Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Nuclear Reactor Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Electrochemical hydrogen isotope fractionation - fundamental insights leading to process scale up

Introduction Deuterium and tritium, the two isotopes of hydrogen besides protium, are utilized in many industries. Deuterium is routinely used as a nuclear reactor moderator and molecular labeling agent, while tritium is used as an autoradiography label in medical imaging, and in an emerging market for self-powered lighting for watches, exit signs, firearm night-sights and future fusion fuel. Tritium is produced naturally at very low steady-state levels due to cosmic rays, natural nuclear decay reactions, as well as commercial nuclear fission reactors, and terrestrial nuclear testing conducted primarily in the mid-twentieth century. Tritium often accumulates in the heavy water used in nuclear fission reactors and sometimes appears in groundwater near nuclear reactors due to slight leakage from water sources in the reactor. Because of the health and environmental impacts from tritium leaking into the water sources, as well as the value of this precious material, it is desirable to remove and recover as much tritium as reasonably possible from contaminated water.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
NASA NTRS2007

Liquid Metal Pump Technologies for Nuclear Surface Power

Multiple liquid metal pump options are reviewed for the purpose of determining the technologies that are best suited for inclusion in a nuclear reactor thermal simulator intended to test prototypical space nuclear system components. Conduction, induction, and thermoelectric electromagnetic pumps are evaluated based on their performance characteristics and the technical issues associated incorporation into a reactor system. The thermoelectric electromagnetic pump is recommended for inclusion in the present system based on favorable quantitative and qualitative measures relative to the other options under consideration.

Polzin, Kurt A.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Liquid-Metal Pump Technologies for Nuclear Surface Power

Multiple liquid-metal pump options are reviewed for the purpose of determining the technologies that are best suited for inclusion in a nuclear reactor thermal simulator intended to test prototypical space nuclear system components. Conduction, induction, and thermoelectric electromagnetic pumps are evaluated based on their performance characteristics and the technical issues associated with incorporation into a reactor system. The thermoelectric pump is recommended for inclusion in the planned system at NASA MSFC based on its relative simplicity, low power supply mass penalty, flight heritage, and the promise of increased pump efficiency over earlier flight pump designs through the use of skutterudite thermoelectric elements.

Polzin, K. A.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Qualifying the Instrument Thimble 11 Test Position in the Advanced Test Reactor Critical

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is a versatile nuclear research reactor located at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in Eastern Idaho, United States of America. It is one of the most powerful and flexible research reactors in the world and is primarily used for materials testing, isotope production and basic nuclear science research. The ATR is a light-water-cooled, beryllium-moderated reactor with a nominal thermal power capacity of 250 MW utilizing specially designed fuel, arranged in a serpentine pattern to create 9 flux traps. The special design of ATR allows for the neutron flux within each of the flux traps providing flexibility for experiments, programs and allowing experiments with different dose requirements to be irradiated simultaneously. The Advance Test Reactor Critical (ATRC) is a full-scale replica of the ATR core but is housed in a pool instead of a pressure vessel. ATRC is usually operated at less than 600 watts [1]. There are 12 dry instrument thimbles located around the outside of the core tank where a variety of measurement equipment is housed to facilitate reactor operations. Currently Instrument Thimble 11 (IT-11) is not utilized in ATR or ATRC. A range of measurements is ongoing to qualify IT-11 as a test platform for nuclear instrumentation research, development and further experimentation.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2017

Real-Time In-Pile Acoustic Measurement Infrastructure at the Advanced Test Reactor

The core of any nuclear reactor presents a particularly harsh environment for sensors and instrumentation. The reactor core also imposes challenging constraints on signal transmission from inside the reactor core to outside of the reactor vessel. In this paper, an acoustic measurement infrastructure installed at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), located at Idaho National Laboratory, is presented. The measurement infrastructure consists of ATR in-pile structural components, coolant, acoustic receivers, primary coolant pumps (PCPs), a data acquisition system, and signal-processing algorithms. Intrinsic and cyclic acoustic signals generated by the operation of the PCPs are collected and processed. Finally, the characteristics of the intrinsic signal can indicate the process state of the ATR (such as reactor startup, reactor criticality, reactor attaining maximum power, and reactor shutdown) during operation (i.e., real-time measurement).

