Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “salvage”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

99 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2011

Evolution of the Space Shuttle Primary Avionics Software and Avionics for Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicles

As a result of recommendation from the Augustine Panel, the direction for Human Space Flight has been altered from the original plan referred to as Constellation. NASA s Human Exploration Framework Team (HEFT) proposes the use of a Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (SDLV) and an Orion derived spacecraft (salvaged from Constellation) to support a new flexible direction for space exploration. The SDLV must be developed within an environment of a constrained budget and a preferred fast development schedule. Thus, it has been proposed to utilize existing assets from the Shuttle Program to speed development at a lower cost. These existing assets should not only include structures such as external tanks or solid rockets, but also the Flight Software which has traditionally been a "long pole" in new development efforts. The avionics and software for the Space Shuttle was primarily developed in the 70 s and considered state of the art for that time. As one may argue that the existing avionics and flight software may be too outdated to support the new SDLV effort, this is a fallacy if they can be evolved over time into a "modern avionics" platform. The technology may be outdated, but the avionics concepts and flight software algorithms are not. The reuse of existing avionics and software also allows for the reuse of development, verification, and operations facilities. The keyword is evolve in that these assets can support the fast development of such a vehicle, but then be gradually evolved over time towards more modern platforms as budget and schedule permits. The "gold" of the flight software is the "control loop" algorithms of the vehicle. This is the Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) software algorithms. This software is typically the most expensive to develop, test, and verify. Thus, the approach is to preserve the GNC flight software, while first evolving the supporting software (such as Command and Data Handling, Caution and Warning, Telemetry, etc.). This can be accomplished by gradually removing the "support software" from the legacy flight software leaving only the GNC algorithms. The "support software" could be re-developed for modern platforms, while leaving the GNC algorithms to execute on technology compatible with the legacy system. It is also possible to package the GNC algorithms into an emulated version of the original computer (via Field Programmable Gate Arrays or FPGAs), thus becoming a "GNC on a Chip" solution where it could live forever to be embedded in modern avionics platforms.

Ferguson, Roscoe C.↗
NASA NTRS2014

A Large Lunar Surface Testbed from Low Cost Material

For users needing to simulate the lunar surface, several distinct avenues have been used. Numerous volcanic areas, including Hawaii, have been used. While providing very large areas and scenic interest, field parties to such an area is expensive and limits testing time. An alternative is to build test facilities locally. This has been done many ways, contrast GRC-1, GSC-1, BP-1 and the KSC Morpheus facility [1-4]. GRC-1 is a mixture of sand and clay; GSC-1 and BP-1 are waste materials created in the process of crushing basaltic rock. The Morpheus field used salvaged concrete and crushed quartz rock [5]. Here I report about a 30 m X 30 m test area at MSFC which was both low cost and relatively high fidelity [6].

Rickman, Douglas↗
NASA NTRS2020

Change of Exposure Time Mid-test in High Temperature DIC Measurement

Performing digital image correlation (DIC) at extreme temperatures has been greatly challenging due to the radiation which saturates the camera sensor. At such high temperatures, the light intensity emitted from an object is occasionally so powerful that the acquired images are overwhelmingly saturated. This induces data loss, potentially ruining the test, thus requiring the user to restart the test. For this reason, selection of an appropriate camera sensitivity plays a crucial role prior to beginning the test. Exposure time is a factor contributing to camera sensitivity and it is the easiest setting to manipulate during the test since it introduces minimal errors when comparing to other factors, especially in quasi-static tests. This paper examines the influence of changing exposure time mid-test on DIC measurement uncertainty. The investigation was conducted by rigid body motion experiments at room temperature and 1600 ◦C, respectively. Thereby, some recommendations are given to help DIC users assess their images at room temperature to extrapolate the exposure at extreme temperatures along with accompanying solutions to salvage data at high temperature.

