TIME VARIATIONS OF INTENSITY IN THE EARTH'S INNER RADIATION ZONE - OCTOBER 1959 THROUGH DECEMBER 1960
Time variations of trapped radiation intensity in van allen belt inner zone
RADIATION INTENSITY↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “radiation trapping”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Microwave evidence for interstellar molecules.
The present state of microwave observations of interstellar molecules is reviewed, with emphasis on the need for accurate theoretical understanding of their rates and modes of production. Typical abundances of molecular species in dark interstellar clouds are tabulated, and it is shown that in addition to abundance information observations of molecular lines can yield data on the isotope contents, velocities, and temperatures of the clouds in which they exist. Collisions, spontaneous emission, the isotropic radiation, radiation trapping, and higher-frequency radiation are evaluated as factors contributing to molecular excitation processes.
Townes, C. H.↗
Solar Array Verification Analysis Tool (SAVANT) Developed
Modeling solar cell performance for a specific radiation environment to obtain the end-of-life photovoltaic array performance has become both increasingly important and, with the rapid advent of new types of cell technology, more difficult. For large constellations of satellites, a few percent difference in the lifetime prediction can have an enormous economic impact. The tool described here automates the assessment of solar array on-orbit end-of-life performance and assists in the development and design of ground test protocols for different solar cell designs. Once established, these protocols can be used to calculate on-orbit end-of-life performance from ground test results. The Solar Array Verification Analysis Tool (SAVANT) utilizes the radiation environment from the Environment Work Bench (EWB) model developed by the NASA Lewis Research Center s Photovoltaic and Space Environmental Effects Branch in conjunction with Maxwell Technologies. It then modifies and combines this information with the displacement damage model proposed by Summers et al. (ref. 1) of the Naval Research Laboratory to determine solar cell performance during the course of a given mission. The resulting predictions can then be compared with flight data. The Environment WorkBench (ref. 2) uses the NASA AE8 (electron) and AP8 (proton) models of the radiation belts to calculate the trapped radiation flux. These fluxes are integrated over the defined spacecraft orbit for the duration of the mission to obtain the total omnidirectional fluence spectra. Components such as the solar cell coverglass, adhesive, and antireflective coatings can slow and attenuate the particle fluence reaching the solar cell. In SAVANT, a continuous slowing down approximation is used to model this effect.
Bailey, Sheila G.↗
NASA Radiation Operations Sources, Models, and Standards
Space radiation is one of the major challenges of spaceflight. Astronauts spending time in low Earth orbit, the lunar surface, deep space, and elsewhere will all be exposed to multiple space radiation sources. These sources include trapped radiation in Earth’s upper atmosphere, solar energetic particles, and the omnipresent galactic cosmic radiation, as well as non-ionizing radiation from inside and outside a vehicle or habitat. The Space Radiation Analysis Group (SRAG) at Johnson Space Center is responsible for ensuring astronauts are protected from short- and long-term risks of radiation exposure. This talk details the radiation operational standards employed by NASA.
space radiation↗
Energetic particles in the earth's magnetic field.
Radiation belts, energetic charged particle flux and trapped radiation in geomagnetic field as result of neutron albedo decay and plasma- magnetic field interactions
PLASMA-ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTION↗
Radiation-induced electron trapping in M.I.S. transistors
Electron trapping in MIS transistor, discussing thermal annealing process activation energy and trap production by radiation
Brashears, S. S.↗
Infrared detector performance in the Shuttle Infrared Telescope Facility /SIRTF/
The limitations imposed on infrared detectors for SIRTF are quite different from those imposed on ground-based, balloon-borne, or aircraft-borne systems. The paper examines the limitations and provides performance predictions corresponding to SIRTF conditions. Detector parameters typical of an infrared camera are used. The detector size is taken to be of the order of the diffraction-limited spot, frequency response is taken to correspond to a fraction of a second or less time constant, and spectral definition is provided by multilayer dielectric filters, inductive or capacitive grids, intrinsic absorption, or a combination of these. A nominal 10-micron bandwidth is assumed. The discussion covers atmospheric absorption and emission, zodiacal dust radiance, Shuttle contaminants, telescope self-emission, charged particle radiation, clear environment detector performance, and trapped radiation effects. It is concluded that the SIRTF design and operating conditions will allow current and near-term state-of-the-art detectors to reach their performance limits with SIRTF at a temperature of 10-12 K.
