Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “BOOSTER”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

Booster engines derived from the Space Shuttle Main Engine

Current vehicle studies of post-Space Shuttle vehicles have identified the potential need for a high-pressure booster engine using liquid oxygen/hydrocarbon fuel (RP-1) as propellants. Recent studies of the possibility of using Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) components for a high pressure LOX/RP-1 engine have resulted in several engine configurations which are based largely on SSME components. The current SSME thrust chamber is regeneratively cooled with hydrogen using a relatively low percentage of the total hydrogen flow. For a LOX/RP-1 application the SSME thrust chamber can be run at high pressures and be cooled with a relatively low hydrogen flow. In addition, the SSME oxygen pump, valves, and main injector components may be utilized for the booster engine. By using a majority of the current SSME engine components for the LOX/RE-1 booster engine, engine development time and cost can be significantly reduced compared to the development of a new engine.

Sobin, A. J.↗

A unique nozzle cover for the Shuttle booster separation motors

The stringent requirements imposed upon the Shuttle booster separation system led to the development of two unique nozzle cover concepts with potential applications in other space propulsion systems. Major requirements were to (1) protect the booster separation motors (BSMs) from the ascent aerothermal environment; (2) provide a humidity seal for the BSM during storage and readiness on the launch pad; (3) open completely during the ignition transient; and (4) produce no debris during ascent, separation, and booster reentry. The nozzle cover concepts included (1) a frangible reinforced elastomeric cover with a retraction mechanism to remove the cover sections away from the plume, and (2) a stainless steel cover hinged by a plastically deforming torsion pin.

Dettling, J. R.↗

Quality assurance and control in the production and static tests of the solid rocket boosters for the Space Shuttle

The paper surveys the various aspects of design and overhaul of the solid rocket boosters. It is noted that quality control is an integral part of the design specifications. Attention is given to the production process which is optimized towards highest quality. Also discussed is the role of the DCA (Defense Contract Administration) in inspecting the products of subcontractors, noting that the USAF performs this role for prime contractors. Fabrication and construction of the booster is detailed with attention given to the lining of the booster cylinder and the mixing of the propellant and the subsequent X-ray inspection.

Cerny, O. F.↗

Economics of the solid rocket booster for space shuttle

The paper examines economics of the solid rocket booster for the Space Shuttle. Costs have been held down by adapting existing technology to the 146 in. SRB selected, with NASA reducing the cost of expendables and reusing the expensive nonexpendable hardware. Drop tests of Titan III motor cases and nozzles proved that boosters can survive water impact at vertical velocities of 100 ft/sec so that SRB components can be reused. The cost of expendables was minimized by selecting proven propellants, insulation, and nozzle ablatives of known costs; the propellant has the lowest available cost formulation, and low cost ablatives, such as pitch carbon fibers, will be used when available. Thus, the use of proven technology and low cost expendables will make the SRB an economical booster for the Space Shuttle.

Rice, W. C.↗

Feasibility of recovering a one million-pound booster

The concept of reusing spacecraft and launch vehicles is currently exemplified by the Space Shuttle Orbiter and the two recoverable and reusable solid rocket boosters (SRBs) which are part of its launch system. It is shown that it is possible to recover launch systems weighing as much as one million pounds at reasonable impact velocities using a hybrid parachute-retrorocket recovery system. The new Kevlar materials, which have a much higher strength-to-weight ratio than nylon materials, make it possible to recover a one-million-pound booster for a reasonable weight penalty. The selected input parameters to the parachute weight equation result in an accurate estimation of the current Space Shuttle solid rocket booster parachute recovery system.

Toni, R. A.↗

Control techniques to improve Space Shuttle solid rocket booster separation

The present Space Shuttle's control system does not prevent the Orbiter's main engines from being in gimbal positions that are adverse to solid rocket booster separation. By eliminating the attitude error and attitude rate feedback just prior to solid rocket booster separation, the detrimental effects of the Orbiter's main engines can be reduced. In addition, if angular acceleration feedback is applied, the gimbal torques produced by the Orbiter's engines can reduce the detrimental effects of the aerodynamic torques. This paper develops these control techniques and compares the separation capability of the developed control systems. Currently with the worst case initial conditions and each Shuttle system dispersion aligned in the worst direction (which is more conservative than will be experienced in flight), the solid rocket booster has an interference with the Shuttle's external tank of 30 in. Elimination of the attitude error and attitude rate feedback reduces that interference to 19 in. Substitution of angular acceleration feedback reduces the interference to 6 in. The two latter interferences can be eliminated by atess conservative analysis techniques, that is, by using a root sum square of the system dispersions.

Tomlin, D. D.↗

Space Shuttle with rail system and aft thrust structure securing solid rocket boosters to external tank

The configuration and relationship of the external propellant tank and solid rocket boosters of space transportation systems such as the space shuttle are described. The space shuttle system with the improved propellant tank is shown. The external tank has a forward pressure vessel for liquid hydrogen and an aft pressure vessel for liquid oxygen. The solid rocket boosters are joined together by a thrust frame which extends across and behind the external tank. The thrust of the orbiter's main rocket engines are transmitted to the aft portion of the external tank and the thrust of the solid rocket boosters are transmitted to the aft end of the external tank.

