Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “advanced reactor facilities”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

National Reactor Innovation Center Annual Report

The National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC), established in August 2019, is a national United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) program. NRIC’s mission is to partner with industry and national laboratories to bridge the gap between the concept, demonstration, and commercialization of advanced nuclear technology. NRIC accomplishes this through building or enhancing existing DOE infrastructure to support the testing of components and systems that are key to successfully deploying advanced nuclear technology. NRIC works to inspire stakeholders and the public, empower innovators, and deliver successful outcomes through efficient collaboration and coordination with partners. NRIC’s vision is that by 2028, NRIC will be partnered with industry and accelerating the demonstration and deployment of advanced nuclear technology using DOE national laboratory infrastructure and expertise. NRIC will establish four new experimental facilities and two large reactor test beds for integrated technology demonstrations and experimentation by 2028 and complete two advanced nuclear technology tests by 2030. Achieving this vision will enable urgently needed abundant and affordable clean energy both domestically and internationally. NRIC’s success will inspire our nation and the global community to embrace the promising contribution of innovative nuclear reactor technologies to the clean energy economy and re-establish the U.S. as the global leader in advanced nuclear energy. NRIC is tasked with expediting the development of advanced nuclear energy technologies by bringing together private-sector technology developers and the world-class capabilities of the DOE national laboratory system. Through this program, the U.S. private sector is given access to the physical infrastructure available at DOE national laboratories to test and demonstrate their reactor concepts. NRIC works closely with the Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN),; which is the DOE-Nuclear Energy (NE) program that grantings access to technical, regulatory, and financial support for commercializing nuclear energy. As observed in Figure 1, NRIC builds upon these new reactor concepts and technology successes to effectively strengthen U.S. nuclear leadership.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Reactor Technologies Quality Assurance Program Plan

This QAPP covers INL ART R&D, licensing, and program support activities. QA implementing procedures will be identified for all activities to ensure work is documented and the results are capable of successfully completing a technical review by DOE. For work performed by other organizations under contract or other agreements with INL, applicable requirements will be flowed down through the contract or other agreements, but the organizations will be responsible to implement the flowed down requirements through their own specific implementing procedures. This QAPP also covers implementation of software QA (SQA) requirements for software used exclusively by INL ART. Software that is used to support multiple INL programs/projects is not covered by this QAPP; the responsibility for implementing SQA requirements for that software resides with the owners and respective managers of the software. This QAPP does not cover activities for installing and operating experiments in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at INL, nor does it cover ATR facility modifications designed to meet INL ART testing needs (such as temperature, pressure, gas flow, and control systems). Those activities are controlled by the INL QAP and specific ATR implementing procedures. ATR facility management and INL ART management jointly approve experiment designs and functional system requirements. This QAPP does apply to INL ART R&D experiments that will be inserted into ATR and any support activities associated with those R&D activities. This QAPP does not cover activities for installing and operating general post irradiation examination (PIE) test equipment in Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) facilities. Those activities are controlled by the INL QAP and MFC implementing procedures. However, this QAPP does apply to MFC facility modifications designed to meet specific INL ART testing needs. It also applies to INL ART experiments that will have PIE performed on them and any support activities associated with the PIE activities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

HYBRID Modeling of DETAIL Experimental Facility

Idaho National Laboratory continues to be at the forefront of advanced reactor systems and integrated energy systems research. Through the Thermal Energy Distribution System (TEDS) and Microreactor Agile Non-nuclear Test Bed (MAGNET) experiments in the Dynamic Energy Transport and Innovation Laboratory (DETAIL) within the Engineering Systems Laboratory, a mix of digital and physical testing systems can explore the operation of thermally and electrically integrated systems. Modeling of these systems has been done using the HYBRID modeling repository of the Integrated Energy Systems program. DETAIL also contains high temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) units to produce hydrogen and generate the load imposed on MAGNET and TEDS. The dynamic modeling capabilities within the IES program describe the DETAIL components as-built and can be used to evaluate controls, process flows, and overall system conditions.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Multimetallic Layered Composites (MMLCs) for Rapid, Economical Advanced Reactor Deployment (Final Report)