Mccarthy, S. G.↗
An overview of medical-biological radiation hazards in earth orbits
The radiation exposure of crew members on space missions in LEO and GEO is evaluated in a general review. The radiation environment is characterized, taking the trapped radiation belts, solar flares, Galactic and solar cosmic rays, and secondary radiation into account and emphasizing the increased dosages produced by transient phenomena such as solar flares. The biological effects of space radiation in the individual cells, on the body as a whole, and on critical organs are summarized, and the exposure limits and shielding specifications (for spacecraft and for EVA suits) currently used by US mission planners are reviewed. For GEO, 4-g/sq cm Al-equivalent shielding is considered adequate under normal conditions, making EVA in this volatile environment questionable; for anomalously large solar flares, emergency shelter within 10-g/sq cm walls or the capability to retreat to a lower orbit is necessary.
Stauber, M. C.↗
The energetic particle environment of Relay I
Energetic particle environment of Relay I, damage due to proton exposure, and trapped radiation belts
PARTICLE EMISSION↗
A survey of inner zone protons
Survey of trapped radiation in magnetosphere interior by Relay I satellite
RELAY I SATELLITE↗
Solar cycle modulation of the radiation belt proton flux
Solar cycle time variations in trapped radiation belt proton flux, deriving proton transport equation from Boltzmann equation
Dragt, A. J.↗
Measurements of the Jovian radiation belts
The University of California at San Diego trapped radiation detector measured proton and electron fluxes, angular distributions, and energy spectra throughout the Pioneer 10 fly by of Jupiter in December 1973. The instrumentation and calibrations are described, and good values for particle fluxes in the inner and outer regions are presented. The major features of the Jovian radiation belts are described, with preliminary discussions of their meanings.
Fillius, R. W.↗
Space Environment Factors Affecting the Performance of International Space Station Materials: The First Two Years of Flight Operations
In this paper, the natural and induced space environment factors affecting materials performance on ISS are described in some detail. The emphasis will be on ISS flight experience and the more significant design and development issues of the last two years. The intent is to identify and document the set of space environment factors, affecting materials, that are producing the largest impacts on the ISS flight hardware verification and acceptance process and on ISS flight operations. Orbital inclination (S1.6 ) and altitude (nominal3S0 km to 400 km altitude) determine the set of natural environment factors affecting the functional life of materials and subsystems on ISS. ISS operates in the F2 region of Earth's ionosphere in well-defined fluxes of atomic oxygen, other ionospheric plasma species, and solar UV, VUV, and x-ray radiation, as well as galactic cosmic rays, trapped radiation, and solar cosmic rays (1,2). The high latitude orbital environment also exposes external surfaces to significantly less well-defined or predictable fluxes of higher energy trapped electrons and auroral electrons (3 ,4). The micrometeoroid and orbital debris environment is an important determinant of spacecraft design and operations in any orbital inclination. Environment factors induced by ISS flight operations include ram-wake effects, magnetic induction voltages arising from flight through Earth's magnetic field, hypergolic thruster plume impingement from proximity operations of visiting vehicles, materials outgassing, venting and dumping of fluids, ISS thruster operations, as well as specific electrical power system interactions with the ionospheric plasma (S-7). ISS must fly in a very limited number of approved flight attitudes leading to location specific environmental exposures and extreme local thermal environments (8). ISS is a large vehicle and produces a deep wake structure from which both ionospheric plasma and neutrals (atomic oxygen) are largely excluded (9-11). At high latitude, the ISS wake may produce a spacecraft charging environment similar to that experienced by the DMSP and Freja satellites (800 to 100 km altitude polar orbits), especially during geo-magnetic disturbances (12-14). ISS is also subject to magnetic induction voltages (VxB L) on conducting structure, a result of high velocity flight through Earth's magnetic field. The magnitude of the magnetic induction voltage varies with location on ISS, as well as the relative orientation of the vehicle velocity vector and planetary magnetic field vector, leading to maximum induction voltages at high latitude (15). The space environment factors, natural and induced, that have had the largest impact on pre-launch ISS flight hardware verification and flight operations during the first two years of ISS flight operations are listed below and grouped according to the physical and chemical processes driving their interaction with ISS materials.
