DOE OSTI2016
Nuclear power plants (NPPs) have less flexibility to follow grid load demand than their natural-gas fueled counterparts. Most of the natural-gas power plants can supply peak-loads by adding more fuel, and thus, can generate far more revenue during those peak hours. On the other hand, use of NPPs for peak load following is quite complex due to technical constraints associated with reactor behavior. These technical challenges include the adequate handling of reactivity swings caused by time-varying fuel and moderator temperatures, a higher fuel-failure probability due to thermal-structural cycling, and spatial variations in xenon concentration. Although there are presently some reactors around the world that are operating with flexible load-following capabilities, such operation is restricted to slowly-varying powers, 2-3 times a day, and only up to 80% of the fuel cycle. Thus, a more convenient and effective method to facilitate load following by NPPs would be to integrate energy storage Authors have previously developed models and performed exergy analysis for integrating liquid type TES with LWRs and SMRs. These exergy based models show that technical feasibility index of integrating thermal energy storage is very high. But most of these previous studies include integration based on existing layout of NPPs with heat exchange between storage Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF) and Reactor Coolant (RC). However, most of the Light Water-cooled Small modular reactor (LW-SMR) based NPP designs can not accommodate additional heat exchange equipment. Although power production is only reduced to 1/20 scale, the containment volume in thus NuScale LW-SMR is reduced to {approx} 1/170 scale. As steam is the secondary or working fluid which exits out of the reactor containment in LW-SMRs, the simplest and most practical way to integrate thermal storage with LW-SMRs is to directly store the energy from steam. Indirect heat exchange between steam and another heat transfer fluid during the storage process, and then heat recovery again via indirect heat exchange is inefficient process due to heat transfer resistance. This inefficiency is due to what is called as 'Pinch point' which occurs whenever there is indirect heat transfer between two media where one undergoes phase change and other undergoes change in sensible heat. Another existing popular option is to use a steam accumulator which stores dry or wet steam directly inside the pressure vessels, however, due to large volumetric requirements it is not a viable option. This work proposes a new method of integrating packed bed TES systems with LW-SMRs, where steam produced in the secondary side of LW-SMRs can be injected into the packed bed of inert particles with sufficient thermal conductivity and capacity to efficiently store energy with high energy density. The changes in the load demand will not effect the LWSMR operation and the excess steam will be diverted to TES. When the demand increases this stored energy in hot packed beds can be recovered by injecting cold pressurized water. Although there are some existing packed bed TES designs and models which consider steam as HTFs, these models have not been extended for wide range of process parameters important for this integration. Authors have previously developed a packed bed thermal model for steam injection and validated it using experimental data. This thermal model is extended to assess behavior of packed bed thermal energy storage (TES) system under storage and recovery cycles. Steam is the only heat transfer fluid (HTF) which exits the reactor vessel, so any application such as process heat or TES integration should be evaluated with steam as process fluid. This project will develop a process system integration model of LW-SMR with packed bed type TES using steam as HTF. (authors)
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