DOE OSTI2017
The past decade has seen considerable advancements in multiscale and multiphysics simulations that account for nonlinear effects of feedback between different physical processes within a single calculation. One area of particular interest has been multiphysics simulations that include both neutronics and thermal-hydraulics effects to accurately model the thermal feedback effects present in nuclear reactors. During this time, many groups have successfully modeled thermal feedback effects by coupling a variety of different types of neutron transport and thermal-hydraulic solvers together. However, formal verification and validation of these coupled code systems has proven challenging due to a lack of benchmark problems with well-characterized reference solutions. One approach is to confirm gross energy balance using bulk coolant properties (outlet temperature/enthalpy) for code verification purposes. Alternatively, code-to-code comparisons of results for a predefined reference/challenge problem have been used to establish reasonability of local results (neutron flux, heating, enthalpy rise) for various implementations, for example the VERA Core Physics Progression Problems. While community solutions are valuable for assessing the relative performance and fidelity of different implementations, they are not guaranteed to provide a measure of the absolute accuracy of a given implementation. In fact, these code-to-code comparisons can give a false sense of confidence by masking the effects of errors or approximations that are common to all of the solution methods tested. This is a particular concern when many methods derive from a common approach, such as Picard iteration. To this end, an analytical benchmark would be very valuable for verifying individual coupled physics implementations, as well as for providing a formal assessment of algorithm accuracy and sensitivity to model approximations such as mesh size and number of convergence iterations. However, creation of an analytical benchmark is difficult due to the complex nature of the eigenvalue form of the neutron transport equation (which does not permit a simple analytical solution for non-trivial cases) as well as the variety of different empirical closure relationships used in thermal-hydraulic modeling. In this paper we propose a benchmark for coupled neutronics/thermal-hydraulics simulations. The proposed benchmark overcomes the challenges associated with a multiphysics benchmark problem by using a fixed-source (rather than eigenvalue) formulation of the neutron transport equation and limiting fluid properties to the single-phase regime where the density and temperature of the coolant are related to enthalpy by a known relationship, while still preserving significant nuclear/thermal feedback effects within the simplified problem. The new benchmark is easy to simulate using existing coupled physics implementations, and allows for a direct comparison with a reference solution, as provided in this summary.