Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Kernel function”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1976

Preliminary study of effects of winglets on wing flutter

Some experimental flutter results are presented over a Mach number range from about 0.70 to 0.95 for a simple, swept, tapered, flat-plate wing model having a planform representative of subsonic transport airplanes and for the same wing model equipped with two different upper surface winglets. Both winglets had the same planform and area (about 2 percent of the basic-wing area); however, one weighed about 0.3 percent of the basic-wing weight, and the other weighed about 1.8 percent of the wing weight. The addition of the lighter winglet reduced the wing-flutter dynamic pressure by about 3 percent; the heavier winglet reduced the wing-flutter dynamic pressure by about 12 percent. The experimental flutter results are compared at a Mach number of 0.80 with analytical flutter results obtained by using doublet-lattice and lifting-surface (kernel-function) unsteady aerodynamic theories.

Doggett, R. V., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Aerodynamic loads near cranks, apexes, and tips of thin, lifting wings in incompressible flow

The calculation of the incompressible and irrotational flow in the vicinity of tips and corners of thin, lifting wings is considered. It is shown that the important characteristics of the flow are governed by an eigenvalue problem, which is nonlinear at the trailing edge because of the shed wake (assumed to be in the wing plane). A new solution method was devised because either the existing methods were not valid for the trailing edge case or they would have required excessive amounts of computer time. The new method, which is fundamentally different than the previous ones, was used to calculate solutions for a number of cases, including some for which correct answers had not previously been obtained. Two of these solutions were used to determine the validity of drag and leading-edge-suction distributions near the tips of a delta wing and a swept wing as calculated by using both the vortex lattice method and a kernel function method. The calculations for the swept wing resolved the question of whether or not the induced drag should be zero at the wing tip.

Medan, R. T.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Some applications of the NASTRAN level 16 subsonic flutter analysis capability

The Level 16 flutter analysis capability was applied to an aspect-ratio-6.8 subsonic transport type wing, an aspect-ratio-1.7 arrow wing, and an aspect-ratio-1.3 all movable horizontal tail with a geared elevator. The transport wing and arrow wing results are compared with experimental results obtained in the Langley transonic dynamic tunnel and with other calculated results obtained using subsonic lifting surface (kernel function) unsteady aerodynamic theory.

Doggett, R. V., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Some experimental and theoretical flutter characteristics of an arrow-wing configuration

Experimental and theoretical flutter results are presented for a simplified 1/50-size wind-tunnel model of an arrow-wing configuration. Transonic flutter characteristics are presented for three configurations - wing without engine nacelles, wing with flow-through nacelles, and wing with pencil nacelles (thin, streamline bodies). Experimental results are correlated with analytical results obtained from kernel-function and doublet-lattice unsteady aerodynamic theories. Theoretical results are presented that show the effects on flutter of systematic changes in structural stiffness and mass.

Doggett, R. V., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1977

The resolvent of singular integral equations

The investigation reported is concerned with the construction of the resolvent for any given kernel function. In problems with ill-behaved inhomogeneous terms as, for instance, in the aerodynamic problem of flow over a flapped airfoil, direct numerical methods become very difficult. A description is presented of a solution method by resolvent which can be employed in such problems.

Williams, M. H.↗
NASA NTRS1977

An extension to the Chahine method of inverting the radiative transfer equation

An extension of the Chahine relaxation method (1970) for inverting the radiative transfer equation is presented. This method is superior to the original method in that it takes into account in a realistic manner the shape of the kernel function, and its extension to nonlinear systems is much more straightforward. A comparison of the new method with a matrix method due to Twomey (1965), in a problem involving inference of vertical distribution of ozone from spectroscopic measurements in the near ultraviolet, indicates that in this situation this method is stable with errors in the input data up to 4%, whereas the matrix method breaks down at these levels. The problem of non-uniqueness of the solution, which is a property of the system of equations rather than of any particular algorithm for solving them, remains, although it takes on slightly different forms for the two algorithms.

Twomey, S.↗
NASA NTRS1978

User's Guide for a Modular Flutter Analysis Software System (Fast Version 1.0)

The use and operation of a group of computer programs to perform a flutter analysis of a single planar wing are described. This system of programs is called FAST for Flutter Analysis System, and consists of five programs. Each program performs certain portions of a flutter analysis and can be run sequentially as a job step or individually. FAST uses natural vibration modes as input data and performs a conventional V-g type of solution. The unsteady aerodynamics programs in FAST are based on the subsonic kernel function lifting-surface theory although other aerodynamic programs can be used. Application of the programs is illustrated by a sample case of a complete flutter calculation that exercises each program.