Vonpragenau, G. L.↗

The Solid Rocket Booster Auxiliary Power Unit: Meeting the Challenge

The thrust vector control systems of the solid rocket boosters are turbine-powered, electrically controlled hydraulic systems which function through hydraulic actuators to gimbal the nozzles of the solid rocket boosters and provide vehicle steering for the Space Shuttle. Turbine power for the thrust vector control systems is provided through hydrazine fueled auxiliary power units which drive the hydraulic pumps. The solid rocket booster auxiliary power unit resulted from trade studies which indicated significant advantages would result if an existing engine could be found to meet the program goal of 20 missions reusability and adapted to meet the seawater environments associated with ocean landings. During its maturation, the auxiliary power unit underwent many design iterations and provided its flight worthiness through full qualification programs both as a component and as part of the thrust vector control system. More significant, the auxiliary power unit has successfully completed six Shuttle missions.

Hughes, R. W.↗

STS-26 solid rocket booster post flight structural assessment

A post flight assessment of the Space Shuttle's Solid Rocket Boosters was conducted at the John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida after the launch of STS-26. The two boosters were inspected for structural damage and the results of this inspection are presented. Overall, the boosters were in good condition. However, there was some minor damage attributed to splash down. Some of this damage is a recurring problem. Explanations of these problems are provided.

Herda, David A.↗

Two-stage reusable launch system utilizing a winged core vehicle and glideback boosters

A near-term technology launch system is described in which Space Shuttle main engines are used on a manned orbiter and also on twin strap-on unmanned boosters. The orbiter has a circular body and clipped delta wings. The twin strap-on boosters have a circular body and deployable oblique wings for a glideback recovery. The dry and gross weights of the system, capable of delivering 70klb of cargo to orbit, are compared with a similar system with hydrocarbon-fueled boosters and with the current Shuttle.

Macconochie, Ian O.↗

Corrosion Prevention in Copper Combustion Chamber Liners of Liquid Oxygen/Methane Booster Engines

Prior research conducted by United Technologies Research Center and Rockwell International Rocketdyne Division encountered severe copper corrosion while flowing hydrocarbon fuels through copper cooling tubes. These experimental results have very important implications for the development of low-cost, regeneratively cooled, oxygen/hydrocarbon bipropellant booster engines. Aerojet TechSystems undertook a program sponsored by NASA/Lewis Research Center in 1986 with two objectives: (1) to define the corrosive interaction process that occurs between hydrocarbon fuels and copper combustion chamber liner materials, using both static and dynamic test methods, and (2) to identify and demonstrate protective measures against this corrosive process. The results of the first program task demonstrated that the most damaging corrosive process was caused by trace amounts of sulfur-containing impurities in the hydrocarbon fuel which react with the copper chamber liner material to form cuprous sulfide (Cu2S), as reported in Paper No. AlAA 88-3215. Experiments were conducted which demonstrated this corrosive process with Mil-Spec RP-1, propane, and methane fuels in contact with OFHC, NASA-Z, and ZrCu coppers. The preliminary results of the second program task demonstrated that electrodeposited gold and platinum coatings held promise of preventing corrosion of copper chamber liners by methane contaminated with sulfur-containing impurities, as reported in Paper No. AIAA 89-2738. Experiments were conducted which demonstrated greatly reduced corrosion of copper by hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) as measured impurities in methane. This paper presents the concluding, confirmatory results from the second program task. The efficacy of a protective gold coating on NASA-Z copper cooling channel walls was conclusively demonstrated. Tests were conducted in the Aerojet Carbothermal Test Facility which provide realistic simulations of booster engine cooling channel conditions such as temperature, pressure, flow velocity, and heat flux. Dynamic test series were performed with methane containing 5 and 10 ppm (by volume) hydrogen sulfide. Gold-plated and unplated copper alloy specimens were evaluated. The tests demonstrated that gold coatings were effective in preventing corrosion of the copper. Posttest metallographic examinations of the unplated specimens showed severe corrosion as a result of reaction with the sulfur containing contaminant in the fuel. In contrast, posttest metallographic examination of the gold-coated specimens showed no corrosion under similar operating conditions. The findings from metallurgical and chemical analyses of the copper specimens, chemical analysis of the methane, and description of all test conditions are provided. Conclusions are reached as to the efficacy of the plating methods and the effectiveness of the metal coatings in the prevention of corrosion in hydrocarbon-fueled booster engine combustion chamber liners.

S D Rosenberg↗

Space Transportation Booster Engine Configuration Study. Volume 3: Program Cost estimates and work breakdown structure and WBS dictionary

The objective of the Space Transportation Booster Engine Configuration Study is to contribute to the ALS development effort by providing highly reliable, low cost booster engine concepts for both expendable and reusable rocket engines. The objectives of the Space Transportation Booster Engine (STBE) Configuration Study were: (1) to identify engine development configurations which enhance vehicle performance and provide operational flexibility at low cost; and (2) to explore innovative approaches to the follow-on Full-Scale Development (FSD) phase for the STBE.