Koontz, Steven L.↗
Effects of drive pulse shape on graded metal pushered single shell capsule implosions on the National Ignition Facility
Graded metal pushered single shells (PSS) are a viable alternative to low-Z capsules (Z is the atomic number) for indirect drive inertial confinement fusion implosions due to enhanced core tamping and radiation trapping, but they can be compromised by the pusher mixing with the fuel. We compare 2-shock and 3-shock laser pulses for Be/Cr PSS capsules filled with deuterium–tritium gas fuel at 6 mg/cc density. 1D radiation-hydrodynamic simulations predict higher core compression and, hence, ∼2× higher fusion yield for the 3-shock drive than for 2-shock. Nevertheless, we observe similar core ion temperatures and fusion yields for both drives. The implosion burn duration is 25% shorter and the core volume is ∼2.5× smaller for the 3-shock drive than for 2-shock, consistent with a higher compression. 1D LASNEX mix simulations using a buoyancy-drag model matching the measured yields also agree with the observed core sizes and burn durations and suggest ∼40% and ∼70% yield degradations for 2-shock and 3-shock drives due to hydrodynamic instabilities and atomic mix at the pusher–fuel interface. At the same time, 2D HYDRA simulations show that mid-mode (2–250) instability degradations are negligible for the 2-shock implosion (9%) and significant (45%) for 3-shock. Subtracting these from the 1D mix simulations, we infer similar degradations from high-mode instabilities and atomic mix for both drives. Due to its robustness to mid-mode instabilities, future pusher–gas mix studies will use the 2-shock drive.
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
Environmental Effects on ISS Materials Aging (1998 to 2008)
The performance of ISS spacecraft materials and systems on prolonged exposure to the low- Earth orbit (LEO) space flight are reported in this paper. In-flight data, flight crew observations, and the results of ground-based test and analysis directly supporting programmatic and operational decision-making are described. The space flight environments definitions (both natural and induced) used for ISS design, material selection, and verification testing are shown, in most cases, to be more severe than the actual flight environment accounting, in part, for the outstanding performance of ISS as a long mission duration spacecraft. No significant ISS material or system failures have been attributed to spacecraft-environments interactions. Nonetheless, ISS materials and systems performance data is contributing to our understanding of spacecraft material interactions with the spaceflight environment so as to reduce cost and risk for future spaceflight projects and programs. Orbital inclination (51.6 deg) and altitude (nominally near 360 km) determine the set of natural environment factors affecting the functional life of materials and systems on ISS. ISS operates in an electrically conducting environment (the F2 region of Earth s ionosphere) with well-defined fluxes of atomic oxygen, other charged and neutral ionospheric plasma species, solar UV, VUV, and x-ray radiation as well as galactic cosmic rays, trapped radiation, and solar cosmic rays. The LEO micrometeoroid and orbital debris environment is an especially important determinant of spacecraft design and operations. The magnitude of several environmental factors varies dramatically with latitude and longitude as ISS orbits the Earth. The high latitude orbital environment also exposes ISS to higher fluences of trapped energetic electrons, auroral electrons, solar cosmic rays, and galactic cosmic rays than would be the case in lower inclination orbits, largely as a result of the overall shape and magnitude of the geomagnetic field. As a result, ISS exposure to many environmental factors can vary dramatically along a particular orbital ground track, and from one ground track to the next, during any 24-hour period. The induced environment results from ISS interactions with the natural environment as well as environmental factors produced by ISS itself and visiting vehicles fleet. Examples include ram-wake effects, hypergolic thruster plume impingement, materials out-gassing, venting and dumping of fluids, and specific photovoltaic (PV) power system interactions with the ionospheric plasma (7-11). Vehicle size (L) and velocity (V), combined with the magnitude and direction of the geomagnetic field (B) produce operationally significant magnetic induction voltages (VxB.L) in ISS conducting structure during flight through high latitudes (> +45deg) during each orbit. Finally, an induced ionizing radiation environment is produced by cosmic ray interaction with the relatively thick ISS structure and shielding materials. The intent of this review article is, therefore, to provide a summary of selected aspects and elements of the ISS vehicle with regard to LEO space environment effects, associated with the much larger and more complicated vehicle that ISS has become since 1998, but also with an eye towards performance life extension to the year 2016 and beyond.