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Analyses Supporting Design Review of TREAT Multi-SERTTA Experiment Test Vehicle

The Transient Test Reactor (TREAT) Facility was designed to evaluate nuclear fuels and structural materials under simulated nuclear excursion and transient power/cooling mismatch situations that could be encountered in nuclear reactors [1]. It was historically operated from 1959 through 1994; ongoing activities at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) include resumption of transient testing capabilities to generate experimental data suitable to validate advanced modeling and simulation of these transient conditions, supporting current and next generation power reactor design and nuclear safety [2]. The resumption of transient testing requires new experiment vehicle designs to satisfy testing needs. The most developed experiment test vehicle candidate in TREAT’s arsenal will be the Multi-SERTTA (Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatuses) [3], which accommodates up to four concurrent rodlets under separate environmental conditions. An overview of the Multi-SERTTA, which would be placed at the center of the TREAT core during use, is shown in Figure 1. In the current design, all four rodlet test vessels are identical except for flux shaping collar material content to meet design needs. As the date rapidly approaches for TREAT restart, there is a need to have the Multi-SERTTA design approved and tested. Test experiments are an integral component of TREAT operations, and will be integrated among initial restart testing and supporting core reactor physics measurements. An integral step in finalization of any test vehicle design for TREAT is the hosting and resolution of a formal design review.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Advanced Test Reactor Long-Term (20-Year) Operational Strategy

The Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) and the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) have identified the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) as a critical need for continued thermal irradiation testing capability to support and advance U.S. commercial and naval nuclear power systems. The ATR is currently the only suitable test reactor operating in the world that can provide these capabilities at volume. ATR must, then, plan to operate for at least the next 20 years. As of the beginning of 2024, ATR has operated for 57 years, with many of the original reactor structures, systems, and components installed and operated for 60 years. Some ATR Complex and reactor support equipment that is currently in use was installed 75 years ago with the startup of the Materials Testing Reactor (MTR).

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Evaluation of the NSUF Reactor Activation and Damage (RAD) Calculator damage component

The Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) provide researchers access to nuclear research facilities and expertise all over the United States and at the Belgian Center for Nuclear Research (SCK/CEN). One special capability of the NSUF is providing access to nuclear research and test reactors often used for conducting material testing experiments. These services are provided at no cost to the researcher through a competitive, peer-reviewed process. With so many proposals being submitted simultaneously, an NSUF information management resource called the Combined Materials Experiment Toolkit (CoMET) was implemented to speed up the review process and give users access to the information and tools necessary for designing meaningful experiments and writing the best proposals possible. One of CoMET’s tools is the Reactor Activation and Damage (RAD) Calculator. For those with little or no background in it, neutron irradiation in research and test reactors can be a challenging subject to include in a proposal. That is why the RAD Calculator was created to assist users with providing estimates of irradiation and post-irradiation conditions, enabling them to select the best neutron irradiation and post-irradiation examination facilities for reaching their experiment goals. The RAD Calculator is a general scoping tool that estimates radiation damage in terms of DPA, in addition to the resulting radioactivity of the material post-irradiation. This report evaluates the neutron damage component of the RAD Calculator. The evaluation of the activation component of the calculator is covered in report INL/EXT-20-58080.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Evaluation of an Accident Tolerant Fuel Leak in the Advanced Test Reactor

Accident Tolerant Fuels (ATF), which are nuclear fuel sources designed to withstand operational irregularities and incidents, have been a topic of interest in the nuclear industry for several decades. Interest in ATF technology surged following the 2011 accident at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan. At the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), one of Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL) four operating nuclear reactors, the ATF program is a collaborative effort between the national laboratory and various stakeholders within the nuclear industry. This program focuses on the research and development of novel fuel compositions, cladding, and component materials with enhanced accident-resistant properties. During one of ATR’s 60-day operating cycles in 2024, the reactor experienced five unplanned shutdowns. Following the fifth shutdown, radiation monitors detected an increase in radiation levels coming from the loop piping. Subsequent water samples confirmed the cause was a leak of fission products from the ATF experiment, designated as ATF-2C. The source of the leak was identified as the instrumented section of the test train. The primary discussions in this presentation are 1) the design of the ATF test train, 2) the operating parameters leading up to and following the detection of the leak, and 3) the quantification and characterization of the released fission products.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NASA NTRS2013

Reactor Simulator Integration and Testing

As part of the Nuclear Systems Office Fission Surface Power Technology Demonstration Unit (TDU) project, a reactor simulator (RxSim) test loop was designed and built to perform integrated testing of the TDU components. In particular, the objectives of RxSim testing were to verify the operation of the core simulator, the instrumentation and control system, and the ground support gas and vacuum test equipment. In addition, it was decided to include a thermal test of a cold trap purification design and a pump performance test at pump voltages up to 150 V because the targeted mass flow rate of 1.75 kg/s was not obtained in the RxSim at the originally constrained voltage of 120 V. This Technical Memorandum summarizes RxSim testing. The gas and vacuum ground support test equipment performed effectively in NaK fill, loop pressurization, and NaK drain operations. The instrumentation and control system effectively controlled loop temperature and flow rates or pump voltage to targeted settings. The cold trap design was able to obtain the targeted cold temperature of 480 K. An outlet temperature of 636 K was obtained, which was lower than the predicted 750 K but 156 K higher than the cold temperature, indicating the design provided some heat regeneration. The annular linear induction pump tested was able to produce a maximum flow rate of 1.53 kg/s at 800 K when operated at 150 V and 53 Hz.

