Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “corn and soybean”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

The Impact of Crop Rotation and Spatially Varying Crop Parameters in the E3SM Land Model (ELMv2)

Abstract Earth System Models (ESMs) are increasingly representing agriculture due to its impact on biogeochemical cycles, local and regional climate, and fundamental importance for human society. Realistic large scale simulations may require spatially varying crop parameters that capture crop growth at various scales and among different cultivars, as well as common crop management practices, but their importance is uncertain, and they are often not represented in ESMs. In this study, we examine the impact of using constant versus spatially varying crop parameters using a novel, realistic crop rotation scenario in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) Land Model version 2 (ELMv2). We implemented crop rotation by using ELMv2's dynamic land unit capability, and then calibrated and validated the model against observations collected at three AmeriFlux sites in the US Midwest with corn soybean rotation. The calibrated model closely captured the magnitude and observed seasonality of carbon and energy fluxes across crops and sites. We performed regional simulations for the US Midwest using the calibrated model and found that spatially varying only a few crop parameters across the region, as opposed to using constant parameters, had a large impact, with the carbon fluxes and energy fluxes both varying by up to 40%. These results imply that large scale ESM simulations using spatially invariant crop parameters may result in biased energy and carbon fluxes estimation from agricultural land, and underline the importance of improving human‐earth systems interactions in ESMs.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Ground far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and vegetation indices in the US Midwestern agroecosystems

Abstract Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provides an opportunity to study terrestrial ecosystem photosynthesis dynamics. However, the current coarse spatiotemporal satellite SIF products are challenging for mechanistic interpretations of SIF signals. Long-term ground SIF and vegetation indices (VIs) are important for satellite SIF validation and mechanistic understanding of the relationship between SIF and photosynthesis when combined with leaf- and canopy-level auxiliary measurements. In this study, we present and analyze a total of 15 site-years of ground far-red SIF (SIF at 760 nm, SIF 760 ) and VIs datasets from soybean, corn, and miscanthus grown in the U.S. Corn Belt from 2016 to 2021. We introduce a comprehensive data processing protocol, including different retrieval methods, calibration coefficient adjustment, and nadir SIF footprint upscaling to match the eddy covariance footprint. This long-term ground far-red SIF and VIs dataset provides important and first-hand data for far-red SIF interpretation and understanding the mechanistic relationship between far-red SIF and canopy photosynthesis across various crop species and environmental conditions.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

A new bioenergy model that simulates the impacts of plant‐microbial interactions, soil carbon protection, and mechanistic tillage on soil carbon cycling

Abstract Advancing our predictive understanding of bioenergy systems is critical to design decision tools that can inform which feedstock to plant, where to plant it, and how to manage its production to provide both energy and ecosystem carbon (C) benefits. Here, we lay the foundation for that advancement by integrating recent developments in the science of belowground processes in shaping the C cycle into a new bioenergy model, FUN‐BioCROP (Fixation and Uptake of Nitrogen‐Bioenergy Carbon, Rhizosphere, Organisms, and Protection). We show that FUN‐BioCROP can approximate the historical trajectory of soil C dynamics as natural ecosystems were successively converted into intensive agriculture and bioenergy systems. This ability relies in part on a novel tillage representation that mechanistically models tillage as a process that increases microbial access to C. Importantly, the impacts of tillage and feedstock choice also influence FUN‐BioCROP simulations of warming responses with no‐till perennial feedstocks, miscanthus, and switchgrass, having more C that is unprotected and susceptible to warming than tilled annual feedstocks like corn–corn–soybean. However, this susceptibility to warming is balanced by a greater potential for increases in belowground C allocation to enhance soil C stocks in perennial systems. Collectively, our model results highlight the importance of belowground processes in evaluating the ecosystem C benefits of bioenergy production.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Supranutrition of microalgal docosahexaenoic acid and calcidiol improved growth performance, tissue lipid profiles, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens

