Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lunar lander”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

Robotic Lunar Landers for Science and Exploration

The MSFC/APL Robotic Lunar Landing Project (RLLDP) team has developed lander concepts encompassing a range of mission types and payloads for science, exploration, and technology demonstration missions: (1) Developed experience and expertise in lander systems, (2) incorporated lessons learned from previous efforts to improve the fidelity of mission concepts, analysis tools, and test beds Mature small and medium lander designs concepts have been developed: (1) Share largely a common design architecture. (2) Flexible for a large number of mission and payload options. High risk development areas have been successfully addressed Landers could be selected for a mission with much of the concept formulation phase work already complete

Cohen, Barbara A.↗

Selection and Characterization of the Landing Site for NASA CLPS PRISM1 Lunar Lander Mission CP-11

The NASA Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program delivery known as "CP-11" will carry multiple payloads to the lunar surface in 2024. The payloads include (a) Lunar Vertex, the first science suite sponsored by the NASA Science Mission Directorate's Payloads and Research Investigations on the Surface of the Moon (PRISM) program, (b) JPL's CADRE (Cooperative Autonomous Distributed Robotic Explorers), a project from the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate's Game Changing Development Program, (c) the Lunar Space Environment Monitor (LUSEM), a high-energy particle detector from the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI) and funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea (MSIT), and (d) MPAc (MoonLIGHT Pointing Actuator), a laser retro-reflector developed by the National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN-LNF) and funded by the European Space Agency.

David T. Blewett↗

Demonstration of Capability to Simulate Particle Irregular Shape and Poly-Disperse Mixtures Within Lunar Lander Plume-Surface Interaction

Plume-Surface Interaction (PSI) between lander engine plumes and regolith soil creates hazards in obscuration and contamination by particle clouds, high-energy ejecta streams, and landing area cratering damage. The MSFC Fluid Dynamics Branch is developing simulation tools to offer a predictive PSI capability to NASA customers such as the Human Lander System (HLS) and Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS). The Gas-Granular Flow Solver (GGFS) is the main application tool for coupled gas-particle two-phase flow simulations to predict the range of PSI effects from onset of surface erosion to deep crater formation. GGFS features an Eulerian-Eulerian modeling approach, treating both gas and granular material as interacting continuum phases. Modeling the lunar regolith granular material fluidic characteristics poses special challenges due to complex particle shapes and mixture composition. The lunar regolith is poorly sorted with broad particle size distributions and large fines content. It has significant cohesion, due to interlocking jagged particle shapes. Eulerian granular material flow modeling requires closure formulations for the granular material constitutive models (stress, friction, collisional and kinetic energy dissipation, drag, etc.). While closure models for spherical particles are available from particle kinetic theory, closure models for realistic non-spherical particles must be extracted from unit physics Discrete Element Model (DEM) particle interaction simulations and provided in the form of tabular datasets. The effects of particle irregular shape (non-spherical shape factors, angular particle surface roughness, and interlocking features) are simulated by approximating the particle features in the form of grouped elemental spheres to form composite particles in the DEM simulations. The effects of the wide range of regolith mixture particle sizes and the strong effects of the presence of the small particle sizes results in high cohesion and low porosity of the regolith mixture. The range of particle sizes is simulated by binning the particle sizes into an appropriate finite number of particle-size species and solving the problem as a species mixture. Combining these two modeling approaches enables simulations to capture both, the contributions of the irregular particle shape and the particle size distribution. The integration and maturation of the DEM-based constitutive model database generation process and poly-disperse mixture binning approach into the GGFS simulation framework are proceeding under funding by the NASA Game Changing Development program. The status of current capabilities will be presented in comparisons of crater characteristics resulting for spherical and irregular shape particles, and for mono-, bi-, and tri-disperse mixture simulations of Apollo LM plume-surface interaction. The computational results confirm the significance of including the particle shape and mixture effects. Going forward plans for the full implementation of the general poly-disperse regolith modeling capability and maturation towards NASA project application readiness under the GCD program will be presented.

