Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Tank 49H Solids Disturbance Analysis

Tank 49H will serve as the feed tank for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Transfers into Tank 49H may disturb solids that have settled to the bottom of the tank, resulting in feed that may exceed the insoluble solids content limit of 1,200 mg/L from the SWPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). During a transfer into Tank 49H, material that free falls into Tank 49H through a downcomer and passes through the supernate could potentially disturb the solids on the bottom of the tank and scour or suspend solids from a settled solids layer or turbid region. A previous analysis and report evaluated the potential to disturb solids when transferring into Tank 49H through the B4 riser and recommended a minimum tank level of 120 inches to prevent disturbing any solids in the bottom of the tank. The scope of this task is to perform additional fluid flow analysis to determine the impact of a “plunging jet” through the C3 downcomer on solids in Tank 49H and to determine a minimum liquid level to be maintained in Tank 49H prior to transfers that will minimize disturbing the solids and exceeding the SWPF WAC limits for insoluble solids carryover to SWPF since the C3 riser downcomer is at a lower elevation and farther away from the B5 transfer pump than the B4 downcomer.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Tank 49H Solids Disturbance Analysis

Tank 49H will serve as the feed tank for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Transfers into Tank 49H may disturb solids that have settled to the bottom of the tank, resulting in feed that may exceed the insoluble solids content limit of 1,200 mg/L from the SWPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). During a transfer into Tank 49H, material that free falls into Tank 49H through a downcomer and passes through the supernate could potentially disturb the solids on the bottom of the tank and scour or suspend solids from a settled solids layer or turbid region. A previous analysis and report evaluated the potential to disturb solids when transferring into Tank 49H through the B4 riser and recommended a minimum tank level of 120 inches to prevent disturbing any solids in the bottom of the tank. The scope of this task is to perform additional fluid flow analysis to determine the impact of a “plunging jet” through the C3 downcomer on solids in Tank 49H and to determine a minimum liquid level to be maintained in Tank 49H prior to transfers that will minimize disturbing the solids and exceeding the SWPF WAC limits for insoluble solids carryover to SWPF since the C3 riser downcomer is at a lower elevation and farther away from the B5 transfer pump than the B4 downcomer.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Literature Review on the Impact of Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation Rate from the Next Generation Solvent

A literature review was undertaken to assess the thermolytic hydrogen generation potential of the Next Generation Solvent (NGS) system, which is planned to replace the Original Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) Solvent at the Salt Waste Processing Facility. NGS uses a new extractant and suppressor and the same modifier and organic carrier solvent as the Original CSSX Solvent at different concentrations.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

A Review of the Literature on the Radiolytic Stability of the Next-Generation Solvent

The Original Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) solvent (based on the BOBCalixC6 extractant) currently in use at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) is set to be replaced by the Next-Generation Solvent (NGS, based on the MaxCalix extractant). Current SWPF flammability safety controls use G-values for volatile gases obtained from radiolysis studies with the Original CSSX solvent. A review of past irradiation tests of both solvent systems was performed to assess the radiolytic stability of NGS with respect to flammable gas generation from radiolysis.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Literature Review on Next Generation Solvent Isopar ® L Vapor Pressure Curve and the Partitioning of its Modifier and Extractant

