A study of transfer of UNF from non-disposable canisters - 15388
A study was performed by AREVA and URS for the Department of Energy (DOE) [1] to establish optimal methods for the opening of dry storage canisters (DSC) and the subsequent repackaging of used nuclear fuel (UNF) from the DSCs into generic standard transportation, aging, and disposal canisters (STADs) in wet or dry environments at reactor, consolidated storage, or repository sites. Eight dry and wet cutting technologies were evaluated: (1) skiving; (2) milling; (3) arc gouging/plasma torch; (4) cutting wheel; (5) diamond cable cutting; (6) laser cutting; (7) sawing; and (8) electrical discharge machining. The evaluated UNF repackaging technologies options included: (1) wet transfer in a pool; (2) dry transfer in a dry transfer system (DTS); (3) dry transfer in a fixed hot cell (FHC); (4) dry transfer in a mobile hot cell (MHC), and (5) a hybrid approach utilizing wet transfer in a pool and dry transfer in a FHC. A systems engineering evaluation was utilized for ranking the eight viable cutting options and the five different repackaging approaches for each of the sites. The systems engineering evaluation took into account six criteria (i.e., life cycle costs, worker dose, operational efficiency, technical maturity, ease of licensing, and waste generation) and performed a qualitative pairwise ranking of their relative importance to one another. Then quantitative or qualitative factors associated with each criterion (e.g., cost in millions of dollars, relative ease of licensing, etc.) for each option at each location (reactor, consolidated storage facility [CSF], repository) were developed based on historical experience, existing design studies, current 'state-of-the art', and/or engineering judgment. Using this input, the systems engineering evaluation identified dry skiving as the preferred cutting technology, with the wheel cutting technology in either a dry or wet environment identified as a promising technology that, with some RD and D, could mature to a better option (depending also on the disposition of the used DSC). For a reactor and a CSF/repository site, the systems engineering evaluation ranked the repackaging option using the skiving dry cutting technique and wet transfer of UNF in a pool as the highest option. However for a CSF and a repository site, the team recommended the hybrid option using the skiving dry cutting technique and both dry and wet transfer of UNF in a pool and FHC as a potentially better option (providing specific benefits such as higher throughput and more flexibility in operation). (authors)