Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “shock wave and boundary layer interaction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1972

Shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions in rectangular channels.

Interaction regions created by the impingement of full span, externally generated, shock waves on a nozzle wall boundary layer were investigated. Incident shock strength was varied to produce unseparated, incipient, and fully separated flow fields. Significant departures from two-dimensionality were observed over the entire range of shock strengths tested and were identified with sidewall and corner boundary layer effects. However, comparisons of present centerline results with published two-dimensional data, obtained under similar test conditions and geometrical constraints, showed excellent agreement (e.g., incipient separation pressure levels, wall pressure distributions, free-interaction, and scale of the interaction region). This raises some question concerning the degree of two-dimensionality achieved in these previous investigations.

Reda, D. C.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Calculation of oblique-shock-wave laminar-boundary-layer interaction on a flat plate

A finite difference solution to the problem of the interaction between an impinging oblique shock wave and the laminar boundary layer on a flat plate is presented. The boundary layer equations coupled with the Prandtl-Meyer relation for the external flow are used to calculate the flow field. A method for the calculation of the separated flow region is presented and discussed. Comparisons between this theory and the experimental results of other investigators show fairly good agreement. Results are presented for the case of a cooled wall with an oncoming flow at Mach number 2.0 without and with suction. The results show that a small amount of suction greatly reduces the extent of the separated region in the vicinity of the shock impingement location.

Goldberg, U.↗
NASA NTRS1992

The hypersonic shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction generated by a sharp fin at Mach 8.2

A combined experimental and numerical study has been conducted on the hypersonic shock-wave turbulent-boundary layer interaction at Mach 8.2 generated by a single fin of angles alpha = 10 and 15 deg. Three models are considered: (1) the 3D compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations using the k-epsilon turbulence model, (2) the 3D RANS using the Rodi turbulence model, and (3) the conical RANS using the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic turbulence model. The computations are compared with various experimental data. The computations using models (1) and (2) show quantitatively very similar results and very good agreement with experimental data for surface pressure and skin friction. Comparison with boundary layer profiles of pitot pressure and yaw angle are also generally good, but the peak surface heat transfer is overestimated by up to 48 percent. The effect of the laminar boundary layer on the fin is restricted to the immediate vicinity of the fin surface. Conical calculations using model (3) show substantially poorer agreement with experiment.

Knight, Doyle D.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Three-dimensional shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions generated by a sharp fin at Mach 4

This paper describes a combined experimental and theoretical study of three-dimensional swept shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions at Mach 4 generated by a sharp fin of angles alpha equals 16 and 20 degrees. The theoretical model is the three-dimensional compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with turbulence incorporated through the algebraic eddy viscosity model of Baldwin and Lomax. Previous computations have been performed by Horstman using the Baldwin-Lomax, Cebeci-Smith and Jones Launder models. Computed results for the surface pressure, skin friction and streamline angles are compared with experiment and previous numerical results. The present results display good agreement with experimental data for surface pressure and surface flow direction. All turbulence models fail to accurately predict the peak skin friction. The computed flowfields are in agreement with many of the features of the quasi-conical flowfield model of Settles.

Knight, Doyle D.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Computation of laminar viscous-inviscid interactions in high-speed internal flows

A review is given of computations for a series of nominally 2-D laminar viscous-inviscid interactions. Comparisons were made with detailed experimental shock tunnel results. The shock wave boundary layer interactions considered were induced by a compression ramp in one case and by an externally generated incident shock in the second case. In general, good agreement was reached between the grid refined calculations and experiment for the incipient and small separation conditions. For the highly separated flow, 3-D calculations which included the finite span effects of the experiment were required in order to obtain agreement with the data.

Rudy, David H.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Measurement of heat-transfer coefficients in shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction regions with a multi-layered thin film heat transfer gauge

A thin film heat transfer gauge is applied to the measurement of heat transfer coefficients in the interaction regions of incident shock waves and fully developed turbulent boundary layers. It was developed to measure heat flux with high spatial resolution and fast response for wind tunnels with long flow duration. To measure the heat transfer coefficients in the interaction region in detail, experiments were performed under the conditions of Mach number = 4, total pressure = 1.2 MPa, 0.59 to approximately 0.65. Reynolds number = 1.3 to approximately 1.5 x 10 to the 7th power and incident shock angles from 17.8 to 22.8 degrees. The results show that the heat transfer coefficient changes complicatedly in the interaction region. At the beginning the interaction region, the heat transfer coefficient decreases at first, reaches its minimum value at the point where the pressure begins to increase, and then increases sharply. When the boundary layer begins to separate, even a small separation bubble causes significant changes in the heat transfer coefficient, while the pressure does not show any changes which suggests that the boundary layer begins to separate.

