Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LIGNIN”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

Synthetic Design of Microorganisms for Lignin Fuel

Despite the proof-of-the-concept for lignin bioconversion at the time when the project was first funded, the conversion efficiency and titer were extremely low for bioconversion of lignin into lipid. The low conversion efficiency is due the inherent recalcitrance of lignin and limited understanding of lignin chemistry. In nature, lignin is a complex aromatic heteropolymer composed of phenylpropane units cross-linked via a variety of chemically stable bonds, which makes it particularly difficult for microbial degradation. In addition to the recalcitrance, lignin as a biorefinery waste is also highly heterogeneous in terms of chemical linkage abundance, functional group distribution, molecular weight and uniformity. In order to achieve better lignin bioconversion, it is critical to understand how lignin chemistry impacts the conversion performance. Throughout the project, we have clearly found that ‘not all lignin are created equal’, in particular, for the lignin out of different biochemical conversion processes. In addition, we have clearly shown that lignin chemistry defines its functionality and processiblity for bioconversion. In particular, the S/G/H ratio, functional groups, chemical linkages and molecular weight defines the reactivity of lignin during bioconversion. Throughout the project, we have advanced the understanding for the impact of lignin chemistry on reactivity, developed a series of lignin 3 fractionation technologies to improve lignin processibility, and ultimately advanced biorefinery design holistically for simultaneous optimization of carbohydrate release and lignin reactivity. In addition to lignin reactivity, another important consideration for lignin bioconversion is the available microbial strains for bioconversion. Natural biomass utilization systems evolved mechanisms for lignin degradation, often with at least three sequential steps: lignin depolymerization into aromatic compounds, subsequent degradation of aromatic compounds into common intermediates like acetyl-CoA, and eventually the conversion of central metabolites into target bioproducts like lipid and PHA. Extensive work has gone into understanding the mechanisms of lignin depolymerization in model systems such as white rot fungi and termites. Despite interest, no fungus-based commercial process for lignin depolymerization has been developed, due in large part to the practical challenges of fungal genetic manipulations. In addition to white rot fungi, a few members of the Actinobacteria, α-Proteobacteria, and γ-Proteobacteria (including Rhodococcus putida) have lignin degradation activity in vitro. However, most of lignindegrading bacteria has very low lignin conversion efficiency, in particular, for lignin depolymerization. The project focused on addressing the issue with systems biology-guided microbial design to improve lignin bioconversion. The project first established that laccase enzyme can synergize with bacteria to promote lignin depolymerization, and further utilized synthetic biology approach to designed functional modules for lignin depolymerization, aromatic compound utilization, and bioproduct accumulation. The integration of biorefinery design, synthetic biology, and fermentation optimization eventually allowed us to achieve the target yield of 10g/L lipid production from lignin-containing biorefinery waste. In this summary, we hereby briefly review the major discoveries from the project with reference to different sections of this report.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Trends in lignin modification: a comprehensive analysis of the effects of genetic manipulations/mutations on lignification and vascular integrity

