DOE OSTI2016
Cape Thompson, Alaska, is located approximately 120 miles north of Kotzebue, Alaska, within the Ogotoruk Creek valley. The remote Alaskan location is also home to the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) Project Chariot study area. Project Chariot was part of the Plowshare Program, created in 1957 by the AEC to study peaceful uses for atomic energy. Project Chariot began in 1958 when a scientific field team chose Cape Thompson as a potential site to excavate a harbor using a series of nuclear explosions. Between 1959 and 1962, AEC was responsible for over 40 pretest bio-environmental and geotechnical studies of the Cape Thompson area. Strong public opposition to the tests developed, which caused the project to be cancelled with no nuclear explosions ever conducted at the site. In the early 1960's, several deep boreholes were drilled to obtain subsurface, temperature, and high-explosive testing data. Refrigerated diesel was used as a drilling fluid to keep the boreholes open so that thermistors could measure subsurface temperatures. The test boreholes were named Able, Baker, Charlie, Dog, and X-1. In the summer of 2014, the US Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed the remediation of remnant diesel at these sites. Prior to the 2014 remediation activities, LM conducted two separate characterization field studies to determine the nature and extent of the contamination from the 1960's drilling activities. In 2013, LM developed a remediation plan that was submitted and approved by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). The 2014 Project Chariot remediation had some unique logistical challenges and historic issues with stakeholders to overcome. Many of the historic issues centered on previous AEC scientific actions and a general mistrust of the government by the local stakeholders. Prior to and during the 2014 remediation work, an outreach campaign was implemented to discuss prior activities at the site and include stakeholders from Point Hope, Alaska, in the remediation-planning process. The remoteness of the region also provided unique logistical challenges. Because of the short field season, LM initiated several subcontracts over a year in advance. The field camp, heavy equipment, and soil storage containers were shipped by barge to the site. Personnel, food, and small materials were flown in by bush plane from Kotzebue, Alaska. Previous site characterization had identified diesel-range organics (DROs) as the primary contaminant. The cleanup levels for the site were provided by the Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) for the Arctic Zone region. The AAC cleanup level for DROs on gravel pads is 500 mg/kg and 12,500 mg/kg tundra in the arctic-zone region. To help determine the extent and direct soil excavation in the field, photoionization detectors (PIDs) were used for field screening. While the PID results provided rough limits for excavation, laboratory confirmation sampling was required to provide actual excavation guidance. All excavation locations remained open until laboratory results met AAC criteria and ADEC approved closure. The laboratory sample protocol required the bush plane to pick up samples almost daily and transfer them to Anchorage for analysis. In order to meet holding time requirements, all laboratory samples were analyzed on an expedited basis. Analytical results and ADEC approval notifications were e-mailed back to the site via satellite connection. A total of 202 laboratory analyses were needed to complete the remediation effort. At each location (Able, Baker, Charlie, Dog, and X-1), the boreholes were plugged and abandoned in accordance with ADEC regulations. Contaminated soil was excavated, and the material was placed in super-sacks and hauled to connex boxes located near the sea shore. Approximately 786 tons of material was removed and shipped by barge to the Columbia Ridge Landfill in Arlington, Oregon, for disposal. The well casings were cut and sealed below ground surface. Each location was graded to its original contours and reclaimed with native vegetation, and a geodetic survey was conducted. Tours with leaders of the Village of Point Hope and the land owner (Arctic Slope Regional Corporation) were conducted prior to the final demobilization. All remediation equipment and camp facilities were removed at the completion of the project. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