Source record↗

Space transportation booster engine configuration study. Volume 2: Design definition document and environmental analysis

The objective of the Space Transportation Booster Engine (STBE) Configuration Study is to contribute to the Advanced Launch System (ALS) development effort by providing highly reliable, low cost booster engine concepts for both expendable and reusable rocket engines. The objectives of the space Transportation Booster Engine (STBE) Configuration Study were: (1) to identify engine configurations which enhance vehicle performance and provide operational flexibility at low cost, and (2) to explore innovative approaches to the follow-on Full-Scale Development (FSD) phase for the STBE.

Source record↗

Space transportation booster engine configuration study. Volume 1: Executive Summary

The objective of the Space Transportation Booster Engine (STBE) Configuration Study is to contribute to the Advanced Launch System (ALS) development effort by providing highly reliable, low cost booster engine concepts for both expendable and reusable rocket engines. The objectives of the Space Transportation Booster Engine (STBE) Configuration Study were to identify engine configurations which enhance vehicle performance and provide operational flexibility at low cost, and to explore innovative approaches to the follow-on full-scale development (FSD) phase for the STBE.

Source record↗

Effects on Longitudinal Stability and Control Characteristics of a B-29 Airplane of Variations in Stick-force and Control-rate Characteristics Obtained Through Use of a Booster in the Elevator-control System

The longitudinal stability and control characteristics of a B-29 airplane have been measured with a control surface booster incorporated in the elevator-control system. The measurements were obtained with the booster operating to provide various control-force gradients and various maximum rates of control motion. Results are presented which show the effect of these booster parameters on the handling qualities of the test airplane.

STABILITY, LONGITUDINAL - STATIC↗

Effect on Longitudinal Stability and Control Characteristics of a Boeing B-29 Airplane of Variations in Stick-Force and Control-Rate Characteristics Obtained Through Use of a Booster in the Elevator-Control System

A longitudinal stability and control characteristics of a Boeing B-29 airplane have been measured with a booster incorporated in the elevator-control system. Tests were made to determine the effects on the handling qualities of the test airplane of variations in the pilot's control-force gradients as well as the effects of variations in the maximum rate of control motion supplied by the booster. The results of the control-rate investigation indicate that large airplanes may have satisfactory handling qualities with the booster adjusted to give much lower rates of control motion than those normally used by pilots.

Mathews, Charles W↗

Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster Lightweight Recovery System

The cancellation of the Advanced Solid Rocket Booster Project and the earth-to-orbit payload requirements for the Space Station dictated that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) look at performance enhancements from all Space Transportation System (STS) elements (Orbiter Project, Space Shuttle Main Engine Project, External Tank Project, Solid Rocket Motor Project, & Solid Rocket Booster Project). The manifest for launching of Space Station components indicated that an additional 12-13000 pound lift capability was required on 10 missions and 15-20,000 pound additional lift capability is required on two missions. Trade studies conducted by all STS elements indicate that by deleting the parachute Recovery System (and associated hardware) from the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBS) and going to a lightweight External Tank (ET) the 20,000 pound additional lift capability can be realized for the two missions. The deletion of the parachute Recovery System means the loss of four SRBs and this option is two expensive (loss of reusable hardware) to be used on the other 10 Space Station missions. Accordingly, each STS element looked at potential methods of weight savings, increased performance, etc. As the SRB and ET projects are non-propulsive (i.e. does not have launch thrust elements) their only contribution to overall payload enhancement can be achieved by the saving of weight while maintaining adequate safety factors and margins. The enhancement factor for the SRB project is 1:10. That is for each 10 pounds saved on the two SRBS; approximately 1 additional pound of payload in the orbiter bay can be placed into orbit. The SRB project decided early that the SRB recovery system was a prime candidate for weight reduction as it was designed in the early 1970s and weight optimization had never been a primary criteria.

Wolf, Dean↗

Propulsion system advances that enable a reusable Liquid Fly Back Booster (LFBB)

This paper provides an overview of the booster propulsion system for the Liquid Fly Back Booster (LFBB). This includes, system requirements, design approach, concept of operations, reliability, safety and cost assumptions. The paper summarizes the findings of the Boeing propulsion team that has been studying the LFBB feasibility as a booster replacement for the Space Shuttle. This paper will discuss recent advances including a new generation of kerosene and oxygen rich pre-burner staged combustion cycle main rocket engines. The engine reliability and safety is expected to be much higher than current standards by adding extra operating margins into the design and normally operating the engines at 75% of engine rated power. This allows for engine out capability. The new generation of main engines operates at significantly higher chamber pressure than the prior generation of gas generator cycle engines. The oxygen rich pre-burner engine cycle, unlike the fuel rich gas generator cycle, results in internally self-cleaning firings which facilitates reusability. Maintenance is further enhanced with integrated health monitoring to improve safety and turn-around efficiency. The maintainability of the LFBB LOX/kerosene engines is being improved by designing the vehicle/engine interfaces for easy access to key engine components.

Keith, E. L.↗