Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “COMMUNICATION NETWORKS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration - 3 (ATD-3) Dynamic Weather Routes Domestic En Route Concept of Operations Synopsis Version 1.0

NASA conducted a survey in 2015 of stakeholders in industry, flight operators, and others to collect data on the most pressing air traffic management (ATM) issues impacting en route operations. Weather related delays and interruptions were identified as the most significant and costly problem impacting en route operations in today's system. Additionally, future traffic demands will place greater demands on the FAA's air traffic control system, necessitate a more efficient and integrated traffic management system and provide controller tools to leverage human productivity. Consequently, NASA is assembling a suite of integrated ground and aircraft-based technologies and decision-making aids under the Airspace Technology Demonstrations 3 (ATD-3) project to continuously search for more efficient weather-avoidance routes and to rapidly respond to weather changes and associated traffic management initiatives. These route efficiency enhancements are targeted at en route airspace and will enable continued use of en route and arrival metering in the presence of weather. NASA's Dynamic Weather Routes (DWR) concept represents a subset of those technologies and focuses primarily on the cruise phase of flight. It leverages existing air traffic weather, airspace, and traffic data, as well as improvements in navigation, surveillance, communication and digital network technologies, and builds upon existing ATM automation to address the shortcomings associated with strategic traffic flow management initiatives and weather forecasting uncertainties. The potential benefits in the form of time, fuel, and cost savings are significant. This concept of operations synopsis provides a detailed description of DWR, its potential benefits and notional implementation paths.

DWR↗
NASA NTRS2015

RUMS - Realtime Visualization and Evaluation of Live, Virtual, Constructive Simulation Data

This paper describes the tools and display capabilities being developed to visualize aircraft flight and trajectory information that is produced during a distributed Live, Virtual, Constructive (LVC) simulation events involving a mix of manned and unmanned aircraft. This paper discusses the design approach and general software architecture of the Remote User Monitor Service (RUMS) application. The simulations and flight tests are conducted over a nationwide network with components communicating via software gateways that translate the messages and provide a location to access and collect data. The data collected is not only archived for post-processing and analysis, but also processed in real-time by RUMS, which allows dynamic viewing of the information via a web browser. This real-time dynamic viewing of the data allows test conductors and researchers to monitor the health of the distributed system and of the data being collected not only in situ where tests are conducted but also at remote locations.

distributed simulation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Centers and Universities Collaborate in Annual Smallsat Technology Partnerships

The Small Spacecraft Technology program within the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate sponsors the Smallsat Technology Partnerships (STP) initiative. The STP initiative awards cooperative agreements between NASA centers and university teams for technology development efforts that advance the capabilities of small spacecraft to achieve NASA mission objectives in unique and more affordable ways. NASA’s announcement to return humans to the Moon by 2024 raises new opportunities for Smallsats to contribute to missions in cislunar space, though technical challenges are to be overcome to establish their value in this environment. Precursor missions utilizing small spacecraft will blaze the trail for lunar exploration, establishing infrastructure such as communication and navigation networks, and performing assembly and repair services for larger structures and human habitats. To achieve these goals, certain novel Smallsat technologies will need to be developed and demonstrated. The 2020 STP solicitation sought proposals for specific technologies to enable these lunar missions. For the 2020 STP cycle, NASA selected nine university teams to mature new systems and capabilities in the laboratory, and in some cases, demonstrate in suborbital or orbital spaceflights. This paper describes the STP portfolio, past and present efforts, and the nine partnerships selected.

