Mars surface asset positioning using in-situ radio tracking
This paper primarily addresses positioning performance improvements from in-situ orbiter to rover doppler tracking compared to DTE doppler only.
Mars↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Mars surface”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
FIDO: a field integrated design and operations rover for Mars surface exploration
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
architectures Mars surface exploration↗
Mars Surface Solar Arrays With Storage (SAWS) Seedling Study
The Solar Arrays With Storage (SAWS) Seedling Study was a year-long effort initiated by the Game Changing Development (GCD) Program under NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate to evaluate the feasibility and key technical challenges that must be addressed for a solar-based surface power system to support a crewed Mars base.
Frederick Elliott↗
FIDO: a Field Integrated Design & Operation rover for Mars surface exploration
We overview or recent development and testing of the FIDO rover, an advanced technology prototype for long range mobile planetary science.
architectures Mars surface exploration↗
Mars Surface Systems Common Capabilities and Challenges for Human Missions
This paper describes the current status of common systems and operations as they are applied to actual locations on Mars that are representative of Exploration Zones (EZ) - NASA's term for candidate locations where humans could land, live and work on the Martian surface. Given NASA's current concepts for human missions to Mars, an EZ is a collection of Regions of Interest (ROIs) located within approximately 100 kilometers of a centralized landing site. ROIs are areas that are relevant for scientific investigation and/or development/maturation of capabilities and resources necessary for a sustainable human presence. An EZ also contains a habitation site that will be used by multiple human crews during missions to explore and utilize the ROIs within the EZ. The Evolvable Mars Campaign (EMC), a description of NASA's current approach to these human Mars missions, assumes that a single EZ will be identified within which NASA will establish a substantial and durable surface infrastructure that will be used by multiple human crews. The process of identifying and eventually selecting this single EZ will likely take many years to finalized. Because of this extended EZ selection process it becomes important to evaluate the current suite of surface systems and operations being evaluated for the EMC as they are likely to perform at a variety of proposed EZ locations and for the types of operations - both scientific and development - that are proposed for these candidate EZs. It is also important to evaluate proposed EZs for their suitability to be explored or developed given the range of capabilities and constraints for the types of surface systems and operations being considered within the EMC. Four locations identified in the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG)'s Human Exploration of Mars Science Analysis Group (HEM-SAG) report are used in this paper as representative of candidate EZs that will emerge from the selection process that NASA has initiated. A field station site plan is developed for each of these four HEM-SAG sites. Because of the difficulty in getting equipment and supplies to the surface of Mars, specific assessments have been conducted to identify those systems and processes that can perform in multiple, sometimes completely unrelated, situations. Examples of common systems that are assessed at all of these sites include: (a) habitation and associated logistics storage systems, (b) a centralized power plant capable of supplying power to a geographically distributed (but within the central habitation zone) set of systems, (c) mobility systems that can be used to off-load and move payloads to specific locations at the central field station location that could also be used to traverse long distances to reach some of the more remote ROIs and (d) robotic systems that can support various activities (such as system set up and maintenance) at the field station that could also be used to explore scientific ROIs and used to support site-specific ISRU (In Situ Resource Utilization) production activities.
Toups, Larry↗
Acid Alteration of Clay Minerals With Implication for Mars’ Surface Processes
The co-occurrence of phyllosilicates (clays) and sulfate stratigraphies at many locations on Mars are associated with a sharp change in surface conditions from neutral/alkaline pH during the Noachian (4.1-3.7 Ga) which favored the formation of clays to acidic conditions during the Hesperian (3.7-2.9 Ga) which favored the formation of sulfates. Yet, if these two contrasting geosystems were temporarily sequential, it is unknown how the Hesperian acidic conditions altered the previously formed clay units. We performed laboratory batch experiments to fingerprint the diagnostic features produced during interactions of Mars-analog clays and acidic solutions. Two clays, and silicon (IV) oxide, were reacted with solution of either sulfuric acid or filtered natural acid rock drainage (ARD) in plastic bottles. The solutions were adjusted at four pH values (1, 3, 5, and 7) and reacted at 4, 30, and 80°C for 3, 7, and 14 days. At the end of the experiments, the filtered supernatants were analyzed by ICP-MS while the solids were characterized by X-Ray Diffraction; Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence analyses; Raman and Short-Wave Infrared spectroscopies and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Results show that the solution chemistry played a key role in the evolution of the clay-solution systems. In H2SO4 systems, the solution pH steadily increased due to partial clay dissolution with no secondary phase formation detected. Contrary, in the ARD systems, the pH decreased due to the ample presence of Fe which controlled both the reactivity of clays by the growth of protecting surface coatings and the solution pH by the precipitation of Fe nanophases; secondary phase detected included goethite, jarosite, gypsum, and siderite. These results indicate that, on Mars, the chemical interaction between clays and acidic solutions was complex and dependent on the solution chemistry. Acidic, sulfate-rich solutions have a high dissolution capacity and could have induced widespread clay disintegration. Notably, if Fe-rich ARD was involved, the clays on Mars could have remained stable during acidic Hesperian period due to formation of protective coatings. Comparison of our results with martian observations will be performed to determine how acidic conditions could potentially affect clays in sedimentary settings, including the Gale crater.
