SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Control”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2014

Development of an Outdoor Temperature Based Control Algorithm for Residential Mechanical Ventilation Control

The Incremental Ventilation Energy (IVE) model developed in this study combines the output of simple air exchange models with a limited set of housing characteristics to estimate the associated change in energy demand of homes. The IVE model was designed specifically to enable modellers to use existing databases of housing characteristics to determine the impact of ventilation policy change on a population scale. The IVE model estimates of energy change when applied to US homes with limited parameterisation are shown to be comparable to the estimates of a well-validated, complex residential energy model.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2013

Ventilation Control of Volatile Organic Compounds in New U.S. Homes: Results of a Controlled Field Study in Nine Residential Units

In order to optimize strategies to remove airborne contaminants in residences, it is necessary to determine how contaminant concentrations respond to changes in the air exchange rate. The impact of air exchange rate on the indoor concentrations of 39 target volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was assessed by measuring air exchange rates and VOC concentrations at three ventilation settings in nine residences. Active sampling methods were used for VOC concentration measurements, and passive perfluorocarbon tracer gas emitters with active sampling were used to determine the overall air exchange rate corresponding to the VOC measurements at each ventilation setting. The concentration levels and emission rates of the target VOCs varied by as much as two orders of magnitude across sites. Aldehyde and terpene compounds were typically the chemical classes with highest concentrations, followed by alkanes, aromatics, and siloxanes. For each home, VOC concentrations tended to decrease as the air exchange rate was increased, however, measurement uncertainty was significant. The indoor concentration was inversely proportional to air exchange rate for most compounds. For a subset of compounds including formaldehyde, however, the indoor concentration exhibited a non-linear dependence on the timescale for air exchange

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2015

Demonstration of thermal control, microstructure control, defect mitigation and process parameter database generation for Ti-6Al-4V Direct Digital Manufacturing - Understanding defect mitigation and process parameter database generation for direct digital manufacturing

Researchers from Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) worked with Applied Optimization (AO) to understand and evaluate the propensity for defect formation in builds manufactured using DM3D-POM laser direct metal deposition. The main aim of this collaboration was to understand the character of powder jet behavior as a function of the nozzle parameters such as cover gas, carrier gas, and shaping gas. In order to evaluate the sensitivities of the parameters used in model, various experiments were performed with in-situ monitoring of the powder stream characteristics using a high speed camera. A wide variety of conditions while keeping the hopper motor rpm constant, including laser power and travel speed were explored. The cross sections of the deposits were characterized using optical microscopy.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

