Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Liftoff”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Preparations for the Launch, Cruise, and Orbital Operations Phases of the Psyche Mission

“Psyche: Journey to a Metal World” was selected in 2017 as the 14th mission in NASA’s Discovery program. The mission uses an electric propulsion (EP) system to rendezvous with and orbit the large metal asteroid (16) Psyche. Spacecraft development is a hybrid approach with deep-space avionics provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and a solar electric propulsion chassis based on Maxar’s 1300-series GEO communications satellites. The payload suite is comprised of a magnetometer, multispectral imager, and gamma ray & neutron spectrometer science instruments and the Deep Space Optical Communications advanced technology demonstration.The spacecraft is currently in the final integration and test phase to support a planned launch period open in August 2022. With under a year until liftoff, final pre-liftoff preparations are underway for the mission’s major in-flight Phases. The Launch Phase is the mission’s only critical event as the vehicle autonomously deploys the solar arrays and delivers the spacecraft to a safe state. Following a planned 70-day Initial Checkout Phase, the spacecraft thrusts with the EP system through the majority of a 3.5-year Cruise Phase, which includes a Mars gravity assist, to rendezvous with (16) Psyche. The Approach Phase uses optical navigation while continuing to thrust with the EP engines to deliver the spacecraft into orbit. Orbital Operations are baselined for 20 months as the spacecraft steps through four progressively lower orbital altitudes to study the largest M-type asteroid in the solar system.

Hart, William↗
NASA NTRS1966

Controlled release device prevents damage from dynamic stresses

Controlled release device that retards motion by extruding or drawing a tapered ductile pin through a die will control launch vehicle motion at liftoff. The device prevents the damaging dynamic stresses that are imposed on the vehicle when it is instantaneously released at full thrust.

Burcham, T. W.↗
NASA NTRS1996

Analysis of Apollo 8 Photography and Visual Observations

Apollo 8 was launched from Cape Kennedy, Fla., at 7 :50 a.m., e.s.t., on December 21, 1968. Two hours 50 minutes later, translunar injection was performed; and astronauts Col. Frank Borman, the commander; Capt. James A. Lovell, Jr., the command module pilot; and Maj. (now Lt. Col.) William A. Anders, the lunar module pilot, were on their way to the Moon. The spacecraft was placed in an elliptical lunar orbit at 69 hours 8 minutes after liftoff. After flying two elliptical orbits of 168.5 by 60 nautical miles with an inclination of 12° to the Equator, the spacecraft was placed in a nearly circular orbit of 59.7 by 60.7 nautical miles, in which it remained for eight orbits. At 89 hours 19 minutes, trans earth injection was performed from behind the Moon. A nearly flawless mission was completed on the morning of December 27 when splashdown occurred in the Pacific Ocean after a total elapsed time of 147 hours. Lt. Gen. Sam C. Phillips, the Director of the Apollo Program, announced that such a mission was being considered at a press conference on August 19, 1968. Formal announcement that NASA was preparing Apollo 8 for an orbital flight around the Moon was released to the press on November 12, 1968. The primary purpose of this mission was to further progress toward the goal of landing men on the Moon by gaining operational experience and testing the Apolio systems. However, a great effort was also made to accomplish worthwhile scientific tasks with photography and visual observations by the astronauts. In planning the scientific tasks to be attempted on this mission, it was obvious that one of the prime tasks should be photography of the lunar surface. Such photography would furnish valuable information on the following : 1. Approach topography and landmarks for the early Apollo landings 2. The scientific merit and the roughness of areas for possible follow-on Apollo landings 3. The broad structure and characteristics of the lunar surface During the orbital part of the mission, a major portion of the lunar far side would be in sunlight. Although almost all of the far side of the Moon has been photographed by the automated Lunar Orbiter spacecraft, the photography generally was made with the spacecraft relatively far from the Moon, limiting the Lunar Orbiter photographs to an average resolution of approximately 100 meters. Thus, Apollo photographs of the far side would have much better resolution than existing pictures. Finally, it was recognized that contamination, both as it relates to window fogging (which did occur) and to contamination clouds around t he spacecraft, should be studied for both scientific and operational interests.