L. Lefticariu↗
Kiloton Class ISRU Systems for LO2/LCH4 Propellant Production on the Mars Surface
As part of the 2023 strategic analysis cycle to explore the trade space, the NASA Mars Architecture Team wanted to explore what it takes to produce in situ on Mars many hundreds of tons of propellants for a large all-chemical transportation system. The conceptual operations and design of the LO 2 /LCH 4 in situ resource utilization (ISRU) water acquisition, propellant production and liquification system was assigned to the NASA Compass concurrent engineering team with support from various NASA ISRU, cryogenic fluid management, and surface power experts. The conceptual point design examined one case producing 300 t of LO 2 /LCH 4 from the Mars atmosphere and delivered water in 20 months and storing the liquified propellants in a to-be-reused lander. Several of these large single-stage, all-chemical class large vertical landers would deliver the required ISRU equipment. The required 150 t of water stock for the ISRU system was traded between three options: delivered, pumped from subsurface ice deposits or extracted from surface soils. The large propellant production systems consist of atmospheric CO 2 collection scroll pumps, a combined solid oxide electrolysis and methanation system to convert the CO 2 and water into gaseous O 2 and CH 4 , and various dryers, scrubbers, and separators to remove the excess water, CO 2 and H 2 . The liquefaction system consisted of 90 K cryocoolers to provide cold Ne to the launch vehicle tanks to liquify these CH 4 and O 2 gases and store them as rocket propellants. The systems are deployed using a 6 t (payload) capable chassis derived from conceptual pressurized rover designs. In total, the propellant production and liquefaction systems required three propellant production pallets, two liquefaction pallets, two water tankers, and six 40 kW-fission surface power systems (FSPS) with cabling. All this equipment was found to notionally fit inside two- 75 metric ton payload capacity Mars ascent and landing vehicles (MALV). For the case where 150 t of water delivered from Earth, four cargo MALVs are required for the full system. The same is true when the 150 t of water is extracted through surface mining. For the borehole system, only 3 cargo MALVs are necessary. A comparison of approaches in terms of number of landers, number and type of elements, power and time is made.
ISRU↗
Preliminary Estimates of the Possibilities for Developing a Deployable Greenhouse for a Planetary Surface (Mars)
Two of the main conditions for plant growth and development on the Martian surface are irradiation (optimal range from 80 W/sq m to 180 W/sq m of photosynthetically active radiation) and temperature (optimal range from 20 C to 27 C). The only known natural source of energy on Mars is sunlight, with a general intensity of 589 +/- 142 W/sq m (Martian Solar Constant). Comparisons of plant growth requirements with conditions on the Martian surface are presented in Table 1, while some basic considerations for implementing plant growth in a Martian DG are presented in Table 2. The general scenario and approximate schedule of startup and development of operations in DG are shown in Table 3.
Rygalov, V. Y.↗
Mars Surface Power Generation Challenges and Considerations
Once the challenges of reaching and landing safely on Mars have been met, the first human explorers will be faced with the challenge of finding sufficient energy to power the systems they will need for a healthy and productive stay on the surface and for their ascent back to orbit.
Moon↗
Mars surface penetrator: System description
A point design of a penetrator system for a Mars mission is described. A strawman payload which is to conduct measurements of geophysical and meteorological parameters is included in the design. The subsystems used in the point design are delineated in terms of power, mass, volume, data, and functional modes. The prospects for survival of the rigors of emplacement are described. Data handling and communications plans are presented to allow consideration of the requirements placed by the penetrator on the orbiter and ground operations. The point design is technically feasible and the payload selection scientifically desirable.
