Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “WIND TUNNEL WALL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1978

Unsteady two dimensional airloads acting on oscillating thin airfoils in subsonic ventilated wind tunnels

The numerical calculation of unsteady two dimensional airloads which act upon thin airfoils in subsonic ventilated wind tunnels was studied. Neglecting certain quadrature errors, Bland's collocation method is rigorously proved to converge to the mathematically exact solution of Bland's integral equation, and a three way equivalence was established between collocation, Galerkin's method and least squares whenever the collocation points are chosen to be the nodes of the quadrature rule used for Galerkin's method. A computer program displayed convergence with respect to the number of pressure basis functions employed, and agreement with known special cases was demonstrated. Results are obtained for the combined effects of wind tunnel wall ventilation and wind tunnel depth to airfoil chord ratio, and for acoustic resonance between the airfoil and wind tunnel walls. A boundary condition is proposed for permeable walls through which mass flow rate is proportional to pressure jump.

Fromme, J.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research at Ames Research Center

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research is summarized. This research includes small-scale two- and three-dimensional wind-tunnel experiments and numerical experiments with a three-dimensional adaptive-wall simulator. Airflow through the test-section walls is controlled by adjusting the pressures in segmented plenums. Interference free conditions are successfully attained in subsonic and transonic flows. An adaptive wall test section is constructed for the transonic wind tunnel. Wall interference was reduced in the three dimensional experiment at several angles of attack at Mach 0.60. A wing on wall configuration was modeled in the numerical experiments. These flow simulations showed that free air conditions can be approximated by adjusting boundary conditions at only the floor and ceiling of the test section. No sidewall control was necessary.

Schairer, E. T.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research at NASA-Ames Research Center

Adaptive wall wind tunnel research is summarized. Small scale two and three dimensional wind tunnel experiments and numerical experiments with a three dimensional adaptive wall simulator are included. A NACA 0012 airfoil was tested in a 25 by 13 cm slotted wall test section. Airflow through the test section walls was controlled by adjusting the pressures in segmented plenums. Interference free conditions were successfully attained in subsonic and transonic flows. For the three dimensional experiment, the 25 by 13 cm wind tunnel was modified to permit cross stream wall adjustments. The test model was a semispan wing mounted to one sidewall. Wall interference was substantially reduced at several angles of attack at Mach 0.60. A wing on wall configuration was also modeled in the numerical experiments. These flow simulations showed that free air conditions can be approximated by adjusting boundary conditions at only the floor and ceiling of the test section. No sidewall control was necessary. Typical results from these experiments are discussed.

Schairer, E. T.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Experimental evaluation of wall Mach number distributions of the octagonal test section proposed for NASA Lewis Research Center's altitude wind tunnel

Wall Mach number distributions were determined over a range of test-section free-stream Mach numbers from 0.2 to 0.92. The test section was slotted and had a nominal porosity of 11 percent. Reentry flaps located at the test-section exit were varied from 0 (fully closed) to 9 (fully open) degrees. Flow was bled through the test-section slots by means of a plenum evacuation system (PES) and varied from 0 to 3 percent of tunnel flow. Variations in reentry flap angle or PES flow rate had little or no effect on the Mach number distributions in the first 70 percent of the test section. However, in the aft region of the test section, flap angle and PES flow rate had a major impact on the Mach number distributions. Optimum PES flow rates were nominally 2 to 2.5 percent wtih the flaps fully closed and less than 1 percent when the flaps were fully open. The standard deviation of the test-section wall Mach numbers at the optimum PES flow rates was 0.003 or less.

Harrington, Douglas E.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Wall Interference Correction System of the NASA Ames 11-ft Transonic Wind Tunnel

The document for review is a chapter for a new AGARD document on wind tunnel wall interference. The chapter describes NASA's current approach to wind tunnel wall interference assessment by using the implementation of the wall interference correction system of the NASA Ames 11-ft Transonic Wind Tunnel as an example.

wind tunnel wall interference↗
NASA NTRS1981

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel development for transonic testing

Experimental techniques for rapid assessment and correction of wall interference in an adaptive-wall wind tunnel are described. The experimental arrangement allows laser velocimetry measurements on two control surfaces and incorporates a dedicated computer for data processing. The apparatus and its instrumentation are described, and typical results from an experiment on a nonlifting NACA 0012 airfoil at M = 0.78 are discussed. It is concluded that the time to acquire laser Doppler velocimeter data should be decreased, and the possibility of using one-step algorithms should be investigated.

