Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “NEP”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Technology Maturation Plan for the Development of Nuclear Electric Propulsion

Over the last two years NASA’s Space Nuclear Propulsion (SNP) Project formulated a Technology Maturation Plan (TMP) for development of the sub-systems needed for a MW-class Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) system which, combined with a high thrust chemical propulsion stage, would be suitable for human missions to Mars. Two recent assessments, independently conducted by the National Academies for Science, Engineering, and Medicine and the NASA Engineering & Safety Center, concluded that the technologies required for a high-power NEP system are immature and the attendant risks insufficiently quantified to justify initiating a flight project. For NEP to be available as a viable option to meet flight opportunities in the late 2030s / 2040s time frame, development of the key sub-systems must begin now. SNP has subdivided the NEP system into five Critical Technology Elements (CTE): the nuclear reactor, power conversion, power management and distribution, electric propulsion sub-system, and the primary heat rejection system. Development plans for each of these CTEs have been drafted which will serve as the template for a focused milestone-driven research and development campaign intended to advance each CTE to Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 5. This will be accomplished by building and testing hardware at relevant power levels (~ 1 MW) and for relevant durations (2,500 hours, ~10% of the required operational lifetime) and conducting numerical modeling of the CTEs anchored by the accumulated test data to predict system performance and reliability. Concurrent with this work, high-level coupled system/mission modeling will be carried out to refine the key performance parameters that the various CTEs must achieve. Non-advocate reviews will be held at milestone points to assess progress and inform down-select decisions. The strategy for formulating the TMP was described previously; this paper describes ongoing progress on the drafting and baselining of the plan, including key specific details.

Space Nuclear Propulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Technology Maturation Plan for the Development of Nuclear Electric Propulsion

Over the last two years NASA’s Space Nuclear Propulsion (SNP) Project formulated a Technology Maturation Plan (TMP) for development of the sub-systems needed for a MW-class Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) system which, combined with a high thrust chemical propulsion stage, would be suitable for human missions to Mars. Two recent assessments, independently conducted by the National Academies for Science, Engineering, and Medicine and the NASA Engineering & Safety Center, concluded that the technologies required for a high-power NEP system are immature and the attendant risks insufficiently quantified to justify initiating a flight project. For NEP to be available as a viable option to meet flight opportunities in the late 2030s / 2040s time frame, development of the key sub-systems must begin now. SNP has subdivided the NEP system into five Critical Technology Elements (CTE): the nuclear reactor, power conversion, power management and distribution, electric propulsion sub-system, and the primary heat rejection system. Development plans for each of these CTEs have been drafted which will serve as the template for a focused milestone-driven research and development campaign intended to advance each CTE to Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 5. This will be accomplished by building and testing hardware at relevant power levels (~ 1 MW) and for relevant durations (2,500 hours, ~10% of the required operational lifetime) and conducting numerical modeling of the CTEs anchored by the accumulated test data to predict system performance and reliability. Concurrent with this work, high-level coupled system/mission modeling will be carried out to refine the key performance parameters that the various CTEs must achieve. Non-advocate reviews will be held at milestone points to assess progress and inform down-select decisions. The strategy for formulating the TMP was described previously*; this paper describes ongoing progress on the drafting and baselining of the plan, including key specific details. * “Strategy for Developing Technologies for Megawatt-class Nuclear Electric Propulsion Systems”, K.A. Polzin, et. al., International Electric Propulsion Conference IEPC 2022, IEPC-2022-155

Nuclear Electric Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS1972

Thermionic reactor ion propulsion system /TRIPS/ - Its multi-mission capability.

The unmanned planetary exploration to be conducted in the last two decades of this century includes many higher energy missions which tax all presently available propulsion systems beyond their limit. One candidate with the versatility and performance to meet these mission objectives is nuclear electric propulsion (NEP). Additionally, the NEP System is feasible in orbit raising operations with the Shuttle or Shuttle/Tug combination. A representative planetary mission is described (Uranus-Neptune flyby with probe), and geocentric performance and tradeoffs are discussed. The NEP System is described in more detail with particular emphasis on the power subsystem consisting of the thermionic reactor, heat rejection subsystem, and neutron shield.