Desmarais, R. N.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Analysis of preflutter and postflutter characteristics with motion-matched aerodynamic forces

The development of the equations of dynamic equilibrium for a lifting surface from Lagrange's equation is reviewed and restated for general exponential growing and decaying oscillatory motion. Aerodynamic forces for this motion are obtained from the three-dimensional supersonic kernel function that is newly generalized to complex reduced frequencies. Illustrative calculations were made for two flutter models at supersonic Mach numbers. Preflutter and postflutter motion isodecrement curves were obtained. This type of analysis can be used to predict preflutter behavior during flutter testing and to predict postflutter behavior for use in the design of flutter suppression systems.

Cunningham, H. J.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Advanced panel-type influence coefficient methods applied to unsteady three dimensional potential flows

A panel method for solving unsteady, subsonic wind-body-tail flow problems is formulated and partially verified. The method is applicable to general aircraft configurations consisting of arbitrary arrangements of wings, bodies, tails, and nacelles. The wake may be located arbitrarily and the unsteady, transverse component of vorticity in the wake may be assigned any covection velocity. The wake in the unsteady flow problem, therefore, can be given the location and convection velocity of the wake produced by a steady flow which is the mean flow of the unsteady flow problem. The panel method has been used as a basis for expanding the unsteady kernel function in a power series to obtain panel influence coefficients which can be integrated in closed form.

Dusto, A. R.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Interfering surfaces in subsonic, transonic, and supersonic flow

Computer program provides analysis method based on kernel-function technique that uses assumed pressure functions with unknown coefficients. With technique, generalized forces are calculated in unsteady flow, and pressure distributions are obtained in steady and unsteady flow.

Cunningham, A. M., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Unsteady Subsonic Loadings Due to Control-Surface Motion

RHOIV computer program predicts unsteady lifting-surface loadings caused by motions of leading edge and trailing-edge control surfaces having sealed gaps at hinge lines and side edges. Analysis is based on linear, subsonic, potential-flow theory using kernel function method. Linear combinations of pressure distributions are used that are continuous except at planform edges and hinge lines. Loading solution is obtained by downwash collocation for deflection or motion of main wing and control surfaces.

Rowe, W. S.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Transonic flutter study of a wind-tunnel model of an arrow-wing supersonic transport

A 1/20-size, low-speed flutter model of the SCAT-15F complete airplane was tested on cables to simulate a near free-flying condition. Only the model wing and fuselage were flexible. Flutter boundaries were measured for a nominal configuration and a configuration with wing fins removed at Mach numbers M from 0.76 to 1.2. For both configurations, the transonic dip in the wing flutter dynamic pressure q boundary was relatively small and the minimum flutter q occurred near M = 0.92. Removing the wing fins increased the flutter q about 14 percent and changed the flutter mode from symmetric to antisymmetric. Vibration and flutter analyses were made using a finite-element structural representation and subsonic kernel-function aerodynamics. For the nominal configuration, the analysis (using calculated modal data) predicted the experimental flutter q levels within 10 percent but did not predict the correct flutter mode at the higher M. For the configuration without wing fins, the analysis predicted 16 to 36 percent unconservative (higher than experimental) flutter q levels and showed extreme sensitivity to mass representation details that affected wing tip mode shapes. For high subsonic M, empennage aerodynamics had a significant effect on the predicted flutter boundaries of several symmetric modes.

Ruhlin, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Transonic flutter study of a wind-tunnel model of an arrow-wing supersonic transport

A 1/20-size, low-speed flutter model of the SCAT-15F complete airplane was tested in a wind-tunnel on cables to simulate a near free-flying condition. Only the model wing and fuselage were flexible. Flutter boundaries were measured for a nominal configuration and a configuration with wing fins removed at Mach numbers M from 0.76 to 1.2. For both configurations, the transonic dip in the wing flutter dynamic pressure q boundary was relatively small and the minimum flutter q occurred near M = 0.92. Removing the wing fins increased the flutter q about 14 percent and changed the flutter mode from symmetric to antisymmetric. Vibration and flutter analyses were made using a finite-element structural representation and subsonic kernel-function aerodynamics. For the nominal configuration, the analysis (using calculated modal data) predicted the experimental flutter q levels within 10 percent but did not predict the correct flutter mode at the higher M. For the configuration without wing fins, the analysis predicted 16 to 36 percent unconservative (higher than experimental) flutter q levels and showed extreme sensitivity to mass shapes.