Peter A Liever↗

Demonstration of Capability to Simulate Particle Irregular Shape and Poly-Disperse Mixtures Within Lunar Lander Plume-Surface Interaction

Plume-Surface Interaction (PSI) between lander engine plumes and regolith soil creates hazards in obscuration and contamination by particle clouds, high-energy ejecta streams, and landing area cratering damage. The MSFC Fluid Dynamics Branch is developing simulation tools to offer a predictive PSI capability to NASA customers such as the Human Lander System (HLS) and Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS). The Gas-Granular Flow Solver (GGFS) is the main application tool for coupled gas-particle two-phase flow simulations to predict the range of PSI effects from onset of surface erosion to deep crater formation. GGFS features an Eulerian-Eulerian modeling approach, treating both gas and granular material as interacting continuum phases. Modeling the lunar regolith granular material fluidic characteristics poses special challenges due to complex particle shapes and mixture composition. The lunar regolith is poorly sorted with broad particle size distributions and large fines content. It has significant cohesion, due to interlocking jagged particle shapes. Eulerian granular material flow modeling requires closure formulations for the granular material constitutive models (stress, friction, collisional and kinetic energy dissipation, drag, etc.). While closure models for spherical particles are available from particle kinetic theory, closure models for realistic non-spherical particles must be extracted from unit physics Discrete Element Model (DEM) particle interaction simulations and provided in the form of tabular datasets. The effects of particle irregular shape (non-spherical shape factors, angular particle surface roughness, and interlocking features) are simulated by approximating the particle features in the form of grouped elemental spheres to form composite particles in the DEM simulations. The effects of the wide range of regolith mixture particle sizes and the strong effects of the presence of the small particle sizes results in high cohesion and low porosity of the regolith mixture. The range of particle sizes is simulated by binning the particle sizes into an appropriate finite number of particle-size species and solving the problem as a species mixture. Combining these two modeling approaches enables simulations to capture both, the contributions of the irregular particle shape and the particle size distribution. The integration and maturation of the DEM-based constitutive model database generation process and poly-disperse mixture binning approach into the GGFS simulation framework are proceeding under funding by the NASA Game Changing Development program. The status of current capabilities will be presented in comparisons of crater characteristics resulting for spherical and irregular shape particles, and for mono-, bi-, and tri-disperse mixture simulations of Apollo LM plume-surface interaction. The computational results confirm the significance of including the particle shape and mixture effects. Going forward plans for the full implementation of the general poly-disperse regolith modeling capability and maturation towards NASA project application readiness under the GCD program will be presented.

Peter A. Liever↗

Will scavenging liquid oxygen from the propellant of lunar landers reduce net delivered mass?

Baseline oxygen (O2) needs for astronauts on lunar surface missions are satisfied through delivery in logistics landers. Supplying O2 through resources already present on the lunar surface could reduce the logistics load mass as well as the cost. The propellant tanks on the landers are the most abundantly accessible source for supplying the needed O2 to the crew. Calculations and analysis were performed on both 28-day missions and year-long missions to determine the amount of O2 able to be scavenged from propellant.

Angelina Rossini↗

Low-cost unmanned lunar lander

Two student groups designed unmanned landers to deliver 200 kilogram payloads to the lunar surface. Payloads could include astronomical telescopes, small lunar rovers, and experiments related to future human exploration. Requirements include the use of existing hardware where possible, use of a medium-class launch vehicle, an unobstructed view of the sky for the payload, and access to the lunar surface for the payload. The projects were modeled after Artemis, a project that the NASA Office of Exploration is pursuing with a planned first launch in 1996. The Lunar Scout design uses a Delta 2 launch vehicle with a Star 48 motor for insertion into the trans-lunar trajectory. During the transfer, the solar panels will be folded inward and the spacecraft will be powered by rechargeable nickel-cadmium batteries. The lander will use a combination of a solid rocket motor and hydrazine thrusters for the descent to the lunar surface. The solar arrays will be deployed after landing. The lander will provide power for operations to the payload during the lunar day; batteries will provide 'stay-alive' power during the lunar night. A horn antenna on the lander will provide communications between the payload and the earth.

Daniel, Walter K.↗

Hybrid CFD Engineering Model of Plume Induced Erosion and Crater Formation During Descent of Lunar Landers

With rapidly increased worldwide interest in landing on the moon, the issue of Plume Surface Interactions (PSI) is gaining attention. Hazards posed by lander plume induced dust and debris, as well as landing site deformation can be mitigated when better understood through predictive simulations. As simulation enabling computational power continues to increase, hybrid Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)/Engineering models provide the immediate ability to conduct parametric/trade studies driving design decisions for landers. Reduced order erosion engineering models apply correlations of the surface erosion rate to the plume induced surface forces with the correlations anchored to flight observations from Apollo LM landings. The MSFC propulsion fluid dynamics branch has developed such a hybrid model for predicting the plume induced viscous erosive regression of the Lunar surface beneath a landing vehicle. The (Descent Interpolated Gas Granular Erosion Model) DIGGEM was originally implemented as a post processing tool to calculate induced erosion rates through vehicle descent using CFD solutions of the vehicle plume at several fixed altitudes. This capability has since been advanced in the Loci/Chem-DIGGEM model to allow transient, moving vehicle, fully coupled viscous erosion modeling of vehicle descent PSI. This model has recently been used to make preflight predictions of the erosive regression of the ground beneath a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) vehicle in support of measurements to be made by the Stereo Cameras for Lunar Plume Surface Studies (SCALPSS) instrument.

