Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “surface operations”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Transient Liquefaction on the Lunar or Martian Surface Operational Demonstration

The Cryogenic Fluid In-situ Liquefaction for Landers (CryoFILL) activity has been investigating concepts for the liquefaction of cryogenic fluids produced on the surface of the Moon and Mars. Liquefaction testing of oxygen in a scaled lander tank using an integrated, industrial cryocooler system was completed. The testing covered the determination of the nominal performance operation of the system, constant liquefaction performance, and transient liquefaction performance. The goal of the testing was to demonstrate cryogenic liquefaction operational capabilities on the Lunar and Martian surfaces for landers and In Situ Resource Utilization. The testing met all key performance parameter threshold values including liquefaction rate (demonstrated 1.6 kg/hr compared to threshold of 1.1 kg/hr), number of variables as transient (goal of 3: liquefaction flow, environmental temperature, and cryocooler input power – all demonstrated), and number of fill levels (goal of 3: < 5%, 50%, and 90% - all demonstrated). Key testing results from oxygen liquefaction testing will be discussed including sensitivities provided by the analysis team.

Liquefaction↗
NASA NTRS1997

Mars Pathfinder Surface Operations Verification

Over 20 years have passed since NASA's Viking landers traveled to the surface of Mars. But now NASA is returning, in fact, it's already on the way with one of NASA's faster, better, cheaper missions known as Mars Pathfinder. This mission was developed in 3 years for $171 million dollars and is focused on engineering, science, and technology objectives.

Mars Pathfinder↗
NASA NTRS2021

Robotics Instrument Deployment System Surface Operations for the InSight Mars Lander

This paper describes NASA’s first successful precision robotics instrument placement and release on another astronomical body since Apollo. This operations breakthrough enabled NASA’s InSight lander to detect the first known ‘marsquake’, a faint trembling of Mars’s surface on 6th April 2019, 128 Martian days after landing on Mars on the 26th November 2018. This is the first quake detected on an astronomical body other than Earth or the Moon. This paper describes the operations of the Robotics Instrument Deployment Systems (IDS) that successfully deployed the InSight science payload to the surface of Mars. The payload includes a seismometer (SEIS), Wind and Thermal Shield (WTS) and Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package (HP3), enabling scientists to perform the first comprehensive surface-based geophysical investigation of Mars’ interior structure. In addition, the paper describes the IDS planning and command sequence generation process used for the successful deployment of SEIS, WTS and HP3 on the surface of Mars. The paper concludes with recommendations based on the experience gained from InSight IDS operations. This includes identified technology gaps in the operations of in-situ manipulators for planetary exploration.

Yen, Jeng↗
NASA NTRS2016

Human Mars Landing Site and Impacts on Mars Surface Operations

NASA has begun a process to identify and discuss candidate locations where humans could land, live and work on the Martian surface. These locations are referred to as Exploration Zones (EZs). Given current mission concepts, an EZ is a collection of Regions of Interest (ROIs) that are located within approximately 100 kilometers of a centralized landing site. ROIs are areas that are relevant for scientific investigation and/or development/maturation of capabilities and resources necessary for a sustainable human presence. The EZ also contains a landing site and a habitation site that will be used by multiple human crews during missions to explore and utilize the ROIs within the EZ. These candidate EZs will be used by NASA as part of a multi‐year process of determining where and how humans could explore Mars. In the near term this process includes: (a) identifying locations that would maximize the potential science return from future human exploration missions, (b) identifying locations with the potential for resources required to support humans, (c) developing concepts and engineering systems needed by future human crews to conduct operations within an EZ, and (d) identifying key characteristics of the proposed candidate EZs that cannot be evaluated using existing data sets, thus helping to define precursor measurements needed in advance of human missions. Existing and future robotic spacecraft will be tasked to gather data from specific Mars surface sites within the representative EZs to support these NASA activities. The proposed paper will describe NASA's initial steps for identifying and evaluating candidate EZs and ROIs. This includes plans for the "First Landing Site/Exploration Zone Workshop for Human Missions to the Surface of Mars" to be held in October 2015 at which proposals for EZs and ROIs will be presented and discussed. It will also include a discussion of how these considerations are (or will be) taken into account as future robotic Mars missions are defined and developed. One or more representative EZs, drawn from similar previous studies involving Mars sites, will be used in the proposed paper to illustrate the process NASA envisions for gathering additional data from robotic precursor missions to assist in making a final selection of an EZ for human crews as well as the steps likely to occur during the buildup of a habitation site. Examples of the systems and operations likely to be used by human crews, assisted by robotic vehicles, to explore the scientific ROIs as well as developing the resource ROIs within the example EZs will be discussed.