This project focused on the development of multi-metallic layered composites (MMLCs) for advanced fission reactor technologies. There are many instances where one alloy or material simply cannot meet all the demands thrown at it by a reactor system, or cannot allow it to perform as strongly as one would like. Instead of focusing all our effort on developing one perfect alloy, we seek to leverage the design principle of “separation of functionality,” used in many other arenas in design, to boost performance beyond single alloys alone. One illustrative example shows the power of this approach for molten salt-cooled reactors: A three meter tall, three meter diameter reactor vessel made of Incoloy 800 was quoted at $\$$500k in 2018. A Hastelloy N vessel was quoted at $\$$5M. An MMLC vessel, in which a layer of Hastelloy N would be weld-overlaid onto Incoloy 800, was quoted at $\$$700k, and it would achieve the same performance. The potential economic gains of leveraging this approach are therefore substantial. At a minimum, each MMLC would contain one core structural layer and one coolant-facing corrosion-resistant layer. Sometimes, MMLCs required buffer layers, as the structural and corrosion-resistant layers were metallurgically incompatible. In other words, they didn’t always play nice, thus separating layers compatible with both functioned as intermediaries to keep the composite together. However, in doing so we inevitably produce new interfaces, where new issues can arise. Therefore, this project focused on what happens at these interfaces from a combination of high temperatures, irradiation, corrosion, and time. After all, a reactor makes money when it is operating, and outages of any kind erode its economic viability. First, we set out to experimentally prove that MMLCs for at least two advanced reactor systems can be made, today, in US domestic facilities. In this respect we were successful – one MMLC (a Ni-201/Incoloy 800H composite) was successfully made and drawn into two-inch coolant piping. Others were attempted, though new issues relating to cracking in vanadium layers for one and radiation damage performance of the corrosion-resistant layer in another prevented us from moving further in those specific arenas – these are engineering problems which deserve continued focus after this project. Additional experimental work focused on long-term corrosion testing of the outermost layers of the salt-cooled and liquid lead-cooled MMLC concepts, which would then be fed into predictions of how long the MMLCs could last. Next, computational (thermodynamics and atomistic) simulation studies studied how much we expect the interfaces to “blend,” due to the mixing action of neutron irradiation. This eats into both the margin for the structural layer of each MMLC, as dilution from the corrosion-resistant layer into the structural layer would decrease the total load-bearing capacity of an MMLC of finite size. On the other hand, dilution of the corrosion-resistant layer into the structural layer further reduced the margin of corrodible material, reducing the lifetime of the MMLC or necessitating extra thickness to be imparted to the MMLC to meet its functional requirements. Work here focused on irradiation-induced segregation to predict new phases which may embrittle the MMLCs, as well as quantifying irradiation-induced mixing at each interface. The results showed that mixing is expected, but it is both steady and therefore predictable, and not lifetime-limiting for most MMLC concepts – it simply has to be accounted for in calculations of reactor performance when utilizing an MMLC. Then, full-core simulations using the experimentally-derived corrosion data, the computationally discovered irradiation-induced mixing data (partially validated by experiment), and existing, benchmarked core designs for large and small sized reactor concepts (one salt-cooled, one lead-cooled) were conducted to quantify any expansion of reactor operating envelopes achieved by utilizing these MMLCs. This new framework, called REX (Reactor Envelope Expansion), incorporates a combination of core neutronics, thermal hydraulics, and the material performance data derived from this project to see how using an MMLC expands advanced fission reactor operating envelopes. It was discovered that in some cases, MMLC utilization does indeed increase the maximum operating temperatures and cycle lengths of reactor concepts, while in other cases it does not. Finally, our tech-to-market (T2M) strategy was not necessarily to create specific embodiments of MMLCs for immediate sale (because getting into the nuclear market is incredibly slow and laden with regulation, this is a long-term goal), but rather immediate stimulation of US industry using the design approach of MMLCs derived from this project. In this respect we were successful, as one of the PhD students funded on this project co-founded Allium Engineering, Inc., which created a stainless steel / low-alloy steel MMLC to function as chloride corrosion-resistant rebar for embedding into concrete structures. Allium Engineering continues to be successful, having recently opened their first factory as of this writing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Advanced Reactors Development in USA