DOE OSTI2017

Analysis of tank 38H (HTF-38-17-18, -19) and tank 43H (HTF-43-17-20, -21) samples for support of the enrichment control and corrosion control programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H samples ranged from 53.7 mg/L for the surface sample to 57.0 mg/L in the sub-surface sample. The Tank 43H samples showed uranium concentrations of 46.2 mg/L for the surface sample and 45.7 mg/L in the sub-surface sample. The U-235 percentage was 0.63% in the Tank 38H samples and 0.62% in the Tank 43H samples. The total uranium and percent U-235 results appear consistent with recent Tank 38H and Tank 43H uranium measurements. The plutonium results for the Tank 38H surface sample are slightly higher than recent sample results, while the Tank 43H plutonium results are within the range of values measured on previous samples. The Cs-137 results for the Tank 38H surface and subsurface samples are slightly higher than the concentrations measured in recent samples. The Cs-137 results for the two Tank 43H samples are within the range of values measured on previous samples. The comparison of the sum of the cations in each sample versus the sum of the anions shows a difference of 23% for the Tank 38H surface sample and 18% for the Tank 43H surface sample. The four samples show silicon concentrations somewhat lower than the previous samples with values ranging from 80.2 to 105 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-17-52, -53) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-17-54, -55) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H surface sample was 41.3 mg/L while the sub-surface sample was 43.5 mg/L. The Tank 43H samples contained total uranium concentrations of 28.5 mg/L in the surface sample and 28.1 mg/L in the sub-surface sample. The U-235 percentage ranged from 0.62% to 0.63% for the Tank 38H samples and Tank 43H samples. The total uranium and percent U-235 results in the table appear slightly lower than recent Tank 38H and Tank 43H uranium measurements. The plutonium results in the table show a large difference between the surface and sub-surface sample concentrations for Tank 38H. The Tank 43H plutonium results closely match the range of values measured on previous samples. The Cs-137 results for the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples show similar concentrations slightly higher than the concentrations measured in recent samples. The Cs-137 results for the two Tank 43H samples also show similar concentrations within the range of values measured on previous samples. The four samples show silicon concentrations somewhat lower than the previous samples with values ranging from 124 to 168 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-18-43, -44) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-18-41, -42) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H surface sample was 38.8 mg/L while the sub-surface sample was 35.7 mg/L. The Tank 43H samples contained total uranium concentrations of 27.5 mg/L in the surface sample and 23.4 mg/L in the sub-surface sample. The U-235 weight fraction ranged from 0.62% to 0.63% for the Tank 38H samples and Tank 43H samples. The total uranium concentrations in the table are reasonably consistent with recent Tank 38H/43H sample uranium measurements. The plutonium results in the table are consistent with the range of concentrations measured in recent samples from these tanks with the exception of the Pu-238 value measured in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample. The Pu-238 in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample is higher than any recent measurement by a factor of two. The Cs-137 results show slightly lower concentrations in the surface samples versus the sub-surface samples from each tank. The non-radioactive components of the samples show some differences between the surface and sub-surface samples for each tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-18-43,-44) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-18-41, -42) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H surface sample was 38.8 mg/L while the sub-surface sample was 35.7 mg/L. The Tank 43H samples contained total uranium concentrations of 27.5 mg/L in the surface sample and 23.4 mg/L in the sub-surface sample. The U-235 weight fraction ranged from 0.62% to 0.63% for the Tank 38H samples and Tank 43H samples. The total uranium concentrations in the table are reasonably consistent with recent Tank 38H/43H sample uranium measurements. The plutonium results in t he table are consistent with the range of concentrations measured in recent samples from these tanks with the exception of the Pu-238 value measured in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample. The Pu-238 in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample is higher than any recent measurement by a factor of two. The Cs-137 reslts show slightly lower concentrations in the surface samples versus the sub-surface samples from each tank. The non-radioactive components of the samples show some differences between the surface and sub-surface samples for each tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-18-78, -79) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-18-80, -81, -83) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. Compared with recent samples, the surface and sub-surface samples from Tank 38H show much lower concentrations of most species analyzed except for silicon. The Tank 38H samples show stratification in the tank with the concentration of species in the surface sample being much lower than in the sub-surface sample and both samples being much lower than recent results. The Tank 43H surface and two sub-surface samples generally showed consistent results across the three samples and compare well with recent analyses. The lowest sub-surface sample from Tank 43H contained slightly higher concentrations of uranium and plutonium likely due to the presence of a small amount of dark sludge solids in the sample.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-19-18, -19) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-19-20, -21) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. Overall, the results of the analysis indicate the concentrations of species in the Tank 38H surface sample increased significantly from the previous sample with the sodium concentration increasing from 1.09 M in the previous sample to 3.19 M in the current sample. However, it should be noted that the previous Tank 38H surface sample was very dilute compared with typical Tank 38H samples of the recent past. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows a composition fairly similar to the previous sample’s composition. Both the Tank 43H surface and sub-surface samples appear slightly more dilute than the previous samples based on the sodium concentrations. For both Tank 38H and Tank 43H, the subsurface samples appear slightly more concentrated for most species than the surface samples. These results indicate some success in increasing the salt solution concentration and reducing stratification in Tank 38H, but some stratification is still evident in both Tank 38H and Tank 43H.