Bussey, Ben↗
NASA NTRS2010

The Role of the Exploration Science Officer in Lunar Surface Operations

A review has been performed of exploration science and payload operations during the Apollo and Space Shuttle programs to extract information of potential usefulness to the Constellation program. That work has resulted in creation of the concept for a unique type of flight controller: the exploration science officer. The controller s primary responsibility is to integrate the tasks and goals of the spacecraft flight control team and the science team in order to maximize science return while maximizing crew safety. Far from being just a mouthpiece for either team, this individual must be fluent in the knowledge and language of two communities: spacecraft operations and planetary science. Responsibilities begin during the requirements phase of vehicle and lunar surface systems development and continue through development, training, planning, mission execution, and post-flight mission phases.

John H Osborn↗
NASA NTRS2016

Surface Operations Simulator and Scheduler (SOSS) Presentation

NASA - KAIA (Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement) - KARI (Korea Aerospace Research Institute) collaboration surface air traffic management research has been ongoing since May 2015. In the first year collaboration, NASA's SOSS software has been transferred to KAIA and KARI teams to provide fast time simulation capability. Incheon International Airport model has been developed for SOSS.

surface traffic management↗
NASA NTRS2024

Magnetically Latching Cryogenic Fluid Coupler for Lunar Surface Operations

Envisioning future lunar exploration and habitation necessitates addressing numerous needs related to sustaining human life and managing resources on the lunar surface. One of these needs is proficient cryogenic fluid management, which is particularly challenging in the dusty lunar environment. To address the need for a robust and environmentally tolerant cryogenic management solution, the CryoMag Coupler was developed as demonstrative solution. The CryoMag is a low-force cryogenic coupler that facilitates the mating, latching, and de-mating of cryogenic connections by way of a magnetic interface, providing a dust-tolerant solution to manage cryogenic fluids in the challenging lunar environment. This paper details the design and testing of this Coupler.

Nic Heersema↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Protoflight Lightweight Surface Manipulation System to Enable High-Load, Long-Reach Lunar Surface Operations

There is a current critical need under the Artemis program for a versatile, high-load, long reach manipulation system that can provide payload offloading and handling for lunar landers. The Lightweight Surface Manipulation System (LSMS) is a highly structurally efficient, long-reach robotic arm that can be sized for a wide range of missions and payload ranges. The LSMS has more than a decade of heritage and testing at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC), including laboratory and field testing of multiple end-effector tools and operational scenarios. With the need for rapid development of a flight-proven offloading capability and the desire to have that device be reusable for future missions and services, a 4-year program was initiated this year under NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate, to develop and build a protoflight unit of the LSMS, capable of lifting 1,000 kg on the Moon at an 8-meter reach. The target mission is to fly on a large cargo lander as a technology demonstrator to validate self-leveling, deployment, and payload handling operations, with future flights adding additional tools and capabilities. This paper provides a summary of the prior decade of work on the LSMS, the current mission drivers and goals, and details the first year of development of the LSMS toward a protoflight unit.

lunar surface↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Planetary Surface Operations and Utilization: How ISS and Artemis Missions Can Be Used to Model Human Exploration of Mars

As NASA moves forward with plans to send astronauts to the Moon under Artemis missions and prepare for human exploration of Mars, the Agency is developing a set of high-level objectives for human spaceflight, identifying 50 points falling into four overarching categories of exploration. An element in NASA’s overall process of achieving these objectives is to leverage its assets and missions – such as the many crew increments sent to the International Space Station and future Artemis expeditions sent to the Moon – to develop more robust spaceflight systems and build a culture of interplanetary human exploration. This paper describes several examples of how NASA is exercising a process to achieve these objectives for future human Mars surface missions; both (a) building on lessons learned from ISS missions and maturing plans for Artemis missions, and (b) using human Mars mission planning to inform the plans for future ISS and Artemis missions so that the knowledge gained will reduce uncertainty and risk for Mars. One focal point for this two-way interaction between ISS and Artemis with future human Mars missions is a document titled “Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization” (HEOMD-415), which describes the systems and operations of the crew thought necessary for the first human Mars surface mission. The details described in this paper will address three specific aspects of HEOMD-415 that have been influenced by ISS and where HEOMD-415 is influencing plans in ISS, Artemis, research and technology development, and other related aspects: (1) crew (activity planning and medical), (2) Mars surface infrastructure, and (3) communication and navigation support. The paper will close by describing near-term opportunities for tests and analogs relevant to these aspects of HEOMD-415.