Hayashi, M.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Interference heating from interactions of shock waves with turbulent boundary layers at Mach 6

An experimental investigation of interference heating resulting from interactions of shock waves and turbulent boundary layers was conducted. Pressure and heat-transfer distributions were measured on a flat plate in the free stream and on the wall of the test section of the Langley Mach 6 high Reynolds number tunnel for Reynolds numbers ranging from 2 million to 400 million. Various incident shock strengths were obtained by varying a wedge-shock generator angle (from 10 deg to 15 deg) and by placing a spherical-shock generator at different vertical positions above the instrumented flat plate and tunnel wall. The largest heating-rate amplification factors obtained for completely turbulent boundary layers were 22.1 for the flat plate and 11.6 for the tunnel wall experiments. Maximum heating correlated with peak pressures using a power law with a 0.85 exponent. Measured pressure distributions were compared with those calculated using turbulent free-interaction pressure rise theories, and separation lengths were compared with values calculated by using different methods.

Johnson, C. B.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Flowfield analysis for successive oblique shock wave interactions with a turbulent boundary layer

A computation procedure is described for predicting flow fields which develop when successive interactions between oblique shock waves and a turbulent boundary layer occur. Computations were carried out for axisymmetric internal flows at free stream Mach numbers = 3.82 and 2.82. The effect of boundary layer bleed was considered for the free stream Mach number = 2.82 flow. A control volume analysis is used to predict changes in the flow field across the interactions. Two bleed flow models were considered. A turbulent boundary layer program was used to compute changes in the boundary layer between the interactions. The results given are for flows with two shock wave interactions and for bleed at the second interaction site. In principle the method described may be extended to account for additional interactions. The predicted results are compared with measured results and are shown to be in good agreement when the bleed flow rate is low (on the order of 3 percent of the boundary layer mass flow), or when there is no bleed. As the bleed flow rate is increased, differences between the predicted and measured results become larger. Shortcomings of the bleed flow models at higher bleed flow rates are discussed.

Sun, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions in transonic flow

The method of matched asymptotic expansions is used in analyzing the structure of the interaction region formed when a shock wave impinges on a turbulent flat plate boundary layer in transonic flow. Solutions in outer regions, governed by inviscid flow equations, lead to relations for the wall pressure distribution. Solutions in the inner regions, governed by equations in which Reynolds and/or viscous stresses are included, lead to a relation for the wall shear stress. Solutions for the wall pressure distribution are reviewed for both oblique and normal incoming shock waves. Solutions for the wall shear stress are discussed.

Adamson, T. C., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Flowfield analysis for successive oblique shock wave-turbulent boundary-layer interactions

Description of a procedure for predicting the flowfields that develop when successive interactions between oblique shock waves and a turbulent boundary layer occur. Such interactions may occur, for example, in engine inlets for supersonic aircraft. A control volume analysis is used to predict changes in the flow field across the interactions. Two bleed flow models are considered. The predicted results are compared with measured results and are shown to be in good agreement when the bleed flow rate is low, or when there is no bleed. Shortcomings of the bleed flow models at higher bleed flow rates are discussed.

Sun, C.-C.↗
NASA NTRS1991

The effect of bleed configuration on shock/boundary layer interactions

The flow field characteristics are simulated numerically in an oblique shock wave/laminar boundary layer interaction for three different bleed configurations. The numerical solution for the flow field is obtained for the strong conservation-law form of the two-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations using an implicit scheme. The computations model the flow in the interaction region and inside the bleed slot for an impinging oblique shock of sufficient strength to cause boundary layer separation on a flat plate boundary layer. The computed results are presented for a normal bleed slot at three different locations, upstream, across and downstream of the shock impingement point. The detailed flow characteristics in the interaction zone and inside the bleed slot are compared for the three cases. The resulting surface pressure and shear stress distributions are also compared for the three bleed cases and for the shock wave boundary layer interaction without bleed.

Hamed, A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

RANS Predictions of Inlet/Isolator Unstart at Mach 4

This paper describes several approaches to back pressuring an inlet/isolator model at Mach 4.0 and the differences in unstart predictions using common RANS simulation methods. The CFD codes OVERFLOW and CREATE-AV Kestrel were used for this work. Verification and validation was conducted on a relevant shock-wave-boundary-layer-interaction case with both solvers. Using aftmounted back pressure flaps did not produce a stable pre-combustion shock train. An unstart comparison between CFD codes OVERFLOW and CREATE-AV Kestrel as well as common 2-equation turbulence models was conducted with numerical back pressure. Unstart predictions using a novel louver back pressure mechanism was done with OVERFLOW. There is notable differences in shock train travel and predicted unstart limit due to turbulence modeling, temporal resolution, and use of the 2D simplification.

CFD↗