Plume Surface Interaction↗

Hybrid CFD Engineering Model of Plume Induced Erosion and Crater Formation During Descent of Lunar Landers

With rapidly increased worldwide interest in landing on the moon, the issue of Plume Surface Interactions (PSI) is gaining attention. Hazards posed by lander plume induced dust and debris, as well as landing site deformation can be mitigated when better understood through predictive simulations. As simulation enabling computational power continues to increase, hybrid Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)/Engineering models provide the immediate ability to conduct parametric/trade studies driving design decisions for landers. Reduced order erosion engineering models apply correlations of the surface erosion rate to the plume induced surface forces with the correlations anchored to flight observations from Apollo LM landings. The MSFC propulsion fluid dynamics branch has developed such a hybrid model for predicting the plume induced viscous erosive regression of the Lunar surface beneath a landing vehicle. The (Descent Interpolated Gas Granular Erosion Model) DIGGEM was originally implemented as a post processing tool to calculate induced erosion rates through vehicle descent using CFD solutions of the vehicle plume at several fixed altitudes. This capability has since been advanced in the Loci/Chem-DIGGEM model to allow transient, moving vehicle, fully coupled viscous erosion modeling of vehicle descent PSI. This model has recently been used to make preflight predictions of the erosive regression of the ground beneath a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) vehicle in support of measurements to be made by the Stereo Cameras for Lunar Plume Surface Studies (SCALPSS) instrument.

Plume Surface Interaction↗

Lunar lander and return propulsion system trade study

This trade study was initiated at NASA/JSC in May 1992 to develop and evaluate main propulsion system alternatives to the reference First Lunar Outpost (FLO) lander and return-stage transportation system concept. Thirteen alternative configurations were developed to explore the impacts of various combinations of return stage propellants, using either pressure or pump-fed propulsion systems and various staging options. Besides two-stage vehicle concepts, the merits of single-stage and stage-and-a-half options were also assessed in combination with high-performance liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen propellants. Configurations using an integrated modular cryogenic engine were developed to assess potential improvements in packaging efficiency, mass performance, and system reliability compared to non-modular cryogenic designs. The selection process to evaluate the various designs was the analytic hierarchy process. The trade study showed that a pressure-fed MMH/N2O4 return stage and RL10-based lander stage is the best option for a 1999 launch. While results of this study are tailored to FLO needs, the design date, criteria, and selection methodology are applicable to the design of other crewed lunar landing and return vehicles.

Hurlbert, Eric A.↗

A Hybrid CFD/Engineering Model Tool for Lunar Lander Surface Erosion Prediction

Plume-Surface Interaction (PSI) between lander engine plumes and landing area regolith poses risks to the landers and space exploration missions through view obscuration and high-energy ejecta impacts from eroded particle clouds and vehicle tilting from plume-induced craters. To address these risks, NASA MSFC Fluid Dynamics Branch (ER42) has developed a cascade of predictive simulation capabilities for PSI, including the recent development of a hybrid CFD/engineering model tool that allows for rapid PSI simulations with a descending/ascending vehicle and an eroding surface. The development of this fully-coupled, moving body/eroding surface simulation capability is detailed along with a demonstration of the tool’s capabilities on the Apollo 12 Lunar Module landing. Predictions of eroded mass flow rates as a function of time are verified against Apollo 12 flight data, from which the developed, viscous erosion model has been calibrated.

Plume Surface Interaction↗

A Hybrid CFD/Engineering Model Tool for Lunar Lander Surface Erosion Prediction

Plume-Surface Interaction (PSI) between lander engine plumes and landing area regolith poses risks to the landers and space exploration missions through view obscuration and high-energy ejecta impacts from eroded particle clouds and vehicle tilting from plume-induced craters. To address these risks, NASA MSFC Fluid Dynamics Branch (ER42) has developed a cascade of predictive simulation capabilities for PSI, including the recent development of a hybrid CFD/engineering model tool that allows for rapid PSI simulations with a descending/ascending vehicle and an eroding surface. The development of this fully-coupled, moving body/eroding surface simulation capability is detailed along with a demonstration of the tool’s capabilities on the Apollo 12 Lunar Module landing. Predictions of eroded mass flow rates as a function of time are verified against Apollo 12 flight data, from which the developed, viscous erosion model has been calibrated.

