Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “gasification”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Biorefinery siting and sizing to achieve the US Billion‐Ton Bioeconomy vision: A case study using a gasification–Fischer–Tropsch process

Achieving a secure, abundant, and affordable energy future requires a robust and adaptable energy strategy, with bioenergy playing a pivotal role. Biomass-based energy presents a promising pathway to use domestic resources while fostering economic opportunities in rural areas. Despite the potential to source more than 1 billion dry short tons of biomass annually in the US, significant infrastructure and economic barriers hinder full utilization for energy production. This study used the Biofuel Infrastructure, Logistics, and Transportation (BILT) model to assess biorefinery siting and scale and determine the number and size of facilities required to maximize use of the US biomass potential. A spatially agnostic approach first assessed the effects of facility capacity and transportation constraints on biomass use. Then, a spatially explicit analysis integrated county-level biomass availability from the US Department of Energy's 2023 Billion-Ton Report and technoeconomic assessments to evaluate different biorefinery deployment scenarios. The results indicate that an optimized mix of facility sizes is essential to leverage biomass resources fully across varying regional production densities to maximize use of the US biomass potential. Larger biorefineries or co-located smaller facilities significantly enhance biomass use while reducing costs through economies of scale. These findings underscore the importance of strategically balancing facility capacity and spatial distribution to optimize the bioenergy supply chain. In conclusion, this study provides critical insights for advancing the US bioenergy economy by aligning biorefinery deployment with biomass resource availability and economic viability.

BILT Model↗
DOE OSTI2023

Performance of hydrophobic physical solvents for pre-combustion CO 2 capture at a pilot scale coal gasification facility

Here, in this paper, we present the first pilot plant data for hydrophobic physical solvents for CO 2 and H 2 S removal from coal-derived H 2 -rich syngas. Four physical solvents were tested under pre-combustion CO 2 capture conditions at bench scale and pilot plant scale: one baseline hydrophilic solvent and three hydrophobic solvents. The solvents were: (1) polyethylene-glycol-dimethyl ether (PEGDME), a hydrophilic solvent analog for the commercial process Selexol, (2) tributyl- phosphate (TBP), a commercially available hydrophobic solvent, (3) polyethylene glycol-poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PEG-PDMS-3), and (4) diethyl sebacate (CASSH-1), a novel, computationally screened hydrophobic solvent developed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). All solvents were studied under pure gas (CO 2 /N 2 /H 2 /CH 4 ) equilibrium conditions at NETL followed by pilot plant testing with syngas at the University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (UND EERC). Long term performance of CASSH-1 and PEDGME was then assessed with results compared to process simulation predictions. Within experimental uncertainties, all solvents showed comparable CO 2 absorption performance at above room temperature operation while the hydrophobic solvents had limited water uptake and low vapor pressure, which alleviates concerns related to corrosion, water absorption, and solvent loss to evaporation. These results indicate low viscosity, low vapor pressure hydrophobic solvents are a promising option for lower cost CO 2 capture from high pressure syngas applications.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