Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “deployable payload mission”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7

Research of advanced techniques for X-ray detectors and telescopes with applications to rockets and the LAMAR facility

A program for the development of high throughput instrumentation for X-ray astronomy based upon focusing optics is being carried out by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. The instrumentation is applicable to investigations requiring large area focusing optics for direct imaging or dispersive spectroscopy. The long range goals of this program are the development of telescopes and gratings for future major X-ray astronomy facilities, including additions to the LAMAR OSS-2/SHEAL experiment after the initial flights. Tests of the devices and their more immediate utilization in scientific investigations can be carried out with SPARTAN payloads deployed and retrieved by the Space Shuttle. However, the present backlog of approved SPARTAN missions is longer than the three-year duration of the program described in this program. Laboratory studies and breadboarding of instrumentation are discussed.

Gorenstein, P.↗

The Near Earth Object (NEO) Scout Spacecraft: A Low-cost Approach to In-situ Characterization of the NEO Population

This paper describes a microsatellite spacecraft with supporting mission profile and architecture, designed to enable preliminary in-situ characterization of a significant number of Near Earth Objects (NEOs) at reasonably low cost. The spacecraft will be referred to as the NEO-Scout. NEO-Scout spacecraft are to be placed in Geosynchronous Equatorial Orbit (GEO), cis-lunar space, or on earth escape trajectories as secondary payloads on launch vehicles headed for GEO or beyond, and will begin their mission after deployment from the launcher. A distinguishing key feature of the NEO-Scout system is to design the spacecraft and mission timeline so as to enable rendezvous with and landing on the target NEO during NEO close approach (<0.3 AU) to the Earth-Moon system using low-thrust/high-impulse propulsion systems. Mission durations are on the order 100 to 400 days. Mission feasibility and preliminary design analysis are presented, along with detailed trajectory calculations.

Woeppel, Eric A.↗

Model Predictions of Radiation Environment for the NASA BioSentinel Mission

- In this work, models are used to predict the GCR exposure expected for the yeast payload and dosimeter on-board the BioSentinel for a six-month mission after deployment. - The model predictions from this work can be validated against the radiation measurements from the BioSentinel once the data have been transmitted to earth. - The methods used can be valuable for facilitating future projections within existing GCR models for planned deep space missions.

Shirin Rahmanian↗

Future of the Search for Life: Workshop Report

The 2-week, virtual Future of the Search for Life science and engineering workshop brought together more than 100 scientists, engineers, and technologists in March and April 2022 to provide their expert opinion on the interconnections between life-detection science and technology. Participants identified the advances in measurement and sampling technologies they believed to be necessary to perform in situ searches for life elsewhere in our Solar System, 20 years or more in the future. Among suggested measurements for these searches, those pertaining to three potential indicators of life termed “dynamic disequilibrium,” “catalysis,” and “informational polymers” were identified as particularly promising avenues for further exploration. For these three indicators, small breakout groups of participants identified measurement needs and knowledge gaps, along with corresponding constraints on sample handling (acquisition and processing) approaches for a variety of environments on Enceladus, Europa, Mars, and Titan. Despite the diversity of these environments, sample processing approaches all tend to be more complex than those that have been implemented on missions or envisioned for mission concepts to date. The approaches considered by workshop breakout groups progress from nondestructive to destructive measurement techniques, and most involve the need for fluid (especially liquid) sample processing. Sample processing needs were identified as technology gaps. These gaps include technology and associated sampling strategies that allow the preservation of the thermal, mechanical, and chemical integrity of the samples upon acquisition; and to optimize the sample information obtained by operating suites of instruments on common samples. Crucially, the interplay between science-driven life-detection strategies and their technological implementation highlights the need for an unprecedented level of payload integration and extensive collaboration between scientists and engineers, starting from concept formulation through mission deployment of life-detection instruments and sample processing systems.

