Verification of the 2D Finite Element SP3 Solutions
Method(FEM) is the free geometry handling. However many of the geometries of the nuclear engineering problems are not unstructured but rather structured, such as a hexahedral, or triangular prism. Thus, the need for the use of FEM has less portion in nuclear engineering. However it is also certain that it is very hard to exclude the possibility for use of an unstructured geometry such as a PBMR core problem, fusion blanket analysis of the source problem, another design issue with an unstructured geometry. In addition, research regarding the acceleration scheme such as Coarse Mesh Finite Difference (CMFD) showed up in nuclear engineering in recent years. By considering these facts, the FEM cannot be totally exclusive. To utilize the FEM for nuclear engineering problems, several types of assistance are needed. The first is parallelization because of its slow calculation speed. The second is an acceleration scheme. With these two types of assistance the FEM can be utilized freely in the nuclear engineering field. In this research, before conducting parallelization and acceleration, the final verification for the implementation of the up-scattering treatment with an arbitrary geometry conducted through a comparison with the McCARD solution through the well-known C5G7 2D benchmark problem. Note that the earlier work for verification of the FEM for the multi-group problem without up-scattering and with a structured geometry including a mathematical formulation has already been done. The main points that will be tested here are as follows. The first is a check of the right implementation for the multi-group problem with an up-scattering cross section from the perspectives of the multiplication factor and power. The second is the transport effect for this problem by comparing the solutions from P{sub 1} and Simplified P{sub 3}(SP{sub 3}). The third is the effectiveness of the higher order basis function for the same number of unknowns. (authors)