James J. Cockrell↗
NASA NTRS2020

Electric Six Degree of Freedom Installation Timelapse (Six Degree of Freedom Dynamic Test System)

The Six-degree-of-freedom Dynamic Test System (SDTS) is a short-range real-time motion based testing platform. Its primary use at NASA/JSC has been for development and qualification testing of docking systems, robotic assisted berthing mechanisms, and dynamic attachment systems. The SDTS is a closed-loop force feedback system that can simulate on-orbit contact dynamics between two vehicles utilizing the actual mechanical interfaces for testing. The facility is controlled by interconnected computers running real-time simulation software that takes measured contact forces, integrates the equations of motion in real time, and provide those states back into the motion table. This infrastructure can also be used for non-mating applications such as relative position sensor testing/evaluations. The SDTS facility provides a superstructure for mounting test articles, multiple test sensors, an intercom network for voice communications, and a synchronized timing system for data acquisition that includes HD video. This time-lapse video shows the buildup and testing of a modern electric actuation system created by Mikrolar, Inc. at the Johnson Space Center. This motion base will replace the current hydraulic actuator system, which is been in use since the 1970s, for all-future NASA testing. Once the system goes through customization to provide JSC’s unique closed-loop environment, the facility will help certify docking system and attach mechanisms on the ground before we send the first woman and the next man to the lunar surface

hexapod↗
NASA NTRS2017

DSN Wide Area Network Architecture, Capacity and Performance

This paper discusses the architecture of the wide area network that connects key communications facilities within the National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA) Deep Space Network (DSN). Several considerations are given to the design of this wide area network to ensure a timely, reliable, and secure data delivery between the mission users and their spacecraft. The network star configuration simplifies data delivery to users and minimizes operational cost. The dual-path connections maximize the system reliability, with geographical diversity in data routing to avoid single point of failure. Data encryption enhances the protection of mission users’ data. The system bandwidth is determined by balancing the needs to minimize the operating bandwidth cost and to have sufficient bandwidth to be able to deliver data to all users within the required. The DSN uses a class base weighted fair queuing (CBWFQ) method in its data delivery. This scheme guarantees a minimum bandwidth to each class of users and allows users to also access any unused bandwidth by other groups. The paper will also show performance of system reliability and bandwidth margin.

Liao, Jason↗
NASA NTRS2021

An evaluation of the CAN bus for use on the Europa Lander motor controller

This paper will present the application of the Controller Area Network (CAN) for communication between the Motor Control Processor and the Europa Lander Motor Control Cards. The Europa Lander preproject team is concerned about lowering the estimated mass, volume, and power of the mission concept so that it could maximize its science return. The motor controller uses multiple Motor Control Cards to control the 24 motors that will be operating in the extremes of the Europa environment. The CAN bus was considered because of its multi-drop nature, low power interface, and simple communication protocol.

Lias, Malcolm↗
NASA NTRS2021

Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification

Under the guidance of NASA’s Space Communication and Navigation (SCaN) program, this document, along with its companion documents, LunaNet Services Requirements Document (TBD) and the LunaNet Concept of Operations and Architecture (TBD), provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet) for services to the human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft platform, or node. The expectation is that the needs of NASA, its partners and other users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the combined, cooperative lunar network.

LunaNet↗
NASA NTRS2021

An Evaluation of the CAN bus for Use on the Europa Lander Motor Controller

This paper will present the application of the Controller Area Network (CAN) for communication between the Motor Control Processor and the Europa Lander Motor Control Cards. The Europa Lander mission is concerned about lowering the mass, volume, and power so that it can maximize its science return. The motor controller uses multiple Motor Control Cards to control the 24 motors that will be operating in the extremes of the Europa environment. The CAN bus was considered because of its multi-drop nature, low power interface, and simple communication protocol. Beyond communication with the motor controller cards we also use the CAN bus interface to gather telemetry from the Power Conversion Card. Our system requires the collection of telemetry at a rate of 64Hz from the Power Conversion Card and all active motor controllers along with the sending of control packets and the receipt of control parameters at 512 Hz. In the paper we will address the ability of the CAN bus to meet these requirements along with our Arduino based test system used to learn about the CAN bus standard and verify our analysis.

Lias, Malcolm↗
NASA NTRS2022

Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification

This document, along with its companion documents, provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet). LunaNet will include Earth ground stations and orbiting spacecraft and will provide services to human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft, or node. The expectation is that the needs of users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the cooperative lunar network. This document was written and reviewed by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).

