NASA NTRS1982
Implications of two broad classes of theories for the origin of the solar system for the composition of Uranus are examined as an approach to the testing of alternative hypotheses. Consideration is given to accretional theories of planetary formation, which predict interior structures consisting of a rock core surrounded by an envelope of H2, He, H2O, NH3 and CH4 with different ratios of H2 to ice, and to theories postulating the formation of giant gaseous protoplanets as a result of an encounter with an extended protostar, the condensation of eddies (flocules) in a cloud, with supersonic turbulence and the breakup of a ring formed in a collapsing massive solar nebula. It is shown that whereas accretional theories can easily account for the high density of Uranus relative to Jupiter and Saturn, the apparent absence of NH3, and the observed D/H ratio being about three times the solar ratio, the giant protoplanet theories do not clearly demonstrate how the compositions were achieved.