Richard J. Allenby↗
NASA NTRS1971

Mascot - A new concept in guidance

Trajectory algorithm for complete trajectory from liftoff to landing with optimal control and onboard flight computer for use in manned space shuttle

Baker, C. D.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Gemini experiment S026

The results of the reduction and analysis of data obtained from the S026 experiment from Gemini 10 and 11 flights are presented. The electron and ion sensors were continuously operative throughout both missions from shroud removal (about 6 minutes after Agena liftoff to power-down conditions one week later). Data on ion and electron currents, electron temperature, and vehicle potential were obtained at a sample rate of 32 times per second on positive ions for each of two ion sensors and once every 1.067 seconds for the electron sensor. Only the data reduction of the Gemini plasma wake measurements comprising roughly twenty minutes of data for six maneuvers programed for wake measurements are considered. The intermediate depletion zone, between 1 and 10 vehicle radii downstream from the object, is emphasized. The smallest characteristic radius of interest is 1.34 feet and the largest is 5 feet. This implies a separation span extending from approximately 1.5 feet at the closest approach to at least 50 feet into the far field.

Medved, D. B.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Apollo/Saturn 5 consolidated instrumentation plan for AS-511 (Apollo 16)

The consolidated instrumentation plan, for employing optical and electronic data acquisition systems to monitor the performance and trajectory of Apollo Saturn 5 vehicle 511 during the launch phase of the mission (prelaunch, liftoff to insertion), is presented. Telemetry, optical, and electronic tracking equipment on board the vehicle and data acquisition systems monitoring the flight are discussed. Flight safety instrumentation, vehicle data transmission systems, and geophysical instrumentation are also described.

Clark, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Guidance system operations plan for manned LM earth orbital and lunar missions using program luminary 1E. Section 2: Data links

Data links for the guidance system of manned lunar module orbital and lunar missions are presented. Subjects discussed are: (1) digital uplink to lunar module, (2) lunar module liftoff time increment, (3) lunar module contiguous block update, (4) lunar module scatter update, (5) lunar module digital downlink, and (6) absolute addresses for update program.

Hamilton, M. H.↗
NASA NTRS1972

TF-34 turbofan quiet engine study

A study of high bypass turbofan engines in heavily sound-suppressed nacelles based on the TF-34 engine. The four-engine noise objective was 95 PNdb at four locations typical of takeoff and landing. Three engines were studied; these had fan pressure ratios, bypass ratios, and fan tip speeds respectively of 1.48/6.5/404 m/sec (1327 ft/sec), 1.25/13/305 (1000), 1.25/13/366(1200). The bypass 13 engines had a variable pitch fan, direct- and gear-driven. Noise suppressive treatment was identified which met 95 PNdb objective except for sideline liftoff at 6.5 bypass, full power, which was 2 PNdb noisier; at 90% power, 95 PNdb was achieved.

Edkins, D. P.↗
NASA NTRS1972

A 10,000-gpm liquid hydrogen transfer system for the Saturn/Apollo program.

Brief description of the design and operation of the liquid hydrogen transfer system used to service the Saturn V launch vehicle. The cryogenic loading of the huge booster begins eight hours before the scheduled liftoff. The first three hours of fueling are spent in cold hydrogen gas conditioning of the fuel tank. The cold hydrogen gas is provided by vaporizing liquid hydrogen from the storage tank and routing the resultant gas through the fill system. Boil-off losses after loading are continuously replaced through control valves which are driven by a computer system. The liquid hydrogen transfer system is made up of a number of subsystems including the 850,000 gal storage tank whose boil-off losses amount to only 200 gal/day, the pressurization system, the burn pond for controlled disposal of hydrogen waste gas, the storage tank fill manifold, and the hazardous gas monitoring system. Some of the subsystems and components are redundant to provide a high degree of reliability.

