffic speeds, while a personal airplane needs about 160 hp at speeds typical of flight. Many automobile engines can deliver 160 hp, but not for very long. A more subtle issue involves the drag of automobiles and airplanes. A good personal airplane can fly 30 miles per gallon of fuel at 200 mph. A good sports car would need 660 hp at the same speed and would travel only 3 miles per gallon. The difference is drag area, about 4.5 sq ft for the automobile and 1.4 sq ft for the airplane. A flying car better have the drag area of the airplane, not the car!

Crow, Steven↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing Planetary Helicopter Brownout Observations with Numerical Predictions for Ingenuity

Ingenuity is considered the Martian equivalent of the Wright Flyer. Its sustained flights on Mars proved that non-terrestrial powered flight is possible, even on planets with thin atmospheres. However, Ingenuity was small and carried no payload. Future planetary rotorcraft will be bigger and heavier to accomplish new scientific and exploratory goals. On dusty planets, the associated increase in rotor thrust poses a potential challenge well known to helicopter pilots who have flown in desert environments: dust clouds forming during take-off and landing due to rotor wash, referred to as brownout. This work evaluates the effectiveness of existing numerical simulation models in predicting the severity of this phenomenon for planetary rotorcraft. We compare the output of a CFD-based dust mobilization model with data recently gathered using image processing techniques of Ingenuity’s flights. The simulation results suggest that the sensitivity of the wall friction velocity to the rotorcraft height may be lower than previously assessed. We further evaluate the sensitivity of the total mass of mobilized dust to other model parameters such as the sandblasting efficiency and the saltation threshold velocity. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this comparison due to uncertainty in both the observation and the numerical model.

HEC↗
NASA NTRS1985

Advanced secondary power system for transport aircraft

A concept for an advanced aircraft power system was identified that uses 20-kHz, 440-V, sin-wave power distribution. This system was integrated with an electrically powered flight control system and with other aircraft systems requiring secondary power. The resulting all-electric secondary power configuration reduced the empty weight of a modern 200-passenger, twin-engine transport by 10 percent and the mission fuel by 9 percent.

Hoffman, A. C.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Mach 10 Stage Separation Analysis for the X43-A

This paper describes the pre-flight stage separation analysis that was conducted in support of the final flight of the X-43A. In that flight, which occurred less than eight months after the successful Mach 7 flight, the X-43A Research Vehicle attained a peak speed of Mach 9.6. Details are provided on how the lessons learned from the Mach 7 flight affected separation modeling and how adjustments were made to account for the increased flight Mach number. Also, the procedure for defining the feedback loop closure and feed-forward parameters employed in the separation control logic are described, and their effect on separation performance is explained. In addition, the range and nominal values of these parameters, which were included in the Mission Data Load, are presented. Once updates were made, the nominal pre-flight trajectory and Monte Carlo statistical results were determined and stress tests were performed to ensure system robustness. During flight the vehicle performed within the uncertainty bounds predicted in the pre-flight analysis and ultimately set the world record for airbreathing powered flight.

Tartabini, Paul V.↗
NASA NTRS2002

Meteorological Support of the Helios World Record High Altitude Flight to 96,863 Feet

In characterizing and understanding atmospheric behavior when conducting high altitude solar powered flight research flight planning engineers and meteorologists are able to maximize the use of available airspace and coordinate aircraft maneuvers with pilots to make the best use of changing sun elevation angles. The result of this cooperative research produced a new world record for absolute altitude of a non-rocket powered aircraft of 96,863 ft (29,531.4 m). The Helios prototype solar powered aircraft, with a wingspan of 247 ft (75.0m), reached this altitude on August 13, 2001, off the coast of Kauai, Hawaii. The analyses of the weather characterization, the planning efforts, and the weather-of-the-day summary that led to at record flight are described in this paper.

Teets, Edward H., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Evolution of Space Shuttle Range Safety Ascent Flight Envelope Design

For every space vehicle launch from the Eastern Range in Florida, the range user must provide specific Range Safety (RS) data products to the Air Force's 45th Space Wing in order to obtain flight plan approval. One of these data products is a set of RS ascent flight envelope trajectories that define the normal operating region of the vehicle during powered flight. With the Shuttle Program launching 135 manned missions over a 30-year period, 135 envelope sets were delivered to the range. During this time, the envelope methodology and design process evolved to support mission changes, maintain high data quality, and reduce costs. The purpose of this document is to outline the shuttle envelope design evolution and capture the lessons learned that could apply to future spaceflight endeavors.

Brewer, Joan↗
NASA NTRS1974

A shuttle development flight test vehicle study

A study is presented that identifies the potential performance capability of the production shuttle orbiter for powered flight tests using several propulsion systems following vertical takeoff and using J-2 rocket engines following air launch. Of the approaches considered, the air-launched orbiter equipped with J-2 rocket engines appeared to have the highest potential for early shuttle development flights. With this approach, mach 4 appeared attainable using 45.5K kg (100K lb) of internal propellant. Several issues were identified that require resolution to prove feasibility.

Rainey, R. W.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

All-Electric X-Plane, X-57 Mod II Ground Vibration Test

As part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration New Aviation Horizons initiative to demonstrate and validate future high-impact concepts and technologies, the X-57 Maxwell airplane--the first all-electric X-plane--was conceived to advance research in the area of electric propulsion to show the feasibility of minimizing fuel use, reducing emissions, and lowering noise during flight. Through several configuration modifications to the X-57 airplane, validation of electrical-powered flight with increasing efficiency between each modification when compared to the baseline original airplane is anticipated. In the case of the X-57 Modification II airplane, a ground vibration test was needed to identify the airplane structural modes and use them to update and validate the finite element model. To determine the airworthiness of the airplane the updated finite element model will be utilized to investigate both classical and whirl flutter. The X-57ModificationII ground vibration test was performed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Armstrong Flight Research Center Flight Loads Laboratory. This paper will highlight the testing performed to acquire the modal data as well as the results.

Natalie Dawn Spivey↗