The Next Generation Solvent (NGS) is set to replace the Original Caustic Side Solvent Extractant (CSSX) at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), formerly Savannah River Remediation (SRR), to perform a literature review on the following topics to address flammability concerns with the current solvent: Isopar ® L vapor pressure curve for NGS, partitioning ratio for the extractant MaxCalix and the modifier Cs-7SB, and high cesium concentration impacts on NGS radiolysis and potential solvent degradation rates in high cesium concentrations. The following conclusions and recommendations are made based on previous experimental work and literature: (1) Current SWPF flammable gas generation calculations use an Isopar ® L vapor pressure curve based on experimental testing with the Original CSSX solvent. No such testing to date has been performed with NGS. It is suggested that the decrease in Cs-7SB concentration for NGS compared to the Original CSSX solvent would lead to a slightly higher vapor pressure at all temperatures in SWPF vessels. A bounding NGS vapor pressure curve has been provided; it is recommended to see if these values would challenge current flammability controls and to perform testing if needed.(2) The partitioning ratio for Cs-7SB is known in the Original CSSX solvent with dilute nitric acid and caustic solutions. No tests could be found for the partitioning of Cs-7SB to dilute boric acid solutions; however, a similar partitioning ratio is expected. Due to the lipophilic alkyl chains on MaxCalix, it is expected to be even less soluble than BOBCalixC6 in the aqueous phase and should not be considered a significant contributor to the f organic term. Additionally, the reaction rate of N,N’,N’’-Tris(3,7-dimethyloctyl)guanidine (TiDG) or its degradation products with a hydrogen radical should be estimated/determined if they are found to be significant contributors to the f organic term. (3) NGS is expected to see much higher Cs concentrations at SWPF in comparison to its use at the Modular CSSX Unit (MCU). These higher Cs concentrations could influence radiolytic degradation rates of the solvent. NGS appears to be fairly stable to radiolytic degradation based on previous testing and its use at MCU. However, there has not been radiolytic flammable gas generation testing with NGS to date. There is a risk that the continued use of G-values obtained for flammable gases produced from the irradiation of the Original CSSX solvent is not bounding for NGS, but this is considered a very low risk due to the similarities in the composition of the solvents, as well as the conservatisms in the experimental design of the Original CSSX testing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Results of the Analyses of the SRNL Solvent Components

At the request of the Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), personnel at Savannah River Site (SRS) performed analyses on the remaining solvent components that are being stored at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). This was done to determine if the remaining stock of materials were still suitable for use for the Salt Waste processing Facility (SWPF). Two drums of Modifier, two drums BOBCalix, four drums of MAXCalix, and four jars of TiDG*HCl were analyzed. All were found to be of acceptable purity for use.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Tank 49H solids disturbance analysis

Tank 49H serves as the feed tank for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Transfers into Tank 49H may disturb any solids that have settled to the bottom of the tank, resulting in feed that may exceed the insoluble solids content limit of 1,200 mg/L of the SWPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). During a transfer into Tank 49H, material that free falls into Tank 49H through a downcomer could potentially disturb any solids on the bottom of the tank and scour or suspend solids from a settled solids layer or turbid region. A previous analysis and report evaluated the potential to disturb solids when transferring into Tank 49H through the B4 riser and recommended a minimum tank level of 120 inches to prevent disturbing any solids in the bottom of the tank. The scope of this task is to perform additional fluid flow analysis to determine whether accounting for disturbed particle settling and particle mixing and dispersion during transfer could allow the minimum liquid level to be reduced below 120 inches. The analysis utilized models from the technical literature to calculate the size and shape of the “plunging jet” as a function of input parameters such as initial velocity, initial jet diameter, elevation of the initial jet, liquid level in the tank, and solids depth. The analysis relied on the M-Star® simulations performed for the previous analysis to provide bounding estimates of the amount of solid particles disturbed and used the MStar® software to calculate the dispersion and mixing of the disturbed solids with other liquid in the tank as the solids are transported to the transfer pump. The analysis showed that with a solid particle size of 5 micron or less, a liquid level of 120 inches should be maintained to prevent significant disturbance of the solid layer at the bottom of Tank 49H.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Physical Properties of the Salt Waste Processing Next Generation Solvent Formulation

In 2020, a review team examined the risks associated with the implementation of a new solvent formulation, similar to what was used in Modular Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU). The team identified a number of risks associated with the change and pathways to mitigate some of the risks. SRNL has been tasked with examination and testing of a Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) formulation for a Next Generation Solvent (NGS) intended for use at that facility. This formulation is known as the “$NGS\tiny{OPTIMUM}$”. This formulation consists of: 50 mM MAXCalix; 3 mM TiDG•HCl; 0.65 M Modifier; Remainder Isopar-L™. SRNL examined several physical aspects of this solvent in order to confirm its suitability for use at SWPF, such as viscosity, dispersion, surface tension, and third phase formation. Results indicate no unusual properties of this solvent when compared to the current “BOBCalix” solvent in use at SWPF.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Next Generation Solvent Vapor Pressure Testing