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of Tank 23H (HTF-23-19-23, -24, -25) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 23H to support ECP and CCP. The results of the analysis indicate the concentrations of species in Tank 23H increase with depth in the tank. The sample obtained from the lowest level of 60” from the bottom of the tank shows the highest concentrations for most species analyzed. The surface sample and the 140” sub-surface sample show similar compositions with the sub-surface sample being slightly more concentrated, and both are more dilute than the lowest 60” sub-surface sample for most species analyzed. The total uranium concentration in the three Tank 23H samples show a slight increase from the surface sample to the next lower sub-surface sample, but then a slight decrease in the uranium concentration in the lowest sub-surface sample. The U-235 weight fraction ranges from 0.94-1.2% in the Tank 23H samples. The sum of the major cations versus the sum of the major anions shows a difference of ~5% or less for all three of the Tank 23H samples indicating good data quality for the non-radioactive analytes in the table. Small %RSD values for the replicate analyses with the exception of species close to the detection limit (e.g., Fe) provide another indication of good data quality for the non-radioactive species. The silicon concentrations measured in the Tank 23H samples were all below detection.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-19-77, -78) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-19-79, -80) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. Overall, the results indicate the concentrations of most species in the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples increased significantly from the previous sample results. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample is more concentrated than the surface sample indicating stratification within the tank. Both the Tank 43H surface and sub-surface samples are similar in composition to the previous samples for most species analyzed. The Tank 43H subsurface sample remains slightly more concentrated than the surface sample indicating a small amount of stratification remains in the tank. The total uranium concentrations for the two Tank 38H samples differ significantly due to the presence of sludge solids in the sub-surface sample that markedly increased the uranium concentration. Both the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples have higher uranium concentrations than the previous samples from the tank. The weight percent water insoluble solids on the Tank 38H sub-surface sample show the sample contained 0.30 wt% insoluble solids, well below the 1 wt% limit. The total uranium concentrations of the two Tank 43H samples differ by <10% and are similar to the previous sample results. The sum of the major cations versus the sum of the major anions shows a difference of ~1% for the both the Tank 38H and Tank 43H surface samples providing an indication of good data quality for the nonradioactive analytes in the surface samples. The silicon concentrations measured in the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples are higher than the previous sample results. Due to the presence of sludge solids, the Tank 38H sub-surface sample show a silicon concentration an order of magnitude higher than the previous result. The Tank 43H surface and sub-surface samples have similar silicon concentrations and are similar to the previous Tank 43H samples. The silicon concentration was below detectable levels in the process blank. The five samples analyzed show silicon concentrations ranging from 88 to 710 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-20-7, -8) and tank 43H (HTF-43-20-9, -10) samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The results indicate the concentrations of most species in the Tank 38H surface sample decreased significantly from the previous surface sample. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows only small changes in concentration for most major species in the solution from the previous sample. The large differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples indicate significant stratification of solution species within the tank. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample contained a small amount of sludge solids (<1 wt%).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-20-62, -63) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-20-60, -61) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The results indicate the concentrations of most species in the Tank 38H surface sample increased from the previous surface sample. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows only small changes in concentration for most major species in the solution from the previous sample. The large differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples indicate significant stratification of solution species within the tank. The Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples both contained a small amount of sludge solids (<1 wt%). The Tank 43H surface and sub-surface samples are slightly more dilute than the previous samples. The Tank 43H sub-surface sample exhibits a composition more concentrated than the surface sample indicating some stratification within the tank. The Tank 38H surface and sub-surface sample both show large increases in the concentrations of uranium and plutonium likely due to the presence of sludge solids in both samples. (Note: the samples were digested and analyzed without filtration.) The total uranium concentrations of the two Tank 43H samples are similar to the previous sample results. The plutonium concentration in both Tank 43H samples appear to have decreased from the previous samples; however, the surface sample concentrations are close to the detection limit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-20-103, -104) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-20-105, -106) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The results indicate the concentrations of most species in the Tank 38H surface sample decreased from the previous surface sample. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows only minor changes in concentration for soluble species in the solution (e.g., Na, Al, Cs-137) but a large drop in concentrations for species typically associated with sludge solids (e.g., U, Pu, Fe, Si) likely because of a decrease in sludge solids from the previous sample. The large differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples indicate significant stratification of solution species within the tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021