Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “radiation models”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1998

Space Environment Effects: Low-Altitude Trapped Radiation Model

Accurate models of the Earth's trapped energetic proton environment are required for both piloted and robotic space missions. For piloted missions, the concern is mainly total dose to the astronauts, particularly in long-duration missions and during extravehicular activity (EVA). As astronomical and remote-sensing detectors become more sensitive, the proton flux can induce unwanted backgrounds in these instruments. Due to this unwanted background, the following description details the development of a new model for the low-trapped proton environment. The model is based on nearly 20 years of data from the TIRO/NOAA weather satellites. The model, which has been designated NOAAPRO (for NOAA protons), predicts the integral omnidirectional proton flux in three energy ranges: >16, >36, and >80 MeV. It contains a true solar cycle variation and accounts for the secular variation in the Earth's magnetic field. It also extends to lower values of the magnetic L parameter than does AP8. Thus, the model addresses the major shortcomings of AP8.

Huston, S. L.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Evaluation of Trapped Radiation Model Uncertainties for Spacecraft Design

The standard AP8 and AE8 models for predicting trapped proton and electron environments have been compared with several sets of flight data to evaluate model uncertainties. Model comparisons are made with flux, dose, and activation measurements made on various U.S. low-Earth orbit satellites (APEX, CRRES, DMSP. LDEF, NOAA) and Space Shuttle flights, on Russian satellites (Photon-8, Cosmos-1887, Cosmos-2044), and on the Russian Mir space station. This report gives a summary of the model-data given in a companion report. Results from the model comparisons with flight data show, for example, that the AP8 model underpredicts the trapped proton flux at low altitudes by a factor of about two (independent of proton energy and solar cycle conditions), and that the AE8 model overpredict the flux in the outer electron belt be an order of magnitude or more.

Armstrong, T. W.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Evaluation of Trapped Radiation Model Uncertainties for Spacecraft Design

The standard AP8 and AE8 models for predicting trapped proton and electron environments have been compared with several sets of flight data to evaluate model uncertainties. Model comparisons are made with flux, dose, and activation measurements made on various U.S. low-Earth orbit satellites (APEX, CRRES, DMSP, LDEF, NOAA) and Space Shuttle flights, on Russian satellites (Photon-8, Cosmos-1887, Cosmos-2044), and on the Russian Mir Space Station. This report gives a summary of the model-data comparisons-detailed results are given in a companion report. Results from the model comparisons with flic,ht data show, for example, the AP8 model underpredicts the trapped proton flux at low altitudes by a factor of about two (independent of proton energy and solar cycle conditions), and that the AE8 model overpredicts the flux in the outer electron belt by an order of magnitude or more.

Armstrong, T. W.↗
NASA NTRS2001

Shuttle Spacesuit (Radiation) Model Development

A detailed spacesuit computational model is being developed at the Langley Research Center for exposure evaluation studies. The details of the construction of the spacesuit are critical to an estimate of exposures and for assessing the health risk to the astronaut during extravehicular activity (EVA). Fine detail of the basic fabric structure, helmet, and backpack is required to assure a valid evaluation. The exposure fields within the Computerized Anatomical Male (CAM) and Female (CAF) are evaluated at 148 and 156 points, respectively, to determine the dose fluctuations within critical organs. Exposure evaluations for ambient environments will be given and potential implications for geomagnetic storm conditions discussed.

Anderson, Brooke M.↗
NASA NTRS2005

Towards an A-train Aerosol Assimilation System: Assimilation of MODIS Aerosol Optical Thickness Retrievals into a Global Aerosol Transport and Radiation Model

To understand the role of atmospheric aerosols in Earth's climate system we ideally require a global, three-dimensional, and temporally continuous system of measurements. The view of aerosols provided by a single polar-orbiting satellite instrument (e.g., MODIS), while providing the greatest spatial coverage of any measurement system available, can offer only a single relevant observation per day of a particular location. Furthermore, the quantitative interpretation of those observations is subject to considerable uncertainty because of we do not know the aerosol optical properties or vertical profiles well enough. Ground-based and in situ measurements can provide missing detail about aerosol vertical and optical properties, but lack the spatial (and sometimes temporal) coverage desired. Chemical transport models treating the aerosol lifecycle complement this picture by providing three-dimensional, global, and continuous aerosol fields, but suffer from poor constraints on their initial conditions (e.g., the aerosol source, sink, and transformation mechanisms). Here we present a global, three- dimensional aerosol transport model and assimilation system. The model assimilates the MODIS aerosol optical thickness product to constrain its aerosol distributions and burdens. We provide an analysis of the model aerosol distributions as constrained by ground-based sun photometer measurements and aerosol products from other satellite measurements.

Colarco, P.↗
NASA NTRS2013

A Comparison between High-Energy Radiation Background Models and SPENVIS Trapped-Particle Radiation Models

We have been assessing the effects of background radiation in low-Earth orbit for the next generation of X-ray and Cosmic-ray experiments, in particular for International Space Station orbit. Outside the areas of high fluxes of trapped radiation, we have been using parameterizations developed by the Fermi team to quantify the high-energy induced background. For the low-energy background, we have been using the AE8 and AP8 SPENVIS models to determine the orbit fractions where the fluxes of trapped particles are too high to allow for useful operation of the experiment. One area we are investigating is how the fluxes of SPENVIS predictions at higher energies match the fluxes at the low-energy end of our parameterizations. I will summarize our methodology for background determination from the various sources of cosmogenic and terrestrial radiation and how these compare to SPENVIS predictions in overlapping energy ranges.

high-energy radiation↗
NASA NTRS1976

Radiative transfer within the earth's troposphere and stratosphere - A simplified radiative-convective model

A radiative transfer model of the troposphere and stratosphere is presented which includes both long-wave cooling and solar heating due to H2O, CO2 and O3 and has a simplified formulation which facilitates the inclusion of Doppler broadening, H2O continuum bands, hot and minor isotopic bands of CO2, and overlap of H2O bands with CO2 and O3 bands. The radiative model is used to develop an accurate radiative-convective model for studying the global surface temperature, stratospheric thermal structure and the net outgoing long-wave flux.

Ramanathan, V.↗