Peelgren, M. L.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Development costs for a nuclear electric propulsion stage.

Development costs are presented for an unmanned nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) stage based upon a liquid metal cooled, in-core thermionic reactor. A total of 120 kWe are delivered to the thrust subsystem which employs mercury ion engines for electric propulsion. This study represents the most recent cost evaluation of the development of a reactor power system for a wide range of nuclear space power applications. These include geocentric, and outer planet and other deep space missions. The development program is described for the total NEP stage, based upon specific development programs for key NEP stage components and subsystems.

Mondt, J. F.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Comparison of advanced propulsion capabilities for future planetary missions

This paper summarizes unmanned planetary performance (payload and trip time) of Shuttle-based advanced propulsion systems for 1980-90 missions analyzed as part of the recent NASA/AEC Advanced Propulsion Comparisons Studies. Propulsion system designs and condensed results from over 300 propulsion/mission combinations are discussed. Chemical rocket (CRP), solar electric (SEP), nuclear rocket (NRP), and nuclear electric (NEP) propulsion systems are all considered. In terms of missions flown, total flight time, and number of Shuttle launches required, NEP provides the best performance. Relative to NEP, it is shown that NRP, SEP, and CRP degrade mission performance by 20%, 40%, and 50%, respectively, at nominal payloads.

Niehoff, J. C.↗
NASA NTRS1981

An evaluation of nuclear electric propulsion for planetary exploration missions

A set of nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) system parameters for planetary exploration missions is described. Orbiter missions to the planets Saturn, Uranus and Neptune were selected for assessment, and five delivery modes were evaluated. The NEP system envisioned for this application consisted of a nuclear fission reactor with a thermoelectric conversion system and a thrust subsystem comprised of power processors coupled with mercury ion-bombardment thrusters. The results indicate that an NEP system sized at 90-160 kW electrical power rating and operating within a specific impulse range of 4500-5500 sec provides adequate performance for outer planet exploration.

Nagorski, R. P.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Nuclear Electric Propulsion - A concept for solar system exploration

The potential of Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) to meet the increasing demands of our planetary space exploration program is examined and evaluated. Based on an assumption of a modest growth beyond current technology, an NEP system is described that provides performance advantage over all competitive technologies. Flight times and available payload mass - as indicators of mission performance - are compared for several mission opportunities of interest. NEP is shown to have a unique capacity for substantial reductions in mission flight times in terms of payloads consistent with the needs of planetary exploration.

Nagorski, R. P.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Nuclear electric propulsion mission to Neptune

A nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) mission to Neptune is studied. Results of trajectory and propulsion parameter optimization are presented which lead to a selection of key electric propulsion system parameters. Spiral earth escape and spiral capture modes are assumed in the optimization studies. Flight time vs payload for Space Transportation System (STS)/Centaur injection and Triton-aided orbit capture at Neptune are also briefly investigated as methods of improving mission performance. Radiation effects of the earth spiral phase are discussed. The effects of NEP technology on science payloads and mission and system designs are evaluated. NEP is shown to be a very flexible and high performing propulsion technology.

Nock, K. T.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Absolute response and noise equivalent power of cyclotron resonance-assisted InSb detectors at submillimeter wavelengths

Spectra are presented of the responsivity and noise equivalent power (NEP) of liquid-helium-cooled InSb detectors as a function of magnetic field in the range 20-110 per cm. The measurements are all made using a Fourier transform spectrometer with thermal sources. The results show a discernable peak in the detector response at the conduction electron cyclotron resonance (CCR) frequency for magnetic fields as low as 3 kG. The magnitude of responsivity at the resonance peaks is roughly constant with magnetic field and is comparable to the low-frequency hot-electron bolometer response. The NEP at the peaks is found to be comparable to the best long wavelength results previously reported. For example, NEP = 4.5 x 10 to the 13th W/(square root of Hz) at 4.2 K, 6 kG, and 40 per cm was measured. The InSb CCR will provide a much improved detector for laboratory spectroscopy, as compared with hot electron bolometers, in the 20-100 per cm range.