Small and micro-reactor advanced reactor development in the USA. Advanced Reactor programs, nuclear renaissance, and INL as a test bed facility. These slides are for presentations in general on the past, INL and nuclear engineering worldwide, GEN IV reactor designs, SMRs and micro Rx designs, multiple commercial designs, and what INL as a test bed means and who uses this to their advantage.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Design and Test of Advanced Thermal Simulators for an Alkali Metal-Cooled Reactor Simulator

The Early Flight Fission Test Facility (EFF-TF) at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has as one of its primary missions the development and testing of fission reactor simulators for space applications. A key component in these simulated reactors is the thermal simulator, designed to closely mimic the form and function of a nuclear fuel pin using electric heating. Continuing effort has been made to design simple, robust, inexpensive thermal simulators that closely match the steady-state and transient performance of a nuclear fuel pin. A series of these simulators have been designed, developed, fabricated and tested individually and in a number of simulated reactor systems at the EFF-TF. The purpose of the thermal simulators developed under the Fission Surface Power (FSP) task is to ensure that non-nuclear testing can be performed at sufficiently high fidelity to allow a cost-effective qualification and acceptance strategy to be used. Prototype thermal simulator design is founded on the baseline Fission Surface Power reactor design. Recent efforts have been focused on the design, fabrication and test of a prototype thermal simulator appropriate for use in the Technology Demonstration Unit (TDU). While designing the thermal simulators described in this paper, effort were made to improve the axial power profile matching of the thermal simulators. Simultaneously, a search was conducted for graphite materials with higher resistivities than had been employed in the past. The combination of these two efforts resulted in the creation of thermal simulators with power capacities of 2300-3300 W per unit. Six of these elements were installed in a simulated core and tested in the alkali metal-cooled Fission Surface Power Primary Test Circuit (FSP-PTC) at a variety of liquid metal flow rates and temperatures. This paper documents the design of the thermal simulators, test program, and test results.

Garber, Anne E.↗

Development of Shielding Benchmarks Using the Godiva IV Assembly

The Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) is developing a shielding benchmark using the Godiva IV assembly as a source. Its present status is reviewed herein. Even eight decades into the nuclear era, substantial work remains to develop a database of shielding benchmarks to support future nuclear development. A nuclear simulation is only as good as its supporting data, inputs, and validation basis. Uncertainty in these areas is addressed using conservatism, which adds margin and, occasionally, cost. In many shielding situations, high accuracy is not necessary because additional material is not particularly expensive. After all, 1–2 cm of lead often reduces the gamma ray dose substantially. However, in certain areas, conservatism can add unnecessary cost. These areas include mobile shielding applications such as casks, ships, microreactors, and spacecraft, where weight and, thus, margin is expensive. Although these characteristics are side benefits for NCSP shielding benchmark development, the main driver is enabling more reliable placement of criticality accident alarm systems (CAASs) in nuclear material facilities, such as those dedicated to the production of advanced reactor fuels. CAAS placement relies on more than accurate data and code validation. It also relies on sufficiently accurate materials specifications, geometry specifications, and a well-defined, alarm-producing baseline accident. All these things require tacit knowledge and understanding of the problem being evaluated. Benchmarks can help ensure this understanding.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Baseload Hydrogen Production Using Nuclear and Renewable Energy: A Comparative Analysis