Previous work by Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) indicated that the actual Next Generation Solvent vapor pressure would be higher than the Original Caustic Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) solvent vapor pressure, but below a bounding vapor pressure using Raoult’s Law. Since solvent vapor pressure has a significant impact on Composite Lower Flammability Limits (CLFL) and attendant accident analyses, obtaining an additional margin from the bounding NGS vapor pressure would be valuable. In order to quantify how much margin might be gained from the NGS bounding solvent, SRNL researchers were requested to perform vapor pressure testing with the Next Generation Solvent (NGS) by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC). The vapor pressure curve for the NGS formulation set to be deployed at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) has been determined by SRNL up to 55°C (131°F) using headspace Gas Chromatography (GC). It was expected that NGS would have a higher vapor pressure than the Original CSSX solvent; however, experimental results indicate a lower vapor pressure. At this time, it is uncertain if this difference is due to the 7x increase in concentration of the large calixarene in the solvent (0.007M BOBCalix in Original CSSX solvent vs. 0.05M MaxCalix in NGS) or to minor batch-to-batch variations in Isopar-L constituents. The NGS and the Original CSSX solvent vapor pressure data were fitted to the Antoine Equation. The Antoine equation gives a more accurate representation of the expected vapor pressure of the solvents outside of the temperature range tested. The Antoine equation fitting for NGS is given below: $P=10^{6.364⁻\frac{1788.4}{T+219.3}}$. Where, p is the vapor pressure (partial pressure) of NGS in mmHg and T is the temperature in °C. It is recommended that SRMC either continue using the more conservative Isopar-L vapor pressure calculations at SWPF with the equation developed for the Original CSSX solvent, or the equation presented above for the NGS solvent. Additionally, it is recommended to study the variability in Isopar-L vapor pressure between lots.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

The Compatibility of Tefzel™ and Viton™ B with Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction Solvents

The Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) plans to switch from the current Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) solvent to the Next Generation Solvent-Phase II (NGS-Phase II). SRNL was requested to evaluate the compatibility between polymeric materials of construction at SWPF and NGS-Phase II solvent. The work presented here concentrated on two materials of interest: Tefzel™ and Viton™ B.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Extraction, Scrub, and Strip Test Results for the IBC BOBCalix Solvent Samples

A second vendor for solvent extraction components has been chosen for use at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). IBC Advanced Technologies (IBC) has provided samples of their BOBCalix, as well as complete solvent. These samples were tested for quality assurance purposes to ensure their use at SWPF is acceptable. Two Extraction, Scrub, and Strip (ESS) tests were performed on solvent samples from IBC. The purpose of testing these samples was to determine if the solvents are displaying the correct extraction and stripping behavior with cesium.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Conceptual Model Testing Related to SDU 6 Drainwell Observations

From its inception in the early 1950s through the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, the Savannah River Site (SRS) produced nuclear materials for national defense in five reactors. Additionally, irradiated reactor fuel and target tubes were dissolved in nitric acid to recover plutonium and uranium using the PUREX (Plutonium Uranium Reduction EXtraction) process. Liquid waste from these chemical separations processes was then stored onsite in 51 underground tanks. Eight waste storage tanks have been operationally closed (i.e. cleaned and grouted) and the remaining tanks hold a mixture of liquids, insoluble solids, and precipitated salts (SRMC-LWP-2022-00001), the latter generated by evaporating water from the liquid waste. Waste is currently being retrieved from tanks and separated into 1) high-radioactivity, low-volume, and 2) low-radioactivity, high-volume components, principally through the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) (SRMC-LWP-2023-00001). The former waste stream is vitrified in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), stored onsite, and destined for offsite disposal in a deep geologic repository. The latter stream is mixed with dry cementitious materials in the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF) and the wet slurry placed in onsite Saltstone Disposal Units (SDUs) within the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF), where it hardens into a cement waste form termed saltstone. A low-infiltration surface cover system will be placed over the SDF at closure, where SDUs will then be in the subsurface post-closure (SRR-CWDA-2019-00001).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Evaluating Liquid Waste Transfers and their Impacts to the SRS Tank Farms to Support Operations and Closure

BACKGROUND • SRMC mission critical milestones – 34 million liters (9 million gallons) Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Processing Rate – Accelerated Waste Tank Closures • Results in an increase in Tank Farm transfers • Barriers – Equipment failures, replacements, and adjustments – Weather – Procedure development – Outside facility changes How has the Tank Farm adapted to meet these milestones? By improving the transfer evaluation process

