Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “REYNOLDS NUMBER”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

High Reynolds Number Testing of the NATO AVT-298 SWiFT Configuration at the National Transonic Facility

A high Reynolds number wind tunnel test of the NATO AVT-298 Swept Wing Flow Test (SWiFT) configuration was conducted in the National Transonic Facility at the NASA Langley Research Center during the summer of 2023. The SWiFT research model geometry has relevance to both blended/hybrid wing body (BWB/HWB) and unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) configurations, and the test campaign was the culmination of an international collaboration under the NATO AVT-298 research task group. The main objectives of the test were to investigate Reynolds number scaling effects on low-speed stability & control characteristics and to examine the onset and progression of flow separation on the wings particularly near the wing crank. Force & moment and surface pressure data were acquired at Mach numbers from 0.2 to 0.8, Reynolds numbers from 2.5 to 34 million, angles of attack from -3 to 20 degrees, and sideslip angles from -10 to 10 degrees. Boundary layer transition detection techniques utilizing static pressure taps, unsteady pressure transducers, and sublimating chemicals were used on the model in a free/natural transition state or a forced transition state using trip dots. Pressure sensitive paint was used to obtain a global surface pressure profile on the model and an advanced laser velocimetry technique was used to obtain velocity measurements in the wake downstream of the wing crank. The results from the test showed clear Reynolds number scaling effects on the maximum lift coefficient and pitching moment coefficient at Mach 0.2, while also capturing significant hysteresis effects. The data acquired from the test will ultimately help improve computational aerodynamic analysis and design tools for application to future BWB-type vehicle configurations.

NATO AVT-298↗

High Reynolds Number and Turbulence Effects on Turbine Heat Transfer

Experimental data on pressure distribution and heat transfer on a turbine airfoil were obtained over a range of Reynolds numbers from 0.75 to 7.0 x 10(exp 6) and a range of turbulence intensities from 1.8 to about 15%. The purpose of this study was to obtain fundamental heat transfer and pressure distribution data over a wide range of high Reynolds numbers and to extend the heat transfer data base to include the range or Reynolds numbers encountered in the Space Shuttle main engine turbopump turbines. The results of this study indicated that Reynolds number and turbulence intensity have a large effect on both the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and the resulting heat transfer. For a given turbulence intensity, heat transfer for all Reynolds numbers at the leading edge can generally be correlated with the Frossling number developed for lower Reynolds numbers. For a given turbulence intensity, heat transfer for the airfoil surfaces downstream of the leading edge can be approximately correlated with a dimensionless parameter. Comparisons of the experimental results were also made with a numerical solution from a two-dimensional Navier-Stokes code.

Yeh, Frederick C.↗

Model Rotor Hover Performance at Low Reynolds Number

Hover performance data from four key experiments has been analyzed in detail to shed some light on model rotor hover performance at low Reynolds number. Each experiment used the simplest blade geometry. The blades were constant chord and untwisted. Three experiments used blades with the NACA 0012 airfoil from root to tip. The NACA 0015 was used in the earliest test. The four experiments provide data spanning a Reynolds number range of 136,500 to 548,700. The specific objective of this report is to ask and answer two questions: 1. Does blade aspect ratio influence hover performance or is rotor solidity the fundamental rotor geometry parameter for practical engineering purposes? ANSWER: Rotor solidity is the fundamental rotor geometry parameter for practical engineering purposes. Any effect of blade aspect ratio appears to be such a secondary variable that its effect lies within the range of experimental error. 2. Is Reynolds number a significant factor in scaling up hover performance to full-scale rotor performance? The answer is twofold. ANSWER: (a) Reynolds number effects on the increase of power with thrust do not appear to be a significant factor for practical engineering purposes, and (b) Reynolds number effects on minimum profile power at or very near zero rotor thrust could not be clearly established primarily because the low torque levels could not be accurately measured with the test equipment used. This has led to significant data scatter. A number of other observations can be made based on the analysis provided herein. For instance: 1. The test matrices used in the four key references contained far too few data points. A collective pitch variation of four or five data points is insufficient to establish experimental accuracy and data repeatability. 2. A common property of the power-versus-thrust (raised to the 3/2 exponent) graphs was that this curve was linear below the onset of blade stall. 3. The blade-to-blade interference at or near zero thrust may, in fact, be creating a turbulent flow field such that the effective Reynolds number at a blade element is considerably greater than what theories using two-dimensional (2D) airfoil properties at a blade element would calculate. 4. Definitive experiments answering the two key questions have yet to be made.