LunaNet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

GeneLab for High Schools – Bioinformatic Training For Students And Educators

Modern biological sciences are increasingly based on high-throughput molecular techniques, including genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics. NASA’s GeneLab program has collected extensive data from ‘omics’ studies, curated them into an accessible platform and provided data analysis/visualization tools to facilitate the generation of new hypotheses and research directions. GeneLab for High Schools (GL4HS), launched in 2017, has endeavored to utilize this database and provide tools for students to understand and analyze omics datasets whilst also learning about spaceflight research. The GL4HS program ran in person at Ames from 2017-2019 and has run virtually since 2020. Each year fifteen high school students are trained to analyze and interpret GeneLab transcriptomic data. Additionally, in the last several years we have expanded our “teacher training program” to include 10 teachers total in an effort to enable this program to be utilized in classrooms across the USA. Teachers also join the NASA GeneLab Education Working Group (EWG) enabling support as they implement custom GL4HS modules into their classrooms. The GL4HS program consists of three main components – (1) core learning modules, (2) networking and teamwork, and (3) an independent learning project. Students are also taught critical networking and science communication skills facilitating their ability to ‘sell their science’ in innovative and creative ways. This program has enabled students to learn about biology in space and to have a glimpse into the world of research for the first time. Many of the students in this program shared that the course was transformative to their perception about biological sciences and how it linked to other areas of STEM. The ultimate and long-term goal of GL4HS is to expand the program to multiple locations thereby facilitating the reach of NASA Space Biology beyond NASA-centric regions.

GeneLab↗
NASA NTRS2022

Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification

This document, along with its companion documents, provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet). LunaNet will include Earth ground stations and orbiting spacecraft and will provide services to human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft, or node. The expectation is that the needs of users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the cooperative lunar network. This document was written and reviewed by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).

LunaNet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Machine Learning for the Validation of Expert-Elicited Causal Risk Diagrams

Exposure to spaceflight poses risk to human health in complex ways. To help manage this risk, the Human Systems Risk Board (HSRB) at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) maintains a set of causal diagrams that attempt to explain how spaceflight hazards generate health risks and lead to adverse outcomes both in-mission, immediately post-mission, and over the long term. These causal risk diagrams are formulated as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and can function as knowledge graphs of connected risks and outcomes. These DAGs have proven useful for communication, and, through network analysis, have allowed for the identification of structurally important factors in the risk network. However, the utility these DAGs provide is directly proportional to their verisimilitude, making assessment of this trait using empirical data – whether from actual human spaceflight or various spaceflight analogue exposures and model organisms – a high priority. In this research we explore the use of machine learning algorithms to learn DAG structure from empirical data as a means of evaluating human-elicited DAG structures. To do so, we test several different graph structure-learning algorithms on data concerning changes in the bones of rats and mice after exposure to either spaceflight or a spaceflight analogue. We explore potential methods for indexing the similarity between each algorithm’s output DAG with all the others and with that of the expert-elicited DAG. We discuss next steps in this ongoing line of research and open science initiatives underway to complete them.

directed acyclic graphs↗
NASA NTRS2023

Expanding the Deep Space Network to Support the Heliophysics System Observatory

Difficulties associated with receiving telemetry from satellites severely limit the volume of scientific data that can be downlinked to the ground. Current missions employ techniques such as compressing and pruning datasets to reduce the data volume they transmit. While existing mission designs are already restricted by limited telemetry budgets, future Heliophysics System Observatory missions will produce ever larger data volumes with higher resolution and cadence observations from constellations of satellites spread throughout the heliosphere1. In addition, heliophysics missions often produce data for the operational Space Weather community that requires a low latency between observation and downlink. In light of current limitations, the infrastructure to receive NASA satellite telemetry must be expanded and modernized to support the science needs of future data-rich heliophysics missions.

deep space network (DSN)↗
NASA NTRS2024

NASA’s Lunar Communications and Navigation Architecture: Human Lunar Return

NASA’s Artemis missions will return humanity to the Moon, establishing a long-term presence there and opening more of the lunar surface to exploration than ever before. This rapid growth of lunar activity requires robust and resilient communications, navigation, and networking capabilities for crew safety, command and control of spacecraft, return of science data, and precise maneuvering of assets in space and on the lunar surface.