Abstract Background Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and calcidiol could be enriched in chicken for improving public nutrition and health. It remains unclear if supranutritional levels of DHA and calcidiol impair growth performance or metabolism of broiler chickens. This study was to determine singular and combined effects of high levels of supplemental DHA-rich microalgal biomass or oil and calcidiol on growth performance, concentrations of triglycerides, cholesterol, and nonesterfied fatty acids in plasma, liver, breast, and thigh, and biophysical properties of tibia. Methods In Exp. 1, 144 day-old Cornish chicks were divided into 4 groups (6 cages/treatment, 6 birds/cage), and were fed a corn-soybean meal basal diet (BD), BD + 10,000 IU calcidiol/kg (BD + Cal), BD + 1% DHA-rich Aurantiochytrium (1.2 g DHA/kg; BD + DHA), and BD + Cal + DHA for 6 weeks. In Exp. 2, 180 day-old chicks were divided into 5 groups, and were fed: BD, BD + DHA (0.33% to 0.66% oil, 1.5 to 3.0 g DHA/kg), BD + DHA + EPA (1.9% to 3.8% eicosapentaenoic acid-rich Nannochloropsis sp. CO18, 0.3 to 0.6 g EPA/kg), BD + DHA + calcidiol (6000 to 12,000 IU/kg diet), and BD + DHA + EPA + Cal for 6 weeks. Results Birds fed BD + Cal diet in Exp. 1 and BD + DHA + EPA diet in Exp. 2 had higher ( P < 0.05) body weight gain (10%–11%) and gain:feed ratio (7%), and lower ( P < 0.05) total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations in plasma (18%–54%), liver (8%–26%), breast (19%–26%), and thigh (10%–19%), respectively, over the controls. The two diets also improved ( P < 0.05) tibial breaking strength (8%–24%), total bone volume (2%–13%), and (or) bone mineral density (3%–19%) of chickens. Conclusion Supranutrition of dietary calcidiol and DHA alone or together did not produce adverse effects, but led to moderate improvements of growth performance, lipid profiles of plasma and muscle, and bone properties of broiler chickens.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

AmeriFlux US-DFC US Dairy Forage Research Center, Prairie du Sac

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-DFC US Dairy Forage Research Center, Prairie du Sac. Site Description - Former US ammunition plant converted to dairy farm in 1980 with annual and perennial croplands mostly comprised of alfalfa, corn, soybean and wheat, with natural vegetation (forest, grass and shrubland), as well as pastures and and hedgerows surrounding the fields. During spring and summer months, dry cows and heifer graze on pastures.

Duff, Alison↗

AmeriFlux US-Mo1 LTAR CMRB Field 1 (CMRB ASP)

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-Mo1 LTAR CMRB Field 1 (CMRB ASP). Site Description - Site is in a 36 ha agricultural research field near Centralia, MO on a broad, slightly sloped landscape. Currently farmed in a corn-soybean-wheat-hay rotation. Used for research since 1991; prior to that was managed for commercial crop production.

Schreiner-McGraw, Adam↗

AmeriFlux US-Mo3 LTAR CMRB Field 3 (CMRB BAU)

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-Mo3 LTAR CMRB Field 3 (CMRB BAU). Site Description - Site is in a 20 ha agricultural field near Centralia, MO on a broad, slightly sloped landscape. Currently managed in a corn-soybean rotation for commercial crop production

Schreiner-McGraw, Adam↗

AmeriFlux AR-CCa Carlos Casares agriculture

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site AR-CCa Carlos Casares agriculture. Site Description - This tower is located in a private agricultural production field. The owner follow the typical rotation of the region: corn / soybean / wheat-soybean

Posse, Gabriela↗

AmeriFlux FLUXNET-1F US-DFC US Dairy Forage Research Center, Prairie du Sac

This is the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) created FLUXNET-1F version of the carbon flux data for the site US-DFC US Dairy Forage Research Center, Prairie du Sac. This is the FLUXNET version of the carbon flux data for the site US-DFC US Dairy Forage Research Center, Prairie du Sac produced by applying the standard ONEFlux (1F) software. Site Description - Former US ammunition plant converted to dairy farm in 1980 with annual and perennial croplands mostly comprised of alfalfa, corn, soybean and wheat, with natural vegetation (forest, grass and shrubland), as well as pastures and and hedgerows surrounding the fields. During spring and summer months, dry cows and heifer graze on pastures.

Duff, Alison↗

AmeriFlux US-UTN UFLUX Nephi

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-UTN UFLUX Nephi. Site Description - This tower is located in between 3 agricultural pivots in a rural valley of Utah. It is within 100 meters of SCAN station 2137. Crops include soybeans, corn, and wheat. The tower was installed for a temporary project.

Inkenbrandt, Paul↗

AmeriFlux FLUXNET-1F US-Mo1 LTAR CMRB Field 1 (CMRB ASP)

This is the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) created FLUXNET-1F version of the carbon flux data for the site US-Mo1 LTAR CMRB Field 1 (CMRB ASP). This is the FLUXNET version of the carbon flux data for the site US-Mo1 LTAR CMRB Field 1 (CMRB ASP) produced by applying the standard ONEFlux (1F) software. Site Description - Site is in a 36 ha agricultural research field near Centralia, MO on a broad, slightly sloped landscape. Currently farmed in a corn-soybean-wheat-hay rotation. Used for research since 1991; prior to that was managed for commercial crop production.