B↗
DOE OSTI2026

Improving Elemental Mercury Recovery in DWPF by pH and Ionic Strength Studies Using Laboratory Scale Replica – 26141

In order to safely disposition nuclear material at large scales, the Savannah River Site (SRS) constructed the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) for the removal of actinides, the Saltstone facility for preparation of a low-level cementitious grout, and the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) for the vitrification of high-level waste (HLW). A few years after processing began, high concentrations of mercury were discovered in cementitious waste at the Saltstone facility which initiated a search for the source of mercury during processing at these SRS facilities. Mercury serves as a catalyst in the dissolution of spent nuclear fuel, aluminum-actinide alloys, for actinide recovery, but not enough is known about the behavior and properties of mercury within these process streams.

Pina, Jeanette [Savannah River National Laboratory↗
DOE OSTI2017

Defense waste processing facility (DWPF) liquids model: revisions for processing higher TIO 2 containing glasses

Radioactive high level waste (HLW) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) has successfully been vitrified into borosilicate glass in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) since 1996. Vitrification requires stringent product/process (P/P) constraints since the glass cannot be reworked once it is poured into ten foot tall by two foot diameter canisters. A unique “feed forward” statistical process control (SPC) was developed for this control rather than statistical quality control (SQC). In SPC, the feed composition to the DWPF melter is controlled prior to vitrification. In SQC, the glass product would be sampled after it is vitrified. Individual glass property-composition models form the basis for the “feed forward” SPC. The models transform constraints on the melt and glass properties into constraints on the feed composition going to the melter in order to guarantee, at the 95% confidence level, that the feed will be processable and that the durability of the resulting waste form will be acceptable to a geologic repository. This report documents the development of revised TiO 2 , Na 2 O, Li 2 O and Fe 2 O 3 coefficients in the SWPF liquidus model and revised coefficients (a, b, c, and d).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Engineering Options Assessment Report. Nitrate Salt Waste Stream Processing

This report examines and assesses the available systems and facilities considered for carrying out remediation activities on remediated nitrate salt (RNS) and unremediated nitrate salt (UNS) waste containers at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The assessment includes a review of the waste streams consisting of 60 RNS, 29 above-ground UNS, and 79 candidate below-ground UNS containers that may need remediation. The waste stream characteristics were examined along with the proposed treatment options identified in the Options Assessment Report . Two primary approaches were identified in the five candidate treatment options discussed in the Options Assessment Report: zeolite blending and cementation. Systems that could be used at LANL were examined for housing processing operations to remediate the RNS and UNS containers and for their viability to provide repackaging support for remaining LANL legacy waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Savannah River Site High Level Radioactive Waste Tank Sample Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation - 20346

To support the revision of flammability calculations and controls for the Savannah River Site (SRS) High-Level Radioactive Waste (HLW) tanks, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) conducted laboratory measurements with the goal of quantifying hydrogen produced in HLW by non-radiolytic chemical reactions (i.e., thermolysis). Testing was performed with HLW tank supernate samples that represented a cross section of types of waste at SRS, including tanks that store typical evaporator concentrate, dissolved salt-cake, dilute recycle stream from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), evaporator concentrate of the recycle stream from DWPF, fresh waste from the canyon separations facility, and waste that has been through salt processing cesium removal. Non-radioactive simulant testing included the classes of organic compounds historically introduced into the HLW tanks that were recently shown to be the most active toward the thermolytic generation of hydrogen. The reaction rate equations developed for thermolytic hydrogen generation from each class of organic compound showed direct proportionality to organic compound concentration and hydroxide concentration. Simulant testing identified that highly concentrated waste with high hydroxide concentration had the highest rates of thermolytic hydrogen generation. Using the radioactive tank sample thermolysis measurements at high temperatures and the mechanistic salt dependence of the simulant models, a global model was developed for tank waste thermolytic hydrogen generation as a function of total organic carbon content of SRS HLW. Through the primary functionality of the global model (organic carbon and free hydroxide concentration), the relative reactivity of the organic carbon in the waste was quantified. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