Brown, E. R.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Multimegawatt nuclear electric propulsion - First order system design and performance evaluation

The development of space nuclear power supplies capable of delivering high levels of power (1 to 10 MWe) for long life (5 to 10 years) is being considered. An important potential application of these systems will be to provide power for advanced electric propulsion devices such as ion thrusters or Magneto-Plasma-Dynamic (MPD) thrusters. High-powered Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) concepts based on both ion and MPD thrusters are reviewed. To allow for mission performance evaluation, power supply, power processing, and thruster subsystems are characterized for both ion and MPD propulsion systems designed for operation in the 1 to 10 MWe power range. Several proposed missions which are significantly enhanced by the performance potential of these devices are investigated. Studied missions include near-earth orbit raising, cis-lunar cargo transportation, and planetary exploration. If developed, these 1 to 10 MWe NEP systems may provide a technological base for the development of even larger propulsion systems with power levels of up to hundreds of megawatts. The potential performance and technologies associated with such ultra-high-powered NEP systems is explored.

Sercel, J. C.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Development of a P-I-N HgCdTe photomixer for laser heterodyne spectrometry

An improved HgCdTe photomixer technology was demonstrated employing a p-i-n photodiode structure. The i-region was near intrinsic n-type HgCdTe; the n-region was formed by B+ ion implantation; and the p-region was formed either by a shallow Au diffusion or by a Pt Schottky barrier. Experimental devices in a back-side illuminated mesa diode configuration were fabricated, tested, and delivered. The best photomixer was packaged in a 24-hour LN2 dewar along with a cooled GaAs FET preamplifier. Testing was performed by mixing black-body radiation with a CO2 laser beam and measuring the IF signal, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio in the GHz frequency range. Signal bandwidth for this photomixer was 1.3 GHz. The heterodyne NEP was 4.4 x 10 to the -20 W/Hz out to 1 GHz increasing to 8.6 x 10 to the -10 W/Hz at 2 GHz. Other photomixers delivered on this program had heterodyne NEPs at 1 GHz ranging from 8 x 10 to the -20 to 4.4 x 10 to the -19 W/Hz and NEP bandwidths from 2 to 4 GHz.

Bratt, Peter R.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Preliminary scientific rationale for a voyage to a thousand astronomical units

A proposed mission to 1000 astronomical units (TAU) is under study by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Launch date for a TAU mission is likely to be well into the first decade of the 21st century. Study of TAU has focused on the technologies required to carry out this ambitious mission and the identification of preliminary scientific rationale for such a deep space flight. A 1-MW nuclear-powered electric propulsion (NEP) system forms the baseline method for achieving the high velocities required. A solar system escape velocity of 106 km/s is needed to propel the TAU vehicle to 1000 AU in 50 years. The NEP system must accelerate the vehicle for about ten years before this velocity is attained because of the extremely low thrust nature of the xenon-fueled ion engines. At the end of the thrusting phase the NEP system is jettisoned to allow the TAU spacecraft and science experiments to coast out to 1000 AU. Another important technology for TAU is advanced optical communication systems, which are envisioned for transmitting science data to Earth. A 1-m optical telescope combined with a 10-W laser transponder can transmit 20 kbps to a 10-m Earth-orbit-based telescope from 1000 AU.

Etchegaray, M. I.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Synergistic use of high and low thrust propulsion systems for piloted missions to Mars

The use of high-thrust, relatively-low-specific-impulse systems, such as chemical or nuclear thermal propulsion, in conjunction with low thrust, high-specific-impulse nuclear electric propulsion (NEP), has been considered for a representative piloted Mars mission. It is concluded that the single-burn option in an all-propulsive mission scenario does not yield a significant performance advantage in reduced trip time for reasonable masses. The multiple burn option allows significant reductions in trip time relative to the NEP system, and may provide a performance advantage over nuclear thermal propulsion depending upon the system assumptions. The combined systems serve to reduce NEP power requirements for fast trip times, and to reduce high thrust systems' sensitivity to mission opportunity. It is considered that 5 kg/kWe systems can provide significant improvements in mass and trip time over the single systems at power levels of 5 to 10 MWe.