A comprehensive assessment of lignin configuration in transgenic and mutant plants is long overdue. This review thus undertook the systematic analysis of trends manifested through genetic and mutational manipulations of the various steps associated with monolignol biosynthesis; this included consideration of the downstream effects on organized lignin assembly in the various cell types, on vascular function/integrity, and on plant growth and development. As previously noted for dirigent protein (homologs), distinct and sophisticated monolignol forming metabolic networks were operative in various cell types, tissues and organs, and form the cell-specific guaiacyl (G) and guaiacyl-syringyl (G-S) enriched lignin biopolymers, respectively. Regardless of cell type undergoing lignification, carbon allocation to the different monolignol pools is apparently determined by a combination of phenylalanine availability and cinnamate-4-hydroxylase/"p-coumarate-3-hydroxylase" (C4H/C3H) activities, as revealed by transcriptional and metabolic profiling. Downregulation of either phenylalanine ammonia lyase or cinnamate-4-hydroxylase thus predictably results in reduced lignin levels and impaired vascular integrity, as well as affecting related (phenylpropanoid-dependent) metabolism. Depletion of C3H activity also results in reduced lignin deposition, albeit with the latter being derived only from hydroxyphenyl (H) units, due to both the guaiacyl (G) and syringyl (S) pathways being blocked. Apparently the cells affected are unable to compensate for reduced G/S levels by increasing the amounts of H-components. The downstream metabolic networks for G-lignin enriched formation in both angiosperms and gymnosperms utilize specific cinnamoyl CoA O-methyltransferase (CCOMT), 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL), cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) isoforms: however, these steps neither affect carbon allocation nor H/G designations, this being determined by C4H/C3H activities. Such enzymes thus fulfill subsidiary processing roles, with all (except CCOMT) apparently being bifunctional for both H and G substrates. Their severe downregulation does, however, predictably result in impaired monolignol biosynthesis, reduced lignin deposition/vascular integrity, (upstream) metabolite build-up and/or shunt pathway metabolism. There was no evidence for an alternative acid/ester O-methyltransferase (AEOMT) being involved in lignin biosynthesis.The G/S lignin pathway networks are operative in specific cell types in angiosperms and employ two additional biosynthetic steps to afford the corresponding S components, i.e. through introduction of an hydroxyl group at C-5 and its subsequent O-methylation. [These enzymes were originally classified as ferulate-5-hydroxylase (F5H) and caffeate O-methyltransferase (COMT), respectively.] As before, neither step has apparently any role in carbon allocation to the pathway; hence their individual downregulation/manipulation, respectively, gives either a G enriched lignin or formation of the well-known S-deficient bm3 "lignin" mutant, with cell walls of impaired vascular integrity. In the latter case, COMT downregulation/mutation apparently results in utilization of the isoelectronic 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol species albeit in an unsuccessful attempt to form G-S lignin proper. However, there is apparently no effect on overall G content, thereby indicating that deposition of both G and S moieties in the G/S lignin forming cells are kept spatially, and presumably temporally, fully separate. Downregulation/mutation of further downstream steps in the G/S network [i.e. utilizing 4CL, CCR and CAD isoforms] gives predictable effects in terms of their subsidiary processing roles: while severe downregulation of 4CL gave phenotypes with impaired vascular integrity due to reduced monolignol supply, there was no evidence in support of increased growth and/or enhanced cellulose biosynthesis. CCR and CAD downregulation/mutations also established that a depletion in monolignol supply reduced both lignin contents supply reduced both lignin contents and vascular integrity, with a concomitant shift towards (upstream) metabolite build-up and/or shunting.The extraordinary claims of involvement of surrogate monomers (2-methoxybenzaldehyde, feruloyl tyramine, vanillic acid, etc.) in lignification were fully disproven and put to rest, with the investigators themselves having largely retracted former claims. Furthermore analysis of the well-known bm1 mutation, a presumed CAD disrupted system, apparently revealed that both G and S lignin components were reduced. This seems to imply that there is no monolignol specific dehydrogenase, such as the recently described sinapyl alcohol dehydrogenase (SAD) for sinapyl alcohol formation. Nevertheless, different CAD isoforms of differing homology seem to be operative in different lignifying cell types, thereby giving the G-enriched and G/S-enriched lignin biopolymers, respectively. For the G-lignin forming network, however, the CAD isoform is apparently catalytically less efficient with all three monolignols than that additionally associated with the corresponding G/S lignin forming network(s), which can more efficiently use all three monolignols. However, since CAD does not determine either H, G, or S designation, it again serves in a subsidiary role-albeit using different isoforms for different cell wall developmental and cell wall type responses.The results from this analysis contrasts further with speculations of some early investigators, who had viewed lignin assembly as resulting from non-specific oxidative coupling of monolignols and subsequent random polymerization. At that time, though, the study of the complex biological (biochemical) process of lignin assembly had begun without any of the (bio)chemical tools to either address or answer the questions posed as to how its formation might actually occur. Today, by contrast, there is growing recognition of both sophisticated and differential control of monolignol biosynthetic networks in different cell types, which serve to underscore the fact that complexity of assembly need not be confused any further with random formation. Moreover, this analysis revealed another factor which continues to cloud interpretations of lignin downregulation/mutational analyses, namely the serious technical problems associated with all aspects of lignin characterization, whether for lignin quantification, isolation of lignin-enriched preparations and/or in determining monomeric compositions. For example, in the latter analyses, some 50-90% of the lignin components still cannot be detected using current methodologies, e.g. by thioacidolysis cleavage and nitrobenzene oxidative cleavage. This deficiency in lignin characterization thus represents one of the major hurdles remaining in delineating how lignin assembly (in distinct cell types) and their configuration actually occurs.