Alred, John↗
Spacecraft Materials in the Space Flight Environment: International Space Station - May 2002 to May 2007
The performance of ISS spacecraft materials and systems on prolonged exposure to the low-Earth orbit (LEO) space flight is reported in this paper. In-flight data, flight crew observations, and the results of ground-based test and analysis directly supporting programmatic and operational decision-making are presented. The space flight environments definitions (both natural and induced) used for ISS design, material selection, and verification testing are shown, in most cases, to be more severe than the actual flight environment accounting for the outstanding performance of ISS as a long mission duration spacecraft. No significant ISS material or system failures have been attributed to spacecraft-environments interactions. Nonetheless, ISS materials and systems performance data is contributing to our understanding of spacecraft material interactions in the spaceflight environment so as to reduce cost and risk for future spaceflight projects and programs. Orbital inclination (51.6o) and altitude (nominally near 360 km) determine the set of natural environment factors affecting the functional life of materials and systems on ISS. ISS operates in an electrically conducting environment (the F2 region of Earth s ionosphere) with well-defined fluxes of atomic oxygen, other charged and neutral ionospheric plasma species, solar UV, VUV, and x-ray radiation as well as galactic cosmic rays, trapped radiation, and solar cosmic rays (1-4). The LEO micrometeoroid and orbital debris environment is an especially important determinant of spacecraft design and operations (5, 6). The magnitude of several environmental factors varies dramatically with latitude and longitude as ISS orbits the Earth (1-4). The high latitude orbital environment also exposes ISS to higher fluences of trapped energetic electrons, auroral electrons, solar cosmic rays, and galactic cosmic rays (1-4) than would be the case in lower inclination orbits, largely as a result of the overall shape and magnitude of the geomagnetic field (1-4). As a result, ISS exposure to many environmental factors can vary dramatically along a particular orbital ground track, and from one ground track to the next, during any 24-hour period.
Golden, John↗
Geomagnetic geometry tables
Geomagnetic field geometry tables for trapped radiation and particles using scalar magnetic field intensity, invariant polar coordinants, and dipole moment
GEOMAGNETIC FIELD↗
Visual assessment of the radiation distribution in the ISS Lab module: visualization in the human body
The US Lab module of the International Space Station (ISS) is a primary working area where the crewmembers are expected to spend majority of their time. Because of the directionality of radiation fields caused by the Earth shadow, trapped radiation pitch angle distribution, and inherent variations in the ISS shielding, a model is needed to account for these local variations in the radiation distribution. We present the calculated radiation dose (rem/yr) values for over 3,000 different points in the working area of the Lab module and estimated radiation dose values for over 25,000 different points in the human body for a given ambient radiation environment. These estimated radiation dose values are presented in a three dimensional animated interactive visualization format. Such interactive animated visualization of the radiation distribution can be generated in near real-time to track changes in the radiation environment during the orbit precession of the ISS.
NASA Center JSC↗