Plume Surface Interaction↗

Lunar lander and return propulsion system trade study - Methodology with results

A trade study was initiated at the NASA/Johnson Space Center in May of 1992 to develop and evaluate main propulsion system alternative configurations for the First Lunar Outpost (FLO) lander and return vehicles. This paper outlines the trade methodology utilized in the FLO vehicle study. Emphasis is placed on the trade attributes, selection criteria, and evaluation process established to perform the comprehensive analysis required to rank the diverse alternative vehicle configurations considered. The use of sensitivity analyses to determine the relative importance of each attribute and selection criteria on the trade results is also presented. Lastly, the paper discusses FLO vehicle configuration recommendations and general vehicle design conclusions which can be drawn from the trade study results.

Moreland, Robert J.↗

A Physics-Based Work-Energy Formulation for Real-Time Trajectory Guidance of A Lunar Lander

Throughout the years, many researchers have calculated and optimized trajectory solutions for lunar landing systems by employing sophisticated mathematical methods, that include: Hamilton’s Principle of Variation, Pontryagin’s maximum principle, and well known convex-optimization techniques among others. Many of these approaches typically require expensive computational resources to achieve convergence in the solution. In an effort to reduce complexity and the computational load required to obtain real-time guidance commands, a simple physics-based work-energy approach has been formulated. This approach is based on the dissipation of the mechanical energy of the vehicle to its final desired energy state required to achieve a safe landing. The rocket engine(s) employed during landing (among other maneuvers) dissipates mechanical energy by both doing work against the velocity vector of the vehicle (thus defining the trajectory path), and by jettisoning mass. Therefore, by solving the energy dissipation problem at every step of the maneuver, a much simpler formulation that naturally and quickly attains convergence is obtained. This formulation is not limited to approach, landing, and divert maneuvers, but in principle it can be employed during de-orbiting, braking burn, ascent, as well as orbit insertion.

Guidance↗

A Physics-Based Work-Energy Formulation for Real-Time Trajectory Guidance of a Lunar Lander

Throughout the years, many researchers have calculated and optimized trajectory solutions for lunar landing systems by employing sophisticated mathematical methods, that include: Hamilton’s Principle of Variation, Pontryagin’s maximum principle, and well known convex-optimization techniques among others. Many of these approaches typically require expensive computational resources to achieve convergence in the solution. In an effort to reduce complexity and the computational load required to obtain real-time guidance commands, a simple physics-based work-energy approach has been formulated. This approach is based on the dissipation of the mechanical energy of the vehicle to its final desired energy state required to achieve a safe landing. The rocket engine(s) employed during landing (among other maneuvers) dissipates mechanical energy by both doing work against the velocity vector of the vehicle (thus defining the trajectory path), and by jettisoning mass. Therefore, by solving the energy dissipation problem at every step of the maneuver, a much simpler formulation that naturally and quickly attains convergence is obtained. This formulation is not limited to approach, landing, and divert maneuvers, but in principle it can be employed during de-orbiting, braking burn, ascent, as well as orbit insertion.

Guidance↗

Lunar Lander project: A study on future manned missions to the Moon

This project is based on designing a small lunar probe which will conduct research relating to future manned missions to the moon. The basic design calls for two experiments to be run. The first of these experiments is an enclosed environment section which will be exposed to solar radiation while on the moon. The purpose of this experiment is to determine the effect of radiation on an enclosed environment and how different shielding materials can be used to moderate this effect. The eight compartments will have the following covering materials: glass, polarized glass, plexiglass, polyurethane, and boron impregnated versions of the polyurethane and plexiglass. The enclosed atmosphere will be sampled by a mass spectrometer to determine elemental breakdown of its primary constituents. This is needed so that an accurate atmospheric processing system can be designed for a manned mission. The second experiment is a seismic study of the moon. A small penetrating probe will be shot into the lunar surface and data will be collected onboard the lander by an electronic seismograph which will store the data in the data storage unit for retrieval and transmission once every twenty-three hours. The project is designed to last ten years with possible extended life for an additional nine years at which point power requirements prevent proper functioning of the various systems.

Source record↗

Navigation Doppler Lidar for Lunar Landers

The new generation of Navigation Doppler Lidar has been designed, developed, and tested for lunar missions. Comprehensive environmental testing is performed to assess the performance of the instrument for upcoming lunar missions and future missions to the Moon and other planetary bodies.

Lidar↗