Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Spin injection”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

113 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

A Multiwavelength Investigation of PSR J2229+6114 and its Pulsar Wind Nebula in the Radio, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Bands

Abstract G106.3+2.7, commonly considered to be a composite supernova remnant (SNR), is characterized by a boomerang-shaped pulsar wind nebula (PWN) and two distinct (“head” and “tail”) regions in the radio band. A discovery of very-high-energy gamma-ray emission (E γ > 100 GeV) followed by the recent detection of ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission (E γ > 100 TeV) from the tail region suggests that G106.3+2.7 is a PeVatron candidate. We present a comprehensive multiwavelength study of the Boomerang PWN (100″ around PSR J2229+6114) using archival radio and Chandra data obtained two decades ago, a new NuSTAR X-ray observation from 2020, and upper limits on gamma-ray fluxes obtained by Fermi-LAT and VERITAS observatories. The NuSTAR observation allowed us to detect a 51.67 ms spin period from the pulsar PSR J2229+6114 and the PWN emission characterized by a power-law model with Γ = 1.52 ± 0.06 up to 20 keV. Contrary to the previous radio study by Kothes et al., we prefer a much lower PWNB-field (B∼ 3μG) and larger distance (d∼ 8 kpc) based on (1) the nonvarying X-ray flux over the last two decades, (2) the energy-dependent X-ray size of the PWN resulting from synchrotron burn-off, and (3) the multiwavelength spectral energy distribution (SED) data. Our SED model suggests that the PWN is currently re-expanding after being compressed by the SNR reverse shock ∼1000 yr ago. In this case, the head region should be formed by GeV–TeV electrons injected earlier by the pulsar propagating into the low-density environment.

Astronomy & Astrophysics↗
DOE OSTI2023

Clean Energy Technology Applications on US Mine Land: Technical Analysis

As the United States transitions toward a clean energy economy, an opportunity exists for redeveloping the more than 17,000 mine land sites located across the nation with clean energy technologies, which have a combined potential for generating more than 85 GW of clean electricity. This report provides an overview of the potential of demonstrating and deploying clean energy projects on current and former mine land. Clean energy project refers to a project that demonstrates one or more of the following technologies: solar; microgrids; geothermal; direct air capture; fossil-fueled electricity generation with carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration; energy storage, including pumped storage hydropower and compressed air energy storage; and advanced nuclear technologies. The report discusses the following technologies and their potential for creating jobs and generating tax revenue that would result in direct and indirect benefits to the local economy: Solar photovoltaics (PV) is being developed on current and former mine land in various parts of the world, including the United States. This approach is attractive because it requires limited infrastructure investment and would utilize the bare surfaces of mines and tailing ponds. Solar resource availability may be greater in the southern regions, including the Interior and Appalachian Basins and the southwestern United States. However, since some mine land sites include areas of significant change in elevation, the deployment of PV on mine land may require sophisticated planning to account for shading and irradiance, or may require regrading of the areas. PV does not create significant environmental risks and generally does not face public resistance; Geothermal systems are often spatially and genetically associated with ore deposits, and in some cases, they have been discovered while in search for epithermal mineral resources. Numerous diverse geothermal applications have been employed at mine land around the world, including power generation, mineral extraction from geothermal brines, process heating, direct use for other mining operations, and direct use for non-mining operations and subsurface energy storage, including geothermal heat pumps. Case studies highlighting these applications provide key lessons relating to identifying drivers and barriers to geothermal resource deployment and can be used to create screening tools for identifying the types and locations of mine land most amenable to utilizing geothermal resources; Carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration technologies include direct air capture (DAC) and enhanced weathering. DAC technologies include air contactors, regeneration systems, and CO 2 compression systems. Captured CO 2 can be converted to valuable feedstocks or possibly injected into abandoned subsurface mines where it would be absorbed by alkaline rock waste and mine tailings or by the porous minerals along the walls of the mine. DAC systems can be coupled with energy sources such as wind, solar, grid, or geothermal. Many DAC systems require a source of water or steam; however, some are expected to be net producers of water. Local impacts of DAC systems are expected to be low, and are related to land footprint, material disposal, and upstream impacts of energy and material production; Compressed air energy storage is an established energy storage technology in salt caverns. It has the potential for implementation in underground mines by pressurizing and storing a large amount of air using electrical compressors when excess electricity is available. When a need for discharge emerges, the air is used to spin turbines and produce the necessary volume of electricity. Abandoned or unused mine openings, including shafts, adits, access tunnels, and mined workings of any orientation, offer potential for vast amounts of compressed air energy storage if the site characteristics meet operational requirements; Pumped hydropower storage can be implemented in surface and subsurface mines. In surface mine applications, both reservoirs may be located in a mine pit or artificial reservoirs made of excavated materials. In subsurface mines, the lower reservoir may be implemented by waterproofing and flooding mine shafts and tunnels. The water is then pumped from the lower reservoir to the upper reservoir during periods of low load and high production, and it is discharged through the turbines during periods of peak demand. The potential environmental damages associated with acidity of mine water or the presence of toxic chemicals incentivizes the development of closed-loop technologies, in which water circulates inside the pumped hydropower facility without being discharged into the external water basins; Advanced nuclear energy technologies include small modular reactors, which can be deployed locally to produce electricity and heat. Such units require seismic stability and a supply of cooling water, but population constraints may exist in some areas. Therefore, remote mine land could represent an optimal location for siting advanced nuclear energy technologies.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2025