Wybranowski, E., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Spacecraft boost and abort guidance and control systems requirement study, boost dynamics and control analysis study. Exhibit A: Boost dynamics and control anlaysis

The simulation developments for use in dynamics and control analysis during boost from liftoff to orbit insertion are reported. Also included are wind response studies of the NR-GD 161B/B9T delta wing booster/delta wing orbiter configuration, the MSC 036B/280 inch solid rocket motor configuration, the MSC 040A/L0X-propane liquid injection TVC configuration, the MSC 040C/dual solid rocket motor configuration, and the MSC 049/solid rocket motor configuration. All of the latest math models (rigid and flexible body) developed for the MSC/GD Space Shuttle Functional Simulator, are included.

Williams, F. E.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Influence of vibration modes on control system stabilization for space shuttle type vehicles

An investigation was made to determine the feasibility of using conventional autopilot techniques to stabilize the vibration modes at the liftoff flight condition for two space shuttle configurations. One configuration is called the dual flyback vehicle in which both the orbiter and booster vehicles have wings and complete flyback capability. The other configuration is called the solid motor vehicle win which the orbiter only has flyback. The results of the linear stability analyses for each of the vehicles are summarized.

Greiner, H. G.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Space shuttle guidance, navigation and control equation document no. 19: Prelaunch alignment and platform compensation

The prelaunch-alignment program which aligns the stable platform to some desired orientation with respect to the local navigation reference frame is discussed. The alignment progresses in three distinct phases: coarse aligning, leveling, and gyrocompassing. While the program is in the leveling or gyrocompassing phase, a new launch azimuth may be specified without reinitiating the program. At liftoff, control is passed to a navigation monitor/control program. A description of the stable-platform-compensation program is included. The programs and equations given are similar to those used for Apollo.

Gallagher, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Rocket ascent G-limited moment-balanced optimization program (RAGMOP)

This document describes the RAGMOP (Rocket Ascent G-limited Momentbalanced Optimization Program) computer program for parametric ascent trajectory optimization. RAGMOP computes optimum polynomial-form attitude control histories, launch azimuth, engine burn-time, and gross liftoff weight for space shuttle type vehicles using a search-accelerated, gradient projection parameter optimization technique. The trajectory model available in RAGMOP includes a rotating oblate earth model, the option of input wind tables, discrete and/or continuous throttling for the purposes of limiting the thrust acceleration and/or the maximum dynamic pressure, limitation of the structural load indicators (the product of dynamic pressure with angle-of-attack and sideslip angle), and a wide selection of intermediate and terminal equality constraints.

Lyons, J. T.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Apollo 15 mission report. Supplement 3: Ascent propulsion system final flight evaluation

The results are presented of the postflight analysis of the ascent propulsion system (APS) performance during the Apollo 15 Mission. The information presented includes: (1) calculated performance values for the APS lunar liftoff burn; (2) disucssion of analysis techniques, problems and assumptions; (3) comparison of postflight analysis and preflight prediction; (4) reaction control system (RCS) duty cycle included in the APS performance analysis; (5) transient performance analysis; and (6) the APS propellant consumption values.

Griffin, W. G.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Skylab rescue space vehicle flight readiness test

A Skylab Rescue Space Vehicle flight readiness test is described which ensures that space vehicle systems are in a state of flight readiness and are compatible with associated ground support equipment. The functions of propellant loading, umbilical ejection, ignition, holddown arm release, liftoff, and service arm and tail service mast retraction are simulated. The test outline is presented along with a list of references, intercommunications information, operations interface control chart, and flight test.

Jevitt, S. J.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Apollo 15 mission report. Supplement 3: Ascent propulsion system final flight evaluation

Results from the postflight analysis of the ascent propulsion system (APS) performance during the Apollo 15 mission are presented. The duty cycle for the LM-10 APS consisted of two firings, and ascent stage liftoff from the lunar surface and the terminal phase ignition (TPI) burn. An evaluation was made of APS performance for the first firing and found to be satisfactory. No propulsion data was received from the second APS burn; however, all indications were that the burn was nominal. All performance parameters were well within their LM-10 3-sigma limits. Calculated throat erosion at engine cutoff for the LM-10 APS was approximately 3 percent greater than predicted.

Griffin, W. G.↗