Marc Neveu↗

iSat Surface Charging and Thruster Plume Interactions Analysis

Characterizing the electromagnetic interaction of a satellite in low Earth, high inclination orbit with the space plasma environment and identifying viable charging mitigation strategies is a critical mission design task. High inclination orbits expose the vehicle to auroral charging environments that can potentially charge surfaces to kilovolt potentials and electric thruster propulsion systems will interact with the ambient plasma environment throughout the orbit. NASA is designing the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) cubesat mission to demonstrate operations of an iodine electric thruster system. The spacecraft will be deployed as a secondary payload from a launch vehicle which has not yet been identified so the program must plan for the worst case environments over a range of orbital inclinations. We will first present results from a NASA and Air Force Charging Analyzer Program (Nascap) -2k surface charging calculation used to evaluate the effects of auroral charging on the spacecraft and to provide the charging levels at other locations in orbit for a thruster plume interaction analysis for the iSAT mission. We will then discuss results from the thruster interactions analysis using the Electric Propulsion Interactions Code (EPIC) with inputs from Nascap-2k. The results of these analyses are being used by the iSAT program to better understand how their spacecraft will interact with the space plasma environment in the range of environments that could be encountered when the final mission orbit is selected.

Parker, L. Neergaard↗

European retrievable carrier (Eureca) and evolutionary space carrier for microgravity, Earth observation and technology demonstration

The Spacelab relatively short stay-time in orbit has led to consideration of the European Retrievable Carrier (EURECA) concept as a reusable carrier. The EURECA concept is a free-flying carrier of experiments which is launched and recovered by the space shuttle. It is commensurate with the size of payloads that can be economically developed in Europe and combines the advantages of Spacelab (high mass and power capability, recovery) with those of a free flyer (extended operating time in a non-polluted environment). The launch of the first EURECA mission is scheduled for October 1987. The Eureca spacecraft will be deployed from the Shuttle cargo bay in orbit, will operate in a free-flying mode for about six months, and will then be retrieved, together with its payloads, returned to Earth by the Space Shuttle and prepared for the next mission. The first mission of EURECA is dedicated to research in the fields of life sciences and material sciences. The experimental hardware of the first mission consist of a variety of processin chambers for crystal growth and equipment for biological investigations viz plant growth and protein crystallization, and there is the possibility to perform experiments in the field of exobiology.

Mory, R.↗

Earth observations during Space Shuttle mission STS-34 - 18-23 October 1989

An overview is presented of the 31st Space Shuttle mission, whose major objective was to deploy the Galileo spacecraft. Color images are presented of photos taken by the four videocameras in the payload bay, one 16-mm Arriflex in the cabin, a videocamcorder, three 35 mm cameras, two 70 mm cameras, and an IMAX camera. In addition, descriptions of visual observations by the mission astronauts are given. The most significant STS-34 earth photography for the major geographical regions is discussed. Individual highlights of this mission include observation of the apparent recovery of the water level of Lake Nasser to conditions similar to those during the second Space Shuttle mission of 1981; the documentation of the impact of the Yucatan forest blowdown and fires after the passage of Hurricane Gilbert; and the confirmation of the high value of space photography under low and very low sun angle conditions for geomorphological and geological analyses.

Helfert, Michael R.↗

Mission safety evaluation report for STS-48, postflight edition

Space Shuttle Discovery was launched into a 57 deg inclination orbit from the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Launch Complex 39A at 7:11 p.m. EDT on 12 Sep. 1991. STS-48 was the second mission since return-to-flight to have KSC as the planned end-of-mission landing site, and the first mission to have a planned night landing at KSC. However, due to weather conditions at KSC, Discovery flew one extra orbit and landed at Edwards AFB, Calif. at 3:38 a.m. EDT on 18 Sep. 1991. Operation of all systems was generally satisfactory during the 5 day mission. On flight day 3, the Upper Atmospheric Research Satellite (UARS) was deployed from Discovery's payload bay 350 statute miles above Earth. This orbiting observatory will study mankind's effects on the planet's atmosphere and its shielding ozone layer. STS-48 safety risk factors are addressed that represent a change from previous flights, factors from previous flights that had an impact on this flight, and factors that are unique to this flight.