Mars↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

PLANETARY SURFACE OPERATIONS AND UTILIZATION: HOW ISS AND ARTEMIS MISSIONS CAN BE USED TO MODEL HUMAN EXPLORATION OF MARS

As NASA moves forward with plans to send astronauts to the Moon under Artemis missions and prepare for human exploration of Mars, the Agency is developing a set of high-level objectives for human spaceflight, identifying 50 points falling into four overarching categories of exploration. An element in NASA’s overall process of achieving these objectives is to leverage its assets and missions – such as the many crew increments sent to the International Space Station and future Artemis expeditions sent to the Moon – to develop more robust spaceflight systems and build a culture of interplanetary human exploration. This paper describes several examples of how NASA is exercising a process to achieve these objectives for future human Mars surface missions; both (a) building on lessons learned from ISS missions and maturing plans for Artemis missions, and (b) using human Mars mission planning to inform the plans for future ISS and Artemis missions so that the knowledge gained will reduce uncertainty and risk for Mars. One focal point for this two-way interaction between ISS and Artemis with future human Mars missions is a document titled “Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization” (HEOMD-415), which describes the systems and operations of the crew thought necessary for the first human Mars surface mission. The details described in this paper will address three specific aspects of HEOMD-415 that have been influenced by ISS and where HEOMD-415 is influencing plans in ISS, Artemis, research and technology development, and other related aspects: (1) crew (activity planning and medical), (2) Mars surface infrastructure, and (3) communication and navigation support. The paper will close by describing near-term opportunities for tests and analogs relevant to these aspects of HEOMD-415.

Mars↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Protoflight Lightweight Surface Manipulation System to Enable High-Load, Long-Reach Lunar Surface Operations

There is a current critical need under the Artemis program for a versatile, high-load, long reach manipulation system that can provide payload offloading and handling for lunar landers. The Lightweight Surface Manipulation System (LSMS) is a highly structurally efficient, long-reach robotic arm that can be sized for a wide range of missions and payload ranges. The LSMS has more than a decade of heritage and testing at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC), including laboratory and field testing of multiple end-effector tools and operational scenarios. With the need for rapid development of a flight-proven offloading capability and the desire to have that device be reusable for future missions and services, a 4-year program was initiated this year under NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate, to develop and build a protoflight unit of the LSMS, capable of lifting 1,000 kg on the Moon at an 8-meter reach. The target mission is to fly on a large cargo lander as a technology demonstrator to validate self-leveling, deployment, and payload handling operations, with future flights adding additional tools and capabilities. This paper provides a summary of the prior decade of work on the LSMS, the current mission drivers and goals, and details the first year of development of the LSMS toward a protoflight unit.

LSMS↗
NASA NTRS2020

The Roughness Properties of Small Ice-Bearing Craters at the South Pole of the Moon: Implications for Accessing Fresh Water Ice in Future Surface Operations

The lunar poles provide a fascinating thermal environment capable of cold-trapping water ice on geologic timescales [1]. While there have been many observations indicating the presence of water ice at the lunar surface [e.g., 2–4], it is still not clear when this ice was delivered to the Moon. The timing of volatile dep-osition provides important constraints on the origin of lunar ice because different delivery mechanisms have been active at different times throughout lunar history. We previously found that some small (<10 km) cra-ters at the south pole of the Moon have morphologies suggestive of relatively young ages, on the basis of crisp crater rims [5]. These craters are too small to date with robust cratering statistics [5], but the possibility of ice in young craters is intriguing because it suggests that there is some recent and perhaps ongoing mechanism that is delivering or redistributing water to polar cold traps. Therefore, understanding if these small, ice-bear-ing craters are indeed young is essential in understand-ing the age and source of volatiles on the Moon. Here we take a new approach to understand the ages of these small polar cold traps: analyzing the roughness properties of small ice-bearing craters. It is well under-stood that impact crater properties (e.g., morphology, rock abundance, and roughness) evolve with time due to a variety of geologic and space-weathering processes [6–11]. Topographic roughness is a measurement of the local deviation from the mean topography, providing a measurement of surface texture, and is a powerful tool for evaluating surface evolution over geologic time [e.g., 11–14]. In this study we analyze the roughness of southern lunar craters (40°S–90°S) from all geologic eras, and determine how the roughness of small (<10 km) ice-bearing craters compare. We discuss the implications of the ages of ice-bearing south polar craters, and potential strategies for accessing fresh ice on the Moon.