As the global push towards net zero carbon gains momentum, the demand for clean hydrogen is expected to grow rapidly across various sectors, including transportation, industries and electrical grids. To meet this growing hydrogen demand, baseload hydrogen production facilities capable of providing a continuous and reliable supply of hydrogen will be necessary throughout the world. This paper explores the technoeconomic feasibility of establishing baseload electrolytic hydrogen production facilities in the United States, utilizing different clean generation resources. The key criteria include maintaining a consistent supply of clean hydrogen without putting baseload demand stress to already vulnerable power grid. In order to do that, the proposed facilities will host onsite clean power generation and energy storage technologies. The proposed facilities can capitalize on available investment and production incentives and have ability to export excess electricity to the utility at a bulk price. Several scenarios are considered based on the clean energy resources to support the electrolysis process including light water reactors (LWRs) currently evaluating retirement options, wind, solar PVs, and advanced small modular reactors (SMRs). For each scenario, a hypothetical hydrogen production facility is considered in a location in the US where the primary generation resource is at its peak strength. Comparative analysis in this paper reveal that the nuclear power plants are most economically viable for baseload hydrogen production facilities, outperforming renewable-based facilities with significantly lower levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH). Even under best-case scenarios for resource availability, incentives and export prices, renewable-based facilities face challenges due to daily and seasonal generation variability, resulting in large installation sizes and lower capacity factors. Among renewable-based facilities, complementarity hybrids, providing more stable power supply, demonstrate superior economics compared to facilities based on a single renewable technology. While LWR-powered facility can achieve a negative LCOH with incentives, SMR-powered facilities can provide economic hydrogen supply with LCOH below $1/kg with high temperature electrolysis option. The analysis in this paper underscores the pivotal role of nuclear energy in the future hydrogen economy.

08 - HYDROGEN↗

NDMAS

Overview of Current ART-GCR Data: Fuel Fabrication, Irradiation Monitoring (Fuel & Graphite – near real-time for HDG-1), Post-Irradiation Examination (Fuel & Graphite), Graphite Characterization (Baseline and Irradiated), High Temperature Metals Mechanical Tests, Design, Methods, and Validation Data, Japan Atomic Energy Agency’s High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR), Argonne National Laboratory’s Natural convection Shutdown heat removal Test Facility (NSTF), Oregon State University’s High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF), Generation IV International VHTR Materials Handbook, Additional related data, and Advanced Test Reactor operations (near real-time).

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Fast neutron irradiation capability in existing thermal test reactors

In today’s nuclear industry, momentum towards the design, licensing, and construction of advanced nuclear demonstration plants, including fast reactors, is at a remarkably high level. However, there are currently no dedicated fast spectrum irradiation test facilities in the United States to support the development of fast spectrum technologies. As a result, a unique situation is developing where most of these plants will likely be designed by leveraging historic nuclear material technologies, but where the further optimization and advancement is impeded by the lack of fast neutron irradiation test facilities. While these circumstances present a challenge, there are some near-term opportunities that, if seized, can still help develop advanced fast reactor materials to a meaningful level of readiness to support future commercial fast reactors. Here, in this paper, we assess the feasibility of using thermal neutron filtering materials in existing experiment positions in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to simulate fast reactor test environments for nonfuel test specimens. Items investigated include the incident neutron flux (both fast and thermal), the total neutron fluence and cumulative atom displacements, helium production rate due to thermal neutron capture in nickel, and the potential impact that the thermal neutron filter material has on the cycle length of a given reactor. It is concluded that while HFIR provides the highest fast flux of all the options investigated, it is limited in the amount of thermal neutron filtering material that can be introduced into an experiment position without significantly affecting the operation of the reactor. Irradiation in Outboard-A positions in the ATR was found to be the most realistic near-term experiment avenue due to having ample space for several capsules in a moderately fast flux.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Multi-Modal Characterization of Nuclear Fuels and Materials at the Idaho National Laboratory Materials & Fuels Complex