Review, Academic↗

Defining the Minimal Set of Microbial Genes Required for Valorization of Lignin Biomass (Final Report)

Project Goals: Lignin is the second most abundant biopolymer on earth and represents a critically underutilized biomass resource for hydrocarbon feedstocks. Despite substantial effort, there is still no efficient process to convert lignin to useable carbon-based platform chemicals and materials. The goal of this project is identify a minimal set of microbial enzymes necessary for lignin breakdown and sufficient for the synthesis of valuable chemical intermediates from lignin isolated as a byproduct of lignocellulosic ethanol production. These genes will be then used to engineer functional whole cell biocatalysts for tunable lignin metabolism. To date, although a number of enzymes have been associated with lignin degradation, most have been tested in isolation (as individual enzymes) and on drastically different substrates -- often dyes that are not related to lignin. In contrast, lignin utilization in nature likely occurs by microbial consortia with multiple enzymes acting synergistically. We propose to examine two separate stages of lignin breakdown carried out by the microbes that do it best: (1) early breakdown of native polymeric lignin into soluble fragments by a set of sequenced wood-rotting fungal species, and (2) downstream metabolism of these soluble lignin fragments to useful chemical intermediates by a panel of sequenced soil saprophytes. Our approach involves testing sets of genes that will be assayed combinatorially in the context of a heterologous expression host. The resulting engineered strains will be systematically assayed using soluble lignin fragments, synthetic defined polymeric lignin, and finally lignin directly sourced from lignocellulosic processing streams. In addition to resulting in a functional whole cell biocatalyst for lignin utilization, we anticipate that this approach will allow us to address key unanswered questions about lignin metabolism in nature, including: (1) Why does the Trametes versicolor genome contain 25 different class II peroxidases? (2) What is the role of laccases in lignin metabolism? Why do some aggressive lignin degraders have many laccases (e.g. >7 in T. versicolor) while others have none (e.g. P. chrysosporium)? (3) How is peroxide provided in a controlled manner to drive peroxidase activity without causing the enzyme inhibition that is so often observed in vitro? (4) What strategies do microbial lignin degraders use to avoid the problem of repolymerization during active lignin degradation? and (5) Can microbial lignin metabolism be diverted for high level production of defined aromatics? A final critical question is whether combining key minimal sets of enzymes from a wide range of organisms will result in engineered strains capable of highly efficient, streamlined pathways for lignin utilization that can be tuned for a specific carbon output. This effort will leverage DOE investments in microbial genome sequencing, and secure a critical channel for lignin biomass utilization that will also help to render lignocellulosic a viable feedstock for the production of renewable liquid biofuels.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Systematic Parameterization of Lignin for the CHARMM Force Field

Lignin is an abundant aromatic biopolymer within plant cell walls formed through radical coupling chemistry, whose composition and topology can vary greatly depending on the biomass source. Computational modeling provides a complementary approach to traditional experimental techniques to probe lignin interactions, lignin structure, and lignin material properties. However, current modeling approaches are limited based on the subset of lignin chemistries covered by existing lignin force fields. To fill the gap, we developed a comprehensive lignin force field that accounts for more lignin-lignin and lignin-carbohydrate interlinkages than existing lignin force fields, and also greatly expands the lignin monomer chemistries that can be modeled beyond simple alcohols and into the rich mixture of natural lignin varieties. The development of this force field utilizes recent developments in parameterization methodology, and synthesizes them into a workflow that combines target data from multiple molecules simultaneously into a single consistent and comprehensive parameter set. The parameter set represents a significant improvement to alternatives for atomic modeling of diverse lignin topologies, more accurately reproducing experimental observables while also significantly reducing the error relative to quantum calculations. The improved energetics, as well as the rigid adherence to CHARMM parameterization philosophy, enables simulation of lignin within its biological context with greater accuracy than was previously possible. The lignin force field presented here is therefore a crucial first step towards modeling lignin structure across a broad range of environments, including within plant cell walls where lignin is complexed with carbohydrates and deconstructed by bacterial or fungal enzymes, or as it exists within industrial solvent mixtures. Future simulations enabled by this updated lignin force field will thus lead to better chemical and structural understanding of lignin, providing new insight into its role in biomass recalcitrance or probing the potential for lignin to be used within industrial processes.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Synthesis and Characterization of Lignin-grafted-poly(ε-caprolactone) from Different Biomass Sources

Modification of lignin with poly(ε-caprolactone) is a promising approach to valorize industrial low-value lignins and to advance the bioeconomy. We have synthesized lignin grafted poly(ε-caprolactone) (lignin-g-PCL) copolymers via ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone with different types of lignins of varying botanical sources (G-type pine lignin, S/G-type poplar lignin, and C-type Vanilla seeds lignin) and lignin extraction methods (Kraft and ethanol organosolv pulping). The lignin-g-PCL copolymer showed remarkably improved compatibility and dispersion in acetone, chloroform, and toluene in comparison to non-modified lignins. The structure and thermal properties of the lignin-g-PCL were investigated using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 31 P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 2D heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) NMR, gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Furthermore, we have found that all the technical lignins were reactive to the copolymerization reaction regardless of their plant source and isolation methods. The molecular weights of the synthesized lignin-g-PCL copolymers were positively correlated with the content of aliphatic lignin hydroxyls, suggesting that the copolymerization reaction tends to occur preferentially at the aliphatic hydroxyls rather than the phenolic hydroxyls of lignin. Thermal analyses of the lignin-g-PCL copolymers were studied, and in general, a reduction of melting temperature and crystallinity percentage in comparison to the neat PCL was observed. However, the thermal behavior of lignin-g-PCL copolymers varied depending on the lignin feedstocks employed in the copolymerization reaction.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Selecting Suitable Near-Native Lignins for Research