Clatterbuck, Guy E.↗

NASA Pocket Statistics

NASA administrative and organizational information is presented along with summaries of space flight activity including the NASA Major Launch Record, and NASA procurement, financial and manpower data. The Major Launch Record includes all launches of Scout class and larger vehicles. Vehicle and spacecraft development flights are also included. Shuttle missions are counted as one launch and one payload, where free flying payloads are not involved. Satellites deployed from the cargo bay of the Shuttle and placed in a separate orbit or trajectory are counted as an additional payload.

Source record↗

NASA Pocket Statistics

Pocket Statistics is published for the use of NASA managers and their staff. Included herein is Administrative and Organizational information, summaries of Space Flight Activity including the NASA Major Launch Record, and NASA Procurement, Financial, and Manpower data. The NASA Major Launch Record includes all launches of Scout class and larger vehicles. Vehicle and spacecraft development flights are also included in the Major Launch Record. Shuttle missions are counted as one launch and one payload, where free flying payloads are not involved. Satellites deployed from the cargo bay of the Shuttle and placed in a separate orbit or trajectory are counted as an additional payload.

Source record↗

NASA Pocket Statistics

Pocket Statistics is published for the use of NASA managers and their staff. Included herein is Administrative and Organizational information, summaries of Space Flight Activity including the NASA Major Launch Record, and NASA Procurement, Financial, and Manpower data. The NASA Major Launch Record includes all launches of Scout class and larger vehicles. Vehicle and spacecraft development flights are also included in the Major Launch Record. Shuttle missions are counted as one launch and one payload, where free flying payloads are not involved. Satellites deployed from the cargo bay of the Shuttle and placed in a separate orbit or trajectory are counted as an additional payload.

Source record↗

NASA Pocket Statistics

NASA Pocket Statistics is published for the use of NASA managers and their staff. Included herein is Administrative and Organizational information, summaries of Space Flight Activity including the NASA Major Launch Record, and NASA Procurement, Financial, and Manpower data. The NASA Major Launch Record includes all launches of Scout class and larger vehicles. Vehicle and spacecraft development flights are also included in the Major Launch Record. Shuttle missions are counted as one launch and one payload, where free flying payloads are not involved. Satellites deployed from the cargo bay of the Shuttle and placed in a separate orbit or trajectory are counted as an additional payload.

Source record↗

[STS-43 Post Flight Press Conference]

The flight crew (Blaha, Baker, Low, Adamson, and Lucid) present and discuss their STS-43 Space Shuttle Mission in this press conference video. This mission was the first flight to deploy the Tracking Data and Relay Satellite (TDRS), the primary payload. A large number of secondary payload experiments were performed. The included: several cell tissue growth and enzyme analysis experiments; a Lower Body Negative Pressure Experiment; optic coupling and flame front propagation/combustion physics experiments; The Space Station Heat Pipe Advanced Radiator Experiment (SHARE) for the Space Station; a crystal control device evaluation; a software and hardware systems checkout for the Shuttle; some flight tests of the new orbiter auto-pilot system; some materials tests on polymer membranes; the Zero Gravity physics experiments; and the Space Shuttle Backscatter Ultraviolet Experiment. Earth views included: the Kuwait oil fires; cloud cover; and B/W lightning footage.

Source record↗

STS-77 Flight Day 4

On this fourth day of the STS-77 mission, the flight crew, Cmdr. John H. Casper, Pilot Curtis L. Brown, Jr., and Mission Specialists Andrew S.W. Thomas, Ph.D., Daniel W. Bursch, Mario Runco, Jr., and Marc Garneau, Ph.D., turned their attention to the deployment of a small technology demonstration satellite known as PAMS. The Passive Aerodynamically Stabilized Magnetically-damped Satellite uses aerodynamic stabilization to orient itself properly and demonstrates a technique that could prolong the lifetime of a satellite by reducing or eliminating the requirement for attitude control propellants. After Mission Specialist Mario Runco deploys the satellite from a canister in the rear of Endeavour's payload bay, it drifts away from the orbiter in a rotating, unstable attitude by design to evaluate how quickly and effectively the spacecraft can stabilize itself using the aerodynamic stabilization method rather than by thrusters. Later in the day, the crew is seen being interviewed by Canadian Television.