Satyanarayana, B.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research at Ames Research Center: A retrospective

This paper reviews adaptive-wall wind-tunnel research conducted at Ames Research Center between 1978 and 1988. This research focused on developing ways to apply the concept of adaptive walls in transonic test sections with ventilated walls. In the approach pursued at Ames, local mass flow through slotted test-section walls was controlled by adjusting the pressure in compartments of a segmented plenum; the flow measurements required to test compatibility of the wind-tunnel flow with free-air boundary conditions were made using a laser velocimeter; empirical influence coefficients were used to predict how pressure changes in the plenum would effect the flow. Both two- and three-dimensional proof-of-concept experiments were conducted in a small indraft wind tunnel. Subsequently, a two-dimensional test section was demonstrated in the Ames 2x2 ft. Transonic Wind Tunnel-a wind tunnel representative of a production facility. The 2x2 ft.tests showed large reductions of wall interference; however, the time required to make the necessary flow measurements and plenum pressure adjustments far exceeded what would be acceptable for production testing. This was primarily because the imaginary surface where free-air compatibility was tested had to be separated from the test section walls to avoid the complex, viscous flow adjacent to the walls. It is unlikely that the Ames approach to adaptive walls will be applied in production wind tunnels. The two biggest unresolved problems are how to quickly and accurately make the necessary flow measurements and how to predict the effects of wall adjustments. In contrast, flexible-wall technology for two-dimensional testing is ready for application in production wind tunnels. However, neither the ventilated- nor flexible-wall approach has been shown to be a technically viable and cost-effective solution to the three-dimensional adaptive wall problem.

Schairer, Edward T.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Study of the integration of wind tunnel and computational methods for aerodynamic configurations

A study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of using a low-order panel code to estimate wind tunnel wall corrections. The corrections were found by two computations. The first computation included the test model and the surrounding wind tunnel walls, while in the second computation the wind tunnel walls were removed. The difference between the force and moment coefficients obtained by comparing these two cases allowed the determination of the wall corrections. The technique was verified by matching the test-section, wall-pressure signature from a wind tunnel test with the signature predicted by the panel code. To prove the viability of the technique, two cases were considered. The first was a two-dimensional high-lift wing with a flap that was tested in the 7- by 10-foot wind tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center. The second was a 1/32-scale model of the F/A-18 aircraft which was tested in the low-speed wind tunnel at San Diego State University. The panel code used was PMARC (Panel Method Ames Research Center). Results of this study indicate that the proposed wind tunnel wall correction method is comparable to other methods and that it also inherently includes the corrections due to model blockage and wing lift.

Browne, Lindsey E.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Rod-Wall Sound Shield for Wind Tunnels

Test model is shielded from turbulence radiated from wind tunnel walls. Shield overcomes problems caused by leading-edge configuration and leading edge angle of inclination of previous designs. Has successfully maintained a laminar rather than turbulent boundary layer.

Creel, T. R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Assessment of lift- and blockage-induced wall interference in a three-dimensional adaptive-wall tunnel

A three-dimensional adaptive-wall wind tunnel experiment was conducted at Ames Research Center. This experiment demonstrated the effects of wall interference on the upwash distribution on an imaginary surface surrounding a lifting wing. This presentation demonstrates how the interference assessment procedure used in the adaptive-wall experiments to determine the wall adjustments can be used to separately assess lift- and blockage-induced wall interference in a passive-wall wind tunnel. The effects of lift interference on the upwash distribution and on the model lift coefficient are interpreted by a simple horseshoe vortex analysis.