Deutsch, Ariel N.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis Crewed Surface Operations Training Dust Mitigation Test/Training Facility (DMTF)

Based on several Apollo mission(s) reports and lessons learned1 on lunar dust impacts, it is imperative for successful Artemis missions, to develop dust mitigation methods & train crew in dust cleaning techniques for efficient use of lunar surface time and for crew health. Longer durations and increased number of Extra Vehicular Activities (EVAs) for Artemis need better training. Apollo missions lacked training in a dust facility. Current facilities do not provide adequate fidelity to train crew in dust cleaning operations in suited, pressurized environments. Mimicking dust cleaning actions in existing facilities (eg- Neutral Buoyancy lab) does not provide in depth understanding of actions and time needed to clean suit or positions crew need to take to remove dust from suit. Available dust bins do not support suited/pressurized ops, personnel not trained in suited ops, more overhead/travel. A local facility at Johnson Space Center (JSC) w/ adequate fidelity supporting suited/pressurized ops, personnel in suited ops is a crucial need for rapid development/testing and training. This facility will provide NASA capabilities to: 1. Provide a dust containment bin to perform suited pressurized crewed training/testing activities for dust interaction/mitigation leveraging existing JSC facility infrastructure and 2. Perform end-to-end simulated lunar dust testing of fluid, mechanical, and electrical systems to provide “test like you fly” confidence for industry developed solutions.

EVA training↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Cloud-Based Operational Surface Water Extent Mapping Service from Sentinel-1 SAR

With its weather independence and day-and-night capabilities, SAR has long been known as a useful data set for flood monitoring. The recently launched Sentinel-1 (S1) C-band sensors, with their regularly acquired, free-and-open data, have finally elevated SAR to a relevant data source in operational hazard response. Leveraging these capabilities of S1, this poster introduces the HYDRO30 product, a 30-m resolution surface water extent product derived from dual-pol S1 SAR data. To enable automatic and near real-time product generation, HYDRO30 is embedded in the HydroSAR service, a cloud-based production pipeline developed by the University of Alaska Fairbanks in collaboration with the NASA Alaska Satellite Facility DAAC and the NASA Marshall and Goddard Space Flight Centers.

Franz J Meyer↗
NASA NTRS2005

Mars Exploration Rover surface operations: driving spirit at Gusev Crater

Spirit is one of two rovers, that landed on Mars in January 2004 as part of NASA's Mars Exploration Rovers mission. Since then, Spirit has traveled over 4 kilometers accross the Martian surface while investigating rocks and soils, digging trenches to examine the subsurface environment, and climbing hills to reach outcrops of bedrock.

mobility↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Common Habitat Base Camp for Moon and Mars Surface Operations

The Common Habitat uses the SLS Core Stage Liquid Oxygen tank as the primary structure (similar to Skylab) and has an internal architecture compatible with microgravity, lunar gravity, and Mars gravity, such that identical versions of the same design can be used in all three environments. Applying the large dimensions and eight-person crew size of the Common Habitat to a surface architecture leads to a unique base camp configuration. A notional such base camp is described in this analysis. The base camp includes four distributed zones – habitation, landing, power, and resource production. The base camp is deployed and assembled in three phases: site preparation, element staging, and habitat delivery, each of which are briefly discussed. Crew arrival and departure is discussed, including variations caused by orbital mechanics-induced differences between the Moon and Mars base camps. Trash and logistics operations are described. Finally, crew operations within the base camp are described.

Lunar Outpost↗
NASA NTRS2019

Common Habitat for Long Duration Transit and Surface Operations

This concept is based on the Skylab II concept, which proposes using a SLS propellant tank as the primary structure of a habitat. Common Habitat takes this a step further, proposing an interior architecture that is equally viable as a lunar surface hab, transit hab, and Mars surface hab, thus enabling a single development to support all three long duration habitat roles. Common Habitat has been pursued by the PI and co-investigators at MSFC and other centers in a spare time / funding available basis, often with heavy student intern support. Student resources have developed preliminary concepts, but these models must be refined to reflect accurate vehicle subsystems, utilities, stowage, workstations, and other crew systems. This investigation applies NASA civil servant and contractor expertise to correct errors in the most recent student concepts in order to prepare them for future human-in-the-loop evaluations to determine the most viable configuration for a Common Habitat. In prior studies there was never an opportunity to trade both crew size and internal orientation. Prior work has been a series of point designs with inconsistent design constraints, making apples to apples comparisons impossible. The most recent student work produced CAD models of four habitat variants for future use in a trade study, but the student products contain model construction and geometry errors, inaccurate subsystems design and placement, and unrealistic structural elements and outfitting. These must be corrected before the models can be moved into a VR environment for humanin- the-loop testing. Through consultation with SMEs throughout the Agency, the fidelity of these designs will be upgraded to a level of quality sufficient to make a comparative analysis of crew size sensitivity and internal orientation. The product of this activity is four upgraded CAD models, each reflecting a different configuration of the Common Habitat. One is a horizontal configuration using the full length of the SLS LOX tank. One is a vertical configuration using the same tank dimensions. The third is a horizontal configuration using a truncated SLS LOX tank (half the barrel length). The fourth is a vertical configuration of the half-length SLS LOX tank.

Howard, Robert L.↗