Results for “Round Robin” — Page 7

NASA NTRS2019

Arc Jet Testing: A Short Course

This course will cover an overview of the Entry Systems and Technology Division (TS) at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) and descriptions of the extensive arc jet testing complex managed within the branch. After a quick look at the Earth and Planetary Entry projects supported by TS, along with the inventions and software developed within the division, a description of the entry environments to which thermal protection systems (TPS) are exposed will be discussed. The question of "How do we insure TPS survival?" will be answered with descriptions of the various test facilities across the agency and beyond and their applicability. The Ames Arc Jet Complex will then be described, starting with how an arc heater works, adding in the associated infrastructure required to run an arc heater, and the capabilities of each of the test tunnels. Finally, examples of TPS test articles will round out the course.

ablative materials↗

NASA NTRS2019

Arc Jet Testing

This course will cover an overview of the Entry Systems and Technology Division (TS) at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) and descriptions of the extensive arc jet testing complex managed within the branch. After a quick look at the Earth and Planetary Entry projects supported by TS, along with the inventions and software developed within the division, a description of the entry environments to which thermal protection systems (TPS) are exposed will be discussed. The question of "How do we insure TPS survival?" will be answered with descriptions of the various test facilities across the agency and beyond and their applicability. The Ames Arc Jet Complex will then be described, starting with how an arc heater works, adding in the associated infrastructure required to run an arc heater, and the capabilities of each of the test tunnels. Finally, examples of TPS test articles will round out the course.

arc jet testing↗

NASA NTRS2012

Testing of Candidate Rigid Heatshield Materials at LHMEL for the Entry, Descent, and Landing Technology Development Project

The material testing results described in this paper were part of a material development program of vendor-supplied, proposed heat shield materials. The goal of this program was to develop low density, rigid material systems with an appreciable weight savings over phenolic-impregnated carbon ablator (PICA) while improving material response performance. New technologies, such as PICA-like materials in honeycomb or materials with variable density through-the-thickness were tested. The material testing took place at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Laser Hardened Materials Laboratory (LHMEL) using a 10.6 micron CO2 laser operating with the test articles immersed in a nitrogen-gas environment at 1 atmosphere pressure. Test measurements included thermocouple readings of in-depth temperatures, pyrometer readings of surface temperatures, weight scale readings of mass loss, and sectioned-sample readings of char depth. Two laser exposures were applied. The first exposure was at an irradiance of 450 W/cm2 for 50 or 60 seconds to simulate an aerocapture maneuver. The second laser exposure was at an irradiance of 115 W/cm2 for 100 seconds to simulate a planetary entry. Results from Rounds 1 and 2 of these screening tests are summarized.

Sepka, Steven↗

NASA NTRS2007

Parametric Evaluation of Thin, Transonic Circulation-Control Airfoils

Wind-tunnel tests were conducted in the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel on a 6 percent-thick, elliptical circulation-control airfoil with upper-surface and lower-surface blowing capability. Results for elliptical Coanda trailing-edge geometries, biconvex Coanda trailing-edge geometries, and leading-edge geometries are reported. Results are presented at subsonic and transonic Mach numbers of 0.3 and 0.8, respectively. When considering one fixed trailing-edge geometry, for both the subsonic and transonic conditions it was found that the [3.0:1] ratio elliptical Coanda surface with the most rounded leading-edge [03] performed favorably and was determined to be the best compromise between comparable configurations that took advantage of the Coanda effect. This configuration generated a maximum. (Delta)C(sub 1) = 0.625 at a C(sub mu) = 0.06 at M = 0.3, alpha = 6deg. This same configuration generated a maximum (Delta)C(sub 1) = 0.275 at a C(sub mu) = 0.0085 at M = 0.8, alpha = 3deg.

Schlecht, Robin↗