The Use of Non-Standard Devices in Finite Element Analysis
A general mathematical description of the response behavior of thin-skin pneumatic envelopes and many other membrane and cable structures produces under-constrained systems that pose severe difficulties to analysis. These systems are mobile, and the general mathematical description exposes the mobility. Yet the response behavior of special under-constrained structures under special loadings can be accurately predicted using a constrained mathematical description. The static response behavior of systems that are infinitesimally mobile, such as a non-slack membrane subtended from a rigid or elastic boundary frame, can be easily analyzed using such general mathematical description as afforded by the non-linear, finite element method using an implicit solution scheme if the incremental uploading is guided through a suitable path. Similarly, if such structures are assembled with structural lack of fit that provides suitable self-stress, then dynamic response behavior can be predicted by the non-linear, finite element method and an implicit solution scheme. An explicit solution scheme is available for evolution problems. Such scheme can be used via the method of dynamic relaxation to obtain the solution to a static problem. In some sense, pneumatic envelopes and many other compliant structures can be said to have destiny under a specified loading system. What that means to the analyst is that what happens on the evolution path of the solution is irrelevant as long as equilibrium is achieved at destiny under full load and that the equilibrium is stable in the vicinity of that load. The purpose of this paper is to alert practitioners to the fact that non-standard procedures in finite element analysis are useful and can be legitimate although they burden their users with the requirement to use special caution. Some interesting findings that are useful to the US Scientific Balloon Program and that could not be obtained without non-standard techniques are presented.