Ruhlin, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1982

On the power output of some idealized source configurations with one or more characteristic dimensions

The calculation of power output from a (finite) linear array of equidistant point sources is investigated with allowance for a relative phase shift and particular focus on the circumstances of small/large individual source separation. A key role is played by the estimates found for a twin parameter definite integral that involves the Fejer kernel functions, where N denotes a (positive) integer; these results also permit a quantitative accounting of energy partition between the principal and secondary lobes of the array pattern. Continuously distributed sources along a finite line segment or an open ended circular cylindrical shell are considered, and estimates for the relatively lower output in the latter configuration are made explicit when the shell radius is small compared to the wave length. A systematic reduction of diverse integrals which characterize the energy output from specific line and strip sources is investigated.

Levine, H.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Reduction of computer usage costs in predicting unsteady aerodynamic loadings caused by control surface motions: Computer program description

A digital computer program was developed to calculate unsteady loadings caused by motions of lifting surfaces with leading edge and trailing edge controls based on the subsonic kernel function approach. The pressure singularities at hinge line and side edges were extracted analytically as a preliminary step to solving the integral equation of collocation. The program calculates generalized aerodynamic forces for user supplied deflection modes. Optional intermediate output includes pressure at an array of points, and sectional generalized forces. From one to six controls on the half span can be accomodated.

Petrarca, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Chordwise and compressibility corrections for arbitrary planform slender wings

The Lomax and Sluder method for adapting slender-wing theory to delta or rectangular wings by making chordwise and compressibility corrections is extended to cover wings of any arbitrary planform in subsonic and supersonic flows. The numerical accuracy of the present work is better than that of the Lomax-Sluder results. Comparison of the results of this work with those of the vortex-lattice method and Kernel function method for a family of Gothic and arrowhead wings shows good agreement. A universal curve is proposed for the evaluation of the lift coefficient of a low aspect ratio wing of an arbitrary planform in subsonic flow. The location of the center of pressure can also be estimated.

Levin, D.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Transonic pressure distributions on a rectangular supercritical wing oscillating in pitch

Steady and unsteady aerodynamic data were measured on a rectangular wing with a 12 percent thick supercritical airfoil mounted in the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel. The wing was oscillated in pitch to generate the unsteady aerodynamic data. The purpose of the wind-tunnel test was to measure data for use in the development and assessment of transonic analytical codes. The effects on the wing pressure distributions of Mach number, mean angle of attack, and oscillation frequency and amplitude were measured. Results from the newly-developed XTRAN3S program (a non-linear transonic small disturbance code) and from the RHOIV program (a linear lifting surface kernel function code) were compared to measured data for a Mach number of 0.7 and for oscillation frequencies ranging from 0 to 20 Hz. The XTRAN3S steady and unsteady results agreed fairly well with the measured data. The RHOIV unsteady-result agreement was fair but, of course, did not predict shock effects.

Ricketts, R. H.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Transonic pressure distributions on a rectangular supercritical wing oscillating in pitch

Steady and unsteady aerodynamic data were measured on a rectangular wing with a 12 percent thick supercritical airfoil mounted in the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel. The wing was oscillated in pitch to generate the unsteady aerodynamic data. The purpose of the wind-tunnel test was to measure data for use in the development and assessment of transonic analytical codes. The effects on the wing pressure distributions of Mach number, mean angle of attack, and oscillation frequency and amplitude were measured. Results from the newly-developed XTRAN3S program (a nonlinear transonic small disturbance code) and from the RHOIV program (a linear lifting surface kernel function code) were compared to measured data for a Mach number of 0.7 and for oscillation frequencies ranging from 0 to 20 Hz. The XTRAN3S steady and unsteady results agreed fairly well with the measured results. The RHOIV unsteady-result agreement was fair but, of course, did not predict shock effects.

Ricketts, R. H.↗