Schoenfield, M. P.↗
NASA NTRS1972

A 1055 ft/sec impact test of a two foot diameter model nuclear reactor containment system without fracture

A study to determine the feasibility of containing the fission products of a mobile reactor in the event of an impact is presented. The model simulated the reactor core, energy absorbing gamma shielding, neutron shielding and the containment vessel. It was impacted against an 18,000 pound reinforced concrete block at 1055 ft/sec. The model was significantly deformed and the concrete block demolished. No leaks were detected nor were any cracks observed in the model after impact.

Puthoff, R. L.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Nuclear characteristics of a fissioning uranium plasma test reactor with light-water cooling

An analytical study was performed to determine a design configuration for a cavity test reactor. Test section criteria were that an average flux of 10 to the 15th power neutrons/sq cm/sec (E less than or equal to 0.12 eV) be supplied to a 61-cm-diameter spherical cavity at 200-atm pressure. Design objectives were to minimize required driver power, to use existing fuel-element technology, and to obtain fuel-element life of 10 to 100 full-power hours. Parameter calculations were made on moderator region size and material, driver fuel arrangement, control system, and structure in order to determine a feasible configuration. Although not optimized, a configuration was selected which would meet design criteria. The driver fuel region was a cylindrical annular region, one element thick, of 33 MTR-type H2O-cooled elements (Al-U fuel plate configuration), each 101 cm long. The region between the spherical test cavity and the cylindrical driver fuel region was Be (10 vol. % H2O coolant) with a midplane dimension of 8 cm. Exterior to the driver fuel, the 25-cm-thick cylindrical and axial reflectors were also Be with 10 vol. % H2O coolant. The entire reactor was contained in a 10-cm-thick steel pressure vessel, and the 200-atm cavity pressure was equalized throughout the driver reactor. Fuel-element life was 50 hr at the required driver power of 200 MW. Reactor control would be achieved with rotating poison drums located in the cylindrical reflector region. A control range of about 18 percent delta k/k was required for reactor operation.

Whitmarsh, C. L., Jr.↗
DOE OSTI2022

ANS MultiApps tutorial

The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) [1] is an open-source, parallel finite element framework which provides the foundation formany advanced modeling and simulation tools developed under the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program [2] for the analysis of advanced reactors. The MOOSE framework provides the common foundational capability on which many NEAMS codes for reactor analysis are built. The MOOSE framework also includes several systems to assemble unique workflows and coupling amongMOOSE-based applications. In particular, the MultiApp and Transfer systems are widely used to assemble different MOOSE-based or MOOSE- wrapped physics applications together to perform loosely or tightly coupled multiphysics simulations. The National Reactor Innovation Center’s (NRIC’s) Virtual Test Bed (VTB) [3] hosts publicly available nuclear reactor multiphysics simulation examples which leverage MOOSE’s MultiApp system to meet the modeling needs of different reactor types. The flexibility and robustness of coupling provided by MOOSE permits rapid development of coupled physics models for a wide range of reactor types and events.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS1973

Feasibility study of full-reactor gas core demonstration test

Separate studies of nuclear criticality, flow patterns, and thermodynamics for the gas core reactor concept have all given positive indications of its feasibility. However, before serious design for a full scale gas core application can be made, feasibility must be shown for operation with full interaction of the nuclear, thermal, and hydraulic effects. A minimum sized, and hence minimum expense, test arrangement is considered for a full gas core configuration. It is shown that the hydrogen coolant scattering effects dominate the nuclear considerations at elevated temperatures. A cavity diameter of somewhat larger than 4 ft (122 cm) will be needed if temperatures high enough to vaporize uranium are to be achieved.

Kunze, J. F.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Virtual Test Bed (VTB): NRIC FY24 Program Review

NRIC: Deliver successful demonstration and deployment of advanced nuclear energy EBRII Test Bed (DOME) ZPPR Test Bed (LOTUS) Virtual Test Bed (VTB): Accelerate deployment of advanced reactors by leveraging state-of-the-art ModSim tools to evaluate performance and safety Ok, but what is it? Library of Reference Model: database of advanced multiphysics advanced reactor models that users can download, edit, and re-run Continuous Software QA: linking repository to software development to avoid legacy issues while enabling rapid code development Virtual models of the test bed: developing demonstration-relevant models (e.g., candidates for DOME/LOTUS) to accelerate safety evaluations

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Containment margins in FFTF for postulated failure of in-vessel post-accident heat removal

This study was performed to complete the assessment of potential melt-through consequences for the postulated failure of post-accident heat removal following a hypothetical core disruptive accident (HCDA) in the FFTF. The SPRAY, SOFIRE, CACECO, HAA-3B, and COMRADEX codes were used to determine potential site boundary radiation doses. Parametric comparisons were made to evaluate the effects of natural hydrogen-oxygen recombination, reactor cavity liner failures and containment coolers. Containment pressure relief, vent/purge options, and the effects of exhaust filtration were also included in the study. The potential site boundary radiation exposures for all options considered were within 10 CFR 100 guideline values.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