Michael J Zemba↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Survey of Autonomous Navigation Techniques Applicable to Lunar Surface Exploration

As humanity returns to the Moon, and more and more attention is being paid to lunar surface operations, there is a greater need than ever for methods of surface navigation. These could be methods of computer-assisted orienteering for astronauts exploring on foot during an Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA), or methods of solving the Lost-on-the-Moon problem to initialize a crewed or autonomous rover’s state estimate. It may also be necessary to process navigation data associated with surface samples or other surface operations a posteriori to better understand where that analysis occurred. Autonomous rover operation will also require Hazard Detection and Avoidance (HDA) and terrain-aware pathfinding. While navigation on the surface of the Moon will likely rely on Earth-based assets such as the Deep Space Network (DSN) or communication with other spacecraft (e.g., LunaNet, LCRNS, pre-deployed moon beacons, a nearby lander) it may be necessary to navigate in a loss-of-communication scenario. This paper analyzes the methods of surface navigation used on other celestial bodies, such as those used during the Apollo missions and autonomous exploration of Mars, as well as novel methods which have been studied but not yet implemented which may prove useful. It is shown that the navigator has myriad options when processing data from an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), a star tracker, (rover) wheel encoders, optical cameras, and LIght Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors. The intention of this paper is to provide a broad overview of what has been done and what could be done, to aid those designing vehicles and/or missions to the lunar surface.

Paul D Mckee↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Survey of Autonomous Navigation Techniques Applicable to Lunar Surface Exploration

As humanity returns to the Moon, and more and more attention is being paid to lunar surface operations, there is a greater need than ever for methods of surface navigation. These could be methods of computer-assisted orienteering for astronauts exploring on foot during an Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA), or methods of solving the Lost-on-the-Moon problem to initialize a crewed or autonomous rover’s state estimate. It may also be necessary to process navigation data associated with surface samples or other surface operations a posteriori to better understand where that analysis occurred. Autonomous rover operation will also require Hazard Detection and Avoidance (HDA) and terrain-aware pathfinding. While navigation on the surface of the Moon will likely rely on Earth-based assets such as the Deep Space Network (DSN) or communication with other spacecraft (e.g., LunaNet, LCRNS, pre-deployed moon beacons, a nearby lander) it may be necessary to navigate in a loss-of-communication scenario. This paper analyzes the methods of surface navigation used on other celestial bodies, such as those used during the Apollo missions and autonomous exploration of Mars, as well as novel methods which have been studied but not yet implemented which may prove useful. It is shown that the navigator has myriad options when processing data from an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), a star tracker, (rover) wheel encoders, optical cameras, and LIght Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors. The intention of this paper is to provide a broad overview of what has been done and what could be done, to aid those designing vehicles and/or missions to the lunar surface.

Paul McKee↗
NASA NTRS1978

Network functions and facilities

The network is designed for two-way communications with unmanned spacecraft traveling approximately 16,000 km (10,000 miles) from earth to the farthest planets and to the edge of our solar system. The objectives, functions, and organization of the Deep Space Network are summarized. Deep space station, ground communication, and network operations control capabilities are described.

Renzetti, N. A.↗
NASA NTRS1973

The deep space network, volume 16

The objectives, functions, and organization of the DSN are summarized, and the instrumentation facility, ground communication facility, and the network control system are described. The requirements for supporting planetary flight projects are discussed along with the research and technology for tracking, navigation, network control, and data processing.

Source record↗