Gilland, James H.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Blazing the trailway - Nuclear electric propulsion and its technology program plans

An overview is given of the plans for a program in nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) technology for outer space applications being considered by NASA, DOE, and DOD. Possible missions using NEP are examined, and NEP technology plans are addressed regarding concept development, systems engineering, nuclear fuels, power conversion, thermal management, power management and distribution, electric thrusters, facilities, and issues related to safety and environment. The programmatic characteristics are considered.

Doherty, Michael P.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Nuclear Electric Propulsion Technology Panel findings and recommendations

Summarized are the findings and recommendations of a triagency (NASA/DOE/DOD) panel on Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) Technology. NEP has been identified as a candidate nuclear propulsion technology for exploration of the Moon and Mars as part of the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI). The findings are stated in areas of system and subsystem considerations, technology readiness, and ground test facilities. Recommendations made by the panel are summarized concerning: (1) existing space nuclear power and propulsion programs, and (2) the proposed multiagency NEP technology development program.

Doherty, Michael P.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Blazing the trailway: Nuclear electric propulsion and its technology program plans

An overview is given of the plans for a program in nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) technology for space applications being considered by NASA, DOE, and DOD. Possible missions using NEP are examined, and NEP technology plans are addressed regarding concept development, systems engineering, nuclear fuels, power conversion, thermal management, power management and distribution, electric thrusters, facilities, and issues related to safety and environment. The programmatic characteristics are considered.

Doherty, Michael P.↗
NASA NTRS1992

NASA's nuclear electric propulsion technology project

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has initiated a program to establish the readiness of nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) technology for relatively near-term applications to outer planet robotic science missions with potential future evolution to system for piloted Mars vehicles. This program was initiated in 1991 with a very modest effort identified with nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP); however, NEP is also an integral part of this program and builds upon NASA's Base Research and Technology Program in power and electric propulsion as well as the SP-100 space nuclear power program. The NEP Program will establish the feasibility and practicality of electric propulsion for robotic and piloted solar system exploration. The performance objectives are high specific impulse (200 greater than I(sub sp) greater than 10000 s), high efficiency (over 0.50), and low specific mass. The planning for this program was initially focussed on piloted Mars missions, but has since been redirected to first focus on 100-kW class systems for relatively near-term robotic missions, with possible future evolution to megawatt- and multi-megawatt-class systems applicable to cargo vehicles supporting human missions as well as to the piloted vehicles. This paper reviews current plans and recent progress for the overall nuclear electric propulsion project and closely related activities.

Stone, James R.↗
NASA NTRS1992

NASA's nuclear electric propulsion technology project

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has initiated a program to establish the readiness of nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) technology for relatively near-term applications to outer planet robotic science missions with potential future evolution to system for piloted Mars vehicles. This program was initiated in 1991 with a very modest effort identified with nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP); however, NEP is also an integral part of this program and builds upon NASA's Base Research and Technology Program in power and electric propulsion as well as the SP-100 space nuclear power program. The NEP Program will establish the feasibility and practicality of electric propulsion for robotic and piloted solar system exploration. The performance objectives are high specific impulse (200 greater than I(sub sp) greater than 10000 s), high efficiency (over 0.50), and low specific mass. The planning for this program was initially focussed on piloted Mars missions, but has since been redirected to first focus on 100-kW class systems for relatively near-term robotic missions, with possible future evolution to megawatt-and multi-megawatt-class systems applicable to cargo vehicles supporting human missions as well as to the piloted vehicles. This paper reviews current plans and recent progress for the overall nuclear electric propulsion project and closely related activities.

Stone, James R.↗