Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “DEVOLATILIZATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

129 records · Page 8

Calculating the Effects of Solids Input and Removal as a Temperature Control in the Advanced Scale Up Reactor Experiment (ASURE) Facility at NETL Using Aspen

The Advanced Scale Up Reactor Experiment (ASURE) facility at NETL is being designed to be a fuel-flexible multi-purpose reactor that can be used for pyrolysis/gasification or evaluation of other high pressure “circulating fluidized bed” (CFB) chemical processes. The initial system design calculations for pyrolysis/gasification are presented in this work showing the expected performance of the ASURE facility when used as a biomass conversion reactor. Several other areas of application include gasification of any carbonaceous fuel including biomass, coal, plastics, and other waste materials. The reactor can therefore be used to produce SYNGAS of various compositions and hydrogen as well as other high value chemicals resulting from a typical tuned gasification process. This paper discusses an ASPEN model of the facility, focusing on the riser of the CFB reactor and the solids recirculation loop. The ASPEN model divides the riser into two sections. A bottom section which receives ash, char and sand which have been recirculated from a return loop. In this section an inert fluidization gas, (N2 or CO2), is introduced which acts as the primary mover of the solids through the system. The bottom section is equipped with a restricted air feed so that the recirculated char can be partially oxidized. This oxidation process along with the inventory of recirculating sand are used to effectively control the temperature in the following two chemical conversion sections of the reactor which are the pyrolysis zone followed by a tar cracking zone. Fresh fuel is added to the pyrolysis zone and undergoes drying and devolatilization. The products ash, char, volatile matter, and water vapor exit the pyrolysis zone and enter the reaction block for tar cracking. Steam and CO2 gasification reactions will be incorporated into the tar cracking zone, however at the design operating temperature, conversion from these reactions is expected to be essentially zero. The unit when completed in 2026 will test mixtures of biomass, plastics, and waste coal. This paper presents the basic ASPEN engineering design model for this project and provides preliminary sensitivity studies to determine how the various parts of the reactor will perform.

ASSURE↗

Chapter 29 - Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Oil, Char, and Gas

Biomass pyrolysis is a technology that uses high temperatures to break down biomaterials like wood without completely burning them. Products include char, combustible gas, and vapors; the vapors can be condensed into a liquid with myriad uses. This chapter serves as a primer for the fundamental physics and chemistry involved in biomass pyrolysis, common reactor systems, and some reported uses for the products.

BIOMASS FUELS↗

Chemical Diversity of Oligomers in Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oils, Part 2: Heavy Lignin-Derived Molecules and Highly Dehydrated Sugars from Dichloromethane-Insoluble Pyrolytic Lignin

Here, this paper, the second in a series, investigates the water-insoluble, dichloromethane (DCM)-insoluble residue of BTG pyrolysis oil, also known in the literature as high-molecular-weight pyrolytic lignin (HMW-PL). HMW-PL accounts for 9.2 wt % of the original bio-oil, which is known to increase upon aging and contribute to coke formation during bio-oil upgrading. Understanding its composition is crucial for managing pyrolysis oil during the processing. The HMW-PL was fractionated using a silica gel column with solvents of increasing polarity: ethyl acetate (EA), acetone (AC), isopropanol (ISO), and methanol (MeOH), yielding 49.2, 19.9, 8.2, and 8.1 wt %, respectively. Each subfraction was characterized by UV-fluorescence, FTIR, HSQC NMR, and (−)APCI-FT-Orbitrap MS. Analysis revealed that the EA subfraction primarily contained aromatic dimers (C 19 –C 20 ) and trimers (C 17 –C 13 ), while the MeOH subfraction was rich in oxygenated aliphatic monomers (C 8 –C 16 ) likely derived from sugar dehydration products. The resulting fractions were further separated via preparatory HPLC. Fifty-five candidate molecular structures were proposed based on the Orbitrap MS data, supported by UV-fluorescence, FTIR, and NMR results. This fractionation strategy defined four distinct subfractions, enabling the proposal of surrogate molecular structures and advancing the molecular-level understanding of the HMW-PL fraction in the pyrolysis bio-oil.

High-Molecular-Weight PL↗