In Situ Electrochemistry of Buried Interfaces in Metal Halide Perovskites: Probing Energy Bands, Halide Redox Activity, and Kinetics

Control over charge injection and extraction processes across buried interfaces is fundamental for all (opto)electronic multilayer device platforms, necessitating detailed understanding of local structural and chemical differences that promote defect formation, distort energetic band-edge alignments, and alter charge transport processes. Herein, the implementation of a low-cost electroanalytical methodologies’ tool suite is described to quantitatively characterize buried interfaces and redox reactions in printable, mixed electrical–ionic, and redox-active metal halide perovskites and a prototypical hole-transporting nickel oxide (NiO x ) thin film. The objective is to demonstrate the power of electrochemical methodologies to improve the nanoscale understanding of complex interfaces within optoelectronic devices by providing case studies on how to: i) differentiate between electronic and chemical properties in NiO x contacts; ii) measure changes in reversibility of halide redox reactions via NiO x surface states; iii) assess energy alignment and charge transport across (modified) buried interfaces; and iv) quantify defects at buried interfaces that change with modifiers and differences in perovskite processing, including increasing defect concentrations when films are slot-die-coated versus spin-cast. The collective approach addresses major challenges in understanding the precise energy landscape and interface reactivity under relevant electric fields that mimic operando conditions (away from equilibrium) and across length scales in thin film device formats.

(spectro)electrochemistry↗
DOE OSTI2026

Position Operators in Terms of Converging Finite-Dimensional Matrices and Their Intertwining with Geometry, Transport, and Gauge

The position operator 𝑟̂ appears as 𝑖∂ 𝑝 in wave mechanics, while its matrix form (e.g., under a Bloch basis) is well known diverging in diagonals, causing difficulties in basis transformation, observable yielding, etc. We aim to find a convergent r-matrix (CRM) to improve the existing divergent r-matrix (DRM), and investigate its influence at both the conceptual and the application levels. A key modification is increasing the familiar substitution of 𝑟̂ by 𝑖∂ 𝑝 to 𝑖∑ 𝑗 ∂ 𝑘 𝑗 , namely the N-th Weyl algebra. Resolving the divergence makes r-matrix rigorously defined, and we are able to show r-matrix is distinct from a spin matrix in terms of its defining principles, transformation behavior, and the observable it yields. Conceptually, the CRM fills the logical gap between the r-matrix and the Berry connection (this unremarked vagueness has caused the diagonal divergence). In application, we focus on transport, and discover that the Hermitian matrix is not identical with the associative Hermitian operator, i.e., 𝑟 𝑚,𝑛 = 𝑟$^∗_{𝑛,𝑚}$ ⇎ 𝑟̂ = 𝑟̂ † , which subtly affects the celebrated Berry curvature formula for adiabatic current. We also discuss how such a non-representation CRM can contribute to building a unified transport theory.

Weyl algebras↗