Model Rotor Hover Performance↗

Tests of Spheres with Reference to Reynolds Number, Turbulence, and Surface Roughness

The behavior of the Reynolds Number of the sphere is explained (in known manner) with the aid of the boundary-layer theory. Rear spindles may falsify, under certain conditions, the supercritical sphere drag, while suspension wires in the space behind the sphere leave no traceable influence. The critical Reynolds Number of the sphere was arrived at by an unconventional method; that is, by determining the critical wind speed at which the static pressure at the back of the sphere is the same as that of the undisturbed flow. The method makes it possible to interpret the critical Reynolds Number with only one test station.

Hoerner, S↗

Internal low Reynolds number turbulent heat transfer

The results of a semi-analytical and experimental study of adiabatic tube flow and an analytical and experimental investigation of the thermal entrance region for gas flowing through electrically heated circular tubes are presented. Emphasis is placed on the low Reynolds number turbulent flow regime--defined as fully turbulent flow at bulk Reynolds numbers from 3,000 to about 15,000. Adiabatic air velocity and friction data and localized heat transfer measurements for air and helium, at low heating rates, are presented for this range. The adiabatic data were obtained in a 1.61 inch 1D tube for flow at bulk Reynolds numbers from 3,000 to 15,000. A continuous, Reynolds number-dependent, profile is developed from the data by using a modification of Reichardts' wall and middle law eddy diffusivity expressions. The velocity profile satisfies continuity. It is valid for all Reynolds numbers in excess of 3,000 for which the flow is fully turbulent and the Blasius friction factor expression is valid. The thermal entrance problem for a fully developed velocity profile is solved analytically by the method of Sparrow, Hallman, and Siegel. The solution is based on the profile developed from the velocity study. Tabular values of the eigenvalues and normalized Nusselt numbers for gases are presented for it range of Reynolds numbers from 3,000 to 50,000. The axial variation of Nusselt number is found to be correlated by [Nu/Nu_(∞)] = 1 + 0.8 (1+ 70,000 Re^(-3/2)) ((x/D)^(-1)) to within ± 5 per cent for x/D ≥2. The fully developed value agrees with the Dittus - Boelter correlation, Nu_(∞) = 0.021 Re^(0.8) Pr^(0.4) For the eigenvalues, λ^(2)_(n), and the associated constants, A_(n), correlations of the form λ^(2)_(n) =A_(1,n) Re^(-b_(1,n) + C_(1,n) Re^(-d_(1,n)) A_(n) = -A_(2,n) Re^(-b_(2,n) + C_(2,n) Re^(-d_(2,n)) are obtained. The coefficients and powers are presented in tabular form. Heat transfer data are presented, primarily for helium, for the low Reynolds number turbulent range. A one-quarter inch, resistively heated, vertical, circular tube was used for the study. The data cover an axial range from 1.2 to 96 diameters; wall-to-bulk temperature ratios vary from 1 to 1.4. In the low Reynolds number turbulent regime, these data clearly support the present analytical solution rather than the prediction obtained by applying the eddy diffusivity distribution used by Sparrow, Hallman, and Siegel.

Harold C. Reynolds, Jr.↗

High Reynolds number and turbulence effects on aerodynamics and heat transfer in a turbine cascade

Experimental data on pressure distribution and heat transfer on a turbine airfoil were obtained over a range of Reynolds numbers from 0.75 to 7.5 million and a range of turbulence intensities from 1.8 to about 15 percent. Fundamental heat transfer and pressure distribution data are obtained over a wide range of high Reynolds numbers and to extend the heat transfer data base to include the range of Reynolds numbers encountered in the SSME turbopump turbines. The results obtained indicated that Reynolds number and turbulence intensity have a large effect on both the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and the resulting heat transfer. For a given turbulence intensity, heat transfer for all Reynolds numbers at the leading edge can be correlated with the Frossling number developed for lower Reynolds numbers. For a given turbulence intensity, heat transfer for the airfoil surfaces downstream of the leading edge can be approximately correlated with a dimensionless parameter. Comparison of the experimental results were also made with a numerical solution from a 2D Navier-Stokes code.