Schairer, E. T.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Wind-tunnel fan noise reduction including effects of turning vanes on noise propagation

Fan silencers with low-pressure drop have been designed and installed in the NASA Ames 7- by 10-Foot Wind Tunnel No. 1. The silencers are composed of an absorbent lining flush with the wind-tunnel walls upstream of the fan and an absorbent splitter in the duct downstream of the fan. An acoustical insertion loss of 4 to 12 dB was measured between 100 and 1000 Hz. High-frequency performance of the silencers was reduced by test-section noise and by corner vanes which turned the sound waves so they followed the duct axis. Sound below 1.2 kHz diffracted around the 305-mm-long vanes and impinged on acoustically absorbent corner walls. Wind-tunnel flow losses are discussed.

Soderman, P. T.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Computation of wall effects in ventilated transonic wind tunnels.

A method for computing interference effects due to ventilated wind-tunnel walls on lifting transonic airfoils is presented. Differences between the present method based on nonlinear transonic theory and the classical correction formulae from linear subsonic theory are discussed. Computed results are presented for an NACA 0012 in solid and perforated wall tunnels. The solid wall calculations are compared with data.

Murman, E. M.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Atmospheric Boundary-Layer and Flutter Computations Using CFD Model of the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel

This paper presents two Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models of the flow in the NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT). The TDT is a continuous-flow, closed circuit wind tunnel with a 16- by 16-foot slotted test section with cropped corners. The tunnel was originally built as the 19-ft Pressure Tunnel in 1938, but it was converted to the current transonic tunnel in the 1950s, with capabilities to use either air or heavy gas as the test medium. The first computational model describes the generation of an atmospheric-boundary-layer (ABL) profile inside the tunnel. An ABL, which includes both a wind profile and turbulence content, is one of the aerodynamic characteristics affecting the occurrence of wind-induced oscillations for a launch vehicle sitting on a pad. The challenging part of this analysis was modeling the turbulent flow inside the tunnel. This is due to the special ABL-generating hardware that was installed at the entrance of the TDT test section in order to change the downstream velocity profile and to introduce velocity fluctuations into the flow. The second CFD model builds on the computational aeroelastic results that were generated in support of the second Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop (AePW) for the NASA Benchmark Supercritical Wing (BSCW) configuration. During the AePW, the wing-only configuration (classical free-air model) was analyzed. In the current study, the flutter computations were conducted on the configuration as it was mounted in the TDT during the experiment. This includes the wing attached to the splitter plate that was attached to the wind-tunnel walls. The preliminary results show that the wind-tunnel walls marginally affect flutter prediction.

Pawel Chwalowski↗
NASA NTRS1976

Experiments with a self-correcting wind tunnel

The feasibility of controlling the flow actively through the walls of a transonic, porous wall wind tunnel in order to minimize wall interference effects on a test model is demonstrated. The method is based upon measuring the components of the disturbance velocity at discrete points along an imaginary surface in the flow field within the tunnel. A mathematical formulation of the flow field exterior to the surface including the boundary condition for unconfined flow, i.e., that all disturbance vanish at infinite, is used to determine if these measured velocity components are consistent with that boundary condition. If they are not, the theory provides a better approximation to the velocity component for unconfined flow, and the flow through the tunnel walls is readjusted iteratively until the measured quantities are consistent with unconfined flow. A brief review of theoretical methods is followed by a description of the Calspan self correcting wind tunnel design and operation, calibration with and without active wall control. Typical results obtained by approximating a conventional porous wall wind tunnel for an 0012 airfoil show that active wall control largely reproduces the correct shock wave position, eliminates wall interference of lift and drag, and reduces the interference effects on pitching moment to 10%.

Vidal, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Estimating Wall-Induced Velocities in Wind Tunnels

Estimates of wall effects in two-dimensional wind tunnel obtained using upwash measurements on two contours near test model. Method derived from combination of prior techniques that correct for wall effects. Improved method limited to flows described by linear equations. Method accurately predicted wall-induced velocities along centerline of theoretical wind tunnel and confirmed that wall adjustments substantially reduced wall interference.

Schairer, E. T.↗