Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Canard”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

Aerodynamic Loads at Mach Numbers from 0.70 to 2.22 on an Airplane Model Having a Wing and Canard of Triangular Plan Form and Either Single or Twin Vertical Tails Supplement I-Tabulated Data for the Model with Single Vertical Tails: Tabulated Data for the Model with Single Vertical Tail - Supplement 1

Tabulated results of a wind-tunnel investigation of the aerodynamic loads on a canard airplane model with a single vertical tail are presented for Mach numbers from 0.70 to 2.22. The Reynolds number for the measurements was 2.9 x 10(exp 6) based on the wing mean aerodynamic chord. The results include local static pressure coefficients measured on the wing, body, and vertical tail for angles of attack from -4 deg to + 16 deg, angles of sideslip of 0 deg and 5.3 deg, vertical-tail settings of 0 deg and 5 deg, and nominal canard deflections of 0 deg and 10 deg. Also included are section force and moment coefficients obtained from integrations of the local pressures and model-component force and moment coefficients obtained from integrations of the section coefficients. Geometric details of the model and the locations of the pressure orifices are shown. An index to the data contained herein is presented and definitions of nomenclature are given.

Peterson, Victor L.↗

Aerodynamic characteristics at mach numbers from 2.5 to 3.5 of a canard bomber configuration designed for supersonic cruise flight

Resilts have been obtained from an investigation in the Langley Unitary Plan wind tunnel at Mach numbers from 2.5 to 3.5 of a canard-type configuration designed for supersonic cruise flight. Tests extended over an angle-of-attack range from about -4 deg to 11 deg and an angle-of-sideslip range from -4 deg to 6 deg. For the present tests, the results indicate that forebody deflection was an efficient means of providing a sizable positive pitching-moment shift with little or no increase in drag. The test configuration had a trimmed lift-drag ratio of approximately 6.0 at Mach numbers near 3.0 and at a Reynolds number of 2.52 X 10(exp 6). The configuration was both longitudinally and directionally stable. The lift-drag ratios are believed to be somewhat low in as much as the models used for the present tests had large-grain size transition strips fixed to the various surfaces and these strips added wave drag. Also, the model boundary-layer diverter is oversized with respect to a full-scale configuration and therefore contributes additional drag.

Carmel, M. M.↗