Yeh, Frederick C.↗

High Reynolds number analysis of an axisymmetric afterbody with flow separation

The ability of a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes method, PAB3D, to predict nozzle afterbody flow at high Reynolds number was assessed. Predicted surface pressure coefficient distributions and integrated afterbody drag are compared with experimental data obtained from the NASA-Langley 0.3 m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel. Predicted afterbody surface pressures matched experimental data fairly closely. The change in the pressure coefficient distribution with Reynolds number was slightly over-predicted. Integrated afterbody drag was typically high compared to the experimental data. The change in afterbody pressure drag with Reynolds number was fairly small. The predicted point of flow separation on the nozzle was slightly downstream of that observed from oilflow data at low Reynolds numbers and had a very slight Reynolds number dependence, moving slightly further downstream as Reynolds number increased.

Carlson, John R.↗

Reynolds number dependence of the freestream turbulence effects on turbulent boundary layers

Published experimental data on the influence of freestream turbulence on turbulent boundary layers were examined to determine the effect of Reynolds number on such influence. Two manifestations of the effect of low Reynolds numbers on the outer layer were observed: (1) the dependence of Clauser's shape parameter G on Reynolds number at very low Reynolds numbers and (2) the reduction in the wake component due to freestream turbulence undergoing a reversal in the Reynolds number dependence. These observations were used to modify Hancock's (1980) freestream turbulence parameter.

Bandyopadhyay, Promode R.↗

A summary of Reynolds number effects on some recent tests in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel

Reynolds number effects noted from selected test programs conducted in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel (0.3-m TCT) are discussed. The tests, which cover a unit Reynolds number range from about 2.0 to 80.0 million per foot, summarize effects of Reynolds number on: (1) aerodynamic data from a supercritical airfoil, (2) results from several wall interference correction techniques, and (3) results obtained from advanced, cryogenic tests techniques. The test techniques include: (1) use of a cryogenic sidewall boundary layer removal system, (2) detailed pressure and hot wire measurements to determine test section flow quality, and (3) use of a new hot film system suitable for transition detection in a cryogenic wind tunnel. The results indicate that Reynolds number effects appear most significant when boundary layer transition effects are present and at high lift conditions when boundary layer separation exists on both the model and the tunnel sidewall.

Johnson, C. B.↗

A review of some Reynolds number effects related to bodies at high angles of attack

A review of some effects of Reynolds number on selected aerodynamic characteristics of two- and three-dimensional bodies of various cross sections in relation to fuselages at high angles of attack at subsonic and transonic speeds is presented. Emphasis is placed on the Reynolds number ranges above the subcritical and angles of attack where lee side vortex flow or unsteady wake type flows predominate. Lists of references, arranged in subject categories, are presented with emphasis on those which include data over a reasonable Reynolds number range. Selected Reynolds number data representative of various aerodynamic flows around bodies are presented and analyzed and some effects of these flows on fuselage aerodynamic parameters are discussed.

Polhamus, E. C.↗

Airfoil stall penetration at constant pitch rate and high Reynolds number

The model wing consists of a set of fiberglass panels mounted on a steel spar that spans the 8 ft test section of the UTRC Large Subsonic Wind Tunnel. The first use of this system was to measure surface pressures and flow conditions for a series of constant pitch rate ramps and sinusoidal oscillations a Mach number range, a Reynolds number range, and a pitch angle range. It is concluded that an increased pitch rate causes stall events to be delayed, strengthening of the stall vortex, increase in vortex propagation, and increase in unsteady airloads. The Mach number range causes a supersonic zone near the leading edge, stall vortex to be weaker, and a reduction of unsteady airloads.

Lorber, Peter F.↗

Large eddy breakup devices as low Reynolds number airfoils

Turbulent drag reduction downstream of large-eddy breakup (LEBU) devices is analyzed from the viewpoint of low-Reynolds number airfoil aerodynamics. It is argued that the variability of results between different research labs is primarily due to low Reynolds number 'phenomena' associated with unsteady separation/transition of the LEBU device boundary layer. LEBU drag reduction is shown to be an extremely sensitive function of device microgeometry at the low Reynolds numbers of all current investigations, and by analogy with conventional low-Reynolds number airfoil testing, the conclusion is drawn that the full potential for LEBU drag reduction must be explored at chord Reynolds numbers of 300,000 and above.

