DOE OSTI2018
Land surface models are used to represent terrestrial processes that shape global climate; examples of these processes include evaporation, plant water use, and photosynthesis. While much progress has been made to improve and refine these models, some hydrological processes are not well captured, which hinders our ability to understand land-atmosphere interactions and ultimately to predict impacts of climate change on water resources. The inadequate representation of evapotranspiration may partly explain why global climate models do not match observed precipitation patterns. Multiple factors contribute to this problem. In moist tropical regions, high humidity, leaf wetness, and cloud cover combine to suppress forest water use and possibly reduce forest growth in ways that are poorly understood. Mountainous areas pose additional difficulties, as standard modeling and measurement techniques are not readily applied in rough terrain. In this project, we aimed to improve our understanding and modeling of fluxes of water vapor and carbon dioxide to and from tropical forests. To do this, we collected a suite of data from the mountainous rainforest surrounding the Texas A&M Soltis Center in San Ramon, Costa Rica. From 2014 to 2018, a suite of variables were measured, including: in-canopy profiles of water vapor, carbon dioxide, temperature, light, and leaf wetness; transpiration, evapotranspiration, carbon flux, and soil respiration; and local weather conditions. Leaf-scale measurements were used to find photosynthesis rates and derive their parameters. Using this data set, we were able to better quantify the relationships between assimilation and transpiration and their main drivers in tropical forests. These variables were namely available light, vapor pressure deficit, and leaf wetness, but not soil moisture, which exerted no detectable control. We also showed the vertical variability in canopy microclimates and how neglecting forest layers in models may misrepresent overall fluxes. The data were then used to test and refine evapotranspiration and energy budget formulations in the Community Land Model. Fluxes and energy budget components were compared to simulated values from CLM4.5 and CLM.5. The biggest discrepancies arose from hillslope shading effects, particularly mismatches in afternoon carbon fluxes, with notable differences in transpiration rates and sap flux due to capacitance in large trees. Secondary, but still significant issues included unrealistic leaf wetness and leaf drying rates, as well as air and vegetation temperatures, both of which were likely linked to CLM’s formulations controlling wet leaf and sunlit/shaded leaf fractions. Modeling multiple layers in the canopy via the newly released CLM-ml and making adjustments to existing parameters both show promise in resolving these issues. In total, the project has produced 5 peer-reviewed articles, 24 presentations, 2 theses, 4 public outreach items, and 4 publically available datasets, to date. Additional products are expected pending the completion of an additional thesis. Data has also been shared with several collaborative networks, including PHENOCAM and SAPFLUXNET.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