Digital Image Correlation↗
NASA NTRS2003

Lunar transfer trajectory design and the four-body problem

The existence of a ballistic trajectory from the Earth to orbit about the Moon was long considered to be impossible based on analysis of the three-body problem. In 1990 a ballistic trajectory from the Earth to lunar orbit was discovered while analyzing a plan to salvage the Muses A (Hiten) spacecraft. This trajectory utilized the Sun's gravity in conjunction with the Earth and Moon's gravity and was thus the first example of a practical four-body trajectory design. This paper presents a review of lunar transfer trajectories that go beyond three-body theory and the Jacobi integral. These include Hiten, Lunar A and the Genesis return trajectory from the vicinity of the Moon to Earth.It is shown that these trajectories may be analyzed by piecing together segments where three-body motion dominates.

Muses↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heritage to Flight; The Test Program that Brought an Inflation System Back to Life for the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID)

Following the success of the Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment-3 (IRVE-3) project, the Terrestrial Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) Orbital Reentry (THOR) project was stood up with a “built to print” Inflation System utilizing the IRVE-3 flight spares. When THOR was canceled, this Inflation System had already been tested and assembled, ready for use. Thus, when the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) was spun up, the THOR system seemed like a good candidate to salvage flight ready hardware. There were, however, some key differences in the IRVE/THOR system and the LOFTID one. LOFTID’s HIAD was two times the size of IRVE for starters and would require much higher flows to accommodate inflating such an article within a specific timeframe. With new requirements and a tight schedule, the LOFTID Inflation team set to work to verify flight readiness under LOFTID conditions and eliminate the need to requalify new hardware. LOFTID, utilizing an Inflation System built primarily hardware from IRVE-3 spares, successfully flew in November of 2022. This paper will outline the mission differences, the test campaign used to prepare LOFTID’s Inflation System for flight, and some lessons learned in repurposing older hardware.

Inflation System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heritage to Flight: The Test Program that Brought an Inflation System Back to Life for LOFTID

Following the success of the Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment-3 (IRVE-3) project, the Terrestrial Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) Orbital Reentry (THOR) project was stood up with a “built to print” Inflation System utilizing the IRVE-3 flight spares. When THOR was canceled, this Inflation System had already been tested and assembled, ready for use. Thus, when the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) was spun up, the THOR system seemed like a good candidate to salvage flight ready hardware. There were, however, some key differences in the IRVE/THOR system and the LOFTID one. LOFTID’s HIAD was two times the size of IRVE for starters and would require much higher flows to accommodate inflating such an article within a specific timeframe. With new requirements and a tight schedule, the LOFTID Inflation team set to work to verify flight readiness under LOFTID conditions and eliminate the need to requalify new hardware. LOFTID, utilizing an Inflation System built primarily hardware from IRVE-3 spares, successfully flew in November of 2022. This paper will outline the mission differences, the test campaign used to prepare LOFTID’s Inflation System for flight, and some lessons learned in repurposing older hardware.

Inflation System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heritage to Flight: The Test Program that Brought an Inflation System Back to Life for LOFTID

Following the success of the Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment-3 (IRVE-3) project, the Terrestrial Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) Orbital Reentry (THOR) project was stood up with a “built to print” Inflation System utilizing the IRVE-3 flight spares. When THOR was canceled, this Inflation System had already been tested and assembled, ready for use. Thus, when the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) was spun up, the THOR system seemed like a good candidate to salvage flight ready hardware. There were, however, some key differences in the IRVE/THOR system and the LOFTID one. LOFTID’s HIAD was two times the size of IRVE for starters and would require much higher flows to accommodate inflating such an article within a specific timeframe. With new requirements and a tight schedule, the LOFTID Inflation team set to work to verify flight readiness under LOFTID conditions and eliminate the need to requalify new hardware. LOFTID, utilizing an Inflation System built primarily hardware from IRVE-3 spares, successfully flew in November of 2022. This paper will outline the mission differences, the test campaign used to prepare LOFTID’s Inflation System for flight, and some lessons learned in repurposing older hardware.

Inflation System↗