Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “X-15 AIRCRAFT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1981

Analytic study of orbiter landing profiles

A broad survey of possible orbiter landing configurations was made with specific goals of defining boundaries for the landing task. The results suggest that the center of the corridors between marginal and routine represents a more or less optimal preflare condition for regular operations. Various constraints used to define the boundaries are based largely on qualitative judgements from earlier flight experience with the X-15 and lifting body research aircraft. The results should serve as useful background for expanding and validating landing simulation programs. The analytic approach offers a particular advantage in identifying trends due to the systematic variation of factors such as vehicle weight, load factor, approach speed, and aim point. Limitations such as a constant load factor during the flare and using a fixed gear deployment time interval, can be removed by increasing the flexibility of the computer program. This analytic definition of landing profiles of the orbiter may suggest additional studies, includin more configurations or more comparisons of landing profiles within and beyond the corridor boundaries.

Walker, H. J.↗
NASA NTRS1958

Centrifugal simulation of the X-15

Paper presents the results of physiological tolerance tests of the pilot to the oscillating accelerations of large amplitude and long duration which might occur as a result of aircraft heading errors during reentries from the altitude mission in the X-15 without control augmentation.

Clark, Carl↗
NASA NTRS1958

Effects of aerodynamic heating on X-15 temperatures

Paper describes examples which show how wind-tunnel model tests of the actual configuration of the aircraft aid in aerothermodynamic analyses and how these tests have made possible increased accuracy in structural temperature prediction. Also, from this and other research, development and design work on the X-15 has been done to accomplish a design consistent with the specified flight requirements. In this work, structural temperatures have been held within acceptable limits by providing sufficient heat sink material. Limited areas of the skin and leading edges are expected to attain temperatures greater than 1,200 degrees F. However, these areas have been carefully investigated for the effect of these higher temperatures on the structure and have been found to be satisfactory.

Kinsler, Martin R↗
NASA NTRS1983

Flight testing of unique aircraft configurations

Some historical developments of flight testing of unique aircraft configurations by NASA and the military sector are documented. Several test aircraft are outlined including the M2-F1 (which was the first Space Shuttle concept ever demonstrated, and contributed to the present design), the X-15, the Flying Wing, the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle, the Oblique Wing Research Aircraft, and the Space Shuttle Enterprise. Future test aircraft such as the forward swept wing X-29A Advanced Technology Demonstrator Aircraft, and the X-Wing vehicle are also mentioned. It is noted that the logical preliminary to flight testing is flight simulation, and that flight testing itself is the vital final component of the development, and seems to be the most direct approach to aircraft evaluations.

Painter, W. D.↗
NASA NTRS1958

Development of X-15 escape system

The content of this paper is concerned primarily with testing and determining the suitability of such factors as cockpit mobility, escape potential, mechanical reliability, post-separation performance, and airframe compatibility. Integrating the results of the various studies led to the conclusion that the pressure suit in combination with the open ejection seat would best satisfy the X-15 emergency-escape requirements by virtue of elimination of capsule-imposed penalties on aircraft performance and significant reduction in development time.

Hegenwald, J F↗
NASA NTRS1972

Ground and flight test methods for determining limit cycle and structural resonance characteristics of aircraft stability augmentation systems

Performance criteria and test techniques are applied to stability augmentation systems (SAS) during ground testing to predict objectionable limit cycles and preclude structural resonance during flight. Factors that give rise to these problems, means of suppressing their effects, trade-offs to be considered, and ground test methods that have been developed are discussed. SAS performance predicted on the basis of these tests is compared with flight data obtained from three lifting body vehicles and the X-15 research airplane. Limit cycle and structural resonance test criteria, based upon ground and flight experience and data, were successfully applied to these vehicles. The criteria used were: The limit cycle amplitude (SAS gain multiplied by peak-to-peak angular rate) shall not exceed 0.5 deg for the highest product of control power and SAS gain that will be used in flight; the maximum in-flight SAS gain should never exceed 50 percent of the value at which a structural resonance can be sustained during ground test.

Painter, W. D.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Aircraft handling qualities data

Available information on weight and inertia, aerodynamic derivatives, control characteristics, and stability augmentation systems is documented for 10 representative contemporary airplanes. Data sources are given for each airplane. Flight envelopes are presented and dimensional derivatives, transfer functions for control inputs, and several selected handling qualities parameters have been computed and are tabulated for 10 different flight conditions including the power approach configuration. The airplanes documented are the NT-33A, F-104A, F-4C, X-15, HL-10, Jetstar, CV-880M, B-747, C-5A, and XB-70A.

Heffley, R. K.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Load and dynamic assessment of B-52B-008 carrier aircraft for finned configuration 1 space shuttle solid rocket booster deceleration subsystem drop test vehicle. Volume 4: Pylon load data

The pylon loading at the drop test vehicle and wing interface attack points is presented. The loads shown are determined using a stiffness method, which assumes the side stiffness of the forward hook guide and the fore and aft stiffness of each drag pin to be equal. The net effect of this assumption is that the forward hook guide reacts approximately 96% of the drop test vehicle yawing moment. For a comparison of these loads to previous X-15 analysis design loadings, see Volume 1 of this document.

Quade, D. A.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Load and dynamic assessment of B-52B-008 carrier aircraft for finned configuration 1 space shuttle solid rocket booster decelerator subsystem drop test vehicle. Volume 3: Pylon load data method 1

The pylon loading at the drop test vehicle and wing interface attach points is presented. The loads shown are determined using a stiffness method, which assumes the side stiffness of the foreward hook guide to be one-fourth of the fore and aft stiffness of each drag pin. The net effect of this assumption is that the forward hook guide reacts approximately 85% of the drop test vehicle yawing moment. For a comparison of these loads to previous X-15 analysis design loadings, see Volume 1 of this document.

Quade, D. A.↗
NASA NTRS1963

THE X-15 PROGRAM

X 15 flight tests showing structure, powerplant, and auxiliary systems problems, and emphasizing pilots boost, entry, and landing techniques

FLIGHT TEST↗