Manning, L. A.↗
Designing a Mars surface rover
Only three categories of vehicular configuration are under consideration for the Mars rover geological exploration mission: a six-wheeled 'lunar roving vehicle' (LRV), an elastic loopwheeled mobility system (ELMS), and a 'walking' vehicle. The LRV uses three compliantly coupled modules, each of which is equipped with two powered wheels. The ELMS uses three loopwheels that are reminiscent of tracks mounted on an articulated suspension. Walkers, which use leg-like mechanisms, are the least developed of the three categories. A comparative assessment of the capabilities and economies of the three vehicle types is presented.
Ruoff, C.↗
Engineering concepts for inflatable Mars surface greenhouses
A major challenge of designing a bioregenerative life support system for Mars is the reduction of the mass, volume, power, thermal and crew-time requirements. Structural mass of the greenhouse could be saved by operating the greenhouse at low atmospheric pressure. This paper investigates the feasibility of this concept. The method of equivalent system mass is used to compare greenhouses operated at high atmospheric pressure to greenhouses operated at low pressure for three different lighting methods: natural, artificial and hybrid lighting. c2004 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
NASA Discipline Life Support Systems↗
Appropriate Simulants are a Requirement for Mars Surface Systems Technology Development
To date, there are two simulants for martian regolith: JSC Mars-1A, produced from palagonitic (weathered) basaltic tephra mined from the Pu'u Nene cinder cone in Hawaii [1] by commercial company Orbitec, and Mojave Mars Simulant (MMS), produced from Saddleback Basalt in the western Mojave desert by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory [2]. Until numerous recent orbiters, rovers, and landers were sent to Mars, weathered basalt was surmised to cover every inch of the martian landscape. All missions since Viking have disproven that the entire martian surface is weathered basalt. In fact, the outcrops, features, and surfaces that are significantly different from weathered basalt are too numerous to realistically count. There are gullies, evaporites, sand dunes, lake deposits, hydrothermal deposits, alluvium, etc. that indicate sedimentary and chemical processes. There is no one size fits all simulant. Each unique area requires its own simulant in order to test technologies and hardware, thereby reducing risk.
Edmunson, Jennifer E.↗
Navigation and performance analysis of a Mars surface sample return /MSSR/ mission
A Viking-derived MSSR mission involves a rendezvous in Mars orbit between the sample-carrying Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) and a modified Viking Orbiter spacecraft. Conditions for the automatic terminal rendezvous phase are established by an initial earth-controlled phase which uses very accurate relative state information obtained by multi-vehicle interferometric tracking data. A navigation analysis has demonstrated sufficient performance and control capability to satisfy those conditions prior to terminal rendezvous. Specific performance constraints for the mission are developed, leading to a sizing of vehicle weight requirements and trades applicable to a 1981 MSSR, launched by a single Titan IIIE/Centaur.
Satin, A. L.↗
Science operations interfaces for Mars surface exploration
The Science Activity Planner (SAP) is the science planning tool used for the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission. This paper begins with an overview of the software developed for MER and how it was used for science downlink analysis and activity planning.
distributed operations↗
Mars Surface Mobility: Comparison of Past, Present, and Future Rover Systems
The future robotic and human exploration of Mars will rely heavily on mobile system to meet exploration objectives. In particular, the next decade of exploration (2009-2020) will utilize rovers and other mobile surface platforms to conduct a wide variety of tasks, including in the search for water and life, characterization of terrain and its geology, and conduct precursor measurements prepare for future human exploration.
Wilson, G. R.↗
Mars Surface Systems Common Capabilities and Challenges for Human Missions
This paper describes the current status of common systems and operations as they are applied to actual locations on Mars that are representative of Exploration Zones (EZ) - NASA's term for candidate locations where humans could land, live and work on the martian surface. Given NASA's current concepts for human missions to Mars, an EZ is a collection of Regions of Interest (ROIs) located within approximately 100 kilometers of a centralized landing site. ROIs are areas that are relevant for scientific investigation and/or development/maturation of capabilities and resources necessary for a sustainable human presence. An EZ also contains a habitation site that will be used by multiple human crews during missions to explore and utilize the ROIs within the EZ. The Evolvable Mars Campaign (EMC), a description of NASA's current approach to these human Mars missions, assumes that a single EZ will be identified within which NASA will establish a substantial and durable surface infrastructure that will be used by multiple human crews. The process of identifying and eventually selecting this single EZ will likely take many years to finalized. Because of this extended EZ selection process it becomes important to evaluate the current suite of surface systems and operations being evaluated for the EMC as they are likely to perform at a variety of proposed EZ locations and for the types of operations - both scientific and development - that are proposed for these candidate EZs. It is also important to evaluate proposed EZs for their suitability to be explored or developed given the range of capabilities and constraints for the types of surface systems and operations being considered within the EMC.
Toups, Larry↗