There are several methods to isolate near-native lignins, including milled-wood lignin, enzymatic lignin, cellulolytic enzyme lignin, and enzymatic mild-acidolysis lignin. Which one is the most representative of the native lignin? Herein, near-native lignins were isolated from different plant groups and structurally analyzed to determine how well these lignins represented their native lignin counterparts. Analytical methods were applied to understand the molecular weight, monomer composition, and distribution of interunit linkages in the structure of the lignins. The results indicated that either enzymatic lignin or cellulolytic enzyme lignin may be used to represent native lignin in softwoods and hardwoods. None of the lignins, however, appeared to represent native lignins in grasses (monocot plants) because of substantial syringyl/guaiacyl differences. Furthermore, complicating the understanding of grass lignin structure, large amounts of hydroxycinnamates acylate their polysaccharides and, when released, are often conflated with actual lignin monomers.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Effects of organosolv and ammonia pretreatments on lignin properties and its inhibition for enzymatic hydrolysis

Lignin offers structural support and protection for plant cell walls; but, it also contributes to biomass recalcitrance and the costs of biofuel production via the biological pathway. Organosolv and ammonia pretreatments have been developed to reduce biomass recalcitrance and improve sugar release performance during enzymatic hydrolysis. It is believed that lignin properties are related to its inhibition on enzymatic hydrolysis; therefore, understanding the characteristics of lignin is a key for effective biomass conversion to biofuels. In this study, an organosolv pretreatment using 60% ethanol with 1.25% H 2 SO 4 significantly deconstructed poplar lignin and reduced its molecular weights due to the cleavage of lignin inter-unit linkages. The organosolv pretreatment increased the contents of phenolic OH units and the lignin residue showed a high cellulase maximum adsorption capacity. Ammonia pretreatment with 5% ammonium hydroxide was not as effective as organosolv pretreatment on lignin deconstruction. Organosolv lignin residue had lower lignin S/G ratio than the untreated one. Furthermore, when compared to the organosolv lignin residue and untreated lignin, ammonia lignin residue had a higher cellulase adsorption affinity. In addition, the effects of lignin on cellulose hydrolysis was investigated and the results suggested that the presence of lignin with cellulose substrates reduced cellulose hydrolysis, and its inhibitory effect was primarily determined by the lignin properties after each pretreatment. The organosolv pretreatment resulted in a slightly lower cellulase binding strength (249.7 mL g -1 ) on poplar lignin than that on untreated samples (261.1 mL g -1 ), while ammonia lignin residue showed a higher cellulase binding strength (402.8 mL g -1 ) and had more significant inhibition effect on cellulose hydrolysis. Our results demonstrated that the binding strength significantly affected the lignin-derived inhibition on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in the cellulose-lignin mixtures.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Systematic Parameterization of Lignin for the CHARMM Force Field

Plant cell walls have three primary components, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, the latter of which is a recalcitrant, aromatic heteropolymer that provides structure to plants, water and nutrient transport through plant tissues, and a highly effective defense against pathogens. Overcoming the recalcitrance of lignin is key to effective biomass deconstruction, which would in turn enable the use of biomass as a feedstock for industrial processes. Our understanding of lignin structure in the plant cell wall is hampered by the limitations of the available lignin forcefields, which currently only account for a single linkage between lignins and lack explicit parameterization for emerging lignin structures both from natural variants and engineered lignin structures. Since polymerization of lignin occurs via radical intermediates, multiple C-O and C-C linkages have been isolated , and the current force field only represents a small subset of lignin the diverse lignin structures found in plants. In order to take into account the wide range of lignin polymerization chemistries, monomers and dimer combinations of C-, H-, G-, and S-lignins as well as with hydroxycinnamic acid linkages were subjected to extensive quantum mechanical calculations to establish target data from which to build a complete molecular mechanics force field tuned specifically for diverse lignins. This was carried out in a GPU-accelerated global optimization process, whereby all molecules were parameterized simultaneously using the same internal parameter set. By parameterizing lignin specifically, we are able to more accurately represent the interactions and conformations of lignin monomers and dimers relative to a general force field. This new force field will enables computational researchers to study the effects of different linkages on the structure of lignin, as well as construct more accurate plant cell wall models based on observed statistical distributions of lignin that differ between disparate feedstocks, and guide further lignin engineering efforts.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