Schreiner-McGraw, Adam↗

AmeriFlux FLUXNET-1F US-Mo3 LTAR CMRB Field 3 (CMRB BAU)

This is the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) created FLUXNET-1F version of the carbon flux data for the site US-Mo3 LTAR CMRB Field 3 (CMRB BAU). This is the FLUXNET version of the carbon flux data for the site US-Mo3 LTAR CMRB Field 3 (CMRB BAU) produced by applying the standard ONEFlux (1F) software. Site Description - Site is in a 20 ha agricultural field near Centralia, MO on a broad, slightly sloped landscape. Currently managed in a corn-soybean rotation for commercial crop production

Schreiner-McGraw, Adam↗

AmeriFlux US-VT1 Vermillion Tributary Paired Cropland – Site 1 (Corn/Soy; No Cover Crops)

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-VT1 Vermillion Tributary Paired Cropland – Site 1 (Corn/Soy; No Cover Crops). Site Description - US-VT1 is located on flat, actively managed farmland operated by working farmers, following a conventional no-till corn–soybean rotation in the U.S. Midwest. US-VT1 is one of two paired working farm sites on the same property; both are managed using similar conventional practices, with the key difference being that the paired site (US-VT2) incorporates cover crops into its rotation. This paired design enables direct site-to-site comparisons to assess the impacts of cover cropping on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.

Key, Kesondra [Indiana University - Bloomington]↗

AmeriFlux US-VT2 Vermillion Tributary Paired Cropland – Site 2 (Corn/Soy; Cover Crops)

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-VT2 Vermillion Tributary Paired Cropland – Site 2 (Corn/Soy; Cover Crops). Site Description - US-VT2 is located on flat, actively managed farmland operated by working farmers, following a conventional no-till corn–soybean rotation in the U.S. Midwest that uses cover crops. US-VT2 is one of two paired working farm sites on the same property; both are managed using similar conventional practices, with the key difference being that the paired site (US-VT1) does not incorporate cover crops into its rotation. This paired design enables direct site-to-site comparisons to assess the impacts of cover cropping on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.

Key, Kesondra [Indiana University - Bloomington]↗

AmeriFlux FLUXNET-1F AR-CCa Carlos Casares agriculture

This is the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) created FLUXNET-1F version of the carbon flux data for the site AR-CCa Carlos Casares agriculture. This is the FLUXNET version of the carbon flux data for the site AR-CCa Carlos Casares agriculture produced by applying the standard ONEFlux (1F) software. Site Description - This tower is located in a private agricultural production field. The owner follow the typical rotation of the region: corn / soybean / wheat-soybean

Posse, Gabriela [INTA]↗

AmeriFlux US-SD1 Shatto Ditch Paired Cropland - Site 1 (Corn/Soy; No Cover Crops)

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-SD1 Shatto Ditch Paired Cropland - Site 1 (Corn/Soy; No Cover Crops). Site Description - US-SD1, located on mostly flat terrain with some gentle hills, is an actively managed farmland operated by working farmers following a conventional no-till corn–soybean rotation in the U.S. Midwest. US-SD1 is one of two paired working farm sites which are relatively close by; both are managed using similar conventional practices with the key difference being that the paired site (US-SD2) incorporates cover crops into its rotation, along with minor differentiating terrain and soil type, where US-SD2 is located on a gently sloped site with more sandy soils. This paired design enables direct site-to-site comparisons to assess the impacts of cover cropping on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.

Key, Kesondra [Indiana University - Bloomington]↗

AmeriFlux US-SD2 Shatto Ditch Paired Cropland - Site 2 (Corn/Soy; Cover Crops)

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-SD2 Shatto Ditch Paired Cropland - Site 2 (Corn/Soy; Cover Crops). Site Description - US-SD2, located on gently sloped terrain, is an actively managed farmland operated by working farmers following a conventional no-till corn–soybean rotation in the U.S. Midwest. US-SD2 is one of two paired working farm sites which are relatively close by; both are managed using similar conventional practices with the key difference being that the paired site (US-SD1) incorporates cover crops into its rotation, along with minor differentiating terrain and soil type, where US-SD1 is located on mostly flat terrain with some gentle hills. This paired design enables direct site-to-site comparisons to assess the impacts of cover cropping on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.

Key, Kesondra [Indiana University - Bloomington]↗

AmeriFlux FLUXNET-1F US-VT1 Vermillion Tributary Paired Cropland – Site 1 (Corn/Soy; No Cover Crops)

This is the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) created FLUXNET-1F version of the carbon flux data for the site US-VT1 Vermillion Tributary Paired Cropland – Site 1 (Corn/Soy; No Cover Crops). This is the FLUXNET version of the carbon flux data for the site US-VT1 Vermillion Tributary Paired Cropland – Site 1 (Corn/Soy; No Cover Crops) produced by applying the standard ONEFlux (1F) software. Site Description - US-VT1 is located on flat, actively managed farmland operated by working farmers, following a conventional no-till corn–soybean rotation in the U.S. Midwest. US-VT1 is one of two paired working farm sites on the same property; both are managed using similar conventional practices, with the key difference being that the paired site (US-VT2) incorporates cover crops into its rotation. This paired design enables direct site-to-site comparisons to assess the impacts of cover cropping on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.

Key, Kesondra [Indiana University - Bloomington]↗