Anders, John B.↗

Drag-n-fly: a Proposal in Response to a Low Reynolds Number Station Keeping Mission

The Drag-n-Fly is a remotely piloted, low Reynolds number vehicle. It was designed to maintain level controlled flight and fly a closed course at flight speeds corresponding to Reynolds numbers of less than 2 x 10(exp 5) and as close to 1 x 10(exp 5) as possible. The success of the mission will be associated with achieving the lowest mean chord Reynolds number possible and maximizing loiter time on the course. The flight plan for the Drag-n-Fly calls for the vehicle to ascent to a cruise altitude of 25 ft. The airfoil selected for the Drag-n-Fly is a Spica chosen for its high lift coefficient at low Reynolds number. The propulsion system for the Drag-n-Fly consists of a 10 inch diameter propeller mounted on the front of the vehicle. Structural support for the Drag-n-Fly comes from four box beams running the length of the fuselage. The tail and horizontal stabilizers are located far aft of the lifting surface in order to assure proper static stability. The present design for the Drag-n-Fly will meet the criteria for the present mission.

Foohey, Mark↗

Backward-facing step measurements at low Reynolds number, Re(sub h)=5000

An experimental study of the flow over a backward-facing step at low Reynolds number was performed for the purpose of validating a direct numerical simulation (DNS) which was performed by the Stanford/NASA Center for Turbulence Research. Previous experimental data on back step flows were conducted at Reynolds numbers and/or expansion ratios which were significantly different from that of the DNS. The geometry of the experiment and the simulation were duplicated precisely, in an effort to perform a rigorous validation of the DNS. The Reynolds number used in the DNS was Re(sub h)=5100 based on step height, h. This was the maximum possible Reynolds number that could be economically simulated. The boundary layer thickness, d, was approximately 1.0 h in the simulation and the expansion ratio was 1.2. The Reynolds number based on the momentum thickness, Re(sub theta), upstream of the step was 610. All of these parameters were matched experimentally. Experimental results are presented in the form of tables, graphs and a floppy disk (for easy access to the data). An LDV instrument was used to measure mean velocity components and three Reynolds stresses components. In addition, surface pressure and skin friction coefficients were measured. LDV measurements were acquired in a measuring domain which included the recirculating flow region.

Jovic, Srba↗

The effect of Reynolds number on boattail drag

An investigation has been conducted in the Langley pilot transonic cryogenic tunnel to determine the effects of varying Reynolds number on boattail drag at subsonic speeds. Six boattailed cone-cylinder nacelle models were tested with the jet exhaust simulated by a cylindrical sting. Reynolds number was varied from about 2.6 million to 132 million by changing model length and unit Reynolds number. Boattail pressure coefficient distributions show that increasing Reynolds number tends to make the pressure coefficients in the expansion region more negative and the pressure coefficients in the recompression region more positive. These two effects were compensating and as a result there was little or no effect of Reynolds number on the pressure drag of the isolated boattails.

Reubush, D. E.↗

Aerodynamics and heat transfer investigations on a high Reynolds number turbine cascade

The results of aerodynamic and heat transfer experimental investigations performed in a high Reynolds number turbine cascade test facility are analyzed. The experimental facility simulates the high Reynolds number flow conditions similar to those encountered in the Space Shuttle Main Engine. In order to determine the influence of Reynolds number on aerodynamic and thermal behavior of the blades, heat transfer coefficients were measured at various Reynolds numbers using liquid crystal temperature measurement technique. Potential flow calculation methods were used to predict the cascade pressure distributions. Boundary layer and heat transfer calculation methods were used with these pressure distributions to verify the experimental results.

Schobeiri, Taher↗

Aerodynamics and heat transfer investigations on a high Reynolds number turbine cascade

The results of aerodynamic and heat transfer experimental investigations performed in a high Reynolds number turbine cascade test facility are analyzed. The experimental facility simulates the high Reynolds number flow conditions similar to those encountered in the Space Shuttle Main Engine. In order to determine the influence of Reynolds number on aerodynamic and thermal behavior of the blades, heat transfer coefficients were measured at various Reynolds numbers using liquid crystal temperature measurement technique. Potential flow calculation methods were used to predict the cascade pressure distributions. Boundary layer and heat transfer calculation methods were used with these pressure distributions to verify the experimental results.

Schobeiri, Taher↗