Source record↗

NASA Pocket Statistics

This booklet of pocket statistics includes the 1996 NASA Major Launch Record, NASA Procurement, Financial, and Workforce data. The NASA Major Launch Record includes all launches of Scout class and larger vehicles. Vehicle and spacecraft development flights are also included in the Major Luanch Record. Shuttle missions are counted as one launch and one payload, where free flying payloads are not involved. Satellites deployed from the cargo bay of the Shuttle and placed in a separate orbit or trajectory are counted as an additional payload.

Source record↗

STS-87 Day 03 Highlights

On this third day of the STS-87 mission, the flight crew, Cmdr. Kevin R. Kregel, Pilot Steven W. Lindsey, Mission Specialists Winston E. Scott, Kalpana Chawla, and Takao Doi, and Payload Specialist Leonid K. Kadenyuk deploy the Spartan satellite with the shuttle's robot arm.

Source record↗

CubeSat Initiatives at KSC

Even though the Small PayLoad Integrated Testing Services or SPLITS line of business is newly established, KSC has been involved in a variety of CubeSat projects and programs. CubeSat development projects have been initiated through educational outreach partnerships with schools and universities, commercial partnerships and internal training initiatives. KSC has also been involved in CubeSat deployment through programs to find launch opportunities to fly CubeSats as auxiliary payloads on previously planned missions and involvement in the development of new launch capabilities for small satellites. This overview will highlight the CubeSat accomplishments at KSC and discuss planning for future projects and opportunities.

CubeSat↗

Internal Electrostatic Discharge Testing of Inert Solid Rocket Motor Materials

Jupiter’s moon Europa is believed to have a global liquid-water ocean beneath its icy surface. As such, it is a highly interesting destination for explorers seeking signs of life outside of Earth. This interest has given rise to the Europa Lander Mission [Hand, et al., 2017]. The central goal of the Europa Lander Mission is to place a stationary lander on Europa and make surface and sub-surface measurements, dramatically improving understanding of this Jovian moon, and potentially detecting signs of life.Placing a lander on Europa will require multiple spacecraft elements deployed across a multi-year mission timeline. Some of the key elements include: a large payload capacity rocket, such as the Space Launch System (SLS), capable of providing direct Jupiter orbit insertion; a solar-powered carrier; a de-orbit system; a sky crane landing system; and, of course, the surface lander. A noteworthy fact is that the current design requires a large solid rocket motor to provide the necessary braking thrust for the de-orbit stage. While solid rocket motors have been used extensively by NASA during launch, in-space use has been limited. In addition to the normal challenges associated with a long-distance planetary mission, the Europa Lander Mission must also contend with the high-radiation environment associated with the Jovian system. The size of Jupiter, combined with its magnetic field strength, and rotation speed, result in a harsh radiation environment composed of high energy charged particles (ions and electrons) as well as high-temperature plasmas [de Soria-Santacruz Pich, 2016]. Due to this high-radiation environment, each component of the Europa Lander spacecraft must be evaluated to determine its radiation dose tolerance and its likelihood for experiencing electrostatic charging (and discharging). In general, metal components in a Jovian environment do not pose a concern for radiation degradation; in fact, metal structures and closeouts can act as radiation shielding for the more sensitive components. Charging of a metal component is only an issue if the component is not properly grounded to the spacecraft chassis. However, electrically insulating materials, such as polymers, are subject to radiation degradation as well as surface and internal charging, and therefore require extra scrutiny. The focus of this paper will be on the insulating materials that are commonly used inside solid rocket motors. The special application of a solid rocket motor used in space after a relatively long duration flight, combined with the high energy electron environment in the Jovian system, raises concerns about the possibility of significant charging and discharging leading to reduced performance.

Schneider, Todd A.↗