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) leads cutting-edge research pertaining to the advancement of nuclear reactor technologies, including nuclear fuels and materials. The INL Irradiated Materials Characterization Laboratory (IMCL), Electron Microscopy Laboratory (EML), and future Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL) are available to the nuclear research community to assess the behavior of nuclear fuels and materials, efficiently and comprehensively characterizing from the engineering to atomistic scale. The IMCL is a unique, 12,000-square-foot facility located at the INL Materials and Fuels Complex designed for analysis of irradiated materials. The facility operates advanced characterization instruments that are sensitive to vibration, temperature, and electromagnetic interference in modular radiological shielding and confinement systems, granting researchers the ability to assess the microstructural, chemical, mechanical and thermophysical properties of nuclear materials, especially irradiated fuels. The EML is dedicated to advanced characterization of materials with optical and electron microscopy tools, including scanning electron microscopy/focused-ion beam (SEM/FIB) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon construction, the SPL will be a 3 story, 49,000 sq. ft facility, that is the most modern reactor structural materials testing and analysis facility in the world, designed to investigate reactor structural materials in support of life-extension programs and development of advanced reactor concepts, including mechanical testing and advanced characterization capabilities. This presentation will showcase some of the main capabilities available at both IMCL, EML, and SPL, specifically illustrating how these characterization techniques are incorporated into multi-modal characterization work scopes to elucidate the degradation of nuclear structural materials and irradiated fuels.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

The National Criticality Experiments Research Center and its role in support of advanced reactor design

The National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) located at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) in the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) and operated by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is the only general purpose critical experiments facility in the United States. Experiments from subcritical to critical and above prompt critical are carried out at NCERC on a regular basis. In recent years, NCERC has become more involved in experiments related to nuclear energy, including the Kilopower/KRUSTY demonstration and the recent Hypatia experiment. Multiple nuclear energy related projects are currently ongoing at NCERC. This paper discusses NCERC’s role in advanced reactor design and how that role may change in the future.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Safeguards Considerations for Coated Particle Fuel Fabrication Facilities

This study aims to identify where existing fuel fabrication safeguards are limited in application to coated particle fuel fabrication facilities; perform a review of techniques that may be appropriate to address these limitations; and identify where further study is required. The purpose is to ensure the necessary technology and safeguards developments are established to facilitate safeguards-by-design for coated particle fuel fabrication facilities, analogous to the research and development (R&D) efforts in the advanced reactor space, including those requiring coated particle fuels and progress to higher technology readiness levels. Finally, this study will also help meet high priority objectives set forth by the IAEA in establishing safeguards R&D precedence and measurement/procedural standards at emerging fuel fabrication facilities. To achieve these objectives, the report is formatted to (1) distill relevant background information on fuel fabrication of oxide and coated particle fuels; (2) provide an overview of the fuel fabrication techniques for a reference oxide fuel fabrication facility and two selected TRISO fuel fabrication facilities; (3) develop facility models of safeguards approaches for the reference facility and the two TRISO facilities; and (4) identify any observed technology needs or gaps from this analysis.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

An Evaluation and Qualification of U.S.-Based Research Reactors for Irradiation Capabilities Supporting Advanced Nuclear Systems

Irradiation experiments are a prerequisite for evaluating nuclear reactor system designs, analyzing the performance of these systems, and obtaining licenses. Likewise, irradiation facilities are necessary for producing the radioisotopes used in industrial and medical applications. Recent developments in modeling and simulation capabilities and advancements in computational resources have further enabled the design of irradiation experiments for evaluating radiation-induced phenomena and determining nuclear fuel, material, and system design and safety criteria pertaining to both normal and accident scenarios. These computational tools and models require comprehensive experimental datasets acquired under prototypic radiation conditions—for exploring material and system performance under the uniquely harsh environments found in nuclear reactors—to enable verification and validation for qualification and licensing purposes. However, qualification of irradiation experimental facilities, primarily research and test reactors (RTRs), necessitates that their performance be evaluated based on the irradiation environment (e.g. flux, power, testing capabilities) using an appropriate scoring matrix. Although many university campus RTRs are available for research and development (R&D) activities and initiatives, this study focuses on evaluating and qualifying the irradiation facilities (mostly RTRs) within the United States that are suitable for advanced nuclear fuel, material, and system irradiation experiments aimed at establishing operational-performance limits and informing component and fuel designs so as to improve operational efficiencies and mitigate proliferation vulnerabilities, as well as for radioisotope production aimed at multipurpose applications. As a result, the findings of the present study support the acceleration of nuclear fuel and material qualifications, thus hastening new and advanced nuclear energy system demonstrations and radioisotope production efforts by using extended R&D.

irradiation experiment↗

Challenges and Solutions for Fast Neutron Irradiation of Bulk Material Specimens

Reactor developers continue to recognize opportunities for further enhancing fast spectrum reactor designs with advanced core materials, but all the material test reactors currently available to the United States are thermal spectrum designs. Fortunately, the Advanced Test Reactor and High Flux Isotope Reactor are versatile high flux facilities where spectral modification strategies can be used to reduce undesirable thermal neutron capture transmutation damage and augment fast flux delivered to specimens. New opportunities to leverage high flux regions and specially designed fast flux boosting experiment configurations can be used to achieve meaningful fast fluences on large specimens in ATR. New optimization potentials can be employed to achieve even higher fluences, albeit for smaller specimens, using thermal neutron filters in HFIR test positions. These capabilities, while not true fast reactors, can provide highly relevant environments for researchers needing to study the effects of fast neutron damage in bulk material specimens.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Testing and Characterization to Develop a Mechanistic Explanation for Unsaturated Drift of Fiber Optic Sensors during High-Dose Irradiation

The primary limitation for any optical fiber-based sensor for nuclear reactor applications is radiation-induced attenuation (RIA) of the transmitted and/or reflected signals. Based on several recent studies, RIA is tolerable for some fused silica optical fibers with the proper choice of sensing wavelength and fiber dopants. For extreme temperature applications (> 1000°C), sapphire optical fibers have been proposed; however, recent optical transmission measurements performed on bulk sapphire samples showed prohibitively large RIA. For some sensors, radiation-induced dimensional changes in the fiber materials can also cause significant drift. Moreover, the drift that was observed in numerous experiments performed in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), the Advanced Test Reactor, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor, and other international facilities far exceeded what would be expected based on compaction of fused silica glass. Clearly, additional work is needed to better understand the origins of both RIA and radiation-induced drift in both silica and sapphire optical fiber-based sensors before these sensors can be reliably deployed for nuclear applications. This work evaluated the underlying mechanisms that may be responsible for RIA and drift in silica and sapphire materials. First, detailed characterization was performed on bulk fused silica glass samples that were previously irradiated to different neutron fluences at different temperatures to better understand the structural changes that drive radiation-induced drift in the absence of coating effects that are discussed later. Results show that the non-monotonic compaction that occurs with increasing neutron fluence continues up to fast neutron fluences approaching 10 22 n/cm 2 , which has important implications for physics-based models that may be used to compensate for the sensor drift. Initial Raman spectroscopy and synchrotron x-ray diffraction provide insights into the nature of the structural changes. Next, detailed characterizations were performed on silica fibers with various coatings that were subjected to several different thermal treatments. The hypothesis is that the coatings convert to carbon-rich materials that compact under irradiation, putting a large compressive strain on the fiber. Out-of-pile testing confirms that both polyimide and acrylate fiber coatings convert to glassy carbon (GC) materials when heated under inert conditions, and the degree of order (i.e., graphitization) increases with increasing temperature. The results provide increasingly strong evidence that the combination of polymeric coatings and inert (or vacuum) conditions render fiber optic sensors susceptible to significant radiation-induced drift that would not otherwise exist in uncoated fibers. Finally, transmission electron microscopy was performed on bulk sapphire samples that were irradiated to two neutron fluences at different temperatures to gain insights into the potential mechanisms driving the prohibitive RIA at higher neutron fluences and temperatures. Contrary to previous hypotheses, results show that scattering from radiation-induced voids cannot explain the observed RIA. Similarly, models for scattering losses from dislocation loops also do not agree with the experimental results. Instead, fitting to the experimental data shows that increased absorption from aluminum vacancy centers is the most likely explanation for the the prohibitively large RIA that was observed at high irradiation temperature and dose. In addition, the voids that formed in these single-crystal samples were found to align along the basal plane (a-axis) as opposed to that seen in previous observations of c-axis alignment in polycrystalline samples, which could have important implications for anisotropic swelling and other phenomena that could affect sensor performance at high neutron fluence.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Testing and Characterization to Develop a Mechanistic Explanation for Unsaturated Drift of Fiber Optic Sensors during High-Dose Irradiation

The primary limitation for any optical fiber-based sensor for nuclear reactor applications is radiation-induced attenuation (RIA) of the transmitted and/or reflected signals. Based on several recent studies, RIA is tolerable for some fused silica optical fibers with the proper choice of sensing wavelength and fiber dopants. For extreme temperature applications (> 1000°C), sapphire optical fibers have been proposed; however, recent optical transmission measurements performed on bulk sapphire samples showed prohibitively large RIA. For some sensors, radiation-induced dimensional changes in the fiber materials can also cause significant drift. Moreover, the drift that was observed in numerous experiments performed in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), the Advanced Test Reactor, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor, and other international facilities far exceeded what would be expected based on compaction of fused silica glass. Clearly, additional work is needed to better understand the origins of both RIA and radiation-induced drift in both silica and sapphire optical fiber-based sensors before these sensors can be reliably deployed for nuclear applications. This work evaluated the underlying mechanisms that may be responsible for RIA and drift in silica and sapphire materials. First, detailed characterization was performed on bulk fused silica glass samples that were previously irradiated to different neutron fluences at different temperatures to better understand the structural changes that drive radiation-induced drift in the absence of coating effects that are discussed later. Results show that the non-monotonic compaction that occurs with increasing neutron fluence continues up to fast neutron fluences approaching 10 22 n/cm 2 , which has important implications for physics-based models that may be used to compensate for the sensor drift. Initial Raman spectroscopy and synchrotron x-ray diffraction provide insights into the nature of the structural changes. Next, detailed characterizations were performed on silica fibers with various coatings that were subjected to several different thermal treatments. The hypothesis is that the coatings convert to carbon-rich materials that compact under irradiation, putting a large compressive strain on the fiber. Out-of-pile testing confirms that both polyimide and acrylate fiber coatings convert to glassy carbon (GC) materials when heated under inert conditions, and the degree of order (i.e., graphitization) increases with increasing temperature. The results provide increasingly strong evidence that the combination of polymeric coatings and inert (or vacuum) conditions render fiber optic sensors susceptible to significant radiation-induced drift that would not otherwise exist in uncoated fibers. Finally, transmission electron microscopy was performed on bulk sapphire samples that were irradiated to two neutron fluences at different temperatures to gain insights into the potential mechanisms driving the prohibitive RIA at higher neutron fluences and temperatures. Contrary to previous hypotheses, results show that scattering from radiation-induced voids cannot explain the observed RIA. Similarly, models for scattering losses from dislocation loops also do not agree with the experimental results. Instead, fitting to the experimental data shows that increased absorption from aluminum vacancy centers is the most likely explanation for the the prohibitively large RIA that was observed at high irradiation temperature and dose. In addition, the voids that formed in these single-crystal samples were found to align along the basal plane (a-axis) as opposed to that seen in previous observations of c-axis alignment in polycrystalline samples, which could have important implications for anisotropic swelling and other phenomena that could affect sensor performance at high neutron fluence.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

RELAP5-3D Solutions to Exercise 1 of the OECD-NEA HTTF Benchmark

Discussion of RELAP5-3D solutions to Exercise 1 of the OECD-NEA High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) Benchmark. Results from ongoing benchmark activities supported by the Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-Cooled Reactor Program with use of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory. Also discussion of Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation and BWXT plans for the decade, and issues of modern thermal hydraulic tools for prismatic HTGR modeling. Open discussion of verification and validation and ART-GCR campaign to spearhead the development of an HTGR thermal hydraulics benchmark based on the HTTF.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